reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses concern about daily stratospheric aerosol injections containing bromium, aluminum, and strontium. They mention Dane Wigington as an expert on the topic. The question posed is: How do we stop it?

My name is Karen Johnson, a former Arizona legislator, concerned about chemtrails and their impact on health. People need to wake up and fight back against those spraying harmful chemicals in the sky. The excessive aluminum and barium levels in the air are alarming. Geoengineering programs and weather modification are connected to this issue. We must focus on stopping the toxic effects of chemtrails to protect human health and the environment. The time to act is now before it's too late.

We are here to address a long-standing issue in our province regarding the systematic and legal intervention in weather patterns. We have been denouncing the use of cloud-seeding planes by certain companies and insurers, which prevents rainfall and leaves us without water. These practices have been going on for over 20 years, and we demand that they be prohibited and investigated. These planes inject chemicals into the atmosphere to prevent hail, but they also disperse storms and hinder rainfall. This is a well-documented phenomenon, supported by organizations like the World Meteorological Organization. These weather modification practices, including anti-hail efforts, have been around for over a century in Argentina.

The speaker, representing the Trump EPA, frames geoengineering and contrails as urgent questions for which the American public deserves honesty and transparency. The speaker asserts that “the era is over” when questions were dismissed or vilified, and declares that the Trump EPA is committed to total transparency. The administrator states that the EPA tasked its team to “compile a list of everything we know about contrails and geoengineering for the purpose of releasing it to you now publicly.” The goal is for readers to know “everything I know about these topics and without any exception.” Rather than dismissing questions as baseless conspiracies, the EPA is meeting them head on, performing legwork, reviewing science, consulting agency experts, and incorporating relevant outside information to create online resources. “Everything we know about contrails to solar geoengineering will be in there.” The administrator emphasizes that anyone reading the information will know as much about these topics as the EPA administrator does, addressing questions from people who have looked up at the sky and wondered “what the heck is going on?” or seen headlines about private actors and governments seeking to blot out the sun in the name of stopping global warming. The EPA states that it has endeavored to answer all questions at the links provided. The EPA notes that it shares many of the same concerns about potential threats to human health and the environment, especially from solar geoengineering activities. The speaker highlights that the enthusiasm for experiments that would pump pollutants into the high atmosphere has set off alarm bells at the Trump EPA. Prior to now, the EPA has “never been this proactive to raise awareness about concerns with geoengineering and to stop this activity from being scaled up.” Finally, the administrator frames the stance as an example of government listening to the will of the people, not squashing it, and asserts that “you can always trust this administration and this EPA to take your concerns seriously, answer your questions honestly, and carry out the will of voters with integrity.”

The Tennessee State Senate has passed a bill that aims to ban the intentional release of chemicals into the atmosphere for geoengineering purposes, specifically targeting chemtrails. The bill, sponsored by Representative Monte Fritz and Senator Steve Sutherland, seeks to safeguard the environment and public health from unregulated geoengineering practices. If the bill is passed by the House, Tennessee will become one of the first states to establish a legal framework explicitly prohibiting the spraying of chemicals for geoengineering purposes. The legislation is set to be enforced from July 1, 2024. This development could set a precedent for other states to address concerns around environmental and atmospheric manipulation.

The speaker introduces a bill to protect Tennessee's atmosphere from intentional manipulation through chemical injections. Doctors testify about the health and environmental risks associated with such actions, emphasizing the importance of sunlight for human health and crop production. They urge legislators to pass the bill to prevent harmful consequences.

Following a viral post by Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, a bill banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate, making it a third-degree felony to release chemicals or use devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicious activity. Proponents fear the weaponization of weather modification, citing insufficient scientific understanding. While cloud seeding is used to induce rain, supporters of the ban prefer to wait for more research. Meanwhile, a more moderate version in the Florida House codifies geoengineering and weather modification, which the governor opposes. Opponents of the ban worry that lawmakers are legislating based on "tinfoil theories" and moving too fast without proper methodology, potentially penalizing people without fully understanding the issue.

