reSee.it - Related Video Feed

- Speaker 0 notes that vaccines and boosters are readily available, testing has been dramatically scaled with millions of rapid tests, and that 82 percent of adult Americans have taken the vaccine. He states that those not vaccinated are nine times more likely to be hospitalized or die from the virus, and emphasizes that the country is in a different place than a year ago, with ongoing work to fight the virus. - On the strategic petroleum reserve (SPR), Speaker 0 explains that the release totals 50,000,000 barrels, with 18,000,000 already congressionally required and accelerated by the president to provide immediate relief. The remaining 32,000,000 comes from an exchange, putting barrels on the market now in exchange for their return in the future. He describes the exchange as a tool matched to the current economic environment and notes the aim to lower costs for the American people, particularly gas prices ahead of the holiday season, while acknowledging the pandemic’s impact on the global cost of goods and gas. He also mentions pressing OPEC+ to increase supply and using every tool at the administration’s disposal to help working families. - When pressed about the 50,000,000 barrels figure, Speaker 0 refrains from further detail beyond the explanation that 18,000,000 were congressionally required and the rest come from the exchange arrangement. - On China, Speaker 0 clarifies that the president did not intend to separate China publicly, saying China may do more, but the president does not want to speak for any country. He notes that the president has had conversations with other countries and that the national security team has communicated with them; announcements will be made by those countries themselves. Speaker 1 asks whether the president spoke with Xi Jinping; Speaker 0 confirms they did talk, as referenced in a readout issued afterward, and that the president asked China to discuss helping with supply, without detailing further. - Regarding Ukraine, Speaker 1 asks for updates on White House assessments and plans for a possible phone call with President Putin. Speaker 0 says there is nothing to preview at this time, but reiterates that the United States remains in very close contact with European partners.

all of the companies here are building just making huge investments in in the country in order to build out data centers and infrastructure to power the next wave of innovation. "How much are you spending, would you say, over the next few years?" "Oh, gosh. I mean, I think it's probably gonna be something like, I don't know, at least $600,000,000,000 through '28 in The US. Yeah. It's a lot." "It's it's significant. That's a lot." "Thank you, Mark. It's great to have you. Thank you."

Speaker 0 discusses an upcoming March, which they describe as the No Kings March, scheduled for March 28 across the United States. They state that this march will probably be the biggest mass march demonstration in American history and affirm that they will be in attendance along with the We steady state. They also note that they are partners with many organizations that span a wide range of political views and specific positions, emphasizing a broad coalition. The central message conveyed is that it is time to go out into the street and demonstrate the resolve of the American people to stay a democracy. Speaker 0 mentions attending a planning meeting for the No Kings rally on March 28 and adds, “there’s my plug again,” indicating personal involvement and enthusiasm, and notes that they left the planning meeting practically in tears. The speaker emphasizes the scale and significance of the effort by stating that thousands of people are involved in the planning of this event. The transcript ends with an incomplete line: “What’s,” suggesting there is more to the discussion that is not included in the excerpt.

The United States has the largest reserves of oil and gas in the world, and we may soon see significant growth in our country. For years, we have remained the same size, but that could change. Our focus will be on increased drilling, which is expected to lower prices and boost the economy.

The speaker states they will achieve net zero by February 1950, with specific, measurable short-term targets set for 2025 and February 1930. They also believe they will profit from this initiative, as the world is moving in this direction. They express confidence that being carbon competitive will create value.

