TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the mystery of how the Great Pyramid was built, highlighting its massive size and precision. They mention the alignment to True North and the Earth's dimensions encoded in its design. The speaker refutes the idea of slaves being involved in its construction, emphasizing the skilled craftsmanship and care put into the pyramid's creation. The speaker marvels at the feat of moving large stone blocks and achieving such high precision, acknowledging the work as a masterpiece of architecture.

The federal government will cover the cost of rebuilding the bridge in Baltimore. The focus is on supporting the people and reopening the port. The speaker sends blessings to those affected and praises first responders. They plan to visit Baltimore quickly. While the ship company may be held responsible, the government will pay for repairs upfront to expedite the process.

The speaker details ongoing outreach to hundreds of records departments and officials to obtain a single blueprint for an old world building, specifically focusing on the Field Museum in Chicago. They claim mainstream history states the Field Museum was constructed from 1919 to 1921 as a 480,000 square foot palace with 75-foot interior columns, designed, engineered, and completed in two years, and assert that blueprints and related documentation should be publicly archived as proof of this construction timeline. He argues that by the early 1900s Chicago had strict building codes and permit laws requiring stamped architectural and structural plans, with plans to be permanently kept in the city’s engineering archives, including blueprints, engineering load calculations, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC schematics, logs, and permits. He contends that, if the Field Museum’s narrative is true, these documents should exist and be accessible today. The team has contacted various places, archives, and museums with a set of questions aimed at verifying the true construction records: blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, engineering calculations; evidence of communications between architect and builder; costs, including marble shipments and origins. They begin with the Chicago History Museum, which preserves Chicago’s architectural, civic, and engineering history and claims to hold architectural drawings and maps since 1856, including records from major firms like Graham, Anderson, Probstin White—the firm tied to the Field Museum. They note the History Museum’s responses to their inquiries: staffing reductions, limited ability to answer questions about architecture, and that the collection is complicated. They claim the museum admits they only have renovation drawings from the 1980s and cannot confirm originals; they suggest they may have copies but lack originals, leaving the status of original blueprints unclear. The speaker asserts they have “unlocked another building that does not have blueprints” and emphasizes the Field Museum’s large, marble construction as a key case. They recount further email exchanges showing the Chicago History Museum responding with negative findings for original blueprints, engineering calculations, and contractor ledgers, while offering some photographs. They question why a 1915 photo labeled “construction of the Field Museum” exists when construction supposedly began in 1919, suggesting the building appeared roofed before the stated start date. They press for inspection, occupancy, or dedication certificates but the museum again states they do not hold these records. They connect this issue to Soldier Field, implying a broader pattern of shared architecture and funding knowledge. They acknowledge the Field Museum was said to be under construction 1919–1921, yet present contradictions about pre-1919 imagery. They thank supporters and donors, reiterating that they will continue investigating and exposing inconsistencies. They report contacting the Field Museum directly on 10/27/2025 to describe their research project and institutional affiliation as an independent researcher producing a long-form documentary on landmark buildings’ architectural and engineering history, requesting blueprints, ledgers, and public records from the last two hundred years, but receive no reply after follow-ups on 10/28/2025 and 11/11/2025. They declare the archivist’s knowledge that original blueprints are not held and assert the Field Museum is exposed. The speaker pledges to continue exposing buildings worldwide and promises more discoveries weekly, thanking supporters and subscribers as they continue.

Today marks a huge milestone: we've successfully purchased land for Epic City! This 402-acre space in Josephine, Texas, just 20 minutes from Epic, will be the future of living. Epic City is more than just a neighborhood; it's a meticulously designed community centered around Islam. It will feature single-family homes, townhomes, apartments, and senior living, with a mosque and school at its heart. We'll have parks for Eid prayers, carnivals, community events, and sports fields for soccer, cricket, tennis, and volleyball. Epic City will celebrate diversity and promote unity, fostering belonging for all residents. Together, we are building Epic City, the city of tomorrow, starting today. This will be the epicenter of Islam in America.

