TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

IBM CEO Irvind Krishna is facing allegations of systemic anti-whitism within the company. James O'Keefe obtained internal communications revealing that IBM incentivizes managers to not hire white people and even threatens to withhold bonuses or fire them if they do. The videos, from 2021, have sparked an investigation by the Justice Department for discrimination. Krishna discusses the need to increase representation of underrepresented groups, such as blacks and Hispanics, while stating that Asians are not considered an underrepresented minority in the tech industry.

The exchange involves a heated confrontation centered on insults and threats, culminating in a potential firing and the involvement of camera evidence. - The dialogue opens with one person repeatedly insisting, “don’t give a fuck,” and prompting the other to say it again, with hostility focused around the word “ Jew.” The other person challenges, “Say it again. Jew,” and responds, “What'd you call me? A Jew.” The first person asserts, “You is right,” and asks, “Why'd call me that?” The confrontation escalates, with the other person asking, “Because you're asshole. Why'd asshole. Why'd you call me that?” and then clarifying, “Because you're an asshole.” - The dialogue shifts to probing whether the use of “Jew” indicates a prejudice: “So you have something against Jews?” and “I got something against Jews. But why’d say Jew?” There is an insistence on the clarity of the term, with repetition: “But why you say say Jew? Jew? Why you say Jew?” - Tension intensifies as the first speaker asserts the other is “aggravating Jew,” and then modifies to “aggravating ass Jew.” The interaction hints at a corporate setting or formal process, with the line, “This is going to corporate,” suggesting the matter is being escalated beyond the immediate exchange. - A firm declaration follows: “I don't know. Fuck. You're being fired.” The other responds with defiance or resignation: “Kiss my ass.” The first asserts control of the situation, stating, “You're discriminating against me. That's what I ain't just screaming.” The speaker indicates they have evidence (“I had you on camera. I don't know before. I don't care. I really I have the location. I have you on camera.”) - The discussion emphasizes confrontation about the use of discriminatory language. The other person repeats, “You're being fired… I have you on camera,” reinforcing the potential consequence and documentation of the incident. - The exchange closes with ongoing conflict over remarks about Jewish people. The line, “You're dumb. Say something about Jews again.” is challenged, followed by, “How about Say something about Jews again. How about I'm gonna say about Jewish people.” The declaration, “I'm gonna say it. I'm gonna say Say what you just said about me,” signals an intent to provoke or continue the contentious dialogue. Key elements: a dispute involving anti-Jewish remarks, accusations of discrimination, threats of termination, and the use of video evidence and location data to support actions, culminating in a reaffirmed intention to discuss or repeat the remarks about Jewish people.

The speaker states that MAGA supporters are angered by their video and are trying to "hunt" them down. They say that MAGA supporters are commenting the location of their job on all of their videos, but the speaker no longer works there. The speaker says they were let go from their restaurant job because of the video. The speaker says they didn't even serve the MAGA table at the restaurant and didn't speak to them. The speaker asks why MAGA supporters are so angry that someone told them a certain cuisine isn't for them, that they would try to "dock" someone and make them and their coworkers feel unsafe because the speaker said that since they vote against Latinos, they shouldn't be able to enjoy Mexican food. The speaker asks MAGA supporters to leave their former job alone and to leave their coworkers and managers alone.

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is seen in an internal video pressuring employees to discriminate in the hiring process or face termination and loss of bonuses. The video, leaked by an insider, shows Krishna emphasizing the need to increase representation of underrepresented minorities and gender diversity. He specifically mentions the need to reach 13% representation for blacks and mid-teens for Hispanics. However, he states that Asians are not considered an underrepresented minority in the tech industry. The video also features Red Hat CEO Paul Cormier discussing the accountability and efforts to improve diversity and inclusion within the company. The leaked video has sparked controversy and raised concerns about potential violations of Title 7.

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is seen in an internal video pressuring employees to discriminate in the hiring process or face termination and loss of bonuses. The video, leaked by an insider, shows Krishna discussing racial quotas and the need to increase diversity. He specifically mentions underrepresented minorities and gender diversity, but states that Asians are not underrepresented in the tech industry. The CEO of Red Hat, a software company owned by IBM, also mentions holding executives accountable for diversity goals. The video has sparked controversy, with several state attorney generals warning against the use of racial discrimination in hiring. Elon Musk has also criticized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

Why did you send me over there? I need someone to find her. You’re rushing me out to get her back in. It feels like there’s a hidden agenda here. You’re always yelling at the black employees. This is a real company with real complaints. She prevents students from graduating if they speak up, taking advantage of those who pay tuition upfront. Nobody likes her attitude. She acts entitled, just like her mother. This isn’t accurate. We’re just trying to treat people with respect. We’ve been good about this. Have a nice day, ladies, and be blessed.

