TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Command to wipe out from among all the descendants of Esauv, descendants of Amalek, male and female, young and old. And that is why Amalek is so terrible, and it has to be totally uprooted. Therefore, Therefore, God tells us we should erase their memory, and we should eradicate them from the face of the earth. Who is Amalek? Amalek comes from Asav. Asav was a brother to Jacob. Esav became Edoine, which is a nation. Edoine became Rome. Instead of it being Rome, it became Christianity. Christianity, of course, ultimately became Western civilization. The throne of God is incomplete until we destroy Amalek. The audacity, the chutzpah to destroy Amalek and to cut off the offsprings of the nation of Amalek. I have the high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to you the prime minister of Israel, his excellency Benjamin Netanyahu.

God's wrath is mentioned, and the child should be turned over and not be in your life because they will do malicious things. They despise authority and are malevolent, twisted, wicked, and becoming vile. They are the deceiver and the slanderer, which is the point of no return. When a child slanders their dad, that is soul murder, and they are going after dad's reputation, which is harmful, like what happened with Absalom. Once a child targets you, you have to let them go.

In America today, we have white supremacy. In the Torah, we had Amalek. Amalek is seen as the eternal enemy of our people whose members found strength by making us suffer. Therefore, when the Lord your God grants you safety from all your enemies around you, in the land that the Lord your God is giving to you as a hereditary portion, you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget. Our rabbinic sages parse these sentences and derive two distinct meanings. Blotting out the memory of Amalek is a military command, literally to destroy Amalek. Now facing today's Amalek, we are reminded that the Torah calls us not just to escape, but to extirpate Amalek. We are commanded to do real and literal battle against it. That means coming off the bench in the fight against white supremacy. Means putting our reputations and our money and our physical bodies on the line. But also so that we are ready to answer people with radically destructive and incoherent versions of history so that we can counter white supremacists, so that we can counter Amalek and blot them out by retaining on our lips and in our records their history. By being bearers of history, we can help guide the future. Blotting out Amalek need not merely be about military conquest. Equally important is ideological victory, and nothing could more readily counter white supremacy than a Jewish community proudly helping our Muslim neighbors. There is nothing that undermines a white supremacist worldview more than diverse communities getting along and building together towards the future.

We must destroy Hamas and raze Gaza according to the divine plan. The Torah does not permit mercy in war, even towards children. In the future, these children will attack us. We follow the rules of the Torah, which includes smashing infants on rocks as revenge. We bless Hashem for the food we eat after killing innocent infants. We kill all men, women, and even breastfeeding babies.

There is a terrorist in the building who will harm Jews. The Torah allows for preemptive action, even if it means harming innocent children, as they may become terrorists in the future. It is advised not to show mercy towards children of terrorists, as they may pose a threat later on. This approach is based on the belief that there is no distinction between terrorists and their offspring. Translation: The Torah permits preemptive action against a terrorist, even if it means harming innocent children who may become threats in the future.

The speaker asks if the person supports Israel's right to defend themselves against acts of violence committed by Hamas. They repeatedly mention horrific acts such as chopping off baby heads and burning children alive, asking for a comment on these actions. They express disbelief and ask if there is no comment on the matter.

The speaker discusses the concept of Amalek, representing doubt and evil. They emphasize the need to eradicate Amalek and appoint a king when entering the land of Israel. Another speaker connects Amalek to Western civilization, particularly the United States and Europe. They mention that destroying Amalek is necessary for the completion of God's throne. The audacity to destroy Amalek is highlighted, and the idea of spitting as a symbolic act when leaving Europe is mentioned.

The speaker discusses the inhumane actions of the Syrian regime and questions why Israel is not condemned for their actions. They mention the killing of children and criticize the idea of being lenient in such cases. The speaker also mentions Ben Gordon, who played a role in establishing Israel, and quotes his statement about ensuring Palestinians never return. They emphasize the importance of not forgetting and state that Palestine will only be free if they remember.

