reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses a four-year fight to uncover who paid for trucks allegedly used to transport ballots, suspecting the DNC or a front company. They claim the postal service digitally photographs all first-class mail, but there are no digital photos for 10-12 million ballots, suggesting they weren't legitimately processed. The speaker alleges the postal service changed its document retention policy from a six-year look back to 30-90 days in March/April 2020, destroyed election-related documents, and then reverted to the six-year policy. They claim this violated the Administrative Procedures Act, which requires public notice and comment periods for such changes, unless a federal judge signs off. The speaker states that Judge Emmett Sullivan, who oversaw the Mike Flynn case, signed off on the postal service's document destruction. Another speaker adds that Judge Sullivan oversaw the postal service's handling of mail-in ballots nationally in the summer of 2020 and ordered them to deliver ballots by specific dates.

We just wrapped up a four-hour legal battle suing David Lemenyi, Trudeau's former Justice Minister, for illegally deleting his Twitter account after he was found to have invoked the Emergencies Act unconstitutionally. The government is trying to argue that it's a private account and they have no control over it, but we believe it's a public record. The Chief Justice presided over the hearing, which was surprising, and it lasted four hours, covering various acts and charter submissions. We argued that Lametti broke the law and the government is trying to let him off easy with just a "pinky swear" not to do it again. Despite contradictory arguments from their counsel, we feel our arguments were consistent. Even if we don't win the injunction, we've already moved from deleted records to promises of preservation. We're concerned about deleted direct messages that could reveal more about Lametti's conduct as a minister. This legal fight is costly, but we're committed to holding the government accountable.

The speaker questions why the post office shut down ballot imaging and stopped keeping the images for the required 6 years. They highlight that the post office only kept the images for 30 days and then resumed keeping them for 6 years once Biden became president in 2021.

One of the 8,376 Treasury Department employees launched an investigation into me on Christmas Eve, coinciding with my Twitter Files release. Months later, while I testified, they made an unannounced visit to my home, which they've since discontinued due to related issues. Ironically, they owed me money. A judge ruled that political appointees and special government employees can't access certain information, unlike those 8,376 employees. This raises concerns about trusting unelected bureaucrats over elected officials. USAID is implicated in censorship efforts, manipulating the perception of information, like the Hunter Biden laptop case. They're also training NGOs to demand censorship, secretly flagging information. This approach mirrors prebunking tactics used in the laptop story. Leaked intelligence is strategically manipulated through media outlets to control investigative news.

It's remarkable to speak with a lawyer who understands the separation of powers, especially given the current situation. A judge has blocked the Treasury Department from accessing certain records, even preventing the Secretary from accessing them. I've never seen anything like it. This reflects a two-tiered justice system. The actions of people at the Treasury and USAID regarding the release of records are concerning. For example, USAID's allocation of funds to Serbia and Guatemala for gender transition procedures is unacceptable. American tax dollars will no longer fund this, and those responsible will be identified and stopped.

Jesse Morgan, a truck driver and subcontractor for the US Postal Service, claims that nearly 200,000 completed mail-in ballots were smuggled from New York and then disappeared. He witnessed the ballots being loaded onto his trailer in boxes called Gaylords, with envelopes inside. Although he didn't see every single ballot, he estimates seeing around 5 or 6 in one pallet and up to 20 in others. When he arrived in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, he was directed to go to Lancaster instead, where he was not given the proper paperwork for delivery. Jesse has faced threats and believes the system is corrupt, urging others to come forward and stand up for their country.

With the drop boxes, the transcript says there were issues associated with what was going on in polling places. It also states that in the mid-1980s, a federal district court judge in New Jersey entered a consent decree preventing Republicans from being poll watchers. From the mid-1980s until 2020, Republicans were reportedly not allowed to serve as poll watchers on national elections. According to the transcript, the judge later died, and the Democrats/DNC had to renew the injunction every five to eight years. When the judge was replaced by an “Obama judge,” the DNC reportedly returned to the court to request that the consent decree remain in place, keeping Republicans from being poll watchers and from participating in the process. The Obama judge reportedly responded that the request was unconstitutional and refused to renew the consent decree and refused to renew the injunction. The transcript then claims that 2020 was one of the first years with professional Republican poll watchers in these elections. It lists locations including Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia, saying this was the first time Republicans could really see what was happening in polling places. The transcript concludes that this ability to observe likely indicates many “shenanigans” may have been occurring for a long time, but that there had been no Republicans present to report on them.