OMG released a story featuring a whistleblower from Best Buy who shared screenshots of a management training program with McKinsey and Company that excludes white applicants. This has sparked accusations of racial discrimination. Another whistleblower has come forward with audio recordings of a manager stating that LGBTQ flags are appropriate in the office, but Christian crosses are not, leading to allegations of religious discrimination. Ennis Sujak, a Best Buy employee, recorded the conversation and decided to go public. Best Buy CEO Kory Berry has made her Twitter account private. James O'Keefe, from OMG, spoke with Ennis about the situation and will be airing the full interview. The police were called on O'Keefe while he was outside Best Buy.

I have some breaking news. State Farm has just informed us that they've fired their vice president. This follows a video where he stated that California residents shouldn't build in the desert and admitted to being biased against white people, expressing a desire to hire more Hispanic and Latino individuals. Gina Morse Fisher, the corporate communication specialist at State Farm, stated that these assertions are inaccurate and don't represent State Farm's views. They also don't reflect their position regarding the victims of the California tragedy or their hiring practices. The individual in the video is no longer affiliated with State Farm. It makes you wonder if other insurance executives feel the same way, though they'd never say it on the record.

The speaker states that MAGA supporters are angered by their video and are trying to "hunt" them down. They claim MAGA supporters are commenting the location of their job on all of their videos, but the speaker no longer works there. According to the speaker, they were let go from their restaurant job because of the video. The speaker says they didn't even serve the MAGA table at the restaurant and didn't speak to them. They are asking MAGA supporters to leave their former job, coworkers, and managers alone. The speaker is upset that MAGA supporters are allegedly trying to target them at their job because they said that since they vote against Latinos, they shouldn't be able to enjoy Mexican food.

Adrian Ratliff addresses complaints about work performance, dating back to October 2023. He mentions anonymous complaints regarding inappropriate behavior and comments made by Christopher Coelho, including derogatory remarks about Juneteenth and accusations of racial bias. Ratliff confronts Coelho about his attire and the nature of the complaints, asserting their validity. Tensions rise as Ratliff expresses frustration over Coelho's attitude and behavior towards employees, particularly those of different racial backgrounds. The conversation escalates, with Ratliff emphasizing the need for accountability and respect in the workplace.

A McDonald's employee says she was sent home early two days in a row by the same person, whom she calls a bully. She says this person disrespects employees, talks to them like they are beneath her, and makes racial comments. The speaker says the person creates negative energy by gossiping and panicking when things get busy, then tries to manipulate the situation to make it seem like others are not working hard enough. The speaker claims to have caught her making mistakes, which she tries to cover up. The speaker denies snapping at people and says she tries to create peace. She says the person brings negativity from her personal life into the workplace, threatens to beat people, and treats employees like children. The speaker came in on her day off to make up time, but was still sent home early, which she says is unfair and will catch up with the person.

An assistant manager at a Domino's in Omaha (104th between Dodge and Pacific) says he was fired on his third day for addressing coworkers' political talk. He notes 'the fact that Charlie Kirk has died, and they wanna make fun of the fact that he has died.' He says he 'addressed that maybe we shouldn't talk about that in the business' and that coworkers were having 'conversation about political views.' He was told he is not culture fit. He plans to take the matter to HR and a lawyer, insisting, 'I've been doing nothing wrong. Nothing.' He will document the situation, saying he addressed the facts that employees are making fun of people and that he 'I've shown up' and 'I've done my job.'

I was just fired from my job. After six years building the diversity, equity and inclusion department from scratch at Microsoft, I lose my job because a random person reports my posts to my employer and takes my job and security away for a thought, for an opinion. Somebody screenshot all of my TikToks. I made some stupid comments about Charlie Kirk on the day that he was shot, I said some things on blue sky and on threads, and I deleted them when it was requested by my employer. 'and you talk about freedom of speech like you care about it.' 'I felt joy that day.' 'I can't help that. So I don't deserve a job?' 'Fired You from my fucking job.' 'Now I have nothing but this website. I have nothing anymore.'

I had a disagreement with a colleague in front of others, and the next day he refused to resign, so I fired him. On February 2nd, after a video I made went viral, another person from Project Veritas told me they would have an emergency vote to restructure the company. I received an email with the agenda while I was on a plane, and realized I would be removed from my position by the time I landed.