The speaker announces plans to open Venezuela for foreign investment, describing a $1,700,000,000,000 opportunity across multiple sectors. The opportunity is not limited to oil and gas, which are highlighted as huge, but also spans mining (including gold), infrastructure, and power. The speaker emphasizes that the opportunities will touch the entire energy value chain, stating that they will open all upstream, midstream, and downstream activities to all companies. In addition to energy, the speaker identifies opportunities in technology, AI, and tourism. They note that Venezuela has 2,800 kilometres of pristine Caribbean coastland ready to be developed, suggesting significant potential for coastal or tourism-related projects. A central part of the plan is to establish a favorable environment for foreign investment. The speaker asserts that they will bring rule of law, open markets, and security for foreign investment. They also mention a transparent massive privatization program that is waiting for investors, implying a broad and clear path to privatizations as part of the reform agenda. Key points highlighted include: - A $1.7 trillion opportunity encompassing oil and gas, mining (gold), infrastructure, and power. - The energy sector potential described as DRIP with 17 gigawatts of opportunity that needs rehab, indicating substantial modernization and development needs. - Broad openness to investment across the entire oil and gas value chain: upstream, midstream, downstream. - Additional growth areas in technology, AI, and tourism. - 2,800 kilometres of Caribbean coastline ready for development. - Commitments to rule of law, open markets, security for foreign investment, and a transparent privatization program designed to attract international investors. The overall message is that Venezuela is positioning itself as a major, diversified investment destination with a comprehensive framework to protect and promote foreign investment, underpinned by large-scale privatization and development of a broad range of sectors.

- The speaker explains mark-to-market profits from a given amount of gold, using a simple example: 50 ounces of gold, gold rises by $1,000 per ounce, yielding $50,000 in profit; another $1,000 rise yields another $50,000, and so on. People think in terms of the thousand-dollar increments and the real money those increments represent. - However, each $1,000 increment becomes easier to achieve as the price base rises, because the percentage gain shrinks. Example progression: - From $2,000 to $3,000 per ounce: 50% gain. - From $3,000 to $4,000 per ounce: 33% gain. - From $4,000 to $5,000 per ounce: 25% gain. - From $9,000 to $10,000 per ounce: 11% gain. - From $19,000 to $20,000 per ounce: 4% gain. - Thus, the same $50,000 profit corresponds to smaller percentage gains as the price rises. The point is that benchmarks at thousand-dollar steps get easier to reach over time, and the market can move to higher levels more quickly than people expect. - The speaker notes that, while these benchmarks are real money and meaningful, the relative difficulty of achieving each increment decreases as the base price grows, implying faster potential moves to new high levels (e.g., reaching $20,000 an ounce) than audiences might anticipate.

This speaker is attending their sixtieth annual meeting, which they believe will be the biggest and best yet. They shared figures from the previous day, noting record attendance. Specifically, 19,700 people joined between noon and 5:00 PM, up from the previous record of 16,200 the year before. According to the speaker, records were set in every aspect.

We can't track $2.3 trillion in transactions. That's two trillion, three hundred billion dollars.

The speaker emphasizes that the numbers cannot be denied or manipulated. They then reveal the staggering figure of 2,437,856, which represents the magnitude of a certain situation. The speaker expresses astonishment at this number, highlighting their lack of familiarity with such a large figure.

Energy demands are growing, and that includes the Chinese economy, which is still one of the locomotives of global economic development, over 5% growth. And we're seeing increased demand for energy resources. There is objective demand, there are concrete capabilities and supply capacities. We finally have a consensus among the parties that had been engaged in the talks, and it's not charity from either side. We're talking about mutually beneficial agreements based on market principles. And the energy prices involved are shaped not based on the prices of today, but rather on a specific formula that is calculated based on objective factors and market considerations. Gazprom is a leading company. It's now expanding to new markets. We'll have a 50,000,000,000 from Mongolia. Now we have 38. And all in all, it will be over 100,000,000,000 cubic meters of

