TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

So it's it's referred to in the literature as photobiomodulation photobiomodulation. If you want to look up any of the clinical studies, put photobiomodulation, and then put and dementia, and Alzheimer's, and skin, and inflammation, the studies will come up. But basically different nanometers of light have different effects in the body, and so they are well researched and publicized to reduce inflammation, increase microvascular circulation, so the smallest of the capillaries in our body are affected by light. They have a very specific effect in the mitochondria, the powerhouse of the cell. So if you actually went through the wall of a cell and into the cytoplasm and found the mitochondria and you went into the mitochondria, you'd see that there's a motor in there that's spinning around.

The speaker will debunk myths while eating an animal-based diet of organs, meat, fruit, honey, and raw dairy. One myth is that being in the sun is bad. Ancestors sought the sun, and it feels good because the skin makes endorphins, nitric oxide, and cholesterol-containing molecules that are healthy and allow for laminar blood flow. The sun is a valuable resource that humans have always sought. The speaker encourages others to enjoy vitamin D from ultraviolet light and to not fear the sun.

Dr. Alexis Cohen (Jasmine Cohen) and the host discuss a wide-ranging view of health, science, and society, centered on mitochondria, light biology, and decentralized approaches to knowledge and healing. - On science, health, and authority: - Cohen argues that “we really haven’t been doing science for about seventy years now” and that modern science has become scientism, with people looking to scientists and doctors as authority figures over personal health, even though no one can fully know another’s lived body experience. - She emphasizes that aging is a reflection of mitochondrial heteroplasmy and that there are ways to slow or speed that burden, but contemporary living habits harm mitochondrial health. She asserts there are incentives to promote lifestyle advice that is not monetizable (outdoor activity, barefoot grounding, seasonal eating, movement), which she says slows research and access to information. - The conversation asserts a need to reclaim personal authority over health and to recognize life as magical and miraculous. - Personal entry into Bitcoin and crypto curiosity: - Cohen notes she and her partner became interested in Bitcoin in 2018, with a continued engagement including taking a cryptography course to understand the underlying proofs rather than accepting information at face value. - Background and work: - The host introduces Cohen as a Princeton-trained molecular biologist, a PhD focusing on metabolism, gut health, and circadian biology, who shifted from academic research to helping people rebuild health through nutrition, movement, mitochondrial function, and light exposure. Cohen shares that her own childhood illnesses, weight issues, and colitis prompted a pivot from academia to health coaching, emphasizing ownership of wellbeing through science and practical lifestyle strategies. - Cohen highlights that she values rigorous science but seeks practical lifestyle strategies to empower clients to understand their biology and take ownership of their health. - Dance, embodiment, and biology: - Cohen describes taking up social dancing (salsa, bachata, merengue, fox trot, hustle) and training intensely. She explains dancing challenges the brain in novel ways, requires being guided by a partner, and expands neural connections. - The host shares similar experiences with dance, noting body memory across decades and the importance of movement, rhythm, and social connection for health. - Mitochondria, heteroplasmy, and light: - Cohen explains mitochondria as the battery of the cell, with their own circular DNA and multiple roles in ATP production, biosynthesis, and epigenetic regulation. Heteroplasmy, the mutation burden in mitochondrial DNA, reflects dysfunction that can lead to energy production deficits across tissues. - She notes three key mitochondrial outputs: - ATP production powers cellular processes and metabolism. - Metabolic water production (including deuterium-depleted metabolic water). - Biophotons, photons largely in the UV range, emitted by mitochondria and nucleus during electron transport; older, sicker individuals emit more light due to increased permeability of the system. - Cohen argues aging mirrors mitochondrial heteroplasmy and mutation accumulation, with higher mutation burdens in tissues like immune cells, gut, liver, and brain associated with disease. She also discusses that mitochondria contribute to energy, water, and biophotons, and that modern life elevates heteroplasmy by lifestyle choices. - She argues heteroplasmy can be slowed or sped, and that there are actionable interventions—though the exact list is not exhaustively enumerated in this segment. - Why mitochondrial health isn’t the central target: - Cohen says mitochondrial health research is less profitable because it emphasizes lifestyle and environmental changes rather than drugs, which affects funding and research direction. She describes a system where focusing on broad environmental and lifestyle changes could be financially less lucrative than drug-centered approaches. - She expands on historical dynamics in science, including siloing of scientists and the development of a paywalled academic publishing model, suggesting that the system discourages holistic, integrative approaches that would unify mitochondrial biology with systems biology. - Light, circadian biology, and UVA/UVB: - The discussion shifts to light as a regulator of mitochondria. Cohen divides the sun’s spectrum into ultraviolet (UVB and UVA), visible light, blue light, and near infrared (NIR). She emphasizes that near-infrared light penetrates deeply and stimulates mitochondria, while UVB promotes melanin production via POMC and MSH peptides, affecting energy balance, mood, and metabolism. - UVB light triggers alpha-MSH and beta-endorphin production, the latter contributing to mood and dopamine support, and helps regulate energy expenditure and appetite via POMC-derived pathways; UVB exposure supports melanin synthesis, redox balance, and photoreception across tissues. - UVA light activates Neuropsin receptors on eyes and skin, aiding circadian entrainment and nitric oxide