reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker stumbled upon the involvement of the CIA in vaccine production, specifically with Pfizer and Moderna. They discovered that Resilience, a biotechnology company, partnered with Moderna and received significant funding from the US government, Department of Defense, and other organizations. The speaker also highlighted connections between Resilience's team members and the intelligence community, as well as ties to big banking. They expressed concerns about the influence of these individuals and organizations in the production of vaccines and emphasized the need for transparency and control. The speaker also mentioned the involvement of Illumina and the connections between various board members.

In 2015, a 153-page agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates. The NIH co-owns the vaccine, as shown in the agreement. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

Bill Gates, a prominent philanthropist, is linked to eugenics and population control through his funding of organizations like the World Population Council. He is also connected to Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, who advocated for birth control and eugenics. Gates' investments in vaccines have raised questions about his motives, especially as he stands to profit from them. His family lineage includes connections to powerful banking families and influential figures like John D. Rockefeller. Gates' involvement with Jeffrey Epstein has also raised eyebrows. Overall, there are concerns about Gates' influence and the potential impact of his actions on global health and population control.

Gates allegedly has incestuous and financially corrupt entanglements with Anthony Fauci dating back twenty years. The transcript claims Gates pays Fauci, and they have “all kinds of really corrupt financial entanglements.” It describes Gates bringing Fauci to his $189,000,000 house in Seattle in 2000, sitting him down, and saying he wants to form a partnership. Fauci’s account is that Fauci would develop the drugs and pass them on to drug companies like Merck, Sanofi, Gilead, and Johnson and Johnson. Gates would then guarantee markets in Africa through his control of WHO. It is asserted that those companies don’t want to give vaccines to Africa because it’s uncertain, with Botswana reportedly wanting them this year and not next year, and Gates, by controlling WHO, allegedly controls those countries because WHO pays for health ministries and supplies all HIV medications, forcing these countries to do what WHO tells them to do. The claim is that Gates can require those companies and countries to buy the vaccines and that he is invested in the companies. The transcript also states Gates has investments in tobacco companies, processed foods, Coca Cola, Cargill, Monsanto, Philip Morris, Kraft, and cheese. It alleges he has stakes in virtually all oil companies, portraying him as not caring about climate or public health but about control. It asserts Gates appeared daily on TV as a public health expert. According to the speaker, Gates’s message was that people should shut down, lock down, wear a mask, and that it would never end until they took the vaccine he was making for them.

I discovered the CIA's involvement in vaccine production while researching Pfizer. Notably, the CEO of In-Q-Tel, the CIA's investment group, is on the board of Resilience, a biotech company that partnered with Moderna. Resilience has received significant government funding and has ties to various high-profile investors. Key figures like Bob Nelson and Luciana Borio, who have connections to the intelligence community and the FDA, are involved with Resilience. During Operation Warp Speed, Moderna collaborated with this newly formed company, which aims to innovate biomanufacturing and develop gene therapies and vaccines. The connections between these organizations and individuals raise questions about the intertwining of intelligence, big pharma, and government interests in public health initiatives.

The vaccines were developed by the NIH, not Moderna or Pfizer. The patents are 50% owned by the NIH, and they were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their names on the vaccines, but it was a military project from the start.

A biopharmaceutical complex has formed, with various organizations and individuals colluding to take advantage of medical emergencies. They meet in Davos, Switzerland and have realized that during a crisis, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex includes the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, Welcome Trust, Rockefeller Foundation, UN, Gavi, UNITATE, CEPI, and regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC. Key figures like Scott Gottlieb and Steven Hahn are involved, with Gottlieb now on Pfizer's board and Hahn supporting Moderna. Even high-ranking officials like Deborah Birx have joined biotech companies. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded massive returns. Overall, it's a money-driven operation.

In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government is discussed. The agreement reveals collaboration between the NIH, Moderna, and Dr. Barrick on mRNA technology for a coronavirus vaccine. The government co-owns the vaccine candidates developed, raising questions about ulterior motives. This predates any current political affiliations.