The transcript assembles a dense, interconnected narrative alleging extensive ties between NXIVM, the Clintons, Epstein’s network, and other elites, interwoven with QAnon theory and culture-war rhetoric. - NXIVM and Clinton connections - NXIVM attended a Hillary Clinton fundraiser, reserving three VIP tables at the front. Kirsten Gillibrand sat at one table; Nancy Salzman (NXIVM co-founder) sat at the table and was later arrested on racketeering charges along with her daughter Laura Salzman. Victims described Nancy Salzman as Ranieri’s “fiercely loyal enabler and enforcer,” who turned a blind eye to his atrocities and parroted his theories, including claims about children and adults and women’s “freedom during rape.” - Clare Bronfman illegally funneled thousands into Hillary Clinton’s campaign to buy influence. Bronfman, daughter of Edgar Bronfman (president of the World Jewish Congress), came from immense wealth and leadership in NXIVM, and was later imprisoned for her role in the organization. - The program notes that at least three NXIVM top members were Clinton Global Initiative members, including Nancy Salzman and the Bronfman sisters. NXIVM donors contributed about $29,900 to Clinton’s presidential campaign, with several first-time donors giving the maximum $2,300. The Bronfmans also tried to influence political events beyond NXIVM, including Libyan matters. - NXIVM leadership, structure, and practices - Keith Ranieri, who called himself Vanguard, cultivated a largely international circle; half of his close associates were Mexican, including Emiliano Salinas (son of former Mexican president Carlos Salinas) and Rosa Larayonco (connected to a major Mexican newspaper group). - Ranieri elevated Clare Bronfman’s former ally Mac (Allison Mack’s ally) to leadership of Jeunesse, then to DOS (Dominus Obsequious Sororium), a women’s group where branding, blackmail material, and control mechanisms were used to keep women from leaving. DOS led to a hierarchy culminating in Ranieri’s harem, with some women identified as slaves under Mac’s leadership. - Mack recruited celebrities; tweets show Mack attempting to recruit more celebrity involvement. DOS used branding of women and arranged coercive dynamics, including starvation for those who refused. - Key individuals and affiliated networks - Alison Mack emerged as a high-profile NXIVM member who admitted to involvement and expressed remorse in public statements, though some victims dispute her remorse. - The organization’s inner circle connected to notable figures and families, including ties to the Bronfman sisters, the running of Rainbow Cultural Garden centers, and connections to other elites. The Rainbow Cultural Garden centers reportedly conducted multi-language child care that drew scrutiny for potential exploitation, tying back to NXIVM leadership and to Mack. - The transcript alleges connections to powerful figures such as Richard Branson (Virgin), with Branson reportedly hosting a NXIVM event on Necker Island and being linked to Epstein’s orbit; it mentions Branson’s family ties to other elites and a broader network around Spirit Cooking, Marina Abramović, and related controversies. - Broader NXIVM-related scandals - DOS is described as a training ground for women who could be recruited into Ranieri’s harem, enabling branding, control, and coercive recruitment. - The Rainbow Cultural Garden is described as under NXIVM influence, with allegations of human experimentation on children in Albany and connections to Halliburton-like leadership and Hillary donor links. - The transcript cites Pizzagate-era claims and suggests a broader conspiracy linking NXIVM, Epstein, and other high-profile figures to trafficking, blackmail, and occult symbolism. - Epstein, trafficking, and associated figures - The transcript highlights Epstein’s network, including flight logs with Bill Clinton and Rachel Chandler, described as a child handler linked to trafficking. It asserts Chandler’s modeling agency Midland Agency (co-founded with Walter Pierce) as a front to attract minors into trafficking networks, with connections to MC Squared and Epstein’s circle. - MC Squared is presented as Epstein’s underage-model procurement agency, run by Jean-Luc Brunel, who allegedly supplied underage girls to Epstein and others; Brunel is reported dead in a Paris prison cell, with officials treating his death as suicide. - Ghislaine Maxwell is described as having been convicted and sentenced to twenty years for trafficking, with the transcript presenting victim perspectives on accountability and justice. - The document links Chandler to Marina Abramović’s spirit cooking and to public figures associated with Epstein’s island, including a claimed temple beneath the temple on Little St. James. - QAnon and public discourse - The speakers reference QAnon posts, claiming that Q dropped evidence about Epstein, Maxwell, Chandler, and other elites, including assertions that “the big arrests” are coming and that information is stored on servers (including in China). They discuss fingerprints of Q posts about “class one to 99” trafficking and suggest that information is being revealed in stages, with references to the Clinton Foundation, Mueller, and the broader “deep state.” - They present a narrative of hidden surveillance, blackmail, and “puppet masters” behind global elites, arguing that revelations are imminent and that media coverage has downplayed these issues. - Closing tone - The closing segments urge sharing the video and frame the revelations as part of a larger, ongoing exposure of “the deep state cabal” and “pedos” within politics, entertainment, and media. A concluding sequence features a dramatic, cautionary outro and a call to stay vigilant. Note: The summary preserves the transcript’s explicit assertions and naming, without evaluating their veracity or providing independent commentary.

