TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

He states, "Zelenskyy does not represent the opinion of Ukrainians as his democratic mandate expired in the 2024." He adds, "He received it in 2019 under the promise to find common ground with Russia and secure peace." "Today, it is president Trump who fulfills Zelenskyy's pre election promises." Therefore, "for Ukraine and Ukrainians, he has a thousand times more right to be called our president than the self proclaimed and deceitful Zelensky." He argues that "neither president Trump nor European leaders, and certainly not the self proclaimed Zelenskyy, can decide Ukraine's future without Ukrainians." He notes that "This right was simply stolen from us by canceling elections and using punitive measures to forbid speaking about peace." He warns that "On Monday, Zelensky will again be in the Oval Office, once more pushing the agenda of perpetual war."

Tonight, I want to address the ongoing situation with Ukraine. I called Ukraine's leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, a dictator, which is a term Putin would love to hear. I said Zelensky should move fast or he won't have a country left, noting his poor job and the shattered state of Ukraine. Some say I echoed Putin's talking points by questioning Zelensky's legitimacy due to the cancellation of elections. I mentioned that Zelensky admitted half the money we sent is missing, which he didn't say, and that his poll numbers are very low, but that's not true either.

I've banned another political opposition party that questioned my legitimacy, using the Department of Justice to seize its members' assets. This follows my earlier actions in 2022, where I banned major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, and took government control of Ukraine's largest TV networks. My presidential term ended May 20th. I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. While some may excuse this due to the war, consider the implications: Accepting this rationale could normalize leaders suspending constitutions and canceling elections, especially given the ongoing conflicts involving Russia and China. They're already setting the stage, justifying the targeting of political opponents to maintain their grip on power.

I've banned another political opposition party that questioned my legitimacy, using the Department of Justice to seize their assets. This follows my 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, as well as taking control of Ukraine's largest television networks. My presidential term ended on May 20th, but I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. Some may say this is acceptable because we are at war. But, consider the implications if we accept this rationale. Leaders in other countries may use the same excuse to suspend constitutions and cancel elections, especially considering the conflicts with Russia and China. They are already conditioning people to accept a dictatorship by using the Department of Justice to target political opponents.

In the electoral process, there is an absence of checks and balances in Russia. This has led to one man making the decision to launch an unjustified and brutal invasion of Ukraine, or Iraq, as he mistakenly mentioned.

Ukrainian comedian and actor Zelensky is now a leading candidate in the presidential election. Drawing parallels to his role in the TV series "Servant of the People," Zelensky's rise to power mirrors his character's journey. He has promised to address corruption and signed a decree to consolidate national digital TV channels. However, concerns have been raised about his handling of scandals and his suspension of political parties linked to Russia but not those associated with neo-Nazis. Criticisms have also been made about his actions against religious organizations. President Biden's recent visit to Ukraine was met with sirens, leading to speculation about the authenticity of the situation.

America's involvement in Ukraine is questioned due to corruption and censorship. The speaker criticizes the US agenda on Ukraine, citing the impact on free speech and democracy. The conversation touches on the censorship industry, NATO's response to the Ukraine crisis, and the manipulation of information. The speaker refuses to support US actions in Ukraine until the censorship system is dismantled.

Zelensky was an actor and comedian. He was never involved in politics, never involved in governance, government, nothing. Not one of those things. In 2014, when Ukraine's government was overthrown in a coup, Zelenskyy was placed there, his only experience being playing the role on TV and in movies. Ukraine has always been known to be one of the top 10 most corrupt countries in our entire world. This war started in 2014, and although Russia made the first move, the question you guys need to start asking yourselves is, was Russia actually the aggressor? Zelenskyy has banned all opposing media. Zelenskyy has single handedly banned any oppositional party. There have been documented cases of Zelensky's military showing neo Nazi strategy called the Azov battalion. Liberals, who was laundering money with Russia and Ukraine? Hunter Biden.

