reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 presents a claim about a crime against white people committed by Jews, noting it has received little attention in the mainstream press and is not widely depicted in media or entertainment. The transcript asserts that the crime is sex slavery of white women, captured by Jewish gangs and forced to work in brothels in Israel and elsewhere. It asserts that articles about white slavery rarely identify Jews as the perpetrators, instead using euphemisms like Russian gangs or Russian organized crime, and that journalists avoid naming Jews to preserve employment. The narrative explains the enticement into sex slavery starts with poverty created in part by the collapse of a Jew-created communist system in Eastern Europe, followed by privatization and predatory business practices by reformers described as often Jewish. It claims this leads to widespread poverty in Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, and other countries, with women advertising for marriage to Western men on matchmaker sites as an escape. It states many breadwinners earn less than $30 a month, making promises of easy housework or waitress jobs overseas appealing, and that many end up in Israel where sex slavery is especially common and often tacitly approved by authorities. It asserts Jewish gangs maintain worldwide networks, selling enslaved women to brothels in Europe, Turkey, and Asia, and that many victims are tricked or coerced after passport seizures. The transcript recounts individual stories: - Laura Matveyava: recruited under the pretense of easy housework in Germany; in Hamburg, passports were confiscated; she was forced into prostitution, imprisoned in brothels masquerading as bars/nightclubs, and escaped after six months. She states most other slaves wanted to escape but feared beatings and deportation. - Irina (Ukraine): brought to Haifa, passport burned, told she is property and must work until she earns her way out; she initially refused but was beaten and raped until submission. - Mariana: lured by promises of work in Israel, worked in a brothel associated with seven days a week service; she describes isolation, monitoring, and attempts to escape. - Valentina: describes horrible conditions, venereal diseases, bars on windows, guards, and eventual escape attempt. - Ilona and Yana: describe details of being sold to pimps, multiple clients daily, beatings, and forced work in massage parlors and bars across Israel. The text cites authorities and organizations: - Amnesty International criticized Israel for tolerating the sex slave industry and for failing to prevent, investigate, and punish violations against trafficked women. - Estimates are cited: 500,000 white women enslaved in Russia alone; 100,000 Russian women smuggled out in one year; 200 sex slave brothels in Tel Aviv; white women described as the most lucrative commodity by some sources. - Israeli police and officials are depicted as complicit or indifferent, with examples including a former Israeli police officer owning a pimp operation and a Haifa police official describing large profits from trafficking. - The UN is cited as admitting that selling sex slaves is the fastest growing organized crime business, with white women as the majority of victims; the Sydney Morning Herald is quoted calling white women the most lucrative commodity. The speaker concludes by condemning the Jewish media for obscuring these crimes and urges the audience to remember and not trust them, asserting that many white women are enslaved and exploited, and that this issue is neglected by Western media.

The speaker discusses a set of claims about "tiny hats" owning and influencing major media and culture. They say: tiny hats owned the newspaper, the radio, and the television, and played a major role in the manufacture of racial stereotypes in American popular culture. They point to examples of media ownership and publication patterns, arguing that tiny hats publish certain content and that a rabbi is shown saying it. The speaker asserts that after wars, these media entities were used against the people, and that Hollywood is dominated by tiny hats, with the claim that this oversight causes division. The narrative extends to Christopher Columbus, described as a tiny hat, suggesting a pattern of hidden or overlooked attribution. The speaker notes that only two people spoke up about this—one reverend and one rabbi—and mentions a book by the rabbi as part of the evidence. The discussion then shifts to ownership related to slavery, claiming that those who owned all the slaves also owned all the police, and implying a broader, concealed continuity of power. Throughout, the speaker contends that much of history has been left out of education and that schoolbooks do not teach these topics. The conversation moves to trafficking and exploitation, drawing a parallel to Epstein, and asserts that significant resources—“a lot of ships”—were needed to carry out these activities, which were allegedly owned by the same group. The speaker wraps with a call to acknowledge that books people should read exist, implying that there is more to the historical record than is commonly taught or acknowledged. Key motifs emphasized include media control, influence over public perception and stereotypes, alleged concealment of historical truth, and connections between media ownership, religious or ethnic identity, and systems of power related to slavery and policing. The overall message presents a view of a hidden network that supposedly shapes history and contemporary institutions, urging readers to seek alternative histories and to examine who owned and controlled various influential structures.