Speaker 0 presents a sequence of large-scale financial figures: - From 1998 to 2015, undocumentable adjustments at DOD and HUD amount to 21 trillion. - Bailouts between 2008 and 2012 amount to 29 trillion. - Adding 21 trillion and 29 trillion yields 50 trillion. - Going direct injections after the going direct reset began in 2019 during the pandemic amount to another 5 trillion, bringing the total to 55 trillion, not counting quantitative easing. - He concludes, “we don't have a financial problem. We have a bank robbery.” - He notes that in the annual wrap-up, a new chart was created and released on social media showing the numbers.

Speaker 0 states: "We're gonna manage to net zero by 02/1950. Actually, we're gonna have specific targets by 2025 and 02/1930, so you can measure the short term. And they don't say this quite as loudly, but what they're also saying and thinking, and we're gonna make a lot of money off of this because actually this is the way the world's headed. I mean, I'm sure exactly where we get there, but to be carbon competitive is is gonna be value creating."

Speaker 0 explains that once goals are achieved, Americans understand that “we’re real partners.” Speaker 1 reinforces: “Real partners.” Speaker 0 contends that what has to be done is to have alternative routes instead of going through the choke points of the Hormuz Straits and the Bab El Mandeb Straits in order to have the flow. Speaker 1 prompts: “Wait for it.” Speaker 0 continues: “Just have oil pipelines going west to through the Arabian Peninsula To where? Right up to Israel, right up to our Mediterranean. There” Speaker 1 interjects: “you have it.” Speaker 0 asserts that the real objective of all of this was to intentionally—“they knew that starting a war with Iran would cause a shutdown of both the Bab El Mamdab Straits, which is what the Houthis can affect in the Red Sea, and then the Strait Of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively shut down.” He states that they knew that would happen because their long-term goal has always been to force the Muslim countries in the Arab states, the Gulf Arab states, to route all of their oil exports through Israel. Speaker 1 adds: “Therefore, Israel can now control up to 40% of the world's petroleum. And that amount of control would absolutely make them a superpower, and that's exactly what they want.” Speaker 0 goes on to say that if Iran falls, it’s not going to be Turkey next; it’s going to be Egypt because they have to take back the Suez Canal. He notes that Egypt had control during the Arab-Israeli war for a brief time, but the UN forced them to give it back to Egypt. He emphasizes that they have always wanted that back. Speaker 1 contributes: “Because if they can control the Suez Canal and take that away from Egypt and they can force all the Gulf states to run all their oil through Israel. Israel controls the world, and that's their ultimate objective. That's the objective of this war.”