I've been working to obtain all documents related to the Epstein case, and recently discovered that the Southern District of New York is withholding thousands of pages. We will obtain those documents, redact grand jury information and confidential witnesses, but the American people deserve to know the truth. We will release the full Epstein files, as well as JFK and Martin Luther King files. As a lawyer, I want to review everything before drawing conclusions, but those who withheld information will be held accountable. We will protect victims by redacting their personal information. Regarding Jack Smith's team, we are currently investigating whether they complied with the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act. We're going through everything now and are looking into whether they removed or destroyed any materials.

In 2020, a whistleblower, Jesse Morgan, reported irregularities with ballots. A Michigan company printed extra ballots beyond their contracts, shipping them to Flushing, NY, where they were filled out, then sent to Bethpage, NY, and reintegrated into the mail system. One of Morgan's trucks held a minimum of a million ballots. Eight other trucks were also involved, potentially totaling 12-13 million ballots. The postal service fought revealing who paid for the trucks. They altered their document retention policy in 2020, shortening the look-back period to 90 days, destroying election-related documents, then reverting to a 6-year policy. This change was approved by Judge Emmett Sullivan. A case was filed against the postal service for obstructing FOIA requests and potentially violating the Constitution by involvement in elections. An emergency injunction was sought in Maryland to prevent postal service involvement in the upcoming election or, at minimum, demand radical transparency regarding ballot movement. A hearing is scheduled. The goal is to expose potential fraud and ensure election integrity.

Trump's judge, Eileen Cannon, released unredacted court filings showing coordination between the White House, DOJ, and National Archives in indicting Trump. Documents reveal the GSA demanded Trump's team retrieve boxes of documents, possibly containing classified info, from DC. Biden's White House, DOJ, and National Archives may be conspiring to charge Trump for keeping classified material. Jack Smith tried to hide this info. Biden, accused of mishandling classified info, mocked Trump's legal issues. Biden's administration met with National Archives and DOJ to prosecute Trump shortly after he left office.

Jesse Morgan, a US Postal Service subcontractor, claims nearly 200,000 mail-in ballots disappeared after he transported them from New York to Pennsylvania. He saw ballots in boxes labeled as mail-in ballots but did not inspect each one individually. When he arrived in Pennsylvania, he was redirected to Lancaster and denied paperwork for delivery. Since speaking out, he has faced threats and intimidation. Morgan urges others to come forward and challenges law enforcement and politicians to address corruption in the system.

Why isn't FBI Director Chris Wray publicly defending his department's actions regarding the January 6th investigation? His resignation implies a lack of apolitical integrity within the FBI, suggesting that each presidential administration dictates priorities, rather than upholding a consistent, unbiased approach. This leaves the impression that wrongdoing occurred. The prioritization of the January 6th investigation over other crucial cases, like those involving child sex trafficking and serial killers, has negatively impacted agents' morale. However, some pushback exists; DC judges, including those appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents, have openly criticized the Department of Justice's actions, refusing to allow these cases to be dismissed. Their outspokenness provides a counterpoint to the perceived silence from other quarters.

Giving an update on the DOJ criminal investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Now, the American public is fed up with public monies that seem to go into a black hole, especially in DC, where no one is held accountable. One of the age old tools that all prosecutors have to investigate any crime, including cost overruns, is a grand jury subpoena. Today, however, in Washington, an activist judge has taken that tool away from us. By inserting himself and preventing the grand jury from even obtaining, let alone hearing evidence, he has neutered the grand jury's ability to investigate crime. As a result, Jerome Powell today is now bathed in immunity preventing my office from investigating the Federal Reserve. This is wrong and it is without legal authority. In June 2025, Jerome Powell testified before the Senate Banking Committee, making questionable statements that did not comport with publicly available documents. And that was regarding the atrocious cost overrun of more than $1,000,000,000 I didn't say million, I said billion, in renovations to his headquarters. This from the man who says that he is the steward of our public funds. In November, the United States Attorney's Office began an inquiry. Prosecutors from my office gathered information for months we served two grand jury subpoenas. On December 19, we sent an email to the Federal Reserve to have a conversation, a meeting, or even a phone meeting, or even a phone call to discuss our concerns. Again, we were ignored. We in fact asked to meet the first week in January. We were ignored. It was at that point that two grand jury subpoenas were issued to the Federal Reserve, not even to Jerome Powell. Again, no response, no compliance, but instead a Woe is Me video by Mr. Powell falsely claiming that he was being threatened with indictment. And claiming victim status, Powell proceeds to call his political friends in DC and around the world to gin up support for himself. All the while refusing to produce simple documents. Now enter local district court judge James own. I case. And the subpoenas, thereby prohibiting us from reviewing any records and precluding us from submitting records to the grand jury. That grand jury, of course, comprised of ordinary people. Ladies and gentlemen, no one is above the law.