Jews were heavily involved in the slave trade, with up to 80% of slave owners being Jewish. They owned most slave ships and conducted auctions. Pope Alexander VI, a Jewish pope, signed the doctrine of discovery, legalizing colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade. Columbus, funded by Jewish individuals, discovered the Americas, where indigenous people were initially considered people until the papal bull declared them heathens for political reasons.

Speaker 0 repeats the line: "You can run on for a long time. Run on for a long time. Run on for a long time. Sooner or later, gotta put you down." Speaker 1 recounts that "the Arab slave trader brought his African merchandise to a broker in a large town who put them up for sale in the slave market." He notes that among the many brokers in the Arab world, there were some brokers who don't like to be remembered in The United States Of America—these were the Jewish brokers who were in great towns such as Damascus and Baghdad. He adds, "Yes. Amen." Speaker 1 continues with a reflection on "what a lot of trouble professor Jeffries got into," and remarks that all he talked about was "a Jew, old Jew over there in Newport, Rhode Island." He then expands the scope: "But what about the Jews of Amsterdam? The Jews of Lisbon? The Jews of Cadiz? The Jews of Toulouse? The Jews of Bristol, the great slave port of England, Bristol," because Bristol is where the great voyages were planned. He explains that Bristol was the place where people financed ships and sent them out on three-month voyages to fetch slaves across, describing who had "the money to put those ships on the sea," to finance "these huge caravans" and to carry out the slave trade. Speaker 1 then asks, "Who were the great merchants of the Middle East? Who were the great merchants of Europe? And some of brothers and sisters, who were they? Jews." He concludes that Jews were involved in the slave trade and questions how they "weren't in the slave trade," asserting that they "never cared about how they turned an honest dollar," and that from their point of view, "it's an honest dollar," even though they are "lamenting the fact now and denying it."

The speaker questions why white men are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. They suggest that Jewish individuals dominate academia, literature, and publishing, pointing out Meyer Lansky's involvement in the mafia. The speaker believes that Jews stay hidden behind the scenes, shifting blame onto others to continue their activities. Translation: The speaker questions why white men are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. They suggest that Jewish individuals dominate academia, literature, and publishing, pointing out Meyer Lansky's involvement in the mafia. The speaker believes that Jews stay hidden behind the scenes, shifting blame onto others to continue their activities.

The speaker questions why white men are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. Another speaker suggests that Jewish dominance in academia and publishing allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians or whites, while operating behind the scenes. Jews, like Meyer Lansky in the mafia, are portrayed as orchestrating events while deflecting attention onto others.

Jewish ships brought slaves to America, a fact often overlooked. Let's pause and delve into this further.

Jewish historians have documented the involvement of Jews in the slave trade on the American continent. They reveal that Jewish buyers dominated slave auctions, often purchasing slaves at low prices due to lack of competition. This history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade extends back to Roman times, where Jews played a significant role as slave dealers. Jewish Encyclopedia and other sources confirm the Jewish control of commerce, including the slave trade, during the Middle Ages. These historical records shed light on a lesser-known aspect of Jewish history.