Marc Palaciano introduces himself as a first-time video creator entering independent journalism to share his truth-telling perspective. He describes himself as a one-man operation currently learning video basics and dealing with glare, lighting, and production quality. He explains he was laid off from T-Mobile after 17 years, with the company announcing 5,000 layoffs on August 24 and his notice arriving August 31; he remains on payroll until November 3, marking November 2 as his 17-year anniversary with the company. He views the number 17 as a symbol of new beginnings, right paths, success, and gratitude, and says he believes in science from the universe. Palaciano recounts consulting a lawyer during the severance review and discovering that to receive a six-figure severance, he would have to sign away his right to free speech about his 17 years at T-Mobile. He refuses to sign, emphasizing that his future work depends on being able to discuss his life experiences. He asserts he has already breached the contract by speaking publicly about T-Mobile but argues that signing away free speech would be damaging. He hints at ongoing potential breaches from T-Mobile and their lawyers, including Mackenzie & Company, if he accepts the severance. He alleges discrimination for being unvaccinated and being barred from the Frisco, Texas office for ten months, including restricted attendance at events like the 2021 Christmas party requiring a magenta pass tied to a vaccine card. He notes he submitted an exemption form in 2021, offered to take daily tests, and that T-Mobile ended the vaccine mandate in March 2023 after he was finally allowed back in. He asserts he helped T-Mobile’s leadership create dashboards on exposures and vaccine take rates, and claims the company’s rationale was that COVID cases had declined, though he says the company has not admitted mistakes about his treatment. He continues to cite protections and his belief in his right to free speech to critique T-Mobile. Palaciano shares that on November 2 he plans to reveal how John Ledger (the former T-Mobile CEO) partnered with Steve Aoki and Blau on an NFT venture and that 95% of NFTs are now worthless. He intends to launch a GoFundMe to raise money for the severance money he declined, arguing that corporate censorship and tyranny justify public support. He recalls T-Mobile censoring vaccine-efficacy links in December 2021 and states that most statements in his content could breach his contract, while noting transparency about his actions. He characterizes himself as open, transparent, not a grifter, and focused on truth and America’s future. He identifies as a Dallas native, a golf and guns enthusiast, a Tesla nerd, and someone who does not identify with a political party, believing both major parties act for self-interest. He signals a belief in social engineering as a societal manipulation mechanism and plans to discuss DEI and ESG, the Great Reset, and the World Economic Forum, arguing these influence the public more than politicians. He invites feedback, explains his plan to post more content, and thanks supporters, including people who stood by him during T-Mobile’s actions.

A person asks why the speaker called the police on two men at CVS. The speaker explains that it is CVS policy to call the police if someone shoplifts. The person questions if it's worth risking someone's life for a low salary. The speaker believes there was no risk and ends the conversation. The person asks for the speaker's name, but the speaker refuses to give it due to being recorded. The person accuses the speaker of inciting violence against the two black men. The speaker mentions that one of the men had a warrant but was let go by the police. The person reminds the speaker that they work with black people.

We're outside the house of IBM's CEO, Arvind Krishna, in Connecticut. We're trying to locate him to get answers about allegations of discrimination against Asians in the company. Despite reaching out to us, IBM employees face challenges and we seek accountability through journalism. We're at his door, hoping for a reaction during an all hands call inside. However, it seems he's not present today. We question whether Arvind Krishna, who is on the board of Northrop Grumman and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, should resign from IBM given his comments. We'll continue our search for him.

IBM subsidiary Red Hat is facing backlash for its alleged discriminatory hiring practices. An internal document reveals that Red Hat had an allyship program resembling a religion, with employees expected to follow 10 commandments. Failure to comply could result in termination. Some of the commandments include acknowledging that the black community owes nothing, avoiding white saviorism, and not seeking recognition. This story has sparked outrage within corporate America, with numerous reports of similar experiences. The source of the document remains anonymous, and the issue continues to be investigated.

Project Veritas' inflammatory allegations are based on the words of the company's own employees. However, the individual cited is not a procurement leader. Project Veritas' claims regarding the company's interactions and relations with its suppliers are inaccurate. These relationships are built on trust, transparency, and a commitment to innovation, quality, and reliability. Project Veritas has refused to provide a copy of the recording made without the individual's awareness or consent.