The host opens Episode 157 of My Lunch Break with a provocative claim: historians have been wrong, and there is actual evidence that global structures were not built in the 18th or 19th centuries as commonly taught. He asserts that these structures were constructed by an advanced civilization that existed before us, and that there are documented proofs showing that construction records, receipts, and blueprints for major monuments do not exist or cannot be proven to have been created by the timelines attributed to them. He lists several well-known buildings as examples where construction records allegedly are missing or unrecoverable: the Cathedral of All Saints in Albany, New York; Big Ben (the Elizabeth Tower) in London; the Field Museum in Chicago, Illinois; and Philadelphia City Hall. He claims that these sites expose that construction records do not exist and that there is no proof they were actually constructed as claimed. The host focuses on the New York Public Library (NYPL) in New York City, describing how he and others sought the original blueprints, structural engineering drawings, contractor ledgers, calculations, and material records for the building, which has long been believed to have been constructed in the 19th century. He emphasizes that taxpayers funded the project and that, by law, construction documents should be public records. He questions how many horses would have hauled marble, how many chisels were purchased with taxpayer money, and how the alleged competitive construction process of the era could align with the idea that such palaces were built with primitive means. A correspondence with the NYPL’s reference archivist is detailed: initial emails redirected to general websites with suggested keyword searches and in-person visits, rather than direct answers. The host reports that the NYPL later claimed the original blueprints and related documents exist but are fragile and, because the building is in use, are not available to researchers. According to the archivist, no building plans are shared with external researchers, even though the building is publicly funded. The host notes that no catalog numbers, no condition reports, and no evidence of copies or public access were provided. He cites emails from a staff member who reportedly oversees hundreds of millions in construction projects, claiming that the documents are held by the library and are accessible only to staff, not to the public or external researchers. The host contends that this pattern—no accessible construction records for major landmarks and official claims that records exist but are off-limits—extends to the Field Museum in Chicago. He references a Field Museum library archives manager and a connection to Burnham Brothers, noting that the museum reportedly has very few original drawings, virtually no job filings, no ledgers, and no contracts or project documentation. An archivist at the Art Institute of Chicago is cited as saying there may have been a purge of materials, and that, as far as is known, there are no architectural or engineering drawings or other primary construction documents for the Field Museum. The host summarizes that, across five major cities, there is a pattern of missing original construction documents, no ledgers, no logs, and no public receipts to verify the standard timeline of construction. He argues that this could lead to a profound re-evaluation of the accepted historical timeline and identity, insisting that the pursuit of the truth continues with upcoming FOIA requests. He teases forthcoming discoveries and invites viewers to follow as he and his team continue to audit these institutions and seek concrete evidence.

The story is insane. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it says that on 03/10/1861, they got the land from Alan. Alfred's first project was approved. And just sixteen days later, the foundation was finished with the laying of the cornerstone where I know it now. I've mentioned this a few times, but we have this 100% pinned down now. We are exposing this right now in real time. Are you ready? The stone is larger than the rest and is hollowed out to allow a box of mementos where it was opened up in 1961, and the documents were already gone. So a new container was put into the stone. A new container put into the cornerstone where we now know what is going on here. We know that the previous civilization put valuable items inside these cornerstones all over the world just like we showed in our one hour special episode 77 where they just couldn't remember where the cornerstone was to the Saint Patrick's Cathedral in New York City. They had a 100,000 people there to watch, and then nobody could remember where it was. We know that they know exactly where it was. They never forgot. They simply went and removed it. And this is so clear now. The cornerstones hold incredible information, possibly the details on how the building was constructed or materials inside. There's something inside these cornerstones, and we called it right here on this channel. Unbelievable. Especially when we drive this point home and show the world that we are correct. And we take a look at The US Capitol Building where in 1991, a search for the Capitol cornerstone was conducted. Remember, we are told that this building was constructed in 1793. We are at the point in our research where we understand that they are not going to wait a hundred and ninety eight years to go look for a cornerstone for the first time. And if they really did build it, they wouldn't have forgot where it went. This right here is a 100% evidence in my opinion that our civilization are the finders or the founders of these structures. They did not construct these buildings. They would know where the cornerstone is without a doubt. A search for the capital's cornerstone was conducted, including use of metal detectors. Metal detectors for stone? The cornerstone. Are you able to see very clearly now? To locate the engraved plate. It was, of course, never found, so we are told, where we know that they located it and found whatever was inside from the previous civilization.

This speaker is attending their sixtieth annual meeting, which they believe will be the biggest and best yet. They shared figures from the previous day, noting record attendance. Specifically, 19,700 people joined between noon and 5:00 PM, up from the previous record of 16,200 the year before. According to the speaker, records were set in every aspect.