production, which improves vasodilation and nutrient delivery. Neuropsin is present in skin and testes; its stimulation is linked to testosterone and fertility enhancements. UVA also helps anchor local circadian rhythms in tissues. - Cohen discusses the misperception that UV light is universally harmful and argues that melanin is not only protective but can facilitate energy capture from high-energy photons to support energy metabolism in humans. Melanin’s roles extend beyond protection to potential energy transduction, with POMC, MSH, and alpha-MSH linking light exposure to metabolic regulation. - The My Circadian app is recommended as a tool to track sunrise, UVA/UVB rise, and lux (brightness) to optimize exposure. Cohen notes indoor environments rarely exceed 1000 lux, while outdoor brightness can reach 60,000–60,200 lux, significantly impacting serotonin production, mood, and cognition. She emphasizes the importance of bright daytime light for circadian alignment and melatonin suppression at night. - Infrared, LEDs, and indoor lighting: - The conversation covers lighting technologies, noting fluorescent tubes and LEDs minimize near-infrared and maximize blue light, which disrupts circadian rhythms and flicker, stressing the eyes and sympathetic nervous system. Cohen argues that modern lighting deprives people of infrared and UV radiation, both critical for mitochondrial function and circadian health. - She criticizes the push for energy efficiency that reduces thermal and infrared energy, arguing it contributes to systemic health issues. She emphasizes the importance of incandescent and near-infrared-rich lighting for indoor environments and sun exposure to sustain metabolic health. - Grounding, EMF, and environmental exposure: - Grounding (direct contact with the earth) is presented as a way to discharge excess positive charge in tissues, reducing inflammatory burden and supporting mitochondrial function. Cohen shares practical grounding instructions—grounding directly to the earth when possible, wearing natural fibers, and using grounding footwear. - Non-native electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 5G, and other sources are discussed as contributors to mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation. Cohen cites Robert Becker’s historical work on non-thermal EMF effects and Havana syndrome as context for potential biological risks. She suggests practical mitigation, including reducing EMF exposure, using Ethernet where possible, and using tinfoil to shield exposure in certain situations. Plant life can absorb EMF, and grounding, sunlight, and strategic use of red and infrared light are recommended to compensate where exposure is high. - The discussion includes practical home strategies, EMF-blocking window panels, EMF-blocking paint, and even temporary shielding (e.g., tinfoil) as a do-it-yourself mitigation approach. - Travel, circadian disruption, and protocols: - Cohen outlines travel challenges: high altitude cosmic radiation exposure (non-AVMF exposure), cabin EMFs, circadian misalignment, and sedentary behavior. She suggests pre- and post-travel strategies such as grounding, sun exposure, hydration, lymphatic support, and blue-light management to ease time-zone transitions. - She promotes an ebook protocol focused on lymphatic support and circadian realignment, available for purchase, with a holiday discount code holydays. Blue-light blocking strategies and red-light strategies are included to facilitate adaptation to new time zones. - Health, mental health, and pediatric considerations: - The hosts discuss mental health concerns, including PTSD, anxiety, and depression, emphasizing circadian regulation, light exposure, sleep hygiene, and reducing screen exposure. Cohen notes the importance of bright daytime light and a dark, cool sleeping environment for sleep quality and mood. She mentions a study showing even small nighttime light exposure can influence daytime metabolic markers, emphasizing the importance of darkness at night. - Birth, medications, and vaccines: - They touch on birth experiences, epidurals, and how early life interventions can influence long-term health and microbiome development. Cohen discusses pain as a portal to healing and critiques reliance on certain pharmaceutical approaches. - On vaccines, Cohen describes observed adverse effects post COVID-19 vaccination, including histamine issues, barrier permeability, and rapid cancer reports linked to vaccine exposure, while underscoring the lack of widespread funding to investigate these relationships. She mentions turbo cancers and batch variation as topics already discussed by researchers like Kevin McKernan and a need for independent inquiry. - Decentralization, science, and Bitcoin again: - Cohen envisions a decentralized health system in which multiple modalities (acupuncture, Chinese medicine, Ayurveda, allopathic medicine) can be tested for proof of work, with outcomes guiding what works best for individuals. She believes decentralization is necessary for genuine innovation, with a future vision of a decentralized, funded light research lab and a retreat model to study circadian biology, mitochondrial function, and nature-based health in diverse environments (North America and equatorial regions). - She sees Bitcoin as a tool that enables financial sovereignty and autonomy, providing an opportunity to fund decentralized science and publish findings on blockchain to protect against censorship. She highlights the potential for Bitcoin to support a lab through deflationary funding and to empower researchers and patients alike. - Closing: - The conversation closes with practical resources: Thinkific-hosted classes, an online book club, and a QuantumU course that reframes science education around decentralized, nature-based principles. Cohen emphasizes accessible contact options (Instagram and email) and a holiday discount for courses and ebooks. The participants express enthusiasm for ongoing collaboration, travel and events, and continued education in Bitcoin, science, and holistic health. Overall, the episode centers on mitochondria as a foundational health driver, the essential role of light and circadian biology in energy, mood, metabolism, and aging, and a call for decentralized, nature-aligned science, with Bitcoin framed as a funding and governance tool to empower individuals and researchers to pursue health innovation beyond centralized institutions.