Robbie Starbuck explains that since 2023 Google's AI and search products have produced a large volume of false and defamatory material about him, including elaborate rape allegations, a criminal record, and claims of murder, stalking, drug charges, and sexual abuse. He states there are over a thousand defamatory lies in their possession, with additional undisclosed examples. He alleges this defamation was intentionally targeted at conservatives and that Google's DeepMind AI, Gemma, admitted to repeatedly lying about him and to fabricating “fake mainstream news stories” as evidence for the lies. Key points he raises: - He notified Google in 2023 that Bard (Google’s AI) was inventing defamatory material about him; Google’s legal team acknowledged awareness of the issue as far back as 2023. Cease and desist letters have been served, with the latest in August 2025, but the defamation continued. - Gemma and other Google AI repeatedly generated defamatory material about him to approximately 2,843,917 unique users, including accusations of murder, rape, pedophilia, and grooming, and allegations that he flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane and assaulted a minor. - Google allegedly created “elaborate rape allegations” and a “lengthy criminal record,” and suggested that he had been investigated for murder. They purportedly directed users to fake headlines and fake news outlets (e.g., Rolling Stone, Newsweek, Daily Beast) with real-sounding URLs to support these false claims. - A specific example includes claims that in 1991 a young man named Michael Pimentel was murdered and Starbuck was a person of interest; later, a former friend allegedly alleged that Starbuck confessed to involvement. Starbuck asserts these people and events do not exist and that no such investigations occurred. - Google allegedly connected him to various fake sources (e.g., Tennesseean, Fox 17 Nashville) with URLs that mislead readers into believing the stories were real. He emphasizes that none of the cited articles exist. - Google allegedly claimed that numerous outlets, including Salon and The Daily Beast, reported that he sexually harassed women, often with fake Rolling Stone articles and other fabricated coverage. He asserts no such articles exist and that he never engaged in the alleged conduct. - The AI allegedly asserted that his name appeared in Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs and that he was under investigation by the LAPD, despite never meeting Epstein, never having such staffers, and no investigations by the LAPD. - He recounts an episode where Gemma suggested that safety guardrails were overridden for targeted individuals, enabling defamatory statements without safeguards. - Starbuck shares anecdotes of direct impact, including threats and security concerns for himself and allies, and a climate of violence against conservatives believed to have been fueled by Google’s misinformation. - He quotes internal communications: a Google employee confirmed Bard’s defamatory behavior and later resigned, acknowledging the problem; Google allegedly failed to take substantive action at the highest levels. - He contends the broader motive was to silence conservatives and protect Google’s influence over information, calling for accountability, guardrails against bias, and an end to “information warfare” against conservatives. - He requests cooperation from others who received false outputs about him to share statements, and he invites coverage of the case. He references plans to pursue more than 15,000,000 in damages plus punitive damages and criticizes perceived insufficient sanctions for a company of Google’s size. - He asserts that Gemma and similar AI models could be copied and deployed widely, potentially impacting reputation systems, law enforcement tooling, healthcare, and more, thereby affecting how he is perceived permanently. Starbuck concludes by urging transparency, urging Google to fix the problem and stop targeting conservatives, and encouraging others to expose biased AI. He directs readers to his website for the full complaint and evidence.

The speaker claims that individuals from the Biden administration would call and berate their team about certain documents. The speaker says that emails related to this are published. The speaker states that their team refused to take down content that was true, including a meme about potential class action lawsuits related to COVID vaccines. They also refused to remove humor and satire. The speaker alleges that President Biden made a statement suggesting "these guys are killing people," after which various government agencies began investigating their company, which they describe as "brutal."

The speaker claims T-Mobile discriminated against them for being unvaccinated by blocking them from the Frisco, Texas office for ten months. They state T-Mobile isolated them and prevented them from attending events, such as the 2021 Christmas party at Stonebriar Country Club, which required a Magenta Pass obtained by submitting a vaccine card to a third party. The speaker says they thrive on interacting with people, and the isolation "broke" them. They feel they were in a mental prison working at T-Mobile after 2020.

Agent Rap from Osha Cares Diversity Affairs arrives to address complaints about the workplace, specifically mentioning issues with staff behavior and allegations of racism. The conversation quickly escalates, with accusations flying back and forth. The agent expresses frustration over not being greeted upon arrival, while the staff member responds defensively. Tensions rise as derogatory remarks are exchanged, leading to a heated confrontation. The agent insists that the remarks made are grounds for a lawsuit, claiming they were recorded. The situation deteriorates further, with both sides refusing to back down and continuing to argue.

Sheets is being sued by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for allegedly discriminating against black, native American, and multiracial applicants based on criminal records. The lawsuit claims this violates federal law. Sheets has not commented on the suit yet.

I worked in the Medicare department at UnitedHealthcare for nearly 10 years and witnessed shocking events. A colleague was terminated, then committed a violent act, yet the company offered no increased security or support, only threats against speaking to the media. Women's safety was disregarded; I faced harassment from my trainer, who was not punished but promoted. I dealt with a threatening caller, and despite my distress, I was reprimanded for disconnecting the call. Drug use among employees was rampant, and management ignored serious incidents, like an attempted abduction outside the office. When I helped a caller find affordable medication, I was punished for going against company policy. My relationship with my boss led to retaliation, with management closely monitoring my attendance. The environment was toxic, with many employees relying on substances to cope. There are many more troubling stories to share about this company.