In 1966, a transatlantic experiment on coronavirus manipulation began. Human trials with modified coronavirus started in 1967. Pfizer patented the first spike protein vaccine in 1990. Research showed vaccines were ineffective against mutating coronaviruses from 1990 to 2018. The University of North Carolina patented an infectious replication-defective clone of coronavirus in 2002, funded by Anthony Fauci. SARS 1.0 was engineered in a lab, not a natural occurrence. The CDC patented SARS coronavirus in 2003, violating biological and chemical weapons treaties. The RT PCR test was flagged as a bioterrorism threat in 2003 and labeled a biowarfare enabling agent from 2005 onwards. Over $10 billion was funneled through black operations involving Anthony Fauci.

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna or Pfizer, but by the NIH. The patents are owned by the NIH, and the vaccines were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on the vaccines, but this was originally a military project.

The Chinese lab in Wuhan is linked to GlaxoSmithKline, which owns Pfizer. Dr. Fauci funded the lab, promoting the vaccine. BlackRock manages GlaxoSmithKline, which is tied to Soros Foundation. Soros owns companies involved in Wuhan lab. Allianz, with Vanguard as a shareholder, is connected. BlackRock, controlling central banks, has ties to Microsoft, owned by Bill Gates. Gates is linked to BioNTech and Pfizer, sponsors of WHO. A bat in Wuhan led to a global outbreak.

The speaker discusses their accidental discovery that the CIA has a heavy involvement in vaccine production. They mention various connections between different individuals and organizations, such as Pfizer, Resilience, Moderna, and In-Q-Tel. The speaker also highlights the funding received by Resilience from the government and other sources. They delve into the backgrounds of key figures involved, including Luciana Borio, Scott Gottlieb, and Bob Nelson. Connections to the intelligence community and banking industry are mentioned. The speaker concludes by expressing hope that these influential individuals can protect society from future pandemics. They briefly mention Illumina and the relationships between Francis Arnold, Scott Gottlieb, and Susan Desmond Hellman.

This is a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government from 2015. It reveals that the NIH collaborated with Dr. Barrick on the Frankenstein Coronavirus. The agreement states that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed by NIAID and Moderna are jointly owned by the government. It's surprising that the same government now mandating the vaccine actually owns it.

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna and Pfizer, but by the NIH, which owns 50% of the patents. Furthermore, the vaccines were not manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, but by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were allegedly paid to put their stamps on the vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry, but it was supposedly a military project.

COVID-19 has been a fortunate rescue for vaccine companies tied to the US military. One such company is BioPort, now known as Emergent BioSolutions, which faced controversy over its anthrax vaccine monopoly. The vaccine caused adverse effects and Gulf War Syndrome in US troops. The Pentagon bailed out BioPort multiple times due to safety violations. They partnered with Battelle, known for gain of function research, which involved the anthrax vaccine. However, the 9/11 attacks derailed plans to release a report on the vaccine program. Donald Rumsfeld stepped in to save the program, and concerns about the vaccine disappeared. Today, Moderna faces a similar situation, as COVID-19 saved them from collapse. A slight delay would have spelled their demise.

The Chinese lab in Wuhan is linked to GlaxoSmithKline, owned by Pfizer. BlackRock manages GlaxoSmithKline and is tied to Soros, who owns Wintershall, the lab builder. Allianz bought Wintershall and has BlackRock as a shareholder. BlackRock also owns a share of Microsoft, linked to Bill Gates, a Pfizer shareholder and WHO sponsor. This shows how a bat in China led to a global pandemic.

Speaker 0 contends that the top organization that managed Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic was not a public health agency but the NSA, a spy agency, with the Pentagon as the second agency. He asserts that vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer, but by NIH, whose patents are owned 50% by NIH, and that vaccines were manufactured not by Pfizer or Moderna but by military contractors. He claims Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. Speaker 1 responds by stating it’s not warp speed, but has been happening since 06/10/1980 when entering a Fort Detrick military installation, where the sign was turned around with then-president Richard Nixon. He says, “Oh, we’re just gonna cure cancer,” but asserts they turned the sign around on the bioweapons lab, making it a historic landmark at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end and a plaque was placed when a new lab was built. He characterizes it as all part of a “plague of corruption” and claims that those involved are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. Speaker 1 further alleges that it does not matter whether it is Deborah Birx or Robert Redfield, because they injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and that they know it. He references “HIV p n l four three” and claims to know the plasmid and the exact one, asserting that he knows the people who were injected and that this data exists in his freezer.

