reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker received a letter from the IRS stating that because they closed the bank account used for payments, they now have to send payments by mail. There is a $225 user fee to cover providing an installment agreement. The speaker now owes the IRS $1,700, plus a $38 late payment, and the $225 fee. The IRS said that if the speaker doesn't pay, they can put a tax lien on their home. The speaker is angry because they were initially told they were due a tax return, but now the IRS claims they owe $1,700. The speaker expresses strong disapproval of the IRS.

A customer wants to disconnect their service, but the representative is not complying. The representative mentions a $23 discount and T-Mobile. The customer repeats their request to disconnect, stating the representative is not listening. The representative claims to hear the customer. The customer says what they do with their service is not the representative's business. The representative says their department's nature is to retain customers. The customer says they don't want to be retained and are becoming frustrated. The representative tells the customer to take a deep breath and regulate their nervous system. The customer insists their nervous system is regulated and repeats the request to disconnect the service. The representative asks why the customer is frustrated if their nervous system is regulated.

I currently have no cash available as it's all tied up. I can't even call a taxi because I don't have a credit card or checking account. The little cash I saved is almost gone. I do have a business and can manage business expenses, but I have to be very careful to avoid mixing personal and business expenses. Unlike others, I would face serious consequences for any mistakes.

The speaker denies "tweaking" and accuses the listener of doing so. She states she intends to get her account back because her husband asked her to do so, and requests cooperation to get it done calmly and in a timely manner. The speaker emphasizes that it is her account, that she grew it, and that it has been stagnant. She says they need it for future businesses. She asks the listener to consider if someone was being difficult towards Shay about something Shay wanted to do. She insists the listener is not being reasonable and that she is not "tweaking out."

The speaker expresses their unhappiness despite recent achievements and thanks those who voted for them. They discuss their personal and business accounts being closed by their long-time banking group without a clear reason. They have been unable to find another bank willing to open accounts for them. The speaker speculates that they may be considered a politically exposed person (PEP) due to their involvement in politics, which increases compliance costs for banks. They also suggest that prejudice from institutions and false accusations of receiving money from the Russian government may be contributing factors. Without a bank account, they feel like a nonperson and question their ability to function in modern society. They hint at discussing their decision further on GB News at 7.

I frequently check my E Trade account to see if my positions are still there. I sometimes get worried, but they are always there. I know how to remove them using HTML, but I always put them back. I joke about deleting them, but I never actually do it.

Banks are increasingly restricting withdrawals and deposits. A friend attempted to withdraw $20 but was told he needed to explain its purpose. When he went to withdraw $20,000, the bank required proof of where the money was going. Additionally, attempts to invest in Bitcoin were limited to just $5 a month. This reflects a broader trend towards a cashless society, which could lead to increased control over personal finances. It's essential to diversify your funds across multiple banks, as relying on bank insurance can be risky. Political views can also affect banking access, as seen with Nigel Farage's experience of being debanked. Ultimately, it's crucial to take control of your finances and decentralize your money.

It's April 30, and I saw that yesterday the Department of Justice is suing New Jersey over the Law Enforcement Officer Protection Act, which restricts when law enforcement officers, including federal agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement, can have masks on. This stood out to me because this is exactly what Assemblywoman Dawn Fantasia said was going to happen. Remember this clip? “The love of God and all that is good. Can you differentiate between the fact that we don't make laws that control the federal government? My God, what are we doing here? I'm not a lawyer. I was an English teacher and I comprehend that. My fifth grade middle school English students would understand it. I am coming to you not from a point of ideology because I know in the minority party, we already lost that argument. You guys are way, way out in the ether with that. I'm not even hoping to win the ideology. I'm hoping to win the logical argument to say, why do we keep passing laws that are gonna end up in court, we lose, and the taxpayer gets shafted over and over and over? You cannot vote yes for a law that controls local, county, state. Oh, oops. And federal. No. Federal's gotta come off for this to count. The only reason why you're passing it is to affect federal agents. Hello? Lights on. No one's home. I'm not an attorney. I need a freaking honorary degree after going through this for four hours yesterday saying, what? Don't a roomful of lawyers understand? Ludicrous. Oh my goodness.” What does that mean for us as taxpayers? I did see in New Jersey Spotlight News they reported that New Jersey's attorney general's office had spent over $53,000,000 in one year on outside private lawyers alone, on top of their in-house staff costs. Now for my question that came next, maybe somebody else would have a better source for this, but I just asked Rock about how much something like this would cost as a lawsuit. The initial response in motion practice is somewhere between $50,000 and $150,000 because that's mostly in-house attorneys. The discovery and hearings is $100,000 to $300,000 if it gets contentious. It says the common range for litigation is another $250,000 to $800,000. And then appeals, if New Jersey loses appeals, could range anywhere from $150,000 to $400,000. So that brings us in a range from $300,000 to $1,200,000 over this case. No matter where we stand on the issue, we should know how much it's going to cost us.