We make energy from sunlight. People who are in the sun eat less food. Let your kids be outside in the sun. Take their shirts off. Let them run around barefoot on the grass. You know what you get from the ground? You get electrons. The same thing. It’s straight free energy. What runs through a mitochondria that makes all the ATP? The electron transfer chain. It’s not a fat acid train. It’s not a carbohydrate train protein. The sun is a nutrient. It is not out to kill you. The idea that the sun is giving you cancer is the most asinine, insane gaslighting, ridiculous statement on earth. It makes all life exist. It charges everything. We are alive because of the power of the sun yet you want to tell people to slather on carcinogenic chemicals, bake it into their skin with the suns and say, oh, that’s what’s aging you. I’m 51 years old. I’ve never used sunscreen. I don’t have anything done to my face. I eat a ton of meat. I drive a convertible. I want as much as I possibly can get. You know, because it makes me younger. They’re lying to you. They’ve lied about almost everything. Do the opposite of what the government says.

People get energy from sunlight, and those in the sun eat less food. Children should be outside in the sun without shirts, running barefoot on the grass to get electrons, which is free energy. The electron transfer chain in mitochondria is powered by the sun. The idea that the sun causes cancer is false. The sun is a nutrient that makes all life exist and charges everything. Sunscreen contains carcinogenic chemicals. The speaker, age 51, has never used sunscreen, has had no work done, eats meat, and drives a convertible to maximize sun exposure because it makes them younger. The government is lying. Do the opposite of what the government says.

The speaker discusses the benefits of sunlight, including its positive effects on heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, blood sugar, lactic acid levels, energy, strength, endurance, stress tolerance, and the blood's ability to absorb and carry oxygen. They question the use of petroleum-based SPF products that block these benefits and emphasize the importance of sunlight for our overall health. The speaker also mentions the influence of marketing in promoting these products. They recommend a book called "Health and Light" for further information on the healing properties of light.

