reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We bought $2 million worth of data and remained open-minded about being wrong. We considered the possibility that the people involved were simply influenced by internet blogs. We looked for outliers in the dataset, something that would stand out. We determined that individuals who visited Dropbox in Georgia an average of 23 times and also interacted with NGOs met our criteria. NGOs refer to government organizations or nonprofits, like Stacey Abrams' group.

I wanted to bring you an update from Washington and introduce Data Republican, a digital detective exposing government corruption. She uses AI to analyze data, revealing connections between agencies, media, and NGOs. Her research uncovered that USAID funneled nearly half a billion dollars into Internews Network, a secretive NGO working with media outlets worldwide. Interestingly, a board member at Internews is also the VP of Communications at Reddit. During the Cold War, entities like Internews aimed to prevent the spread of communism, but now, the funds continue to grow with unclear objectives. USAID also funds domestic programs, including CEPPS, which distributes billions to Republican and Democratic groups, creating a complex web of money controlled by powerful politicians, which looks like the deep state manipulating elections. Eliminating the Department of Education and empowering parents and schools would be more effective, as the current system is overly bureaucratic and fails to meet diverse learning needs.

The speaker introduces Web, a tool built to allow natural-language conversations with an entire document set (specifically mentioning the Epstein files and expanding to other datasets, including items like the dancing Israeli files and Israeli art students files). Web enables users to ask normal questions, for example: “show me examples of his foundations, charities, and businesses interacting with Israelis or organizations based in Israel.” The tool analyzes the documents based on the user’s natural-language prompt and returns results with sources cited. Key features demonstrated: - When a query is run, Web pulls back all relevant documents, which can be clicked to turn red and opened as primary sources. Users can see the work the tool is doing, including entities such as Ehud Barak and the network of Ehud Barak, Wexner, and Epstein, as it compiles the research. - The response is written in natural language for easy understanding, with sources cited. The primary sources remain accessible on the left in their original organizational structure, allowing users to read documents in their original form. - The tool will not browse the internet or conduct external research to answer questions; it references only the files in the user’s document set and provides citations that can be checked. The speaker presents the current usage experience: - It’s possible to ask follow-up questions and expand the chat, using suggested questions or generating new ones. - The user interface shows both the generated explanation and its sources (with links to the documents). Operational and access details: - The speaker endorses Web as “the absolute shit” and encourages people to try it. After a period without a password gate, it’s offered in an open beta to anyone who wants to try. - The speaker has personally funded the tokens for the beta so users can access it for free during this phase; beta testers aren’t required to pay. - He notes that running AI tools costs money due to compute resources, and, after the open beta, Web will transition to a subscription model with access to additional datasets. - Plans include open-sourcing the project later, allowing people to download and run it themselves and examine the code (with a caveat: selling it would not be allowed). - The goal expressed is to enable broad accessibility so that “any old person can understand these documents” and to clearly show who Epstein worked for and what was in the files, with all content retained even if DOJ deletes files from the public domain, as “we’ve already got them all and they’re not being deleted from our database.”

Data Republican has exposed seven non-governmental organizations (NGOs) allegedly involved in corruption within DC. These NGOs, termed the "uni-party unmasked," are claimed to receive substantial financial support from USAID and the Department of State. According to Mike Benz, these NGOs are part of a mass money laundering operation involving tens of billions of tax dollars. Data Republican highlights these organizations in a thread on X. The speaker claims Trump is shutting USAID down to rectify this. Elon Musk calls this discovery the "bull's eye."

A judge who halted President Trump's spending freeze received over $100 million in government funding to his NGO, with money going to private jets and huge salaries. This is blatant corruption, as he failed to disclose this information, potentially facing decades in prison. House Republicans have announced impeachment articles against Democrat judges for obstructing Trump's duties and criminal conflicts. Judge McConnell received $128 million for his NGO, the Crossroads Rhode Island Foundation, allegedly for social programs, but almost none of the money went to that. The judge bought his position to protect these NGOs and funnel money. Senators Cotton and Graham are under fire for allegedly misusing funds from the Republican International Institute, an NGO that received hundreds of millions.

Around 7,000 NGOs collect about 90% of taxpayer finances, which is approximately $300 billion in government money. This is a huge percentage of our federal budget, yet there is no transparency into who receives these funds. Most people believe in a two-party political system, with Democrats and Republicans. However, politicians from both parties sit on the same NGO boards. They share boards and money, often associated with names promoting ideals like freedom and peace. It's essentially a uniparty and a shadow government operating through these NGOs and funneled money. To protect your health, consider The Wellness Company. They offer prescription medical kits designed to keep you and your family safe. Visit twc.health/blackout and use code blackout to save 10%.

