reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A journalist argues against the state controlling who can report and who can't, calling it fascism. They accuse Sky News of taking the side of Hamas and using propaganda from them. The journalist questions the police about their actions and accuses them of supporting terrorists. The police ask the journalist to disperse, but they refuse, claiming they have the right to report freely. The journalist argues that they are not causing alarm or distress. They criticize the police for following orders from Sadiq Khan and Mark Rowley, accusing them of two-tier policing. The journalist is eventually dispersed and expresses their frustration.

Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans are seen as a threat to our republic. The video starts with someone being confronted by armed soldiers at their door, claiming their right to free speech has led to a potential 15-year prison sentence. The focus then shifts to the government's expansion of power after 9/11, targeting domestic extremists. The intelligence community is mentioned as having ways to retaliate against those who challenge them. The video suggests that platforms like Google manipulate news algorithms to fit their agenda. The speaker warns that people are not only being deplatformed but also imprisoned. The video ends with a promotion for a film called "Police State."

The documentary alleges the weaponization of court buildings against those who speak out, citing examples from Donald Trump to Katie Hopkins. The speaker claims to have been silenced by a gagging order and bankrupted after losing a court case, preventing the release of a film exposing a lie. The film centers on a playground incident involving a white boy and a Syrian refugee that became global news. It questions the media's role in manipulating narratives and suppressing dissenting voices. The documentary claims the media, justice system, and politicians conspire to suppress free speech, pervert democracy, and deceive the public with a poisonous agenda. It asks if the media is accountable, if the legal system is fit for purpose, and how politicians can be held accountable when inconvenient truths are silenced. The speaker aims to prove he was the only journalist who told the truth about the incident, alleging the Syrian boy was not an innocent victim and that the event was not a racist attack. The film uses hidden cameras to reveal the truth, claiming people are too scared to speak openly. It alleges a cover-up involving non-disclosure agreements and taxpayer money to silence witnesses. The speaker accuses the media and politicians of inciting hatred and violence against the white boy and his family, leading to threats, relocation, and mental health issues.

The speaker questions if the media and courts are shaping false narratives to serve political agendas. They raise concerns about bias in the justice system and the manipulation of information by government-funded groups. The involvement of the chief justice in political narratives is seen as problematic.

On one of the first days this show aired about the 50 states, a delegation to Israel visited, with people from state and local governments going to Israel, reportedly “humping the wall,” “licking the wall,” listening to speeches from Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli dignitaries, and being given instructions on how they would serve. The discussion then shifts to free speech and second amendment rights, setting the stage for the rest of the show. Jonathan Cagle, an American journalist known on X (formerly Twitter) with accounts such as decent backup, geez, decent JC, has been arrested. He is appearing today in a federal court, facing charges of cyberstalking. The report attributes the arrest to a group of “psychotic Zionists” who have been mass reporting him, attempting to have him kicked off the Internet and from various platforms, filing unpublished and videoed reports, and involving law enforcement. They have accused him of harassing, threatening, and stalking them, and now he faces federal charges. A central question raised is how many reports it takes to get arrested and jailed, and whether a “magic number” exists. The conversation notes X’s new program that flags accounts, suppresses content, and reduces reach, assigning scores (80%, 90%), thereby “snuffing out” visibility. The discussion asks if a coordinated online group can push someone into being arrested, just by accusing them of cyberstalking or other offenses. There is a GoFundMe-style fundraising page linked to Jonathan Cagle’s mother, Lisa Cagle, who states: “I’m Lisa Cagle, and my son needs help with a legal matter as he is a patriot fighting for America's future. He has a platform on X and is joined by so many that share the same passion for the great USA. Any donation is greatly appreciated. We’re raising legal funds to help cover the legal defense of a man facing serious federal charges that raise important questions about free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power. The case is complex, high stakes, and emotionally taxing, not just for him, but for his family and loved ones. Federal cases move quickly, require specialized legal expertise, and are extremely expensive to defend properly. Without strong representation, the system can overwhelm even those who believe deeply in their innocence. This fundraiser is not about relitigating the case online or attacking anyone involved. It’s about ensuring that every person, regardless of public opinion, has access to a vigorous, competent defense as guaranteed by the constitution. Legal fees for federal defenses can include, and there’s this list here, and I mean, it’s every step of the way. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps ensure that this case is decided in a courtroom based on facts and law, not by financial imbalance or fear. If you’re unable to donate, sharing this page is also deeply appreciated.” The narrative notes that federal court proceedings are challenging due to the government’s resources, and it references the J6 situation, where participants were uprooted from their homes and faced severe sentences, implying a concern about intimidation by federal power. The discussion promises to follow the case and provide updates on the court hearing and further information about what is happening, given the large online attack from accounts on X that have targeted Jonathan to destroy him, making it difficult to discern the facts. The overarching theme is concern over free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power in the face of online amplification and organized reporting campaigns.

