reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Can you name some NGOs that have received significant funding but haven't used it to protect children? Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services were mentioned. I spoke with someone from DHS who handles electronic fund transfers. He revealed that he oversees Jewish Family Services and recently issued a check for $600 million. When I asked if that was for three years, he clarified that it was actually for just two to three months and is renewable.

The Inter American Foundation (IAF) receives $50 million annually from Congress for grants, such as alpaca farming in Peru and improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala through jam. While nonprofits typically allocate 80-90% of funds to grantees, IAF allocates 58%, with the remainder covering management and travel. According to the GAO, only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient. The money goes through layers of stealing via contractors and subcontractors. Sometimes, the money never reaches the destination. One speaker suggests that it's possible no one got a sex change in Guatemala. Another speaker overheard a contractor being told to falsify billable hours.

Houstonians, Baker Ripley, an NGO, has offshore investments in the Grand Cayman Islands, raising questions about their tax-exempt status. In November 2003, their early childhood program was inspected, resulting in a $1.3 million civil monetary penalty. The county has provided them with $100 million for rental assistance and other programs, but they charge high administrative fees, around 25%. Recently, they received $50 million for an early childhood program, which included $12.5 million in administrative fees. Additionally, the former CEO, Angela Blanchard, who reportedly works zero hours, is paid $160,000. For more details, check my Substack linked below.

Kids Wish Network raised $127 million, paid solicitors $109 million, and spent 2.5% on direct cash aid to kids. The Cancer Fund of America spent less than 1% on the actual cause.

I looked into Norm Eisen's NGO, State United Democracies Center, which is full of prominent figures. This organization receives $17 million in private donations. After researching, the only thing I could find that they did with the money was produce a low-quality Muppet show. All the videos they created with these knockoff puppets have less than 200 views. It makes you wonder, with all those famous names involved, is that the best thing they could do with $17 million? The result is awful; Jim Henson would be rolling in his grave. They didn't even promote the videos with ads. So, where did the $17 million go?

The transcript centers on alleged mismanagement of funds from a Fire Aid benefit concert claimed to raise over $100,000,000 for Los Angeles fire victims. The speakers assert that residents are asking where the money went and imply a lack of transparency or accountability. Key points include: - The Fire Aid initiative reportedly raised about $100,000,000 for residents, community needs, and funds intended to help with the aftermath, yet there is no clear accounting of where the money ended up. - The Fire Aid website states that all direct donations will be distributed under the advisement of the Annenberg Foundation. The IRS Form 990 lists the Annenberg Foundation as a 501(c)(3) based in Kunshakin, Pennsylvania, in a certain office building. - A red flag is raised that only 33% of the Annenberg Foundation’s annual expenses go toward actual charity programs; the remainder goes to administrative costs, including executive compensation. - The transcript highlights Cynthia Kennard (referred to as Cinny) as top leadership, earning roughly three-quarters of a million dollars plus six-figure bonuses, described as nearly seven figures for one person. - There is a reference to a photo or moment showing Cynthia Kennard with Gavin Newsom discussing issues like homelessness, described as an “if you know, you know” moment. - A comparison is drawn with Doctors Without Borders, noting that it spends almost 90% of its money on actual programs and less than 1% on administrative costs. - Local journalists’ inquiries revealed that the Fire Aid site lists only three Palisades organizations among nearly 120 grant recipients: Kahelet Israel, Chabad of Pacific Palisades, and Palisades Charter High School; none appear to be specific to Pacific Palisades. - Attempts to contact the Annenberg Foundation were described as fruitless or thwarted, with extensions that didn’t lead to returns, referrals to a mysterious man named Philip (no last name), and no subsequently found contact. - The speakers conclude that the $100,000,000 was allegedly largely consumed by administration, with about 70% directed toward the organization itself and the rest disbursed to various other nonprofits, each carrying their own administrative costs, leading to the impression that much of the money disappeared. Overall, the dialogue portrays the Fire Aid fundraising as potentially lacking transparency and accountability, with accusations that the majority of funds may have been diverted to administrative costs rather than direct charitable use, and that grant dispersals to other nonprofits were not clearly explained or traceable.

The GAO estimates that only 10 to 15 cents of every dollar reaches the intended recipient. There are multiple layers of theft, like contractors and subcontractors, peeling away at the money. Sometimes, after peeling away the layers, there is nothing left.

