TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Charlie Kirk was just shot and has now passed away while he was debating at the Utah Valley College. This happened during a live stream; the speaker was editing a video and about to upload it, and is stunned. The speaker questions, "For speaking the truth?" and asks, "Are you fucking kidding me right now?" The channel is described as not political, focused on positivity, makeup, sarcasm, jokes, trolling, clapping back, being fun. The speaker says Charlie Kirk was a grown man who fought for the truth, who went all around our country debating people, debating people of all walks of life, walks of religion, walks of duality. "He debated everybody." The speaker admonishes viewers who say it wasn't the truth, calling them delusional, and notes, "Why did I respect him? Because he knows reality."

Speaker 0: 'it's it's like somebody put the constitution up on a wall and and shot the First Amendment,' noting portentous signs and mentioning Mary, his partner. Speaker 1 recalls 'the health care CEO get shot. The two people in Minnesota,' calling them assassinations and saying, 'the First Amendment got shot today.' They reference Butler as 'a game of inches' and that 'the country dodged a bullet' before. The slain was 'a friend' and 'a supporter of Microworks' who 'called me a couple of times' and who was 'pushing a boulder up a hill.' Online backlash is acknowledged; condolences to 'his wife Erica and their kids' are offered, with belief that 'he'll be remembered for a long time.' 'He had a future ahead of him. He was only 31 years old.' 'Four years from now, he could have run for president.' He faced 'lion's den'; fearless; he did it anyway.

Speaker addresses the death of someone they looked up to, Charlie Kirk, and condemns Fortnite memes and insults about him as disrespectful. "All he did was have boldness in his faith with Jesus Christ." They say Christians respect others' beliefs but speak righteously, and urge people not to mock a tragedy because "He has a family. He has kids. He has a wife." They ask, "You guys you guys want someone to respect you if you got shot. Right? If you passed away, you would not want anyone to be talking bad about you." They recount seeing a video mocking his wife as "that's just horrible and rude." The speaker notes reaching 14,000 followers on a day marked by loss and expresses guilt, concluding with a plea to stop making fun of him, insisting "it's not even funny at all."

We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger pointing, there was grieving. On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism. The loss of your friend, Charlie Kirk. May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir? I think very good. Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction. It's demolition, Demolition, construction, construction. This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish, okay?

The speaker writes a chaotic note to family that blends gun culture with political and corporate references: Pace, love, unity, and guns. He recalls meeting Brandon Herrera at SHOT Show last year and says Brandon Herrera for president, noting this message brought to you by BlackRock and ExxonMobil sponsored by Pabst Blue Ribbon. He mentions tomorrow’s apology to his family: Tomorrow. I'm sorry to my family, but that's it. The monologue shifts to violent imagery: Regret everything. I didn't ask for life. You didn't ask for death. I'll make my own and watch my nine millimeter go bang. It includes disturbing lines such as Nigel. That dude raped someone and Got my new headphones so I can hear them scream, plus Got more Jew gas taped on this end and It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel really good.

Speaker 1: Of course, as you all know, in the wake of Charlie's murder, there was an incredible amount of angry discourse from the right. Blaming the Democrats, blaming liberals saying, you're the reason this happened. Only to find out, surprise, 22 year old white dude, loved guns, raised by two parents, lived in a good home, dad as a minister, also a sheriff, didn't check it in boxes. Y'all thought he would check, did he? Speaker 0: Okay. First of all, a coat of mascara would be your friend. Speaker 0: That is disgusting. That was absolutely disgusting. Fuck her. Speaker 0: It's it's weird how she lost the points about him being a furry loving trans dating.

Why are we cheering for someone getting shot? He's dead. Like, no matter what political beliefs are, should not be cheering that someone got shot. He has a family. We do. We I value everyone's beliefs, but we should not be cheering as a class that someone got shot. He has a family. Yes. And who shot them? A transgender person. Oh. Oh. Oh. So that's what it is. Yes. Five males. It doesn't matter. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yes. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yeah. He's still, like, attacking you guys don't care what other people got.

The speaker requests that the person not be remembered solely as a "crazy right winger gone nuts." The speaker expresses concern that this label would be his only legacy. The speaker emphasizes knowing him their entire life.

The speaker proclaims, "They're dead, y'all. Thank God. One down. Couple more to go. He's dead," repeating, "He's dead. He's dead." They taunt, "Bye, Charlie Kirk, bitch. Bye." and murmur, "Piss me the fuck off." They add, "Got shot. Not my problem. Bye." A final exchange follows: "Bye." "Bye." They state, "Call me hateful. I don't care. He deserved it." The closing lines include, "Mhmm." "Bless." "I feel blessed today, guys. Blessed."