I work for an affiliate company that exclusively sells Anheuser Busch products. Due to recent cancellations, sales have significantly dropped, which is disheartening because people are not buying this beer. This has resulted in financial difficulties for me and my family. It's sad that Anheuser Busch made a decision without understanding their customers. I want to express my gratitude to Anheuser Busch for potentially putting my family's well-being at risk.

The speaker expresses frustration with Wells Fargo for not allowing them to deposit money in a state without a mask mandate or lockdown. They refuse to put cash through the drive-thru and demand that the bank either let them deposit the money or retrieve it from the safe. The bank employee explains the mask policy and suggests using the drive-thru, but the speaker insists on getting their money or leaving. The speaker questions the legality of the bank's actions and requests a supervisor. Eventually, the bank employee offers to process the transaction but explains they don't have enough cash on hand. The speaker agrees to wait outside while the employee clarifies the situation. The speaker asks if they are under arrest and decides to leave.

The speaker refuses to put cash through the drive-thru and demands to deposit or withdraw money in person. They argue that the bank's mask policy is not required by law in Tennessee. The bank employee suggests using the drive-thru or wearing a mask, but the speaker insists on getting their money out of the safe. The situation escalates, and the speaker questions if they have broken any laws. Eventually, a bank manager intervenes and offers to process the speaker's transaction. The speaker leaves, stating they have work to do.

I filed my taxes for free, but was charged at the end. Then it was rejected because of a PIN issue I've never encountered. Why should I pay someone when I'm not getting a refund? You already take money from my paycheck weekly, so you know how much you've taken. Why is it my responsibility to figure out if I'm owed a refund or owe you money? You should know how much you took out. Explain to me how this is legal or makes sense. If you're already taking money from me, why would I owe you anything? You should be telling me what I owe or what is owed to me.

The speaker refuses to put cash through the drive-thru and demands to deposit or withdraw money in person. They argue that the state does not have a mask mandate and that the bank should respect their choice. The bank employee offers options, but the speaker insists on getting their money immediately. A police officer is called, and the speaker questions if they have broken any laws. The officer explains that businesses can set their own guidelines and asks the speaker to step outside. The speaker eventually agrees to wait outside and later decides to leave without further confrontation.

I work long hours until 4:45, waiting until age 57 to retire with a pension. Going back to the office on Mondays is tough. I have dental, but filling out forms is frustrating. I'm embarrassed about the price hikes on my rental in Ocean City. Cameras are required for today's meeting. I waste my life waiting for a verification code. It's hard to check my 401k and my fudge round supplier doesn't take Apple Pay anymore. My job could be done by one person. Living in the real world is harder than you think. I have healthcare, but it's scary. I only have a few weeks left to open and roll. The new boss just snaps his pen. They want us back on Tuesdays too. We're just like you.

Elon Musk tweeted that the CFPB is next. We've said these regulatory agencies need to be reduced. The unions inside the CFPB are acting against employee interests. They're blocking an eight-month paid leave option, a deferred resignation benefit. The unions claim to support employees but are actually trying to prevent them from accessing this benefit. Union bosses fear a smaller federal workforce will impact their income. It's clear what's happening: the unions are self-serving, not employee-focused.

A person asks if they can conduct business in the Tesla store. The response is no, it is closed. The person questions why the NYPD is allowed to disassemble in front of a business, closing it down, and claims that this is not the first amendment. They express that it is ridiculous that this is allowed.

JPMorgan Chase allegedly told the speaker they had 20 days to move their hundreds of millions of dollars in cash, despite a 35-40 year relationship with the bank and no loan defaults. Bank of America also showed no interest in opening accounts for the speaker, even after previously being very cordial. As a result, the speaker deposited funds in smaller banks, $5-12 million at a time. The speaker believes banks discriminated against them and other conservatives/Trump supporters. They claim the Biden administration directed banking regulators to target them, but despite this, the speaker became president.