The left uses NGOs to influence elections and reshape American culture, often funded by taxpayers. Each dot represents an NGO linked to the Chinese Progressive Association, which has funded various organizations like the Black Voters Matter Fund and the National Domestic Workers Alliance. These groups, in turn, support others such as the Fair Work Center and LGBTQ Alleyship. This network reveals how taxpayer money is funneled into leftist activities. The Chinese Progressive Association receives funding from major institutions like the San Francisco Foundation and Vanguard Charitable Endowment. Recent advancements in technology now allow for detailed tracking of financial flows between these NGOs, revealing connections and directors across multiple organizations. This information will be made available on the website.

For years, politicians and media have gaslit us, abusing our tax dollars for worldwide control. Data Republican exposed a $17 million "democracy" scam, where an NGO, States United Democracy Center, produced a Muppet show with minimal views. I discovered that government officials needed award IDs to cancel unneeded spending. My work revealed shocking awards and a mission to expose who's financing these initiatives. It's important to hold the government accountable for real results. The National Endowment for Democracy lacks transparency, spending millions without clear results. A massive fraud occurs because the government allows shared Social Security numbers, enabling identity theft and impacting real people. The biggest lie is the illusion of two separate political parties when politicians sit on the same NGO boards, forming a uniparty shadow government. We need to vote in primaries and stay involved to regain control of our country.

Larry Doyle, a Clinton Foundation whistleblower, asserts it's critical to stop government waste, fraud, and abuse by exposing it and holding people accountable. Doyle's case, Doyle Moynihan versus the IRS, has been ongoing in US Tax Court for over five years. He believes the situation involves trillions of taxpayer dollars in the "biggest scam ever," and the public has a right to know. Doyle is sharing information that isn't under seal, starting with their Clinton Foundation whistleblower whiteboard. This extensive flowchart maps connections between various organizations, governments, and NGOs. Created in late 2018/early 2019, it was presented to senior IRS criminal agents shortly after Doyle's congressional hearing testimony on 12/13/2018, and to a senior congressional official in January 2023. Doyle asks viewers to share the whiteboard with others.

Speaker 1 describes the scope of funding tracked by their organization. They state they have tracked over $60,000,000 according to the latest 990 disclosures, directed to approximately 14 groups—some national, others on the ground. Examples of groups involved include the ACLU (providing legal defense and facilitating trainings for some tactics described by Senator Corin) and Democracy Forward, Take Minnesota. Take Minnesota has reportedly received over $10,000,000 from these large NGO networks, including the Neville Roysingham network, Indivisible, National Lawyers Guild, CTUL, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Minnesota Care, Minnesota 3-5-0, Voices for Racial Justice, and others. The speaker emphasizes that the total spans at least 14 groups and more than $60,000,000 in disclosed funding. Speaker 0 asks where the money is coming from and how it flows to these groups. Speaker 1 explains that they have built a database with hundreds of thousands of rows of grants from networks such as the Soros network, Arabella Funding Network, the Neville Royce Singham Funding Network, and many others, including Tides, the Ford Foundation Network, and the Rockefeller Funding Network. These are described as massive NGOs with billions of dollars to spend on all kinds of coordinated protest or, in this case, riot activity.

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obfuscation because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, a first for any administration. They bypassed gatekeepers and uncovered shocking data. We're talking payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to $100 billion. Funds were also traced to entities like Internews Network, pushing a specific viewpoint globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about it; we accessed the data directly and exposed it. It's only been twenty days, and we're already releasing a lot. People are trying to slow us down, but the main question is can we stop their grift?

Data Republican released a tool indexing the National Endowment for Democracy Journal, aggregating authors, articles, and NGOs. The speaker claims this tool proves George Soros and the government collaborate. The National Endowment for Democracy is described as a government-financed NGO involved in intelligence operations, with congressional representatives. The speaker highlights authors in the journal affiliated with the Open Society Foundation, asserting that many Open Society Foundation people write for the journal. The speaker points to numerous mentions of Open Society Foundations in the journal's articles. The speaker concludes that this demonstrates the government's deep involvement with George Soros, portraying him as a deep insider within the intelligence community.