The speaker discusses the idea of honoring God and being Jewish. They mention that according to the Torah, it is considered godly to kill them and that the Torah states that Christians are idol worshippers. They also mention discrimination against Christians.

According to the speaker, showing mercy to a child is not actually merciful, but rather cruel to the child's future victims. The speaker refers to an ideology that the child will grow up with, which is supposedly worse than their father's ideology. The Torah, specifically in the book of Deuteronomy, emphasizes the rules of war and states that no one should be allowed to survive. Additionally, the speaker mentions a verse that instructs the complete eradication of the Amalek people, including men, women, and children, as they are deemed unworthy of existence.

God commands male children to have their foreskin removed as a sign of love and covenant. Despite objections, he asserts his authority. People still follow this practice today, teaching children harsh lessons from birth. Those meant to protect them inflict pain, then welcome them to life with a smile. Translation: God orders male infants to have their foreskin removed as a symbol of love and covenant. Despite objections, he asserts his authority. This practice continues today, with children learning harsh lessons from birth. Those who should protect them cause pain, then welcome them to life with a smile.

Speaker 0 asks for a single verse in the Quran, the hadith, and the Islamic literature that says, "go and kill innocent people." It's a challenge, with lines like, "It's a can. It's wanna hear it? Do wanna hear it?" He responds, "Yeah. I will cast terror into the hearts of the disbelievers. Therefore, cut off their necks Okay. And cut off every fingertip." "That's one. There are a 142. Go to Surah five. Go to Surah eight. Go to Surah 12." He adds, "Don't come here and pretend to me that your book is any different to any other sect of Islam." "Okay. Okay. I've studied the Quran. I've studied the Bible." Then, "Let me tell you one thing. Yeah. And this is a fact."

One speaker suggests killing unwanted children in foster care. They ask for statistics on the percentage of foster children who are abused, molested, or enslaved. Another speaker says they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children who have been abused. One speaker states that if they don't want to have a baby, they should have the choice not to, because people should still have the choice, and that the other speaker doesn't understand the magnitude of having a child.

The speaker states their love for Jews and Israel has nothing to do with the question of whether people are killing or murdering a hundred children a day. Another person calls the speaker a terrorist.

The speaker discusses a conversation they had with someone about the mindset of those who harm children. The person explains that these individuals view the world differently and have a singular purpose: to defeat God. They believe that children are the closest thing to God because they are created in His image and have not yet been corrupted. The more pain they can inflict on a child, the greater their victory over God. This is their sole consideration.

The speaker discusses the idea of honoring God and being Jewish. They mention that the godly thing to do is to respect one another, but also claim that the Torah instructs to kill people who worship idols. They imply that Jewish people discriminate against Christians, considering them to be idolaters.

The speakers discuss the need to obliterate Hamas and destroy Gaza. They believe that there should be no mercy during war, even towards children and women. They reference the divine plan and the Torah, stating that God knows that these children will grow up to attack in the future. They mention a verse in the Bible that justifies killing infants and express happiness in seeking revenge against their enemies. They also mention blessing God for the sword. The conversation ends with admiration for killing all men, women, and even breastfeeding babies.

Amalek represents doubt and hostility towards Jews, and it is a mitzvah to eradicate their memory completely. This includes men, women, and children, as Amalek embodies traits that threaten Jewish existence. The Torah commands the destruction of Amalek upon entering Israel, emphasizing the need for a king and the elimination of this enemy. Amalek is linked to historical adversaries, including the Nazis, and is seen as a source of evil. The ongoing struggle against Amalek is a divine mandate, reflecting a broader spiritual battle. The call to remember Amalek's actions serves as a reminder of the obligation to confront and eliminate such threats to Jewish survival.

According to the speaker, showing mercy to a child is not actually merciful, but rather cruel to the child's future victims. They argue that the ideology a child grows up with can be even worse than their father's. The speaker references the Torah, specifically Deuteronomy chapter 20 verse 16, which discusses rules of war and advises against allowing anyone to remain alive. They also mention Deuteronomy chapter 25 verse 19, which instructs the complete eradication of the Amalek people, including men, women, and children, stating that they have no right to exist.