The speaker discusses geoengineering and urges the audience to share the information they will provide to raise awareness about this unethical practice. They show a video clip explaining how chemtrails and HAART are used to prevent rainfall by raising the temperature of the sky. The speaker then shares their personal story of serving in the US Air Force and working in bio environmental engineering. They explain that their role was to track the environmental impact of the military and ensure accountability. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding the health hazards associated with military jobs.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicions. Supporters of the ban cite insufficient scientific research and worry about the weaponization of weather modification. Cloud seeding, using silver iodide to induce rain, is a real practice, but some want to pause such activities. While the governor supports the ban, he opposes a House version that codifies geoengineering and weather modification. Opponents of the bill fear legislating based on "tinfoil theories" and argue for a more measured approach with proper methodology before imposing penalties.

The speaker claims that airplanes are injecting aerosols containing chemicals like silver iodide, silver dioxide, aluminum barium, strontium, cadmium, polymers, microplastics, and black coal into the sky as nanoparticles. The speaker acknowledges that the full health ramifications are not understood, but believes the activity "cannot be good" and is an attempt to alter the environment by dimming the sun, as Bill Gates allegedly suggested. The speaker urges the committee to approve the bill and recommends increasing the criminal penalty to a felony, so pilots will reconsider dispersing these chemicals. The speaker also states that Representative Steele has observed extensive images of this activity from his farmland.

The speakers discuss the concept of chemtrails, geoengineering, and solar radiation management. They highlight the irregular appearance of trails in the sky, the involvement of global governance in geoengineering, and the potential harm to human health. The speakers emphasize the need for public awareness and action to address the issue.

Legislation is being voted on in New Hampshire to ban climate engineering operations. The draft of this legislation is well-drafted and uses scientific terms and descriptions. It is important to circulate this draft to other states to raise awareness about the issue. The activities in our skies, which involve the release of various elements like aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, polymer fibers, surfactants, and graphene, have significant implications. Some of these elements, such as polymer fibers and graphene, are used militarily as carriers of pathogens. Therefore, there are multiple levels of concern regarding what is happening in our skies.

Governments around the world have been engaging in weather manipulation and geoengineering projects, altering weather patterns and climate conditions. The speaker discusses various historical and modern examples of these projects, as well as the controversy and lack of transparency surrounding them. They highlight the need for further investigation and public awareness. The speaker also explores the funding and influence of organizations like Silver Lining and the involvement of the Met Office and UK Research and Innovation in geoengineering research. They emphasize the uncertainties, risks, and potential dangers associated with these interventions. The speaker concludes by expressing their commitment to uncovering the truth and promoting transparency in government actions.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicious activity. Senator Garcia stated the bill aims to prevent weather modification from being weaponized, while proponents cite insufficient scientific understanding and prefer a cautious approach. Cloud seeding, using silver iodide to induce rain, is a real practice, but some worry about its potential misuse. Meanwhile, a more moderate version in the Florida House codifies geoengineering and weather modification, which the governor opposes. Opponents of the ban, like State Senator Tina Polsky, express concern that the legislation is based on "tinfoil theories" and that lawmakers are moving too fast without proper methodology.

A bill is moving through the Panchatula legislature to end so-called chemtrails, which some lawmakers believe are chemicals dumped from aircraft to manipulate the weather. Representative Kimberly Landry Coates claims the bill addresses the growing problem of white lines in the sky, which she alleges are "chemtrails" made of nanochemicals that change the weather, including nanoparticles of aluminum and barium. Coates claims the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration sends chemicals into clouds to reflect sunlight and cool the Earth, but NOAA denies conducting weather modification experiments. Coates believes multiple groups and contractors are involved, with contracts from at least nine federal agencies. She says she sees these lines in the sky at least once a week. The bill passed the house with a mixed vote and will now go to the state senate.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicions. Supporters of the ban cite insufficient scientific understanding and worry about the weaponization of weather modification. While cloud seeding is a real practice used to induce rain, some Florida lawmakers are concerned about geoengineering and weather modification. Opponents of the bill, like State Senator Tina Polsky, believe lawmakers are moving too fast and legislating based on "tinfoil theories" without proper methodology. The governor supports the ban but has concerns about a more moderate version in the Florida House.