Kids Wish Network raised $127 million but spent only 2.5% on direct cash aid to kids, paying solicitors $109 million. The Cancer Fund of America spent less than 1% on the actual cause.

Kids Wish Network raised $127 million, paid solicitors $109 million, and spent 2.5% on direct cash aid to kids. The Cancer Fund of America spent less than 1% on the actual cause.

Can you name some NGOs that have misused funds meant to protect children? Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services were mentioned. I spoke with a DHS employee who handles electronic fund transfers. He revealed that he oversees Jewish Family Services and has issued a check for $600 million. When I asked if that amount was for three years, he clarified that it was actually for just two or three months, and it’s renewable.

The transcript asserts that the government can provide funding to a so called nonprofit with very few controls, and that there is no auditing subsequently of that nonprofit. It emphasizes that with the 1,900,000,000.0 to Stacey Abrams, those involved “give themselves extremely lavish, like, salaries, expense everything” and that the nonprofit is used to “buy jets and homes and all sorts of things” and to “live like kings and queens” within the tax paradigm. The speaker reiterates that this pattern is not isolated to a single instance but is happening at scale. It is described as not being limited to one or two cases but as something being seen “everywhere.” Key points highlighted include: - Government funding to nonprofits occurs with very few controls. - There is an absence of auditing of the recipient nonprofit after the funding is provided. - A substantial amount, specifically 1,900,000,000.0, is directed to a high-profile figure identified as Stacey Abrams. - The recipients are portrayed as granting themselves lavish salaries, paying for expenses, and purchasing luxury assets such as jets and homes. - The overall implication is that funds are used to “buy jets and homes and all sorts of things,” leading to a lifestyle described as living “like kings and queens” within the tax framework. - The speaker stresses that this phenomenon is not isolated but is happening at scale, with examples seen “everywhere.” The speaker’s framing centers on alleged governance and accountability failures in nonprofit funding, pointing to large sums of money directed to an individual and the perceived use of nonprofit resources for personal luxury. The emphasis is on the scale of the practice and the lack of oversight, suggesting systemic repetition rather than isolated incidents.

Can you name some NGOs that have received significant funding but haven't used it to protect children? Examples include Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services. I spoke with someone from DHS who handles electronic fund transfers. He mentioned that he oversees Jewish Family Services and has issued checks totaling $600 million. When I asked if that amount was for three years, he clarified that it was actually for just two to three months and is renewable.

I see NGOs as a hack, and George Soros was a master at it. He understood how to use a relatively small amount of money to establish a nonprofit, and then lobby politicians to funnel large sums of money into it. For example, a $10 million donation could be leveraged into a billion-dollar NGO. These NGOs, or nongovernmental organizations, often have appealing names, but they can essentially be graft machines. They receive grants with minimal requirements, and the government often assumes they're doing good work, even when they might not be. Many within the government are aware of this dynamic, but the funding continues.

The Inter American Foundation (IAF) receives $50 million annually to give grants for projects like alpaca farming in Peru and improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala through jam. Unlike private sector nonprofits that give 80-90% of funds to grantees, IAF gives 58%, with the rest going to management and travel. Most of the money never leaves DC, ending up in the pockets of locals. The GAO estimates that only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient. There are layers of stealing through contractors and subcontractors, sometimes resulting in nothing reaching the final destination. It's possible that no one got a sex change in Guatemala. A contractor was overheard telling a colleague to falsify billable hours.

A $100,000 donation intended to buy food for poor kids in Africa doesn't fully reach them because the NGO subcontracts the work, creating multiple middlemen. Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, estimates that 88¢ of every dollar goes to middlemen. Only 12¢ of each dollar spent on humanitarian assistance reaches the people who need it. There is a lot of waste.

The shocking part of investigating government-funded NGOs is that small decisions lead to massive, multi-billion dollar outcomes. I saw one instance of $1.9 billion being sent to an NGO that was formed a year prior and had no prior activity. Government-funded NGOs are essentially a loophole, allowing actions that would be illegal for the government directly but become permissible through nonprofits. These nonprofits are then used for personal enrichment, with individuals cashing out and paying themselves exorbitant sums. It's a giant scam where people can establish an NGO for a relatively small investment and then lobby politicians to funnel vast sums of money into it. There might be some good that comes from them, maybe 5 or 10%, but the rest is not.

Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services are NGOs that have allegedly taken hundreds of millions of dollars without using it to protect children. A DHS employee who sends electronic fund transfers claimed he oversees Jewish Family Services and cuts checks for $600,000,000. This amount is reportedly for two to three months and is renewable.

The Inter American Foundation (IAF) receives $50 million annually from Congress for grants, funding projects like alpaca farming in Peru and improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. While private sector nonprofits typically allocate 80-90% of funds to grantees, IAF gives 58%, with the remainder covering management and travel. According to the GAO, only 10 to 15 cents of each dollar actually reaches the intended recipient. Much of the money remains in DC, allegedly benefiting individuals in the area rather than reaching Peru.

I looked into Norm Eisen's NGO, State United Democracies Center, which includes prominent figures like Janet Napolitano and Michael Steele. The organization received $17 million in private donations. After researching, the only thing I could find that they did with the money was produce a low-quality Muppet show. The videos had very few views. I question what happened to the $17 million, considering the poor quality and lack of promotion of the Muppet show.

The speaker describes a months-long forensics and fraud examination of Turning Point USA’s (TPUSA) financials and operations, beginning after Charlie Kirk requested a “doge-like assessment” into TPUSA’s finances and right before Kirk was assassinated. The speaker says the IRS later indicated it would begin examining nonprofits for hiding fraud, abuse, or extremism and for determining transparency in control of money—prompting the speaker to offer the investigation to the IRS. The speaker explains fraud types in an organization context, stating that wire fraud involves electronic lying to obtain money (e.g., email or bank transfers) and mail fraud involves similar conduct via the US Mail or FedEx/UPS, adding that each instance of a detected fraudulent letter or email would constitute an additional count. The speaker claims TPUSA could face “a lot of counts” if found guilty. A “Substack” post is referenced as containing a source document for how numbers were derived. The speaker describes two main ways charities commit fraud: (1) spending money differently from what donors are told, and (2) “self-dealing” where charity funds are used for the benefit of insiders or related LLCs/entities, including through vendor payments. The speaker lists “big red flags,” focusing on a claimed “63 cents” outcome: an analysis based on TPUSA’s IRS Form 990s alleging that for every $100 donated, 63 cents goes back to students. The speaker asserts that fundraising events and their costs mean the “63 cents” is not “of $1.” The speaker further describes an alleged transfer of $57 million to TPUSA’s own endowment, stating that TPUSA lists charitable contributions and program expenses in a way that makes spending appear normal while it is not, according to the speaker’s analysis. Additional red flags include a $999,000 payment to “Clock Tower” (Clock Tower LLC), described as slightly below a threshold the speaker says triggers reporting scrutiny. The speaker says the entity formed in 2019 before receiving the payment, had no listed officers, no identifiable ownership, no employees, no website, and was dissolved a year and a half after receiving the funds; the speaker claims the payment was for a research project “nobody saw.” The speaker also alleges over $20 million in vendor payments to LLCs or entities tied to Turning Point, citing a pattern involving Stacey Sheridan forming LLCs, receiving funds, dissolving them, and repeating. The speaker claims many vendors had worked for Turning Point or had ties to it, and that in a 2024 990 TPUSA had 62 vendors making over $100,000 that were not reported because only the top five are reported, describing this as a red flag that could be obtained through subpoena or discovery. Finally, the speaker alleges TPUSA was not independently audited in 2024, pointing to Form 990 Schedule 12A and stating the answer is “no.” The speaker claims that for many years co-founder Bill Montgomery’s personal financial advisors served as auditors and were paid for bringing in business, and says this undermines claims of independent auditing. The speaker says they will work with Treasury and is planning additional analysis after receiving 2025 and 2026 990s.

Bill Gates donated $5 billion to his own foundation and received a tax write-off for it. This raises questions about the corruption within the government.

The Doge report reveals that US healthcare corporations spent 95% of their income on shareholder payouts, totaling $2,600,000,000,000 over the last 20 years. US taxpayers reportedly pay about 70% of these fees. Additionally, $2,700,000,000,000 in taxpayer money has been improperly paid out in Medicare and Medicaid to people outside of the United States.

The United States has over 1.5 million nonprofit organizations that gross $2.6 trillion a year. This is more than the GDP of most countries. Despite this, the U.S. has a large percentage of homelessness, mass incarceration, and food insecurity. This raises the question of how this is possible.