Speaker 0 discusses how the gut microbiome interacts with light and biophysics to shape health and disease. He notes that when we eat, 40–60% of blood volume flows through the mesenteric gut plexus, and that arteries there have melanopsin receptors. He emphasizes that prokaryotes (bacteria) dominate the microbiome and release 5,000 times more light than eukaryotic cells. A physicist, Fritz Pöt, reportedly showed that every cell on the planet emits a spectrum of extreme low frequency UV light, a signal whose exact spectrum remains unknown, but which has been observed across tested cells. He proposes the microbiome functions as a “light meteor” and, analogously, the microbiome acts as a projector in a theater with the enterocyte surface as the screen; the information embedded in the emitted light is what reveals how the microbiome operates. He asserts that the light emitted by different bacterial species is critical to the quantum biology of the human gut and that this is a key reason gut biology is not fully understood. He praises Jeff Leach’s Science paper on the Hadza: when Hadza people were given western stimuli (antibiotics, candy, Coca-Cola), their microbiome did not change; by contrast, when placed in nature under sunlight, their microbiome did not change with diet. This supports the idea that light and environment, not diet alone, sculpt the microbiome. He predicts that migration changes the microbiome due to changes in latitude and diurnal light variation, noting that the equator has no diurnal light variation, while moving away from the equator lengthens or shortens days and alters diurnal cycles. He envisions a framework where gut microbiome is sculpted by light, water, and magnetism, and he has expanded this in a CPC blog (blog CPC number 42) released on Patreon, with plans to speak in Europe about the gut-brain-light connection. The speaker calls for microbiome researchers to analyze the spectrum of light emitted by the microbiome—preferably by putting microbiome samples into a photomultiplier to measure their emitted spectrum—to better understand species variation tied to environmental light. He explains that UV light is toxic to most prokaryotes, while blue, green, and red light are favored by most bacteria; mitochondria, which originated from bacteria about 650 million years ago, tolerate UV light better due to cytochrome components. Cytochrome one channels excited electrons from light captured via photosynthesis (via the photoelectric effect) and uses that energy within the cell. NAD+/NADH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) and a flavin-containing second cytochrome link light sensing to cellular energy, with NAD derived from tryptophan, an aromatic amino acid absorbing 240–400 nm light, tying light exposure to metabolic signaling. He stresses that signals come not only from the eyes but from skin and gut, with the “light show” between projector and enterocyte driving the action; thus, current microbiome knowledge is only in the first inning. He believes the gut–brain relationship is deeply tied to biophysical changes in blood and barriers (portal and mesenteric systems, hydrogen-bond networks of CSF, blood–brain barrier, cervical spinal cord barrier), explaining why many diseases with gut associations remain puzzling. He concludes with a personal stance: the gut and microbiome are among the most counterintuitive quantum-biologic tissues, and much remains to be understood, especially compared to the brain and eye.

Speaker 0 argues that our ancestors did not spend all day inside looking at a cell phone; our eyes were designed to interact with the sun’s light. The speaker claims that in 1980 the introduction of “sunphobia” with sunscreen and sunglasses, which look cool but block light, marked a shift, and that regular exposure to natural sunlight is therapeutic for the eyes. They state that UV light and infrared into the eye are beneficial, with infrared being healing and helping to build up melatonin in the eyes, which is described as one of the most powerful antioxidants in cells. The speaker asserts that the sun phobia is a huge mistake and that UV radiation to the eyes is not nearly a problem when protected. They recommend getting more light into work or study spaces and eating foods high in lutein and zeaxanthin, two carotenoids found in egg yolks, to support eye health.

Researchers recruited 22 individuals and randomized them into two groups: control and experimental. Both groups had a baseline color contrast test, which assesses visual function. Participants worked in a building with abundant artificially lit LEDs and fluorescent lighting, a spectrum with a big spike in blue light and very low red light and zero infrared light. After two weeks of working under these conditions—described as conditions the participants had experienced for the last two years—there were zero improvements in color contrast in the control group. In the experimental group, researchers added two desk lamps, each equipped with a 60-watt incandescent bulb. The incandescent bulbs provided a spectrum that added abundant infrared light, introducing longer wavelengths similar to sunlight. After two weeks of this infrared light supplementation, color contrast tests were retaken. The experimental group showed a 28% improvement in protan thresholds and a 24% improvement in tritan thresholds. After the incandescent lights were removed, improvements persisted four weeks later and six weeks later, with no other changes to the lighting. The mechanism behind these results centers on retinal energy metabolism. The retina is rich in mitochondria, requiring substantial energy. The electron transport chain in mitochondria handles energy transformation. Two scenarios are described: shining red and infrared light on mitochondria versus blue light. - Blue light: Absorbed by porphyrins in the mitochondria, leading to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Excess ROS reduce ATP production, diminishing energy available to retinal cells and impairing function. - Red and infrared light: Absorbed by cytochrome c oxidase and by nano water around ATP synthase. Absorption releases nitric oxide, allowing oxygen to enter and form water. The longer wavelengths are also absorbed by nano water around ATP synthase, reducing viscosity and enabling the rotor to run faster, generating more ATP and providing more energy for retinal cells to function properly. The speaker attributes the observed improvements to these mitochondrial light–energy interactions, particularly the enhanced ATP production from red and infrared light. A practical takeaway is proposed: add incandescent lighting to the environment.