A Free Press report reveals that the "Trump resistance" is bankrolled by wealthy individuals. The organization "Families Over Billionaires," which opposes Republican tax cuts, doesn't accept public donations and is a trade name for Arabella Advisors, a dark money network. Arabella Advisors is funded by billionaires like Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, Pierre Omidar, and George Soros. These organizations are structured within the Arabella network, obscuring the donors' identities. Such setups raise transparency concerns. "Families Over Billionaires" is staffed by former Biden and Harris officials, including director Michael Linden, previously with Biden's Office of Management and Budget. Currently, the organization is releasing YouTube advertisements featuring paid actors expressing concerns about tax cuts. While this doesn't discredit the organization's message, it's important to know that groups calling themselves grassroots may not be.

FEC data reveals that some senior citizens across the US are listed as donating thousands of times per year, with some allegedly linked to over $200,000 in contributions. I'm James O'Keefe with OMG in Annapolis, Maryland, investigating these claims. I went to people's houses to ask them about these donations. I spoke with one man who told me to ask Donald Trump. I spoke to Cindy Noe, whose records indicate she donated over a thousand times to ActBlue in one year, totaling almost $19,000. She said she only donates $5 occasionally. Another individual was listed as making 18,000 contributions totaling $170,000, which they denied. I called Garland Riggs, who was listed as making over 31,000 contributions. He denied this. I encourage you to knock on doors and ask your neighbors if they've donated to ActBlue or Biden for President and if they know how many donations were made in their name.

Okay, so this Reuters thing is way bigger than we thought. Elon Musk mentioned Reuters getting government payments, and it goes deeper. I checked out usaspending.gov and found over 41 payments to Reuters. When you look this up on USAspending.gov, you can see all the individual payments yourself. Also, there is a graph at the bottom of the page, and the numbers are insane! We seriously need answers about this.

I estimate over $100 billion in taxpayer money is wasted or stolen. I'm working to expose government waste, like with USAID. Elon Musk noticed my work on X, which was a shock. I use AI to analyze public databases, revealing fraud in federal grants and NGOs. People who say this data has always been available miss the point. I'm indexing it to make it accessible; AI is crucial because of the data's volume. My current project maps relationships between people in government, exposing connections like marriages and shared board memberships. Both Democrats and Republicans are involved in conflicts of interest, like congress members voting to fund NGOs they sit on. It's not a partisan issue. Exposing this is risky, and has changed my life, but I feel it's a mission I must pursue.

I looked into Norm Eisen's NGO, State United Democracies Center, which includes prominent figures like Janet Napolitano and Michael Steele. The organization received $17 million in private donations. After researching, the only thing I could find that they did with the money was produce a low-quality Muppet show. The videos had very few views. I question what happened to the $17 million, considering the poor quality and lack of promotion of the Muppet show.

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obstacles because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, something unprecedented for any president. They bypassed the usual obstruction and uncovered shocking data. They saw payments to individuals with duplicate or missing social security numbers, totaling billions. Money flowed to entities like Internews Network, pushing a left-leaning agenda globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about accessing the data and revealing these findings. Despite facing resistance and attempts to slow us down, we're actively releasing information, and more is coming soon. The real question is whether we will be stopped from continuing this process.

I estimate that over $100 billion of taxpayer money is being wasted or stolen. I'm a former programmer who uses AI to search public databases for government waste, like exposing USAID. Elon Musk noticed my work and shared it, which I'm grateful for. I'm working on a project to analyze connections and relationships between people in the government. You start to notice that they're all working together; they know each other. I want to map those relationships and put it on my website. Both Democrats and Republicans are involved in this corruption. We even have sitting members of Congress who sit on the NGOs and vote in congress for money for themselves. It's a huge conflict of interest. Exposing these things is scary, but I feel called to do this work.