This documentary explores the manipulation of news stories, the consequences faced by truth-seekers, and the unholy alliance between the media, justice system, and politicians. It focuses on a playground incident between two boys, Bailey and Jamal, which became a global news event. The film questions the accountability of the media, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK. It reveals testimonies that contradict the mainstream narrative and highlights the threats and hate comments received by both boys. The video also exposes the involvement of lawyers and activists, including Antifa, in targeting the speaker's family. The speaker expresses distrust towards a company associated with Farouk Basula's son, accuses them of covering up information and lying, and discusses incidents of lost documents and threats towards their family. They emphasize the importance of free speech, criticize the media, government, and judiciary for suppressing dissent, and ask for support to continue their work and protect their family.

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his personal experience of being silenced by a gagging order after losing a court case. The video discusses the case of Bailey McLaren and Jamal, two students involved in a school incident, challenging the media's portrayal of Jamal as a victim and Bailey as a bully. Evidence is presented that contradicts the narrative, including Jamal's history of violent behavior. The speaker criticizes biased reporting by journalists like Piers Morgan and Jeremy Vine. The involvement of a jihadist lawyer and Antifa activists in the case is exposed. The man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury and YouTuber Dick Coughlin of promoting violence and hatred against him and his family. He questions the integrity of the legal system and expresses concern for the safety of witnesses. The video raises questions about media accountability, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK.

This documentary reveals the manipulation of the justice system and media to suppress free speech, focusing on a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee and a British boy. The narrative was twisted to portray the British boy as a racist bully, while the truth was buried under political agendas and media sensationalism. The documentary highlights the dangers of a biased media, the exploitation of legal systems, and the consequences faced by those who dare to speak out. It questions the accountability of the media and the legal system, emphasizing the need for transparency and truth in reporting. Ultimately, it calls for the protection of free speech and the importance of standing against oppression in society. This documentary reveals the manipulation of the justice system and media to suppress free speech, focusing on a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee and a British boy. The narrative was twisted to portray the British boy as a racist bully, while the truth was buried under political agendas and media sensationalism. The documentary highlights the dangers of a biased media, the exploitation of legal systems, and the consequences faced by those who dare to speak out. It questions the accountability of the media and the legal system, emphasizing the need for transparency and truth in reporting. Ultimately, it calls for the protection of free speech and the importance of standing against oppression in society.

Tom states he feels good despite being incarcerated since October in a country that doesn't believe in free speech, which he considers an occupational hazard for a citizen journalist. He claims that since he started speaking out against Islamic rape gangs 16 years ago, he has faced relentless attacks from the British state, which uses lawfare to silence him. He asserts that he has never been convicted by a jury and that every one of his convictions have been...

- The speaker declares that free speech is "officially dead in Brussels," citing that the supreme court has ignored grievances and approved a prison sentence for racist memes in a private group chat. - They frame this as bad news, but say eight years of show trials, house raids, and other actions by the Brussels Regime have mentally prepared them to endure the injustice and to fight back, stating they will not back down. - The speaker notes there are "12 more criminal investigations and court cases for hate speech" currently running against them, and asserts these will not stop them from fighting the Brussels regime and a "great replacement." They call for supporters to share the video to demonstrate that resistance is alive and kicking. - They mention the Palace Of Justice, where the Supreme Court resides, and claim it was designed by a "very corrupt Freemason" who made it "way too big" to be bigger than Saint Peter's Basilica in Rome to show a supposed Freemason victory over the church. - The speaker asserts that the Freemasons Palace of Justice, or "injustice", is literally collapsing from the inside out and impossible to repair, noting that scaffolding had to be installed to support previous scaffolding. - They conclude by stating that, just as the palace behind them is collapsing, the Brussels Regime will soon collapse, regardless of how many people they throw in jail for opinions.