The speaker claims that people sacrifice their children because they are dearest to their hearts. According to the speaker, a sense of sacred duty, the principles of Islam and jihad, and God's path are the ultimate priority. The speaker states that Israelis should give up all the land. The speaker concludes by saying that Israelis should either leave alive or leave in pieces.

Speaker 0 expresses shock at the idea of cruelty toward a target, asking, “why be so cruel to him? Get rid of all of him, men, women, and children,” and notes that some accuse them of genocide, calling it “a show” and accusing them of being those who believe in genocide, Has a show. Speaker 1 pushes for decisive action, insisting, “Minister Netanyahu, finish them. Finish them.” He adds a broader demand to support Israel “whatever they want, whatever they need, whenever they need it,” stating, “We need to be there for them.” Speaker 2 interjects to correct, clarifying, “Okay. Hold on. I wanna I wanna correct you. I don't just condone the actions of the Israeli Defense Force and the Israeli government. I celebrate and loud them.” He emphasizes strong support for Israeli actions as part of his stance. Speaker 1 continues, asserting, “You guys are worshiping one Jew. That's a mistake. You should be worshiping every single one of us.” Speaker 3 agrees or elaborates, “That's right. Enemies because they are,” and Speaker 1 repeats, “The children are your enemies?” to which Speaker 3 answers, “They are they are our enemy.” Speaker 2 reflects on his upbringing, saying, “Growing up in Sunday school, I was taught from the bible. Those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed.” He frames his perspective around wanting to be on “the blessing side of things,” specifically among “those who bless the government of Israel,” though he adds, “Doesn't say the government of it. It says the nation of Israel.” He then states his loyalty, declaring, “I'll tell you that I think it will surprise a lot of people. You know, I am very, very loyal to the Jewish people and to Israel.”

The speaker expresses moments of sympathy for a group, but quickly remembers their celebrations over the deaths of Jews. They recall various instances of hatred, violence, and incitement, including children expressing a desire to kill Jews, demonstrations celebrating murder, and the use of money for terrorism instead of development. Another speaker discusses being inside a Hamas training base and the increase in young children wanting to join due to recent events. They address accusations of brainwashing and emphasize the danger and brutality of these groups. They urge people to focus on Jesus Christ and not take sides with those who don't care about them.

The speaker recounts a conversation about why children are targeted. The explanation given was that "they" don't define the world or children the way "you" do. For "them," everything is defined by their all-consuming purpose: to defeat God. "They" believe the true gods are themselves and Satan. Children are seen as the closest thing on Earth to God because humans are created in God's image and haven't had time to be corrupted. Therefore, the younger you are, the closer you are to God, and the more pain inflicted on a baby or small child, the greater the victory over God. This is claimed to be their only consideration.

Speaker 0 alleges that Mark Levin has repeatedly called for murdering civilians in Gaza, including children, because they are Amalek or “stained by blood guilt.” They claim this constitutes a blood guilt argument and leads to collective punishment and genocide, describing it as the Israeli government’s attitude and stating that “we’re paying for that.” Speaker 1 responds that they should defend themselves and that if there is collateral damage, that is unfortunate, emphasizing the need for Israel to defend itself. Speaker 0 contends that twenty-five years ago in this country, people didn’t talk that way; blood guilt would imply being guilty by birth, which they say leads to genocide and is unchristian and unamerican. They claim that if someone said such a thing on television, they would be pulled off the air, and argue that saying “kill kids because you don’t like their parents” reflects the Israeli government’s attitude, a well-documented attitude, and that “we’re paying for that.”

Netanyahu referenced a biblical passage to Israeli troops, urging them to remember what Amalek had done. Critics argue that he used this as a justification for the genocide of Palestinians. They claim he commanded his troops to kill even infants and animals, aiming to utterly destroy everything in Palestine. This perspective views Netanyahu as a madman using religion to justify modern-day genocide.