Speaker 0 describes Zelensky as an American hero and contrasts his public image with the underlying narrative. He explains Zelensky was totally apolitical, an outsider with no government experience, a comedian, and the star of a planned TV show called Servant of the People. In the show, the main character creates a YouTube video that calls out oligarchs and corruption, becomes popular, and is drafted as a protest candidate who eventually becomes president. In real life, the TV show is supported by oligarch Kolomoisky, who owned the channel and did a large, nonstop promotional push to make it the number one show, including primetime slots, ads, and crossovers with the news. In 2018, a year before the show ended, Zelensky formed a political party named Servant of the People, the same title as the show, and secretly produced another season of the show. In April 2019, he announced his candidacy on Instagram, with no campaign, no rallies, no real platform, and he skipped presidential debates; his few early press conferences were poor. Kolomoisky’s channel provided Zelensky with endless airtime and favorable polls while attacking his enemies. Speaker 0 continues that US intelligence agencies, CIA and NSA, helped by funding democracy campaigns in Ukraine—reportedly around $5 billion—funneled through NGOs, with USAID embedding advisers in Zelensky’s organization to assist the campaign. On election day, Zelensky wins with 73% of the vote. Afterward, the war with Russia occurs, he declares martial law, and elections are ended. An election in 2024 is anticipated as the result of democracy money. He asserts Zelensky is an actor in a carefully designed television show—“a construct,” akin to Epstein—an created entity that works, and asks what Americans think about his popularity. Speaker 1 responds that Americans are disappointed by the ongoing war and deaths, noting that the war’s human cost is a major failure of promises from the Trump administration, who claimed he would resolve it in 24 hours. He adds that conscripting 60-year-old men and Americans and others going to fight are part of the situation. He states that the Ukraine narrative, and wars in general, are not organic: wars like this are driven by demands for primacy, control, and wealth, rather than being spontaneous. He reflects that Putin didn’t suddenly decide to invade; similarly, the broader pattern of power is not organic. He notes the Russian soldiers were told they would be welcomed and that they had dress uniforms, and compares to expectations in Iraq, where it was promised that Iraqis would welcome forces. He asks what the Ukraine situation is really about, and comments that human war reduces to a few centers of power like NATO, China, the Soviet bloc, and oil-producing countries, ultimately converging to two leaders in a room who must kill each other, as part of the decay of empire, with the U.S. maintaining about 760 overseas military bases.

the axis, that's the attitude. The White House denied this idea, stating, "we have a legitimate government and I am the duly elected president and we have a people's president according to our constitution." The European Union has done the same; "Everybody understands that the president of Ukraine is a legitimate president." We haven't had elections in Ukraine, where we have martial law or essentially martial law in Ukraine. "There will be elections in Ukraine." "Yes. They have agreed to it." Zelenskyy's powers expired last May. Presidential elections weren't held under the constitution. All officials are appointed by the president. If he himself is illegitimate, then so is everyone else. He calls for a broader coalition, saying, "We will work with any partners, The US, China, India, Brazil, South Africa, BRICS countries, and, for example, North Korea."

Ukraine's President Zelensky banned another opposition party, seized assets, and controlled TV networks. He extended his term, canceled elections under martial law, and suspended the constitution. This raises concerns about potential dictatorship and abuse of power.

American journalist Gonzalo Mira has reportedly approved $113 billion for Ukraine, yet he hasn't tried to secure the release of an imprisoned American journalist there. Moreover, Ukraine has canceled elections, raising questions about its democracy. President Zelensky claims it would be inconvenient and costly to hold elections during the ongoing war. However, supporting a non-democratic country without elections seems contradictory. Political parties have been banned, churches invaded, and priests arrested, revealing a corrupt regime. While the Russians are worse, it's not necessary to take sides. The main concern is the financial aspect, as borrowing more money leads to inflation, recession, and unsustainable practices.

The Biden administration's influence led Ukraine to abandon a peace deal with Russia, resulting in significant loss of territory and lives. The U.S. has prioritized control over Ukraine's resources and financial gains for hedge funds over genuine support for the Ukrainian people. There's a growing concern about the lack of a clear endgame in ongoing conflicts, leading to rising debt and civilian casualties. The conversation highlights the troubling intersection of foreign policy and domestic implications, including censorship and the erosion of democratic principles. The discussion emphasizes the urgent need for accountability and a reevaluation of priorities to protect both national security and civil liberties.

The speaker expresses disagreement with the portrayal of the President of Ukraine by Western media, arguing that he is not the hero he is made out to be. They highlight the mistreatment of ethnic Russian people in Ukraine and the ongoing civil war. The speaker criticizes President Zelensky for endorsing a group with a leader who made a controversial statement about Russian children. They also mention the Azov battalion, a militia with alleged Nazi affiliations, and the US's support for Ukraine's bid to join NATO. The speaker questions Zelensky's image and accuses him of propagating lies and escalating the conflict. They suggest allowing a vote on independence for predominantly Russian areas as a solution. The speaker concludes by cautioning against blindly accepting information about the conflict.