German doctor Alexander Wunsch, a photobiology expert, explains the hidden dangers of modern lighting. With the shift to energy efficient LEDs, we’ve lost out on the health benefits that infrared radiation in traditional incandescent bulbs and candlelight used to provide. Infrared and near infrared light can penetrate as much as an inch into tissue, even through clothing. Unlike natural sunlight, LEDs lack the near infrared light that’s essential for cellular repair, especially in the eyes and mitochondria where energy is produced. Infrared light can actually produce energy in your cells. Overexposure to the blue wavelength of light emitted by LEDs can lead to serious health issues like macular degeneration, which is the number one cause of blindness as we age. It also blocks melatonin release. In addition, these LEDs flicker rapidly, which isn’t visible to us, but it can disrupt cellular function and impact our mental and hormone health. So Wunsch suggests sticking with warm, clear incandescent bulbs, the old fashioned kind, if possible, especially in the evening, and getting natural sunlight exposure during the day. Now it’s not practical to avoid LEDs altogether. He acknowledges that reality. But when you need LED lighting, don’t just buy the cheapest ones. Buy bulbs with a low flicker rate, a high CRI, and R9 values above 90 if you can, because those are closest to natural light. The Centric series by Waveform Lighting and the Sora Vivid a 19 at polarray.com are good choices.

Speaker critiques LED red-light therapy, calling LEDs unhealthy and arguing they emit radio frequencies like street lights; asserts there are no health studies showing LEDs are healthy. Claims Monsanto and IBM created the LED to push robotic, transhuman, or AI futures and that red light therapy is nonsensical unless used outdoors. Advises using incandescent or halogen instead of standing in front of a pane of LEDs. Links LEDs to blindness, cataracts, brain fog, and nausea; notes how shoppers report feeling sicker under store lighting. Argues there is no heat from LEDs and questions the logic of red-light therapy. Promotes sun exposure as the true biohack: sit in the sun for two hours, go out in nature. Says the sun is free and constant, and that most illnesses can be reversed by simply sitting in the sun.

Dosing considerations: "spectrum can I get? Then, how long should I do it? And then, how often?" "directly turn up the energy inside of your cells" "So your cellular respiration is going to speed up." "you can throw off a lot more oxidants, lot more free radicals. Pro oxidation." "they directly decrease the free radical buildup and the oxidative formation." "So you're getting the benefit of energy without the benefit of oxidation because the red light has taken care of that." "through those and some other means, are going to help the cell not only to kick start and to work faster, but you're going to help the cell to build up more healing capacity." "If you have a sick cell that is running slowly and the mitochondria in the cell are running slowly, it cannot heal like it ought to."

