reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

We focus on collecting data from surveillance and monitoring social media platforms to counter negativity and hate speech. Our media analysis unit has increased monitoring to catch incitement to violence and direct threats. Our goal is to ensure the safety and sense of safety for New Yorkers.

I sent my family away due to safety concerns after receiving threats. I secured my credit and informed my mortgage company and bank. The individuals harassing me are causing inconvenience by contacting car dealerships, plumbers, and utility companies. Their actions are disturbing, but I am taking precautions to protect myself.

The speaker recounts being swatted at his home at 2:35 AM. He saw a man with an AR-15 outside his window via security cameras. He called 911, who confirmed they received a report of a shooting, people bleeding, and people hiding at his address, none of which was true. He believes he was targeted due to his conservative political views and possibly for criticizing Zelensky and Ukraine. He notes others, including Alex Jones's reporter, have been swatted, and one InfoWars reporter was killed in Austin. He believes the goal is to scare or even kill people with opposing views. The speaker has since coordinated with the sheriff's department, who now have his and his family's contact information and a plan to verify any future calls to his address before dispatching officers. He also contacted Cash Patel, who informed the FBI director. The speaker decided to publicize the incident to raise awareness and deter future attempts.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

We are committed to confronting threats both in the US and abroad. With the current situation, there has been an increase in reported threats. We need to be alert, especially for individuals who may be inspired by recent events to commit violence. As the first line of defense, it is important for you to stay vigilant and report any signs of potential violence. We encourage you to share any intelligence or observations you may have. We are also committed to sharing information to ensure the safety of our communities. Let's work together to safeguard our communities.

Lisa Monaco, a U.S. prosecutor, discovered illegal activities but was dismissed when she reported them. Despite her concerns, she sought advice from friends to protect herself. The FBI had her under surveillance and planned a violent attack on her family, intending to stage it as a home invasion. They had detailed maps and knowledge of her schedule. As threats escalated, she documented everything and reached out to the U.S. Marshals and a judge to expose the plot. This intervention halted the attack. The court records related to the case remain sealed due to national security. Additionally, an explosive linked to the case was later used in smaller bombings in Boston, demonstrating ongoing threats.

CSIS came to my home while I was cooking for my child and approached me in an uncomfortable manner. Since then, I have faced harassment and stalking from them. Despite telling them I didn’t want to talk, they repeatedly called and even found my gym. They implied that if I didn’t become an informant, my safety and ability to care for my child could be at risk. I’m not impressed with law enforcement in this country. I have not been asked to reimburse any money, but CSIS has applied significant psychological pressure on me to cooperate. I declined their offer, as I refuse to be an asset for any government, and I want to know how much this has cost Canadians.

We have a specialized team, the COVID online team, that investigates and monitors individuals displaying concerning behavior related to anti-government, anti-police, and COVID-19 vaccination conspiracy theories. If you know someone exhibiting such behavior, please inform us through the police or Crimestoppers. However, we do not consider this a domestic terrorism case currently. The three trained family members have shown sentiments against the government and police through their social media posts. We will examine the other individuals posting similar material, the owners of those sites, and their locations.

Be cautious about discussing politics; it can lead to unwanted scrutiny. Avoid revealing personal information about friends’ identities or political beliefs. If someone brings up politics, deflect the conversation. Keep any assistance to immigrants private; do not discuss it openly. Prepare for potential authoritarianism by staying informed and ready. Firearms training may be necessary for self-defense, as the Second Amendment might remain intact. If political views are shared on social media, consider deleting those accounts to protect yourself from future repercussions. Prioritize safety and discretion in a potentially oppressive environment.

A journalist covering far-right extremism had a concerning experience while walking home. A man recognized her from TikTok, which was surprising since she thought no one knew her. Shortly after, she received a message from an anti-racist researcher, informing her that a picture of her had been posted on a far-right extremist messaging board, along with her location. Unaware of this, she walked by a courthouse where a Freedom Convoy trial was taking place. One of the protesters filmed her, seemingly recognizing her. She checked Twitter and saw the warning from her researcher friend. Feeling unsafe, she called a security contact, sought refuge in a mall, and eventually managed to go home discreetly. This incident highlights the need for constant vigilance, even when encountering seemingly friendly individuals.