President Zelensky of Ukraine has gained complete control of the media, banned political opposition parties, and even outlawed the second largest orthodox Christian church. Now, he has canceled the upcoming presidential elections. This is concerning because even during times of conflict, countries like South Vietnam and Iraq still managed to hold elections. President Biden claims to defend democracies, yet he continues to financially support Ukraine in their conflict against Russia, which is seen as a corrupt autocracy. Zelensky's motive for canceling elections is to silence critics of corruption and the war. Those in our government who support him may believe that canceling elections is justified during times of war.

Zelensky's presidency has involved fulfilling obligations that have contributed to Ukraine's destruction. Key tasks include eliminating the Russian language, enforcing Ukrainian-only education, and creating a division within the Orthodox Church. He has suppressed freedom of speech by shutting down opposition media and banning political parties. Zelensky has also engaged in rewriting history, replacing Victory Day with Europe Day, and promoting a narrative that vilifies Russian identity. Furthermore, he has facilitated foreign control over Ukrainian land and turned the country into a testing ground for military and biological experiments. With significant foreign aid and military support, Ukraine's economy is heavily indebted, raising concerns about its future stability and sovereignty. Zelensky's actions reflect a commitment to foreign interests rather than the welfare of his citizens.

America's involvement in Ukraine's war is questioned due to past corruption and censorship. The speaker highlights how the Ukraine crisis led to NATO redefining warfare as information control. This shift influenced censorship tactics in the US, impacting freedom of speech and democracy. The speaker firmly rejects supporting US actions in Ukraine until the censorship system is dismantled.

Zelenskyy has banned another political opposition party, seizing its members' assets through the Department of Justice. This follows his 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, consolidating control over Ukraine's largest television networks under government control. My presidential term ended on May 20th. I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. While some argue this is justified due to the war, consider the implications. Accepting this rationale sets a precedent for leaders to suspend constitutions and cancel elections under similar pretenses, especially considering the ongoing conflicts involving Russia and China. They're already conditioning us to accept authoritarianism by misusing our Department of Justice to target political rivals.

It strikes me as ironic that some of the most vocal anti-Trump activists are now supporting Zelensky, a leader exhibiting dictatorial behaviors. There are traits that help in identifying dictators, such as the consolidation of media under state control, the banning of opposition parties, and the criminalization of political dissent. Emerging dictators target political opponents, often jailing them to silence dissent. War is a common tool for control, leading to martial law and the suppression of religious organizations. To sustain power and wealth, they exploit their nation's resources and youth, avoiding fair elections at all costs. So, why are those who decried Trump as a dictator now backing someone who seems to fit the description?

Russian elections are rigged, with political opponents being imprisoned or eliminated. This leads to a lack of checks and balances in Russia. As a result, one man decides to launch an unjustified and brutal invasion of Ukraine, mistakenly mentioning Iraq.

Joe Biden and his allies, including Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, and news anchors, prioritize Ukraine over the needs of your town. Only Donald Trump opposes Washington's war agenda and is being targeted by those in power. This attempt to remove Trump before you can vote for him should be the most concerning thing in American politics.

The Biden administration allegedly influenced Ukraine to abandon a peace deal with Russia, resulting in significant loss of life and territory. The U.S. is accused of exploiting Ukraine's resources for profit while claiming to support its people. The conversation highlights the unsustainable nature of prolonged military engagement and the human cost involved. There's a critique of how U.S. foreign policy impacts domestic issues, including censorship and the erosion of democracy. The discussion also touches on the potential dangers of an EMP attack on the electrical grid, emphasizing the need for protective measures that were revoked under Biden. The media's role in shaping public perception and the challenges of free speech in the current political climate are also explored. The urgency of addressing these issues for the future of democracy and human rights is underscored.

The speaker questions the justification of President Zelensky's actions during the war, suggesting that if rights are suspended during war, then this war will last a long time. They criticize the abuses carried out by previous administrations in the name of the war on Terror, such as assassinations and warrantless spying. The speaker also mentions the governor of New Mexico suspending a right established by the Supreme Court under the 2nd Amendment due to an emergency. They express concern about the situation in Ukraine, highlighting the threats and prosecutions by Zelensky, and claim that those defending Ukraine online seem coordinated and unhinged. The speaker concludes that Ukraine is anything but a democracy.

Zelensky's actions in Ukraine reveal a troubling authoritarianism, as he has banned opposition parties, shut down critical media, and arrested political opponents. Recently, he announced plans to ban the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, claiming it poses a threat due to its ties to Russia, despite its denunciation of the invasion. This move has been largely ignored or excused by U.S. leaders and media, who continue to support Zelensky as a defender of freedom. However, the reality is that Ukrainians face severe restrictions on their rights, including worship and political expression. The Ukrainian government is prioritizing its power over democratic principles, raising questions about the true nature of the support being given to them by the West.