COVID-19 has been a fortunate rescue for vaccine companies tied to the US military. One such company is Emergent BioSolutions, formerly known as BioPort. They faced controversy over their anthrax vaccine monopoly, which caused adverse effects and Gulf War Syndrome. The Pentagon bailed them out multiple times due to safety violations. They partnered with Battelle, known for gain of function research, and were set to release a report on the anthrax vaccine program in September 2001. However, the 9/11 attacks derailed the inquiry, and Donald Rumsfeld saved the program. Moderna, another company, also benefited from COVID-19, as they were on the verge of collapse. A slight delay in the pandemic would have spelled their demise.

A biopharmaceutical complex, consisting of organizations like the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, has formed a syndicate. They have been meeting in Davos, Switzerland for years, realizing that during a medical emergency, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex invests in itself, colluding with anyone necessary and rewarding them with future jobs. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC are part of this complex. Notable figures like Scott Gottlieb and Deborah Birx are involved, with connections to Pfizer and Moderna, respectively. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded a massive return. This complex is currently experiencing a financial boom.

In 2015, a 153-page agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA tech for a coronavirus vaccine. The NIH co-owns the vaccine candidates with Moderna. This predates current events and raises questions about government involvement in vaccine ownership.

The discussion traces a long, shadowy arc in the development of modern vaccines and medicine, arguing that rapid COVID-19 vaccine progress rests on over a century of influence by powerful interests rather than sudden breakthroughs. - The narrative centers on John D. Rockefeller, who became America’s first billionaire in 1913, the same year the Federal Reserve was created. It frames Rockefeller as leveraging his oil wealth to monopolize medicine, promoting prescription drugs while vilifying natural and holistic remedies. The claim is that Rockefeller used strategic philanthropy (Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, established 1901; Rockefeller Foundation, 1913) to push laboratory-based, drug-centered medicine, marginalize herbalism and naturopathy, and steer doctors toward pharmaceuticals. The effect, according to the speakers, was to keep people sick so they would return for ongoing treatments rather than cures. - The timeline continues with the rise of the pharmaceutical industry from the 1920s to 1940s, described as moving into synthetic drugs with Rockefeller guidance. Natural remedies were said to be non-patentable while synthetic drugs could be patented, creating a business incentive for ongoing, chronic treatment rather than cures. - The conversation shifts to regulatory dynamics, arguing that regulation became regulatory capture from the 1930s to 1960s, with the FDA functioning as a gatekeeper increasingly populated by former pharma professionals. The FDA’s integrity is debated through the example of Dr. Francis Kelsey, who resisted approving thalidomide; the drug was later linked to birth defects worldwide, and Kelsey’s stance is presented as a rare early stand for public safety. - In the 1970s and 1980s, the narrative asserts growing corporate influence: pharma lobbies expand, advertising budgets explode, and medicine becomes a growth industry. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 is cited as enabling private patents on publicly funded research, tying universities to pharma interests and shaping medical education toward pharmaceutical solutions. Direct-to-consumer advertising is highlighted as a turning point in the 1990s, pressuring doctors through patient demand spurred by TV ads. - The discussion includes a first-hand account from a former pharmaceutical sales representative, Lisa Prada, who describes bribes and perks (golf outings, concerts, strip clubs, etc.) to influence prescribing, and asserts that patients were often treated as means to corporate ends. - Kim Bright, founder of Brightcore Nutrition, joins to discuss current health issues, arguing that the pharmaceutical industry prioritizes profits over patient well-being. She notes that the Rockefeller Foundation funded COVID-19 vaccine efforts (she cites $55 million) and argues the foundation and industry continued to push medical interventions globally. She notes that the FDA’s public acknowledgment of COVID vaccine-related child deaths is incongruent with whistleblowers’ claims and autopsy data. - The program underscores the idea that prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in the United States and Europe, citing studies on gut microbiome disruption from medications like antibiotics and acid-reducing drugs (dysbiosis) as a major contributor to chronic disease. - The gut microbiome is emphasized as central to health. Dr. David Perlmutter’s work on the gut-brain connection is referenced, including criticism faced for linking diet and fermented foods to health outcomes. Kimchi is highlighted as a powerful antimicrobial and a potential anti-aging agent in cellular studies. The hosts discuss kimchi’s health benefits, including improved digestion, immune function, and weight management. - Brightcore promotes Kimchi One capsules as a convenient alternative for Americans who dislike traditional kimchi, claiming benefits such as reduced bloating, better digestion, improved hair and skin, and weight loss. A discount offer is advertised: 25% off online, up to 50% off with a phone order, free shipping, and a free vitamin D3 with the first 100 callers, using the code provided. - The conversation closes with reflections on the do-not-mistake-the-system dynamic, optimism about changes in medicine, and calls for removing dependency on processed foods and advertising-driven medicine, with an acknowledgment of RFK Jr.’s activism against pharmaceutical ads on television.