We planned and designed a large kitchen. The person who made the drawings for the hospital also made a beautiful and big picture. We were confused about which mason to hire and how much to pay. Eventually, we found a leader from a religious school who helped us. I provided the labor, but I didn't have money. Many mujahideen were willing to help build the hospital for the sake of Allah. They were motivated and the hospital ended up being two stories tall. When we were about to build the 33rd floor, there was an issue with Israel.

Thank you, Mr. President. The impact of this event is immense, saving millions of lives and transforming communities. Thank you.

The federal government will cover the full cost of rebuilding the bridge in Baltimore. Congress is expected to back this plan. It will be a lengthy process, but we will support the people of Baltimore until the port is operational again and the bridge is reconstructed.

A structural engineer gave a tour of the World Trade Center after the 9/11 attacks. The building was still standing, but many columns were blown out. The building had steel on the outside, making it strong. It was hard to believe a plane could go through the steel. The speaker thinks there were bombs involved because of the extent of the destruction. The buildings were solid and the country has changed since then. The Central Intelligence Agency obtained valuable information from interrogations, including details about planned attacks on buildings in the US. Operatives were instructed to ensure explosives went off at a high point to trap people inside.

The speaker is told a deal will cost $1,500,000,000.0, much higher than the $150,000,000 they expected. They lament buying "towers of babble filled with asbestos" and needing to get the asbestos out or the buildings gone, suggesting it would be cheaper to "fly fucking planes into the building and collect the insurance." They ask Deborah to check the terrorism insurance on the towers. Separately, someone proposes an idea to the vice president, who wants the person to "feel like he's part of the team." Another person says they found a "burnt up" passport from a "Saudi Arabian guy" at the plane crash site, assuming he is a terrorist. The plan is to call it the "global war on terrorism" so they can "fight everywhere." Someone else thinks "daddy's gonna think this is just so cool."

Speaker 0 discusses the Alexandra Palace (Alipali) as home to the World Darts Championship since 2008 and connects it to the Crystal Palace fire narrative. The speaker traces a path of fires, claiming the Crystal Palace burned down with 89 fire engines and 400 firemen, and questions how long the building burned before realization, noting Crystal and her dog were the only ones to realize it. They state 100,000 people watched the blaze within a few hours, and describe the cause as a “true cause of the fire will forever be a mystery,” calling part of the narrative a clear lie. They reference 1866, the North Transept, and GEICO insurance as an aside about rebuilding, asserting old-world structures like York Cathedral existed with such elements but that modern times cannot reproduce them. They claim construction details are missing: “In the year 07/1941, they know all about this building,” followed by a claim that the church was destroyed by a fire, yet no prior fires are noticed until now. The narrator attributes reconstruction to Egbert’s librarian and Ian Bald, insisting the “truth” is that these stories are narratives, not actual events. The speaker asserts that the original building of Alexandra Palace begins with a company name that is “definitely AI generated” (the Great Northern Palace Company), and contrasts it with the Crystal Palace’s Owen Jones. They allege the Great Northern Palace Company built the Alexandra Palace in 1859, that the Palace Construction Company could not fund it, and that materials were recycled from the large 62 International Exhibition Building. They argue the two buildings have the same material and that the explanation is that pieces were taken from the other building. Key timeline claims include: - In 1863, a project to explain why the palace sits on a hill, later built on a ridge over 300 feet high. - The project started in 1865 and finished in 1873, sixteen days later the whole thing burns down; 4,700 items claimed as “historic value” are destroyed. - The entire building is said to be destroyed from the inside while outer walls survive, yet rebuilt and reopened in 1875, with a brand-new Alexandra Palace featuring a concert hall, art galleries, a museum, electro hall, a library, a banqueting room, and a large theater. - A horse racing course and a Japanese village are mentioned as part of the complex. - They note a pattern of many fires and reconstruction projects, while asserting some fires (pre-19th century) are nods to a hidden group and not real events. The speaker highlights a specific 1980 incident: Haringey Council took over trusteeship and insured it for 31,000,000, and “six months after they insured it, for 31,000,000, a fire started under the organ that completely spread,” destroying half the building, with outer walls surviving. They question the odds of the organ being destroyed while it was dismantled, and point out the eight-year reopening vs the two-year reopening claimed for 1873 to 1875. Overall, the speaker argues that fires across these buildings are part of a deliberate, largely untrustworthy narrative, with repeated mentions of “old world” construction, AI-generated names, and insurance-driven destruction. They promise to continue exposing what they see as lies and invite the audience to wait for more.