Outside Westminster Magistrates Court, Tommy Robinson reports that "Only accredited journalists by when they say accredited, only government supported journalists were allowed to report on the second half of trial," meaning access was restricted. Ezra from Canada was gagged today. He alleges he was detained under the terrorism act and that "the reason for detaining me wasn't in order, it just made up so they get went along." He describes a forty-minute gap and an hour-and-a-half gap with no disclosure, noting "there's no evidence of it. There's no paperwork trial. There's no email trial." He says the proceedings used Islamophobia as justification: "Islamophobia. Islam what what even is Islamophobia?" He predicts tomorrow's verdict and accuses police of fabrications. A second commenter says the court's mission is "simply to get Tommy Robinson." He praises citizen journalism growth, mentions BBC interference, and cites "43,000 jihadis" under surveillance. For support visit tommytrial.com.

The speaker claims mainstream media outlets prioritize attention and profit over truth, and they harass, smear, and lie about individuals and their families. A personal anecdote describes a journalist contacting his young daughter. A former News of the World employee admits to mocking and destroying people for the paper. The speaker cites a Daily Mail headline falsely accusing Ant Middleton of assaulting a female police officer and the media falsely claiming Joe Rogan took horse dewormer. JK Rowling won court cases against the Daily Mail for lies and invasive photos of her children. The speaker accuses Panorama of lacking integrity and calls a journalist a liar, fraud, racist, and homophobe. The speaker discusses threats and violence he and his family have faced, including death threats and Osman warnings from the police. He accuses the Daily Mail of endangering his family by publishing their location while on holiday and inciting violence against him by falsely claiming he instigated riots. He shares a message from his daughter expressing fear for their safety. He faces prosecution and a potential ten-year prison sentence for allegedly threatening journalists. He asks for support at fightthemail.com.

This documentary reveals the manipulation of the justice system and media to silence dissent and control narratives. It highlights a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee, Jamal, and a British boy, Bailey, which was sensationalized by the media, leading to severe consequences for Bailey. The documentary questions the accountability of the media and legal system, revealing how they can distort the truth for their agendas. It discusses the repercussions of this incident, including threats against Bailey's family and the broader implications for free speech in the UK. Ultimately, it calls for public awareness and accountability, urging viewers to support the fight for truth and freedom of expression.

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. It discusses how these buildings have been used to silence individuals who speak out against the mainstream narrative. The video raises questions about the accountability of the media, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK. It also highlights a case involving a school fight and the biased reporting surrounding it. The speaker criticizes the manipulation of truth to fit a certain narrative and the severe consequences for those involved. Additionally, a man named Tommy Robinson accuses a journalist of promoting violence against him and his family, expressing distrust towards the legal system and media. He emphasizes the importance of free speech and urges public support.

A journalist ("iTV") confronts another journalist about an upcoming court case. The journalist ("iTV") is being taken to court for allegedly harassing a couple of Germans after they endangered his family by photographing them. He questions why the reporter hasn't watched his documentary, which had 67 million views and details his seven months in solitary confinement. He accuses the reporter of being a "propaganda machine" who will publish a pre-written, biased article implying he caused fear of violence. He asks if he should be allowed to contact journalists and ask them questions on camera, and criticizes the Daily Mail for endangering his family. He believes he is facing ten years in jail for wanting to ask a question on camera. He claims he is being targeted with "lawfare" because he is an "uncontrollable journalist" who is ahead of the population on important issues.

Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison not for posting false information, but for ignoring a court injunction against discussing a specific incident. The judge acknowledged Robinson's work as a journalist and did not comment on the truth of his claims. Despite mainstream media narratives, multiple witnesses supported Robinson's account, while the judge dismissed their testimonies. The case involved a Syrian refugee with a troubling history, and the judge's ruling contradicted the testimonies of respected community members. The media aims to portray immigration as harmless and demonize Robinson. Viewers are encouraged to watch Robinson's film "Silence," which has garnered significant attention, to form their own opinions rather than relying on mainstream media.