The transcript discusses a narrative that connects Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and a global, pre-planned approach to pandemics, presenting a sequence of alleged events and structures designed to profit from health crises. It begins with a claim that new vaccines and health services could be improved and costs reduced by ten to fifteen percent over the next five to ten years, and that a future pandemic will occur regardless of current efforts. It is stated that the pandemic risk is two to three percent per year and that attention to preparedness will continue, noting that the pandemic was predictable and could be far more severe in the future. One speaker asserts they had predicted the risk of a pandemic and that it came true. The brand-new Epstein files are then introduced, claiming they show Epstein planned the whole thing from the start and expose a financial system designed around pandemics that operated long before COVID-19. The documents allegedly reveal a hidden network directly connecting Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and other powerful individuals. Epstein is said to have helped design the financial apparatus that later secured over 100 million dollars in funding for the Gates Foundation, advising JPMorgan executives on pitching a Gates Anchored Donor Fund to attract vaccine investments under the guise of philanthropy but designed to generate profits. It is claimed Gates had already invested in vaccines from the early 2000s but faced controversy over mass vaccine distribution and promises of disease eradication, which allegedly sometimes worsened problems. Gates is also quoted as saying vaccines could reduce the global population by a significant amount. There is a point-by-point timeline: the world’s population is described as 6.8 billion, headed toward about 9 billion, with a suggestion that great work on vaccines and reproductive health could lower that by ten to fifteen percent. In 2013, the Gates Foundation allegedly created the Global Health Investment Fund, allowing private investors to fund drug and vaccine development with a stated health purpose, while offering a 60% guarantee of principal, meaning investors would risk only 40% while the remaining 60% of potential losses would be covered by philanthropic and public money. This structure is said to convert global health issues into profitable opportunities with low risk, securing funds and enabling subsequent actions. Epstein’s role is described as expanding Gates’ influence in pandemic preparedness. The 2011 funding groundwork allegedly paved the way for broader governance, with Gates Foundation discussions in 2015 about pandemics and global responses, involving groups like the International Peace Institute, World Health Organization, World Bank, MSF, and UN officials. It is claimed Epstein acted as a back-channel intermediary to spread Gates’ influence, maintaining contacts even after funding refusals, by forwarding Gates’ articles on pandemic preparedness. The timeline continues with 2017 being a turning point, where pandemics were discussed as business opportunities rather than disasters, and Epstein was said to broker specialists into Gates’ office for pandemic simulations. A doctor’s text is cited indicating pandemic simulation as a key credential, with Epstein recommending a connection to Gates. That year also saw the World Bank launch the first emergency financing facility, raising $320 million in bonds named to cover coronavirus risks, implying planning for a coronavirus-style outbreak years in advance. In October 2019, six weeks before COVID-19, Event 201—a pandemic simulation modeled on a novel coronavirus—was co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Gates Foundation, focusing on government policy during a viral outbreak, distribution of drugs, media messaging, social media management, public compliance, and unified global response. Six weeks later, the real outbreak began. While the documents are not proof, and other evidence such as patents and gain-of-function funding are cited, the narrative suggests a pattern of pre-planned preparation, money, simulations, networks, vaccines, and elite alignment. The closing question asks readers to consider who benefits when such world-stage events occur, proposing that identifying beneficiaries clarifies the situation.

Welcome to Liberty Talk Canada. Bill Gates has been linked to COVID-19 vaccine preparations before the pandemic was officially declared. Through a Freedom of Information request, emails reveal that Gates' foundation was already discussing vaccine development with BioNTech's CEO in early February 2020, even before the WHO labeled it a pandemic in March. The Gates Foundation had also invested in BioNTech in September 2019, suggesting prior knowledge of the virus. Additionally, an email from March 2020 indicated that NIH officials were more concerned about market sentiment regarding vaccines than saving lives, highlighting a profit-driven approach. This raises questions about the NIH's role, suggesting it operates like a for-profit entity, with officials potentially benefiting from vaccine success.

In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccines. The NIH co-owns the vaccine candidates with Moderna. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.