Unelected judges are attempting to control government spending, violating the separation of powers. This is happening to people like Elon Musk, a great man, and it's outrageous. People work hard and pay taxes, only to see their money spent on things like $2,000,000 for sex changes in Guatemala. This will stop. We're fighting back against agencies like USAID. This is happening daily, but the DOJ is prepared to defend these cases. We are committed to carrying out President Trump's agenda.

In 2020, a ballot printing company allegedly printed extra ballots beyond their contracts, shipping them to Flushing, NY, where they were filled out, then sent to Bethpage, NY, to be reintegrated into the mail system. Truck driver Jesse Morgan reported transporting a truckload of these ballots to Lancaster, PA. This truck may have contained 1 to 1.5 million ballots, and there were 8 other trucks. The Postal Service changed its document retention policy from 6 years to 90 days before the election, allegedly destroying relevant documents, then changed it back. This change was approved by Judge Emmett Sullivan. For 4 years, there has been a fight to find out who paid for the trucks. The Postal Service has resisted providing this information, even with judicial orders. A case was filed against the Postal Service in Maryland, arguing they cannot be involved in elections due to their actions in 2020. An emergency injunction was sought, and a hearing is scheduled. The aim is to demand radical transparency from the Postal Service regarding ballot movement or to prevent their involvement in the election altogether.

Some changes were made before the election, and we have learned that this has been happening for about 2 years. This is a federal investigation that is uncovering more and more information. It is concerning because it seems to be a deliberate effort to not only perpetuate false claims, but also to replace certain individuals for various reasons.

Truck driver Jesse Morgan, a U.S. Postal Service subcontractor, claims under sworn affidavit that he transported approximately 200,000 completed mail-in ballots from New York, which then disappeared. According to Morgan, he picked up boxes of ballots and was told he wouldn't be taking mail and ballots back. He noticed some ballots were visible within the packaging. Morgan states he drove 24 boxes of ballots from Bethpage, New York, to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on the night of October 21st, two weeks before the election. Upon arrival, he was redirected to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and was refused proper paperwork for the delivery. Morgan alleges that many things have happened to him since coming out, and that he has been told to be quiet on some things for investigation. He believes the system is corrupt and challenges law enforcement and congressmen to stand up for the country.

Fannie Willis recently revealed she has records of her communications related to the January 6 operation against Trump, following a Judicial Watch lawsuit. Initially, she claimed no such records existed, but a court found her in default for not responding to the lawsuit. Instead of complying with the court's suggestion to release the records, she is attempting to use legal exemptions to withhold them. This situation suggests she was involved in collusion with the Pelosi operation, shows a disregard for the rule of law, and undermines the public's right to know. Legal actions will continue to challenge this.

Claims include that "we're not getting the cooperation that we need" from the Department of Justice, where "Pam Bondi sits as the head of it" but "the COO" is "Todd Blanche," whom the speaker says is "failing on all measures." "Because of him, we haven't had a pardon granted since May" and "Because of him, the he wants the j sixers to not be compensated for all that we put them through." He adds, "we're not, getting the things that we need for Dominion machines, etcetera, etcetera." He notes Blanche "used to be until 01/04/2024, he was a Democrat, a registered Democrat" and "then he represented Donald Trump on the Stormy Daniels case that any Democrat would have done the same job," and argues that "everything that needs to be going forward in order to make Donald Trump's presidency work is being stalled intentionally by this man." "It's not because of ineptitude." "This is a smart guy. This is a very capable guy." "It's because he's intentionally, doing things the opposite of what Donald Trump has ordered to be done."

I saw 24 Gaylords of ballots loaded into my trailer, with handwritten return addresses. I was delayed in Harrisburg, then told to drive to Lancaster without unloading. The transportation supervisor refused to provide a ticket or late slip. The next day, my trailer was missing. I believe the events on October 21st were suspicious, as I transported ballots from New York to Pennsylvania without understanding why. I decided to speak out about it.

A New York judge, Engelmayer, issued an order barring all political appointees, including the Secretary of the Treasury, from accessing US Treasury data. This was done without citing any law, precedent, or reason, and the order was ex parte, meaning it couldn't be challenged initially. Only Democrat attorneys general could weigh in. Current Treasury employees retain access, leaving the Secretary with less power than subordinates. While initially a week-long order, Democrat attorneys general aim to make it permanent. I find this action seditious and treasonous—unacceptable interference by state judges and attorneys general in the executive branch's affairs. This is outrageous; those responsible should face jail time.