I work long hours until 4:45, waiting until I'm 57 to retire with a pension. Going back to the office on Mondays is tough. I have dental coverage, but filling out forms is frustrating. I'm embarrassed about the price hikes on my rental in Ocean City. I waste my life away with verification codes and can't even check my 401k. My fudge round supplier doesn't take Apple Pay anymore. It's a shame. I wish I could wake up and not have to do my job. Health care is good, but I'm scared about the details. I have limited time to open and roll my pledge. They want us back on Tuesdays too. It's exhausting. We're just like you.

Tickets for Fazil Fears, regular or VIP. Can't take a large bill. Use my debit instead. Need ID or driver's license. Gotta make a copy every time you swipe. New policy. Don't want copies of my cards everywhere. Don't want it stolen? Not responsible. Can pay with cash. It's fine. This place feels weird. Strange policy. When did it start? 3228. What? Hold on. Tried to pay with a 100, they said... Let's get out of here.

We're withdrawing funds to pay the workers today. I've noticed banks are becoming more difficult. To withdraw $5,000, they're asking for a Social Security number and ID at Bank of America and Chase. It's strange because when we opened the account, they only asked for a passport, and we opened it with $200. Now, they're asking for many requirements, maybe policies are changing. I hope this doesn't affect loans. I used to get loans with just a number, though the interest was a bit high. I want to see if I can still submit documents to buy a house, and I'll keep you informed. It's concerning because when you enter the bank, they look at you with suspicion. We'll see how things continue according to the laws. Greetings to all, and let's keep moving forward.

Speaker 0: Once you've got everything under one roof and you've got all your ID together in one place, it means you can be switched off at the touch of a button. So they brought this system in in Thailand, and suddenly, like simultaneously, over 3,000,000 people had their bank accounts shut down. Thailand has become a case study for the use of biometric data in every facet of life. Every banking transaction is monitored and scrutinized. Any perceived discrepancies flagged as fraud and punished without due process. Regulations have overwhelmed the system resulting in a full fledged banking crisis. Over 3,000,000 Thai bank accounts were frozen instantaneously without warning as a result of government overreach. Transaction denied, you'd contact your bank to see why the payment failed only to learn that your account has been frozen, all of your accounts for that matter. The bank is investigating you for suspicious activity and potential money laundering or fraud. There was no warning, call, or letter, and there is no clarification as to what transaction was flagged. You're completely locked out of your accounts. You have lost the ability to purchase. You cannot fill your gas tank. You cannot purchase groceries. You've been completely removed from the financial system, and you do not know when or if you will regain access to your funds. This is the reality for millions of people banking in Thailand. That's crazy stuff, folks, and this freaked the entire country out. But the article goes on to say, thousands of accounts are frozen each week. Panic has ensued. Retailers are no longer accepting cards demanding payment in cash as they too are worried that they will be removed from the banking system. Confidence in the government and the entire banking system evaporated. People rationally fear that their account will be targeted next without warning. Government overreach has backfired, and the people are removing themselves from the banking system entirely. And that's a really good thing to see, folks. Yeah. So it backfired, and it caused the people in Thailand to see how much they need to keep cash alive and depend on cash. And it's saying it serves as a test case for what this digital ID is gonna do. Well, it also serves as a test case for why you shouldn't accept it. And so many of us have been warning about this for so long, folks, and it's imperative that people see this because this is what's been going on. All everyone's been arguing over whether Charlie Kirk died or whether he didn't, it doesn't matter. What matters is what they're gonna do with it.

The speaker wants an account returned because it wasn't utilized as well as it could have been. The speaker wants it back to continue their endeavors and allow the account to be utilized. The speaker suggests the account isn't helping the other person, especially if they are stressed. The speaker claims they were concise and respectful when requesting a phone call and were not "crashing out" or "tweaking out." The speaker states they were being business professional by scheduling a call, but couldn't provide sensitive information via text. The speaker acknowledges the other person is upset and feels the request is rude.

I visited the bank today and was told it wouldn't serve me, even though I've been a customer for seven years. I've previously raised complaints about my rent, and the manager had instructed the staff not to harass me. Despite this, I still faced issues today. Officer Jordan, can I speak? I need to address my time off.

These people hate you and see you as worker bees they live off of. They are stealing your money and intentionally impoverishing you. They are intentionally making your life hard, even though they are supposed to be making it better. They are pissed off that they can't financially handicap people like they used to.

I'm angry because the health department won't let me sell my homemade pickles and green beans. I believe in the American dream of growing and selling our own food without government interference. We are clean, have insurance, and offer chemical-free products. To whoever reported us, I say buy your chemically-treated food elsewhere. You don't deserve the freedoms we celebrate on the 4th of July. Government regulations are unnecessary.