After being elected governor, I was interviewed by 23 CIA members who wouldn't reveal their purpose. They refused to share their names or roles, which was unsettling. They questioned me about my election, and I was struck by the diverse group present, resembling everyday people. We need to engage with those in this field to understand their activities and who they are monitoring. It's important to uncover the extent of surveillance happening.

Speaker 1 admits that mentioning being armed was to deter threats. They regret their choice of words and clarified their friend never said that. They received threats and harassment online even 14 months later, with a recent influx after a court subpoena.

I went on TV to talk about grooming gangs in Telford, and police suddenly showed up at my door, claiming it was their duty to follow up. They had done nothing about the abuse for decades but decided to intimidate me after my interview. They said they were trying to make a difference, but it seemed like they were targeting a victim instead of the perpetrators. It's pathetic that criticizing them on TV drove them into action. I have no idea who ordered this "raid."

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto that identified many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action on alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

I sent my family away due to safety concerns after receiving threats. I secured my credit and informed my mortgage company and bank. The situation is inconvenient, with people making unwanted calls to various places. These individuals are causing trouble, but I am taking precautions to protect myself.

The speakers discuss the importance of being cautious and guided by their purpose. Speaker 0 worked in counterintelligence and counterterrorism for 22 years in the FBI. They advise Speaker 1 to seek competent help and gather intelligence before making decisions. Speaker 1 expresses concern about aggressive actions from alphabet organizations. Speaker 0 reassures them that they will be prepared and ready to face any challenges. Speaker 1 warns that if Speaker 0 returns to private life, they will still be targeted. Speaker 0 appreciates the warning.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

National Security Investigations teams are a flying squad of hate disruptors who focus on high harm, high impact, politically motivated violence, communal violence, and hate crimes that don't meet the threshold for terrorism investigations, but that we know drive fear and division. This is all about stopping hate and division earlier and well before it leads to violence. So far, this crack squad has charged 14 individuals across 13 investigations, and of those, four individuals across four operations were charged for offenses relating to antisemitism. The teams were responsible for a recent week long national blitz on the distribution and display of prohibited symbols and for charging a passenger who only this week allegedly threatened violence toward a member of the Jewish community on a flight from Bali to Sydney. The announcement today to boost the numbers of our hate disruptors as well as planned changes to lower the threshold for hate speech will make it easier for the AFP to take action quicker. It could be the difference between us just knocking on a door to warn an individual to an individual being placed in handcuffs.

The speaker recounts a long-standing pattern of interactions with federal agents, noting that jokes about agents reading their chats stopped being funny for a period. They describe being pressured to work for these agencies for months, a pressure that left no paper trail and was deliberately concealed. Each time agents visited their home, they were asked to shut off their phone and told not to tell anyone about what was happening. The speaker explains that the only reason they can discuss the situation now is that they made a deliberate, fear-driven decision to do so. They recall sweating and nearly vomiting, and they went so far as to clip a DJI microphone to their bra before every visit, anxious that the device would beep or reveal what was being discussed. This precaution reflects the level of fear and the stakes involved in the interactions. They claim to have later confronted Parliament about the surveillance and pressure campaigns they faced, actions taken after they recorded evidence of these activities. The speaker asserts a broader possibility: there exists a very real world in which they did none of that—where they would still be online today as an independent influencer while privately secretly acting on behalf of Canadian intelligence agencies—because they were made to believe they would go to jail. They emphasize that they are not the only person affected by this dynamic, suggesting a wider pattern or network behind these experiences.

If he did his job, I wouldn't need to do this. I received a malicious report. Look, they're all pointing. Someone's on the roof. There he is, laying down. We have dangerous people in our country causing trouble.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

I sent my family away due to safety concerns after receiving threats. I secured my credit and contacted my mortgage company and bank to prevent any harm. Despite the inconvenience caused by these individuals, I remain vigilant.

An individual questions whether an action is due to security concerns or intimidation. The response indicates it is a security matter. Another person is told to stay away from someone. An individual asks why they aren't being arrested and demands to see video footage. Someone is told to calm down. An individual states "They will arrest me. I know nothing." Another person is asked if they would arrest someone else, claiming to have seen that person slap someone. It is asserted that no one said "stab him." Someone states they are on the side of another person.

We focus on collecting data from surveillance and monitoring social media platforms. Our goal is to counter negativity and reach out to people when we see hate speech online. Our media analysis unit has increased monitoring to catch incitement to violence and direct threats. We are committed to ensuring the safety and sense of safety for New Yorkers.