James O’Keefe and OMG report on FEC data indicating some senior citizens in the U.S. have donated large volumes of money, with examples of individuals attached to as much as $217,000 in contributions across 12,000 payments over three years, sometimes under variations of names and addresses. The team says the data, drawn from FEC and state records and organized by a group called election watch in Maryland, shows many contributions processed through ActBlue and groups related to political causes. In Annapolis, Maryland, O’Keefe notes the data and asks whether these donors are victims of or participants in a money-laundering scheme, or if they actually engaged in the activity—suggesting actions such as making phone calls or door-knocking to investigate. He describes the process as easy for citizen reporters: bring a microphone and camera (even an iPhone), knock on doors, and call donors to verify. He demonstrates by showing a chart of committees earmarked to receive donations via ActBlue and questions whether the donors are being duped or complicit. During on-camera interactions, he and his team cite a donor with 3,000 contributions totaling $32,000 at a given address, asking the person if she’s aware of such activity. The individual responds that they donated occasionally and not at the stated levels. They also reference the FEC record indicating donations to ActBlue and Biden for President, and question the accuracy of the donor’s claimed totals, while the donor denies making such large-scale contributions and expresses confusion over the situation. One profile highlighted is Cindy Ngo of Annapolis, Maryland, claimed to have contributed over 1,000 times in 2022 for $18,849.77 to ActBlue, which would require daily donations, a claim the interviewee disputes. The donor states they donate occasionally, around $5 at a time, and says they do not believe such frequent contributions were made from her address. The team remarks that the pattern is inconsistent with the donor’s response, noting that the frequency implied by the data does not match the donor’s account. Another profile discussed is Garland Riggs, described as an elderly donor with 31,073 individual contributions under his address, totaling about $230,000. When contacted, Riggs denies donating to ActBlue; he suggests his wife may have donated, but says the amounts are nowhere near the figures alleged. O’Keefe explains he will email the donor the information, including the FEC records, and asks whether Riggs believes someone else might be using his name. The report outlines a method for field inquiries: identify a target by name, confirm whether donations were made in their name and how many times, then ask follow-up questions such as whether they donated 3,000 times. The team emphasizes obtaining comment before publication and notes they have dozens of other homes in Maryland and hundreds nationwide matching the profile. They announce plans to continue calling and visiting more individuals. O’Keefe closes by noting the data came from election watch in Maryland, Gibson Group, and Maryland Twenty Twenty Watch, which have submitted a lawsuit to the U.S. District Court of Maryland regarding the grievance, and invites others to participate as citizen journalists. He directs viewers to okeefmediagroup.com for information on how to pursue similar stories.

I'm definitely not buying Mark Zuckerberg's supposed MAGA conversion. After I posted a Twitter thread linking a group he donated to with organizations that are actively sabotaging Trump's agenda, Meta ran to the New York Times to smear me. Their defense was basically, "We gave money, but don't know what they did with it." Digging deeper, I found over a dozen organizations funded by Zuckerberg that are suing Trump and organizing protests against his policies. Zuckerberg hasn't publicly stated any intention to withdraw funds from these groups. He issued a letter apologizing for their impact on the 2020 election, but provided no evidence. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative website, which previously listed thousands of grants to left-wing organizations, now only shows grants from 2024 onward, conveniently erasing the record of election interference.

Data Republican released a tool indexing the National Endowment for Democracy Journal, aggregating authors, articles, and NGOs. The speaker claims this journal proves George Soros and the government work together. The National Endowment for Democracy is described as a government-financed NGO involved in intelligence operations, with congressional representatives. The tool identifies authors in the journal affiliated with the Open Society Foundation, which is George Soros. The speaker highlights the number of articles in the journal mentioning Open Society Foundations. The speaker concludes that this demonstrates the government's deep involvement with George Soros, portraying him as a deep insider within the intelligence community.

Weed through a complete searchable database of 26,000 files related to Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker has spent hours and hours examining these files and will spend the coming days giving an inside look at them. A taste of the range of materials includes bizarre emails where Epstein is suspiciously dumping lists of names, including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, and Woody Allen. There are emails over the years in which Epstein works with outside consultants to scrub Google search results and essentially bleach the Internet of bad press, claiming they can provide reinforcement from sites like Harvard and other publications they influence to meet Epstein’s needs. In another email, Epstein and Larry Summers, the former Harvard president and board member for OpenAI, are emailing about an article involving Donald Trump and Bill Clinton. Epstein mysteriously says he has some great stories after just coming back from a week of “Jeffrey style” meetings. There are also many emails related to Trump. Despite Trump’s public claim that the whole affair is a scam—with arrows pointing to the Democrats—the files show that he is mentioned in these emails more than anyone else. The speaker invites audiences to follow along as these files are examined and to work to hold everyone involved accountable.

We were covering an article about 55,000 Democrat NGOs discovered to be contributing to campaigns, moving things around, and pushing propaganda. It was discovered through AI that to figure out where the money's coming from, you have to go through layers and layers, and it's all funneling down to one group or another. It's a giant propaganda machine, a giant regime change machine.

I found some interesting information while digging into the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's grants data. They have given billions of dollars to organizations like the Gavi Alliance and the World Health Organization. However, some organizations like Access Health International and Achieve Inc. raise questions. Access Health International received a large sum of money but lacks transparency in how it is spent. Achieve Inc. focuses on standardized testing rather than funding teacher education. Additionally, charter schools like Achievement First raise concerns about their admission policies and representation. Lastly, Achieving the Dream Inc. aims to transform colleges and communities, but there are connections to controversial figures. Overall, I will continue to explore Bill Gates' philanthropic activities.