Mark Baker, founder and president of the Soft Lights Foundation, and Clayton (Speaker 0) discuss the health and societal concerns around LED lighting. Baker argues that LED lights are devastating to health due to their blue-rich spectra, prevalence in night environments, and the resulting impact on sleep, mood, circadian biology, and overall well-being. He describes personal experiences that motivated his activism, including a mental breakdown linked to LED exposure and a subsequent shift to full-time advocacy. Baker explains that LEDs are now ubiquitous: LED headlights in cars, blue-rich LED streetlights, general-service LED lamps in homes, and intense LED indicators on appliances. He notes that emergency vehicles with flashing LEDs are also problematic for some people. He acknowledges that the issue feels overwhelming to many, including bureaucrats, which adds to the difficulty of solving it. The conversation delves into Baker’s backstory. In the mid-2010s, as high-powered LED lights proliferated, he noticed blue-rich headlights and 5,000 Kelvin streetlights that disrupted his psychological wellbeing. Living in California, he experienced intense lighting at night from apartment windows and, after attempting to contest changes with city officials, suffered a severe mental breakdown when his school district refused to turn off the LEDs. This led to hospitalization and redirected his career toward advocacy, studying physics, government regulation, and organizing with others suffering similarly. Baker emphasizes that many people experience LED-induced sensitivities: migraines, epileptic seizures, sleep disruption, and even suicidal thoughts for some. He notes that individuals with astigmatism report driving difficulties due to LED headlights. He characterizes the public as having diverse responses: some people are highly sensitive to LEDs, others notice little to no effect. He frames the community as “canaries in a coal mine” for broader environmental and health impacts. The discussion covers the science of light. The body has photoreceptors beyond the eyes, including in skin and tissues, with blue wavelengths around 450 nanometers linked to circadian regulation. He asserts that artificial light at night interferes with melatonin suppression and cellular repair processes, thereby increasing health risks. He argues that the spectral distribution of many LEDs, with a prominent spike in blue light and no infrared, contrasts with incandescent light, which has a warmer, red-yellow spectrum and includes infrared. He maintains that LEDs are further from natural light than incandescent sources and that this spectral shift affects mood, sleep, and health. On policy and regulation, Baker critiques the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which directed the Department of Energy to pursue solid-state lighting and set a minimum luminous efficacy of 45 lumens per watt. He contends that the DOE did not coordinate with the FDA to ensure safety standards, so LEDs entered markets without assessing flicker, color temperature, or overall quality. He suggests this failure contributed to a mismatch between efficiency goals and health outcomes. He calls for reintroducing safe, healthy lighting and undoing “the effective ban on incandescence,” arguing that incandescents were healthier and that the current LED emphasis ignores health impacts. Baker discusses practical implications for sleep and daily life. He recommends reducing exposure to night-time LED lighting, using warmer color temperatures (around 2,700 Kelvin or lower), and installing measures to limit blue light in bedrooms. He notes that even skin exposure to light and non-visual photoreceptors can affect sleep. He mentions that some LEDs are being redesigned to imitate incandescent light, including “natural light” LEDs with broader spectral distributions and devices that incorporate infrared light to soften nighttime exposure. He also highlights the challenge of modern fixtures that integrate LEDs into fixtures rather than as replaceable bulbs, complicating the shift away from blue-rich lighting. The Soft Lights Foundation provides resources at softlights.org, including a campaign to ban blinding car headlights and an LED incident report for the FDA. Baker mentions a Change.org petition with tens of thousands of signatures, a database of incident reports to push regulatory action, and a resources section with scientific articles. He encourages joining the Ban Blinding LEDs Facebook group and engaging with regulatory and legal efforts (e.g., lawsuits) to address LED-related health concerns. In closing, Baker argues the system resists change, driven by arrogance, incompetence, negligence, and financial incentives, but denies a conspiratorial killing intent. He invites listeners to learn more, sign petitions, and consider environmental and health impacts when choosing lighting options.

"Blue works by helping convert the red blood cells into a form that will properly carry and release oxygen." "It's believed to do this by increasing mitochondrial efficiency, powerhouse of our cells, and promoting the production of ATP." "Methylene Blue also shows promise as a powerful antioxidant, scavenging harmful free radicals and reducing oxidative stress, which is a key factor in aging and many, many diseases." "And lastly, perhaps its most groundbreaking property lies in its potential ability to significantly impact our mitochondrial health." "So Methylene Blue optimizes mitochondrial function, which not only boosts energy levels, but may also extend lifespan by ensuring our cells longevity." "Recent studies suggest its role in neuroprotection, showing its ability to preserve neurological function and protect against neurodegenerative diseases." "Its antimicrobial properties are also gaining attention, offering a potential avenue for treating antibiotic resistant infections such as Lyme disease."

Speaker 0 says: We make energy from sunlight. People who are in the sun eat less food. Let your kids be outside in the sun. Take their shirts off. Let them run around barefoot on the grass. You know what you get from the ground? You get electrons. The same thing. It's straight free energy. What runs through a mitochondria that makes all the ATP the electron transfer chain it's not a fat acid train it's not a carbohydrate train protein if the sun is a nutrient it is not out to kill you The idea that the sun is giving you cancer is the most asinine, insane gaslighting, ridiculous statement on earth. It makes all life exist. It charges everything. We are alive because of the power of the sun yet you want to tell people to slather on carcinogenic chemicals, bake it into their skin with the suns and say, oh, that's what's aging you. I'm 51 years old. I've never used sunscreen. I don't have anything done to my face. I eat a ton of meat and I drive a convertible. I want as much as I possibly can get. You know, because it makes me younger. They're lying to you. They've lied about almost everything. Do the opposite of what the government says.