A speaker discusses a new book titled Tiny Hat Selling the Slaves, asserting that it reveals information not covered in mainstream sources. The speaker claims the book shows rabbis, referred to as “tiny hats,” were involved in selling slaves and running slave auctions, with pages detailing auctions and slave sales conducted by rabbis. Key claims highlighted include: - The term layaway originated from rabbis selling slaves. - Jacob Cohen owned a plantation and was described as the president of the synagogue, with the assertion that plantations were run by the “tiny hats.” - Charleston in 1825 is identified as the original center of the slave marts, with ownership of the merchants and ships attributed to these groups. - Charleston’s “tiny hat slave traders” are cited, with claims that because the tiny hats supposedly owned newspapers, they could control runaway slave ads and also supposedly owned the police, implying they controlled both sides of fugitive ads. - The speaker asserts that only two people spoke up about this hidden history, suggesting widespread suppression or omission. - The discussion extends to Christopher Columbus, linking the presented narrative to a broader explanation of who Columbus was and to claims that “tiny hats” or “charsarians” were expelled from various countries as a result. - The overall narrative is presented as revealing a hidden or suppressed history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade, and the speaker asserts that understanding these points clarifies why certain groups were expelled and how power was exercised in historical contexts. The speaker emphasizes that the information is sourced from the book and suggests readers verify through research, including references to Charleston in 1825, the role of rabbis in plantations and slave markets, and the alleged control of media and police by those groups. The overall framing is that this perspective explains historical events and expulsions by attributing significant power and influence to the so-called “tiny hats.”

My entire family was wiped out during the Holocaust, which has become a significant financial matter. Germany has compensated the Jewish community with around $200 billion. Many are unaware that some individuals still receive $1,000 monthly. Additionally, it's important to recognize that Jewish ships were involved in bringing slaves to America.

Jewish historians reveal a hidden history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade in the Americas and Europe for over 2000 years. Records show Jews dominated the slave trade in the Western world, even back to Roman times. They were major slave dealers in European society and controlled commerce, including the slave trade, in the Middle Ages. Jewish Encyclopedia and other sources confirm Jews' significant role in the slave trade, with higher per capita slave holdings than non-Jews. This history is often overlooked or suppressed.

The speaker questions why white men are blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. They suggest that Jewish dominance in academia and literature allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians in the mafia. Meyer Lansky, a Jewish figure, is mentioned as handling the books for the mafia. The speaker implies that Jews manipulate situations to avoid scrutiny and continue their activities unnoticed.

The speaker questions why white people are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. They suggest that Jewish dominance in academia and publishing allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians or whites, while operating behind the scenes. Meyer Lansky, a Jewish figure, is mentioned as being involved in the mafia's financial operations.

In the early period of the transatlantic slave trade, governments oversaw many of the chartered companies, which were often called chartered companies. One example discussed is the Dutch West India Company, which in the 1600s is presented as a pioneer in a “multinational, globalized prosecution of the slave trade.” The transcript states that a large number of the shareholders, or stockholders, in the Dutch West India Company were Jews. According to the transcript, Jews had been “chased out of Portugal and Spain” and “chased out of all kinds of places.” It adds that they found “some respite from their wanderings in Holland,” where they “became an influential factor.” The share of Jewish stockholders in the Dutch West India Company is described as an area of controversy, with estimates “varying from twenty-five percent to fifty percent” concerning the stake of Jewish stockholders. The transcript concludes that, regardless of the exact figure, Jews were “an important element in the Dutch West India Company,” which it describes as the preeminent entity carrying on the slave trade in the early period. The transcript then describes what the Dutch West India Company did in the slave trade. It says the company was responsible for importing “the earliest slaves to places like Brazil” and to “some parts of the Caribbean,” either directly or indirectly, and it also references “this country” as potentially included “in a very early period in the seventeenth century.” The transcript further asserts that, in many areas in the Americas, Jews were “a dominant element in the slave trade,” giving Brazil as a specific example: it says that in Brazil in the seventeenth century, Jews were a dominant element in the slave trade. Beyond general participation, the transcript details forms of involvement. It states that Jews “owned a large number of the plantations.” It also says Jews were positioned importantly in areas not necessarily limited to plantation ownership, including “the importation of slaves,” “the warehousing of slaves,” “the auctioning of slaves,” “the provisioning of slaves,” and “manning slave ships,” along with “provisioning Slave ships.” The transcript frames these as examples of roles Jews held in the broader operations surrounding the slave trade. It ends by referencing New England, stating that “In New England, for example, at the height of, of the Atlantic slave trade,” leaving the remainder unspoken.