A new report on postmillennial.com, initially broken by Brian Enten from News Nation, states that Tyler Robinson, the accused murderer of Charlie Kirk, is currently holding virtual visits in prison with their son. Robinson is at the Utah County Jail in Utah County, Utah, where sheriff sergeant Ray Ormond oversees the facility. He is being held in a special unit described as the most restrictive custody level Utah can provide pending trial, and he has been there for nearly three months as of tomorrow, since Charlie Kirk’s murder. Robinson has been in custody for about thirty-three hours after his parents turned him in. The facility housing him is referred to as the special management unit (SMU). In this unit, inmates typically receive meals similarly to others, with cardboard sectioned-off trays and plastic utensils. There is a mention of suicide watch considerations, drawing from the speaker’s experience at Guantanamo Bay with detainees on suicide watch. The cell is described as self-contained, often six by ten or eight by ten feet, with a mattress, a sink, and a stainless steel toilet bolted to the wall, and a flat floor. The discussion then turns to what can be inferred from Robinson’s parents conducting virtual visits with him. The speaker suggests this casts their silence in a different light, noting that some have questioned why the parents wouldn’t go public if they believed their son was innocent. It is stated that they are not going public because they are communicating privately with their son through virtual visits, with indications that Robinson’s parents, Brian Natton and others, have been holding these visits several times a week. This is linked to Robinson’s appearances in court for pretrial hearings; another hearing is reportedly set for December 16. From a parental perspective, the speaker reflects on the horror of Charlie Kirk’s murder, a 31-year-old man described as a young father and husband. The speaker recounts that prosecutors’ documents indicate it was Robinson’s mother who first identified him, then informed the father, who then recognized the grandfather’s gun. The mother and father reached out to the grandfather to locate the weapon. The speaker speculates that during these virtual visits, the parents may be saying goodbye to their son, interpreting the private communications as a form of farewell.

The speaker asserts that rifle safety is a primary qualification for being vice president. They claim no recent vice president has used a shotgun irresponsibly, though the Cheney incident is mentioned. The speaker then lists Bernie Sanders, Dick Cheney, and Taylor Swift, before seemingly confirming Cheney is on board with the initial claim.

"Breaking news. Charlie Kirk was in the neck." "As of right now, I think his condition is unknown." "I, on the other hand, do cheer when bad things happen to bad people." "So on behalf of everybody else, I got this shit." "I do not feel bad for him in the slightest, and I'm very, very much wondering what MAGA is going to react with." "I wonder how they're going to make this about how black people shouldn't be allowed guns or trans people." "They're probably gonna blame a trans black person." "I don't fuck." "But we can all celebrate because something really awful happened to a really, really awful guy." "Thank you very much."

"It doesn't feel real." "I was not even a fan, not a friend, and actually an adversary, a foe." "We had a lot of differences, ideologically, politically, and we fought viciously." "Charlie Kirk never had a kind word to say about me in his life." "Now that he has died, I'll say some kind words about him." "In spite of that, it is undeniable that he was a towering figure in American conservatism." "He would take on almost any challengers." "And he did it all before the age of 31." "And ultimately that is why he was killed." "He was clearly a loving father, a loving husband." "He was beloved by millions of people." "God bless him." "I pray for the repose of his soul, for his family, for him."

Transcript portrays a speaker accusing leftists of celebrating Charlie Kirk's death and circulating provocative statements about guns and violence. It includes the lines: 'Leftists celebrating Charlie Kirk's death.' 'Watch this.' 'Bye, Charlie Kirk.' 'Like you said, people getting shot and killed for the second amendment is so worth it. I never thought we'd agree on anything.' 'Bye.' 'I just wanna be part of yourself.' 'By the sword, die by the sword.' 'He did say that gun deaths were an acceptable side effect of gun rights.' 'Congratulations to Charlie Kirk for becoming the new poster child for gun awareness and violence.'

We hit new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger pointing, there was grieving. On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism. But on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this. 'Maconditions on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk. May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir? I think very good.' 'Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction. Demolition, construction. This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish.'

'Happened to him.' The speaker contends that 'you know, sometimes revenge at dispatch are cold.' They express that they hate to to celebrate someone's death, but argue that when you talk about guns rights and you talk about how much the second amendment matters to you and then it impacts you, like, what do you expect? 'Blade.' The remarks imply a connection between staunch gun-rights advocacy and personal consequences, suggesting that the outcomes of gun-rights beliefs are tangible for the individual. The tone blends resignation about violence with a belief that ideological commitments influence real-world events, encapsulated by the question 'what do you expect?' and the final sign-off 'Blade.'