Anomalies occurred with Jesse's trailer. It wasn't unloaded in Harrisburg, even though it contained mail for that location. Jesse waited six hours without explanation. Jesse spoke to a postal supervisor, which is unusual, and was refused a ticket proving he was there. Jesse was told to go to Lancaster while carrying the Harrisburg mail. At the end of his shift, Jesse's trailer was gone from the dock in Lancaster. Digital logs indicate someone else operated his tractor. These anomalies likely occurred because individuals needed to conceal the trailer's contents, specifically completed ballots transported across state lines. The speaker believes the ballots were put on the wrong truck, and Jesse was the wrong person to transport them.

Speaker 1 says that throughout the Biden administration he sought records about decision-making and why the U.S. funded Wuhan, China research, including why evidence about the virus origin being from a lab accident was being suppressed, but “we got nothing.” He says the Biden administration “stiff-armed” him by preventing access to virtually any documents. He says many of the findings during the Biden administration came from Freedom of Information Act requests by people outside government and from court actions forcing disclosure. He says that after the new election, he received promises from Secretary Kennedy and others that documents would be revealed. He says it took about six months, with resistance he attributes not to Secretary Kennedy but to “minders” around him. He says that after finally receiving documents, they have been reviewed for about a month. Speaker 1 states that in communications between Anthony Fauci and others, including Francis Collins, Fauci is depicted telling others to read materials, then delete them, and that he allegedly instructed them to delete “this material” after reading. Speaker 1 says deleting emails and discussions about government business is illegal for someone in the executive branch. He adds that Fauci testified he did not do that, and says this creates “two crimes”: destroying federal records and a prior sworn statement that he wouldn’t do it. Speaker 1 identifies a “big question” involving what he calls an “auto pen pardon” and says it will have to be challenged. He says there are thousands of auto pen pardons and raises whether President Biden was aware. He says they interviewed the person running the auto pen, who said they never met the president, and that the person said they did not discuss it directly but heard about it from higher-ups who allegedly talked to the president. Speaker 1 says this provides “a lot to go on” and describes it as a chance for the issue to get into court and for the Department of Justice to fight it out. Speaker 1 says he has invited Anthony Fauci involuntarily; if accepted, they will bring him in, and if not accepted, they will subpoena him. Speaker 0 asks whether the alleged wrongdoing falls under the auto pen time frame, noting that in some earlier auto pen matters there were specific time frames. Speaker 1 responds that the “umbrella” was “a decade,” described as leading up to the end of Biden’s term, and says this raises questions about whether a pardon can cover crimes not alleged at the time, whether it can be “all inclusive,” and whether a pardon can be upheld if it doesn’t specify the crime. Speaker 1 contrasts this with how pardons are typically specific to an accused or trial-ready crime. Speaker 0 asks about specific consequences, including prison time, regarding destroying federal records. Speaker 1 says lying to Congress is the biggest issue, that it can be five years in prison as a felony, and that destroying records adds to the crime and is against the law. He then ties this to contemporaneous emails, asserting that while Fauci said publicly he had no idea the virus came from a lab and that it couldn’t have been gain-of-function, privately he was “very worried” about the lab because he knew it did gain-of-function research. Speaker 1 also says gain-of-function research was funded by the United States government with Anthony Fauci’s approval, and claims Fauci’s pandemic guidance about origins and about cloth masks was contradictory to privately discussed concerns, including that Speaker 1 says cloth masks do not prevent transmission.

I know people who worked in the Reagan administration. When they asked the bureaucracy questions, they were often blocked and deterred because they weren't technical. Elon Musk's team bypassed this by directly accessing the tech systems. No president has ever done this. They found crazy things like payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to a hundred billion dollars. Payments were also going to organizations like Internews Network, which promotes a left-leaning point of view, and to protesters worldwide. My team is being transparent about it. We went to the data, we found it. We've only been at this for twenty days, so give us a chance. We're already releasing a lot of information. People are trying to slow us down, but the biggest question is whether we can stop their grift.

Jesse Morgan, a truck driver and subcontractor for the US Postal Service, claims that nearly 200,000 completed mail-in ballots were smuggled from New York and then disappeared. He witnessed the ballots being loaded onto his trailer, with some envelopes falling out of the boxes. When he arrived in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, he was directed to go to Lancaster instead, but was not given the proper paperwork for the delivery. Jesse has faced threats and intimidation since coming forward, but encourages others to speak out against corruption in the system. He believes that the electoral process is corrupt and calls on law enforcement and politicians to take action.