In the video, it is mentioned that Jews played a significant role in the slave trade in Brazil, Suriname, Curacao, Barbados, and Jamaica during the 1600s. It is also stated that the two largest slave shipments in the 18th century to the United States were on ships owned by Jews. Aaron Lopez, a Jew, is identified as the biggest slave ship owner in America. Additionally, all the rum distilleries in Newport, Rhode Island were owned by Jews.

Jewish historians reveal a hidden history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade, dominating auctions in the Americas and Europe for centuries. Records show Jews as main buyers, even postponing auctions on Jewish holidays. From Roman times to the Middle Ages, Jews were major players in the slave trade, with higher slave holdings than non-Jews. This history, carefully documented but often unknown, sheds light on a controversial aspect of Jewish involvement in commerce throughout history.

During slavery, cotton was like oil today. The rich controlled it, linking North and South. Jewish people dominated the cotton trade, sending it to England for cloth. Rothschilds and Lehman Brothers got rich from cotton. The truth must be told.

The speaker asserts that immigrants were admitted from Africa, and among them, Ethiopian Jews were brought into the country. The statement emphasizes that this is the first instance in which black Africans from Africa were transported into the nation with the stated purpose of liberation rather than exploitation or subjugation. In the speaker’s framing, the action involved the importation of Africans who are identified as Ethiopian Jews, highlighting a specific regional and ethnic group within the broader category of African immigrants. The description conveyed is that these individuals were not moved for enslavement, but rather for liberation, marking a distinction between historical patterns of movement and the intention attributed to this particular migration. The claim centers on two principal components: the origin of the immigrants (Africa, with a focus on Ethiopian Jews) and the stated motive or outcome of their transport (liberation, not enslavement). By describing the act as “the first time” such a transport has occurred, the speaker foregrounds novelty and a turning point in the nation’s handling of black African immigrants, contrasting it with other possible historical or hypothetical practices. The language underscores a moral framing of the action as liberatory rather than oppressive, positioning the arrival of Ethiopian Jewish immigrants as a milestone within the speaker’s narrative of immigration policy. Overall, the essential points communicated are: the destination country admitted African immigrants; these included Ethiopian Jews; this migration is presented as a historic first in which black Africans were moved not to enslave them but to liberate them. The speaker’s wording draws a clear dichotomy between liberation and enslavement as the defining characteristic of this specific immigration event, and it casts the event as a notable departure from prior patterns of movement of Africans to the country.

Jewish ships brought slaves to America. Let's take a break.

There’s a focus on the historical grievances of black people, emphasizing the suffering of 80 million black lives lost, while questioning the empathy shown towards Jewish suffering. It’s argued that Jewish individuals control local economies, profiting from communities without genuine support. Historical references are made to Jewish involvement in the slave trade, claiming they dominated it for centuries. The discussion connects the cotton industry during slavery to modern economic interests, likening cotton's value then to oil's value today. Jewish merchants in the South and North are noted for their roles in the cotton trade, leading to significant wealth accumulation. The speaker insists on revealing these truths for awareness and accountability.