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a conspiracy surrounding Charlie’s death, challenging the official narrative. - Speaker 0 says, “we definitely penetrated our water jugs,” and notes this won’t stop conspiracy theories. “His head fell off. I figured this is probably what would happen. I was trying to remain optimistic, but that right there is why people are skeptical on the official story.” They state, “The thirty aught six is a very hard round to stop.” - Speaker 1 adds that they want to illustrate what the federal government is selling, and asserts, “that particular bullet would have decapitated Charlie.” They describe the idea that the bullet ricocheted and went inward as “beyond ridiculous” and “insulting.” They criticize attempts to present a certain narrative with goofball public figures, saying, “they think that if they send out these, like, glee boys, like Nick Fuentes… then a bunch of hunters are gonna go, yeah. I see what you mean, man.” They declare that the scenario is never going to happen. - They foresee two possible outcomes: either the government will declare war on the American people because the public won’t accept their account, or they will have to “give us something that’s truthful.” They insist someone must come forward with something that makes sense. - Speaker 1 expresses a belief that the conspiracy is far-reaching, likening it to the JFK assassination, and claims that people close to Charlie are aware of things and “sold him out in many ways every single day.” They argue that the more the truth is avoided and the anxiety surrounding the night before Charlie died is downplayed, the guiltier those involved appear. - They state a conviction that the Deep State is involved in the assassination and that multiple states are implicated. They contend those responsible “don’t know what to do” and have “completely come undone” because they believed wealth and power would let them get away with it. However, they suggest “common sense seems to be ruling the roost.” Overall, the speakers argue that the official explanation is implausible, predict governmental evasions or manipulation, and contend that a deep-state-backed conspiracy involving multiple states may be uncovering itself as untenable under scrutiny. They emphasize the need for truthful disclosure rather than continued obfuscation.

Do not watch the rest of the video. It's a tragedy that he got shot, and it genuinely is. It just makes me giggle a little bit because this is the guy who's walking around saying that everyone has a right to own a gun, and he questions when people say that there we should have stricter gun laws. People say that we should not not have guns, just stricter rules, and he's against that. I think it's charming that he got a taste of his own medicine even though it is a tragedy, and it is very painful. And I I don't wish that on anyone, but I also think that if we had stricter gun laws, you know, maybe this wouldn't have happened. Just me.

Speaker 0 addresses Don, saying it’s better to say nothing than answer the question, and that honoring Charlie Kirk for any reason is to simply say nothing. The speaker notes discomfort with a clip and asserts knowledge of Don’s identity, describing Don as a hunter who loves the wilderness and hunting, and recalls a past fishing experience fighting sea lions or seals in British Columbia. The speaker urges Don not to lie and to be truthful about his beliefs regarding the investigation. The speaker asks Don to make a video stating that he believes Charlie was shot by a .30-06 in the neck and that, through a miracle, Charlie’s neck stopped the bullet, remaining in good shape and not destroyed. The speaker highlights Don’s knowledge of hunting and guns and requests Don to sit down and say to Candace, “I really do think that Charlie, our friend, because you are his friend, you were his brother, stopped a .30-aught-six with his neck which stayed intact.” The speaker notes Don won’t say that because it is untrue and suggests it would spiritually affect him, asserting that hunters know Don does not believe that. The speaker acknowledges ties and pressure from Jared and Ivanka and “the Zionists” to stay quiet, while urging other brothers, sisters, and people in the movement, who may not even know Charlie, to get to the bottom of this because “everything we’re being sold is absolute BS.”

"We had some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." "In between the finger pointing, there was grieving." "On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism." "But on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this." "The loss of your friend, Charlie Kirk." "May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir?" "I think very good." "Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction." "Demolition, Demolition, construction. Construction," "This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend." "This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish." "Okay?"

The speaker criticizes Ada Hutchinson, the governor of Arkansas, for lacking personality and being a nasty person. They also mention Chris Christie and Liz Cheney, accusing them of having Trump Derangement Syndrome. The speaker claims to have pardoned Scooter Libby, a friend of the Cheney family, while criticizing them for not doing anything for him. They argue that they are not a threat to democracy, but rather Joe Biden is.

"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." "In between the finger pointing, there was grieving." "On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism." "And by the way, right there, you see all the trucks. They've just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, and it's gonna be a beauty." "Doctor. Dolce is on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk." "May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir?" "I think very good." "Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction." "This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend." "This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish."

In this heated conversation, Speaker 0 questions why certain politicians, like the Clintons, have a reputation for having people close to them die. Speaker 1 argues that this is a conspiracy theory and lists other politicians who don't have the same reputation. Speaker 0 emphasizes that the list of deaths is based on an obscure website and implies that it dishonors the memory of those who have passed away. The conversation becomes increasingly confrontational, with Speaker 1 insisting on the importance of discussing these deaths and Speaker 0 urging them to apologize to the families affected. The conversation also touches on topics like Benghazi and Barack Obama's birthplace.

Transcript excerpt: 'Charlie Kirk got shot and he's dead.' The speaker follows: 'Finally, finally, somebody with a gun, which is almost everybody in The Fucking States, grew up hair and fucking went and shot somebody on the right side.' The passage ends with: 'Thank you. Can we keep this up, plea' The remarks express celebration of violence against a political figure and request to continue such acts. The tone centers on the shooting of a public figure and uses profanity to emphasize approval and a desire for further incidents. These lines appear to celebrate the act and call for more such acts.

Donald Trump has intensified his violent rhetoric just days before the election, suggesting that Liz Cheney should be shot. This statement is seen as inappropriate and dangerous, especially as it targets a political opponent. The imagery of a firing squad evokes thoughts of execution, raising concerns about the implications of such language. Some argue that this rhetoric may not effectively mobilize low-propensity voters. Additionally, there are harsh critiques of Cheney, labeling her as a "dumb individual" and a "radical war hawk," with calls for her to face the consequences of her beliefs in a more direct manner.