Speaker 0 discusses contacting hundreds of records departments and officials to obtain blueprints and documentation for the Field Museum in Chicago, which are supposedly from 1919 to 1921. He states the building is a 480,000 square foot palace with 75-foot interior columns, built in two years, and argues that blueprints, receipts, and other construction records should be on file in Chicago’s archives. He emphasizes that by the early 1900s Chicago had strict building codes requiring stamped architectural and structural plans, and that these plans, logs, permits, plumbing, electrical, HVAC schematics, and load calculations should be permanently archived. If the narrative is true, he says, these documents should still exist and be accessible today. The team’s outreach is described: they asked the Chicago History Museum for blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, and calculations, and/or evidence of construction and funding, including correspondence between architect and builder and construction costs, especially for marble procurement. The Chicago History Museum is described as preserving Chicago’s architectural history and holding archives from major firms like Graham, Anderson, Probstin White, the firm associated with the Field Museum. The museum reportedly replied that they have experienced staffing cuts and that their ability to answer architectural questions is limited, describing the collection as complicated, and stating they do not have original blueprints for the Field Museum. They reportedly only possess renovation drawings from the 1980s and can only assume they have copies of originals, with no additional information. Speaker 0 highlights a contradiction: a 1915 photograph labeled “construction of the Field Museum” published by the Chicago Daily News shows a structure with a roof, suggesting work predates the claimed 1919 start date. He notes that if the Field Museum began construction in 1919, there should be records; none are available. He questions whether there are occupancy or dedication certificates verifying completion, and repeats that the museum replied they do not believe such records exist, though there are pictures. He also references Soldier Field as having the same architectural design and links the two structures to the same builders, claiming that records are missing for both. The narrator thanks supporters and reiterates that they will continue to investigate and expose discrepancies, stating that they have now unlocked the ultimate key: the question to ask is, “Do you have the blueprints? Show them to us the receipt to the building. We wanna see it.” He claims multiple structures lack blueprints and asserts that this proves mainstream history false. He mentions continuing to pursue questions about contractor ledgers and correspondence, and notes that the Field Museum was contacted again but did not provide blueprints, acknowledging they do not have them. He concludes that the Field Museum is exposed and promises to push forward with further episodes.

The World Trade Center was known as a very strong building that withstood a bomb in the basement, with half the columns blown out. The building was built from the outside with steel, resulting in narrow windows with heavy steel in between. The speaker couldn't believe a plane could go through the steel and believes that there were bombs that exploded simultaneously with the plane impact. The speaker notes the plane seemed to be coming down into the building, gaining speed. The speaker believes the destruction was more than a big plane could cause, considering the heavy caliber steel used in the building. The speaker concludes that the country is different today.

We are in contact with hundreds of records departments, officials and the rest, in search for a single blueprint to an old world building. The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois is said to have been constructed from 1919 to 1921, a 480,000 square foot palace building with 75 foot interior columns, supposedly designed, engineered, and completed in two years. The presenter argues that after today, viewers will understand that this place is different from the mainstream narrative, and that blueprints, framing receipts, and construction details should be on display given Chicago’s early 1900s building codes requiring stamped architectural and structural plans and permanent archival storage. The team has reached out to the Chicago History Museum, which preserves Chicago’s architectural, civic, and engineering history and holds archives from major firms including Graham, Anderson, Probstin White—the firm tied to the Field Museum. The questions posed include blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, engineering calculations, documents proving the Field Museum narrative, logs of communication between architect and builder, construction costs, and marble sourcing. The request letters are dated with the aim to verify the building’s construction, procurement, and design records. The Chicago History Museum’s reply notes staffing reductions, limited ability to answer architectural questions, and that they hold renovation drawings from the 1980s; they can only assume they have copies of originals and cannot provide more information. They state they do not have originals for blueprints or engineering calculations, and that their collection is complicated. The team highlights that this implies the Field Museum and the broader mainstream history may lack the expected records for a building of this scale. The team continues by noting that the Chicago History Museum also claimed to have some pictures, but not the full set of originals. They point to a 1915 Chicago Daily News photo labeled “construction of the Field Museum,” which predates the stated 1919 start date by four years, suggesting a major contradiction. They ask for inspection, occupancy, or dedication certificates verifying completion; the museum again replies they do not believe they have these. The presenter emphasizes that the Field Museum is a massive, marble-built palace on the lakefront and notes related architecture like Soldier Field, implying a connected lineage and common building methods, yet lacking the anticipated archival records. They thank supporters and promote their channels and sponsors, while continuing to press for responses from both the Chicago History Museum and the Field Museum. They report that the Field Museum replied on 10/27/2025 asking for a description of the research project and institutional affiliation; the presenter identified as an independent researcher producing a long-form documentary on architectural and engineering history, requesting blueprints, ledgers, and public records. A follow-up on 11/11/2025 produced no reply. The archivist’s awareness of not having the original blueprints is declared evident, and the presenter proclaims that the Field Museum is now exposed. The episode ends with a pledge to continue exposing these buildings worldwide and to uncover more questions and truth.