The discussion centers on why data centers are expanding so rapidly despite the claim that existing phone and television usage already relies on server storage. Participants cite large-scale developments such as Loudoun County, Virginia’s “never-ending” complexes and a proposed 40,000-acre AI data center campus in Utah described as “two and a half times larger than Manhattan,” with claims that Utah lacks water and that the data center would require more than double the current energy consumption of the entire state of Utah. The question raised is what is really happening behind this scale and where the collected information goes. One participant links the projects to “intel” involvement, pointing to companies said to include Palantir, Nvidia, and Abraxas, and to allegations that some of these firms received CIA investments to start, including staffing by retired senior CIA officers. This leads to questions about whether “the CIA [is] spying on our own people,” referencing Edward Snowden’s revelations and mentioning NSA’s and CIA’s surveillance of Americans. The conversation states that NSA’s charter includes a restriction that it may not spy on Americans, and notes that Snowden’s disclosures are described as the reason people “wouldn’t have any idea” without them. The Utah compound is described with a claim that it has enough memory storage for every phone call, every email, and every text message from every American for the next 500 years, prompting questions about why that amount of storage exists and why such facilities are “everywhere,” and what information they are collecting. The conversation shifts to personal protection, with a suggestion that it is “almost impossible now” and a recommendation that the only way to protect yourself is to “own no technology at all,” referencing Eric Rudolph or the Unabomber as examples. The participant further claims that governments and intelligence agencies are “scooping up” data and holding it, and contrasts earlier post-9/11 practices—where obtaining information required federal judges to approve warrants—with newer methods. The transcript claims that instead of warrants, the government can use “national security letters” to require providers to turn over all information on a named person, or can query the data centers directly by inputting a name so that information “pops up,” describing a lack of legal protections and stating that these actions are “legal now.” It concludes by naming the National Defense Authorization Act of 2016 (and National Defense Act of 2016 as referenced in the transcript) as the change that made this legal.

Speaker 0 discusses the uncertainty around how fast AI will translate into revenue, noting that even if technology advances quickly, misjudging the pace can be ruinous due to the way data centers are purchased. They reference a concept from Machines of Loving Grace, suggesting we might see a powerful AI country in the data center by 2026 or 2027, and acknowledge a possible one- or two-year error in that hunch. They pose a question: if AI can cure all diseases, how long would it take to deliver cures for everyone? They explain that biological discovery, drug manufacturing, and regulatory processes (citing vaccines during COVID) create delay, such as the vaccine rollout taking about a year and a half. They ask how long from the lab-created AI to actual universal cures, noting polio vaccines have existed for fifty years and eradication remains difficult in remote regions, with the Gates Foundation and others trying to overcome this. The speaker asserts that while economic diffusion may not be as difficult as eliminating polio, there are real limits. They outline their expected acceleration curve: a 10x year-over-year revenue increase. At the start of the year, revenue pace is $10 billion annualized; given the time needed to build and reserve data centers, they ask how much compute to buy for 2027. If revenue grows at 10x annually, it could imply $100 billion in 2026 and $1 trillion by the end of 2027, leading to a potential purchase of about $5 trillion in compute starting in 2027 (a trillion dollars per year for five years). They caution that if revenue is not a trillion dollars, no force could prevent bankruptcy from such a purchase. Thus, they acknowledge risk: either the growth rate remains 10x, slows to 5x, or revenue fails to reach the projected level. They emphasize the need to balance ambitious compute procurement with financial risk, rather than a reckless “YOLO” approach. They observe that some other companies may be acting without fully understanding the risks or performing thorough financial scrutiny. The core message is to behave responsibly, aligning compute investments with anticipated revenue growth and recognizing the potential consequences of overextension.

The speaker discusses a three-year plan involving the purchase of 250 units per year. The speaker states that too much Russian LNG is entering the European Union through the back door, along with some Russian gas and oil. The goal is to eliminate Russian fossil fuels entirely from the European Union. Purchasing more affordable and better LNG from the United States is welcomed. The estimation is approximately 250 units per year over three years.