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his personal experience of being silenced by a gagging order after losing a court case and criticizes the mainstream media for manipulating stories and pushing certain narratives. The documentary also examines a playground incident between two boys, Bailey and Jamal, revealing evidence that challenges the media's portrayal of the incident. It highlights the role of politicians, media, and the justice system in suppressing free speech and perverting democracy. The video raises questions about media accountability, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK. Additionally, a man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury of promoting violence and inciting threats against his family. He criticizes the court's handling of a case involving a Syrian refugee, questioning the credibility of witnesses and the media's biased reporting. He argues that free speech is being suppressed and calls for support in his legal battle, urging the public to sign a petition against his imprisonment.

The documentary you're about to see is about the weaponization of court buildings to silence people, from Trump to Hopkins, who speak out against the mainstream narrative. As a journalist who stands for freedom of speech, I failed when I was bankrupted and silenced by a gagging order. But I won't fail again. This film exposes the unholy alliance between the media, justice system, and politicians to suppress free speech. It shows how a playground incident was spun into global news, ignoring the truth and abusing the law to silence dissent. It asks if the media is accountable, if the legal system is fit for purpose, and if our politicians can be held accountable. The film serves as a tutorial on journalism.

They aim to harm us for disagreeing with them. Our justice system no longer prioritizes truth, but winning at all costs.

In London, a 15-year-old girl was fatally stabbed. The speaker criticizes the police for focusing on social media instead of solving crimes. They also claim that the surveillance cameras outside of London are a scam, with no scientific evidence to support them. The speaker accuses Sadiq Khan of rewriting evidence to serve his own agenda and warns of the beginning of a surveillance state. The transcript ends with the speaker mentioning spending their day in the Clink.

A journalist confronts Chrystia Freeland, Canada's Minister of Foreign Affairs, about the government's support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRDC). The journalist is then arrested by the police for allegedly assaulting someone. The journalist protests his innocence and requests the microphone to record the incident. He criticizes the government for suppressing freedom of speech and accuses them of prioritizing political correctness over addressing the IRDC's alleged terrorist activities. The journalist expresses frustration with the arrest and claims that Canada is becoming a totalitarian state. The video ends with the police providing a brief statement assuring everyone's safety.

In this video, the speaker, a journalist reporting on an anti-Semitism rally in London, shares their personal experience of being arrested and violently attacked by the police. They raise concerns about the state of freedom of the press, assembly, and speech in the UK, suggesting that the country is heading towards becoming a totalitarian state. The speaker highlights instances of biased policing, politicized judiciary, state control of media, and surveillance of citizens. They argue that the government and security services are manipulating the public through fear and propaganda. The importance of independent journalism and the need to protect freedom of expression is emphasized. Additionally, the speaker discusses their concerns about the government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, terrorism, immigration, and societal changes. They believe that dissenting voices are being silenced and call for accountability and transparency from the government. The rise of progressive ideologies and the potential loss of freedom of speech are also discussed, with a call to action for people to stand up, speak out, and demand the resignation of Mark Rowley. The audience is encouraged to visit resignmarkrowley.com and join an event in London on July 27th to support the cause of protecting freedom of speech.

This documentary is about the weaponization of court buildings against the public and the suppression of free speech by the media, justice system, and politicians. It centers on a playground incident involving a white boy and a Syrian refugee that was spun into global news, burying the truth beneath agendas and opportunism. The film questions the media's accountability, the legal system's fitness, and how politicians are held accountable when inconvenient truths are silenced. The speaker highlights the unholy alliance between media, justice, and politicians suppressing free speech and perverting democracy. The film exposes media deception, abuse of law, and fear-driven political leaders jumping on stories without knowing the truth. The film raises critical questions on accountability, legal systems, government integrity, and the importance of defending free speech.

A group of Antifa individuals, led by a well-known journalist, attempted to incite violence for a TV documentary in Culop. The journalist, connected to mainstream media, was caught communicating with agitators to cause trouble. This coordinated attack on working-class people highlights media bias and manipulation. The public is urged to be aware of these tactics and hold media outlets accountable for their actions.

This documentary reveals the manipulation of the legal system and media against individuals who challenge mainstream narratives, focusing on a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee, Jamal, and a British boy, Bailey. The media sensationalized the event, portraying Bailey as a racist bully while ignoring Jamal's violent behavior. The film exposes how politicians and journalists, driven by agendas, distorted the truth, leading to severe consequences for Bailey and his family, including threats and relocation. It questions the accountability of the media and the legal system, highlighting how dissent is suppressed in a society that claims to value free speech. Ultimately, it calls for public awareness and action against the erosion of truth and freedom.