The video episode documents an investigative push to verify the construction records for the Field Museum in Chicago. The host asserts that mainstream history claims the Field Museum was constructed from 1919 to 1921, a 480,000-square-foot building with 75-foot interior columns completed in 24 months, and that blueprints, engineering drawings, load calculations, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC schematics, logs, permits, and other archival materials should be permanently stored by Chicago’s building and archival institutions. The host stresses that, if true, these documents should exist and be readily accessible today, given Chicago’s early 20th-century building codes and permit requirements. The team explains their approach: reach out to archives, museums, and record offices to obtain blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, and construction-related correspondence that prove the Field Museum’s narrative. They pose multiple questions to these institutions, including whether there are original architectural blueprints or engineering drawings, ledgers showing material procurement, construction or contractor ledgers, engineering calculations or specifications from before or during construction, and any correspondence between the architect, builder, or diocese regarding design or funding, plus the cost of construction and any communications about it. The Chicago History Museum is the initial focus. They note the museum preserves Chicago’s architectural and engineering history and claims to hold drawings from major architectural firms connected to the Field Museum. The host reports the museum’s responses: they do not have original blueprints or engineering drawings; they only possess drawings related to a 1980s renovation and can only assume copies of the originals exist, with no more information available. The cataloging librarian indicates the collection is limited and that answering architectural questions is challenging. The host highlights the museum’s admission that they do not believe they have original blueprints, engineering calculations, or ledgers, and that the museum’s response includes some photographs, though not the original documents. The host then mentions a contradicting element: a 1915 Chicago Daily News photograph labeled “construction of the Field Museum,” which predates the alleged 1919 start of construction, suggesting an open-air or roofed structure existing before the claimed timeline. They question why there would be a 1915 image if construction supposedly began in 1919. Further inquiries to the Chicago History Museum inquire about occupancy or dedication certificates and other records; the museum again responds that they do not believe these exist. The host connects these gaps to a broader claim that the Field Museum and related structures may have been built earlier than stated or by a different, possibly undocumented, process, linking this to a broader narrative about historic construction across the world. The Field Museum’s own reply is summarized as a request to describe the research project in detail and to identify institutional affiliation; the Field Museum confirms they do not have the blueprints. The host asserts the archivist’s knowledge of this and declares the Field Museum exposed, while promising ongoing investigations and episodes. The message closes with thanks to supporters and a pledge to continue uncovering more details in future episodes.

All the buildings here are new constructions, built from scratch. They were given for free to the people in this neighborhood. These houses and apartments were provided to those affected by the destruction caused during the battle. We have witnessed numerous other buildings being constructed rapidly. There are a significant number of buildings in this neighborhood, potentially accommodating 2000 or more people.

The president is looking into expense overruns on a construction job, specifically the building of basements or expanding them. The cost has increased from 2.7 billion to 3.1 billion. The president was not aware of the increase. The figure of 3.1 or 3.2 billion came from within the organization. There is confusion about whether the figure includes the Martin renovation, which was completed five years ago, or a third building. They are going to investigate what is happening. They don't expect more cost overruns but have a reserve in case. The project is expected to be finished in February 1927. The president was asked what he would do with a project manager who was over budget.