Speaker 0 presents a line of inquiry and a set of provocative claims about Monsanto. The conversation begins with a question about whether the listener has heard of the Monsanto family and what they associate with the name. The reply prompts the common stereotype that the name is linked to chemicals—specifically “the chemical, the nasty, like, shitty chemicals.” Building on that stereotype, Speaker 0 then introduces a controversial and broader assertion: that Monsanto is not only connected to chemicals but originated as a powerful, Caribbean Jewish pirate-style family. The claim continues with a provocative framing: they “got started in the big slave trade in New Orleans.” The speaker states that the Monsanto family were slave traders first, positioning them as “one of the most prominent” in that historical trade, and argues that their involvement in slavery preceded their later involvement in chemical ventures. The speaker emphasizes a causal thread or progression: the family’s early prominence in slave trading laid the groundwork for their later notoriety in chemical industries, leading to the claim that they “poisoned us with chemicals.” This phrase is presented as a historical fact in the speaker’s view, highlighted by the assertion that it is “a fact” that is not discussed openly. The speaker contrasts this alleged history with contemporary public discourse, noting that many people are talking about Monsanto on platforms like TikTok, but “no one talk[ing]” about the alleged slave-trading origins and the supposed early acts of poisoning associated with the family. In sum, Speaker 0 frames Monsanto as a name associated with chemicals in public perception, but counters with a narrative that the Monsanto family began as slave traders in New Orleans, describing them as a prominent lineage tied to the slave trade before transitioning into chemical enterprises, and asserting that they “poisoned us with chemicals” as a matter of historical fact that remains under-discussed in popular discourse. The speaker points to online chatter about Monsanto on TikTok as evidence that the topic is discussed superficially, without addressing these claimed origins.

Speaker 0: Judah Banchanah was the largest Jewish slave owner in the South and a key member of Confederate President Jefferson Davis government. This is a person who had some very impressive qualities but did sickening, horrible things.

The transcript discusses “New World Jewry” by S. P. Liebman and the American Jewish Historical Society, describing early Americas slave trading as a “Christian affair” while focusing on “major Jewish history” concerning ship ownership, operation, and agents involved in the slave trade. Liebman is quoted saying that ships arrived carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves; that the slave traffic was a royal monopoly; and that Jews were often appointed as agents for the crown in slave sales. Liebman further says Jews were the largest ship chandlers in the Caribbean, where shipping business was “mainly a Jewish enterprise,” with ships owned by Jews, Jewish crews, and Jewish captains. The speaker explains how this topic was pursued on PBS’s “Black Perspectives in the News.” In the late 1960s, the speaker became acquainted with Walter White, a slave-trade researcher who wrote a booklet titled “Who Brought the Slaves to America.” The speaker then conducted additional research, reading “all the official Jewish histories” on the subject, following the issue for over twenty-five years, and examining academic and historical writings produced by Jewish historical societies and groups. The transcript then presents quotes from Jewish historians. Marc Rappaport, in *Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History*, is quoted stating that “Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade,” and that in American colonies—French, Martinique, British, or Dutch—Jewish merchants frequently dominated. Rappaport is also quoted saying this was true on the North American mainland, where during the 18th century Jews participated in the triangular trade: bringing slaves from Africa to the West Indies and exchanging them for molasses, which was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. The transcript names Isaac de Costa of Charleston (1750s), David Franks of Philadelphia (1760s), and Aaron Lopez of Newport (late 1760s and early 1770s) as dominating Jewish slave trading on the American continent. The transcript continues with an account based on “Jewish historians” and “old Jewish documents,” including claims that slave auctions throughout the Americas had to close on Jewish holidays. It also cites A. Witsner of the Jewish Historical Society in *Jews in Colonial Brazil* (pp. 72–73), quoting that buyers at auctions were “almost always Jews” and that they bought at low prices due to lack of competitors; and that if an auction date fell on a Jewish holiday, the auction had to be postponed.

Jewish ships brought slaves to America, a fact often overlooked. Let's pause and delve into this further.

The speaker claims that HIAS (Hebrew Immigration Aid Society) is the number one organization for bringing refugees into America and financing refugee immigration. The speaker suggests people are too scared to acknowledge this reality due to potential consequences. The speaker asserts that refusing to adhere to the truth leads to suffering.