Legislation is being proposed in the New Hampshire House of Representatives to make it illegal to intentionally release polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation. This news story highlights the efforts of lawmakers in New Hampshire to prohibit attempts to change the weather through scientific means. The speaker urges viewers to follow them for real news that is not covered by mainstream media.

A New Hampshire news story reports that legislation has been proposed in the state's House of Representatives to prohibit the intentional release of polluting emissions. This includes cloud seeding, weather modification, and excessive electromagnetic radio frequency and microwave radiation. The legislation would impose penalties for violations. According to the speaker, this is real news that people are not seeing on mainstream media.

The speaker is against heavy metals being sprayed over Florida, regardless of the method, claiming they cause major health issues through inhalation, absorption, and ingestion. They state that companies performing aerosol sprays should not be allowed to operate in Florida. The speaker wants to protect Florida's waterways, referencing a past bill to protect water runoff from farmland. They are not talking about visible lines in the sky, but the effects of acid rain. Quoting Lyndon Johnson, "he who controls the weather controls the world," the speaker asks for support for their bill, referencing Johnson's controversial past.

The speaker discusses the government and billionaires using cloud seeding to modify the weather, citing evidence from the 1940s to present day. They highlight the harmful effects of stratospheric aerosol injections, such as sulfur dioxide, and express concerns about public manipulation. The speaker questions the true intentions behind weather modification and criticizes billionaires like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos for supporting these practices. They emphasize the environmental and health risks associated with spraying chemicals into the atmosphere. The speaker advocates for planting trees as a more sustainable solution.

Thank you for the introduction. Today, I want to address the impact of experimental weather modification programs on agriculture. Over 50 such programs operate in the U.S., altering microclimates essential for crop survival and pollination. These programs often lack public oversight and can introduce harmful chemicals into our environment, affecting drinking water and soil health. Persistent jet contrails contribute to climate change by trapping heat and reducing sunlight, which is vital for photosynthesis. This leads to decreased crop yields and increased pests and diseases. We must reconsider geoengineering schemes that add more chemicals to the atmosphere, as they could worsen pollution and harm agriculture. Instead, we should focus on reducing pollution at its source and utilizing existing technologies to promote environmental health. It’s crucial to prioritize sustainable solutions over profit-driven schemes that threaten our ecosystems. Thank you for your attention.

32 states are attempting to ban geoengineering in America. In Oklahoma, Senate Bill 430 was slashed by the energy subcommittee. A reporter from Veterans on Patrol News asked Governor Stitt if he would declare an emergency session to push the legislation through, but Stitt said no. His staff then questioned the reporter's credentials, asking if he was an activist or a journalist. The speaker encourages viewers to check on their state's progress and call their governors to demand a ban on geoengineering. The states listed are: Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming. The speaker urges Oklahoma residents to call Governor Stitt.

Skies are being modified through weather manipulation, with the White House considering dimming the sun to combat climate change. YouTube is removing videos on this topic, sparking questions about its validity. Several states have banned weather modification, raising further concerns. Congress even proposed a bill to block out the sun for environmental reasons. The speaker suggests looking into Wilhelm Reich's cloud buster as a solution.

New Hampshire lawmakers have proposed legislation that would make it illegal to intentionally release polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation. This news story highlights the growing concern about changing the weather through scientific means. The speaker urges viewers to follow them for more real news that is not covered by mainstream media.

I'm here to discuss House File 191, a bill to prohibit geoengineering, while also urging you to consider Senate File 142 as a superior alternative. Inspired by Tennessee's recent law and similar considerations in other states, as well as discussions in the EU and White House policy documents, this legislation addresses the potential for polluting atmospheric activities like cloud seeding and weather engineering. Past congressional hearings and Council on Foreign Relations discussions highlight the urgent need for regulation. Iowa is behind on this issue, and failure to act puts our health, well-being, and economic prosperity at risk. This bill is a necessary fact-finding exercise because the absence of information justifies a prohibition to gather data. I urge swift action in delivering Senate File 142 to the governor. It is the very least the people of Iowa can expect.