I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to own the Twin Towers when the governor of New York decided to privatize the World Trade Center. On the morning of 9/11, I was getting ready to go to the dermatologist and luckily avoided going downtown. After the tragedy, I needed help collecting insurance proceeds, so I reached out to the newly elected governor, Elliot Spitzer, who was a friend. He listened and managed to secure $4.5 billion for me within six months. Overall, we were very lucky throughout these events.

The speaker believes the destruction of the World Trade Center was due to architectural defects, but notes the building withstood a bomb in the basement, its most vulnerable point. The speaker toured the site days after the bombing and was surprised the building was standing solid despite blown-out columns. The speaker highlights the building's unique construction with exterior steel supports between narrow windows, making it hard to believe a plane could penetrate the steel. The speaker suspects bombs exploded simultaneously with the plane impact, citing the speed and angle of the planes, and the extent of the destruction to the building's heavy steel structure. The speaker concludes the event has profoundly changed the country.

There's a significant need for support, and it will persist for years. People require hope, and media coverage can help them feel remembered. We plan to build or acquire 1,000 homes, including 500 houses and 500 mobile homes, to provide shelter for families. This process may take a year or longer, depending on local regulations and government approvals. We have already begun ordering mobile homes and preparing house kits. Our efforts are underway to address this urgent need for housing.

Speaker 0 discusses Holy Name Cathedral at 730 North Wabash Avenue, Chicago. He states that the cathedral was “built before our timeline began” and claims the story that it replaced an earlier 1875 building destroyed in the Chicago Great Fire is false, describing the narrative as AI-generated and lacking originality. He asserts the cathedral was constructed in 16 months, with the cornerstone laid in July 1874 and dedication in November 1875, and he plans to email the Chicago History Museum to challenge this mainstream timeline, requesting original architectural blueprints or construction drawings. He argues the basement exists and posits that basements must be excavated before the cornerstone, implying construction began before 1874 and that the published timeline starting with the cornerstone omits an entire basement level. He questions how many floors lie underground and whether the cathedral connects to tunnels, noting Chicago’s “thousands of miles” of tunnels. He contends there are zero details in the narrative about construction logistics, such as how many horses were used, construction ledgers, purchase orders, or water consumption for horses, and he finds it improbable that dozens of horses pulled thousands of tons of stone in the described timeline and conditions. Speaker 1 states that ground was broken in July 1874 and that completion occurred in sixteen months, labeling it a quick construction. Speaker 0 counters by reiterating questions about horses, wagons, and missing documentation, noting the absence of any records about water for horses, foundation drawings, or other critical construction details. He repeats that the Chicago History Museum claims to have no original architectural plans for the Holy Name Cathedral. Speaker 0 notes that the museum provided photographs from 1902 and a 1916 ceremony, which he says do not prove construction details. He mentions the museum’s guidance on researching their collection and the museum’s librarians’ assertion that there are no architectural plans for the cathedral. He emphasizes that the cathedral’s basement and tunnels are not documented in existing records and states that, according to the museum, there are zero architectural plans, zero load-bearing calculations, and zero evidence supporting the sixteen-month construction claim. Despite the lack of documentation, the speaker reveals that the museum showed a file titled “map showing tunnels and connections from 1929.” He plans to obtain a digital image of the map, since the museum does not allow copies, and intends to view and eventually photograph the map to make it public. He commits to investigating whether tunnels connect to the Field Museum and other public buildings, and to asking those buildings about access to their tunnel networks. He invites viewers to subscribe for ongoing updates as they pursue the tunnels and related records.

Over eight hundred years ago, we built this cathedral and over the centuries, we made it bigger and better. Tonight, I solemnly declare that we will rebuild this cathedral, all together. It is undoubtedly a part of the French destiny. In the coming years, we will have a project, and I am committed to it. Tomorrow, a national subscription will be launched, and we will reach out to the greatest talents, both within and beyond our borders, who will contribute to the rebuilding. We will rebuild Notre-Dame because it is what the French people expect, because it is what our history deserves, and because it is our profound destiny.

A hospital was built in Mari El in just three months, which is impressive considering it usually takes 30 years. The building is beautiful, with two departments and a large lawn. There are even machines there, although it's unclear why they are needed. The video ends with the speaker expressing surprise at another building behind the main one, which is also impressive. In the past, the speaker only saw cranes demolishing old buildings, but now they are being replaced with new ones. The speaker encourages others to learn from this example.