Speaker 1 argues that the outcome mentioned in the headline is already baked in due to the lack of energy and fertilizer coming out of the Strait of Hormuz. He notes we are in week nine of the conflict, and there doesn’t appear to be a solution in sight. If the conflict lasts a few more months, it becomes catastrophic on a global scale. The countries most impacted will not be the United States but nations that already have tens of millions on the edge of famine, including Sudan and Yemen. Egypt is close to that category, and India and Bangladesh will also have a lot of difficulty. He explains that Bangladesh has its own nitrogen production plants but relies on imported natural gas to produce nitrogen. Two of Qatar Energy’s 14 natural gas trains, which are production pipelines, are out of commission for three to five years, taking 17% of Qatar Energy’s gas offline. The Haber-Bosch chemical process, which turns gas into ammonia and then into urea and other nitrogenous fertilizers, underpins this. Therefore, the world is already going to face starvation of millions in 2027, and that number could grow to tens of millions or even hundreds of millions if the Strait of Hormuz is not open soon. Speaker 0 asks for a global explanation of how the food system works and why countries depend on inputs from abroad. Speaker 1 responds that about 8,000,000,000 people globally, or roughly 4,000,000,000 or more, live today because of the Haber-Bosch process that turns hydrocarbons into ammonia and then nitrogenous fertilizers. If the supply chain is lost, and while not all natural gas comes from the Strait of Hormuz, a large amount—25% or more—comes from there for fertilizer production. The destruction of Nord Stream pipelines affected BASF (BASF is a German company) which produced nitrogenous fertilizers from Russian gas, and that cut off years ago. China and Russia have now halted all exports of fertilizers, including to India, which asked China for emergency fertilizer and was told that China needs it for its own populations. The bottom line is that not only is the natural gas feedstock being cut off that would normally feed 4,000,000,000 of the 8,000,000,000 on the planet, but countries are becoming more nationalized with their supplies, leaving vulnerable countries like Bangladesh, Thailand, and India hanging in the wind.

Speaker 0 describes how the Hoover Dam, completed during the Great Depression, formed Lake Mead—the largest reservoir in the United States—and submerged 248 square miles of land, equivalent to 158,720 acres, all under 532 feet of water. He notes that the town of Saint Thomas in Nevada was submerged, with residents told to sell their land; most buildings were abandoned or dismantled. He questions why dismantle brick and stone buildings if they would be sunk anyway, describing these as “palaces” from the old world that did not belong in Nevada. He states that Saint Thomas reemerged recently as water levels dropped, allowing visitors to walk through ruins with old roads visible, mud floods, and doors and windows found underground. He asserts that this reveals that much of the mapped area was hit by water. Speaker 0 also discusses the Hoover Dam’s underground infrastructure, noting tunnels, shafts, chambers, and sealed-off rooms not accessible to the public. He claims the dam is more than a water-management or power-generation project, and mentions a dedication ceremony in 1935 where President Roosevelt spoke in front of two winged figures and bronze statues at the dam’s dedication plaza. He argues the symbolism includes a compass rose and a celestial star chart linking the architecture to the stars, and points to the date 09/30/1935 at exactly 08:56 PM as significant. He questions why the time was chosen and asserts that at that moment Jupiter and Saturn were prominent in the sky, with Saturn described as one of the most symbolically loaded planets. Speaker 0 cites worker fatalities—“ninety six workers died during the construction,” with others claiming many more—and notes there is no memorial listing their names. He references a pattern of ritual imagery, similar to “the ball cycle” episodes, including a plaque claiming sacrifices were made to “make the desert bloom.” Speaker 0 connects the dam to broader conspiracy themes, arguing that dams are “weapons against the old world structures,” and that the dam appears to be aligned with astrology and ancient knowledge. He questions what kind of old world technology could require vast power, given the Hoover Dam’s intake of 2.5 to 3.5 trillion gallons of water per year and its output of 4,000,000,000 kilowatt hours annually, enough to light 1,300,000 homes and sufficient energy to run an entire country, equating this to “over six CERN colliders.” Speaker 0 cites the Bureau of Reclamation, which states there are more than three miles of tunnels as part of the Hoover Dam’s construction, and reiterates that the site remains off-limits to the public. He suggests the dam may be “splitting dimensions” and asserts this is not the only dam of its kind, mentioning other dams in Turkey, Egypt, China, and India as part of a broader pattern of submerging old world sites. He posits that the dam is a symbol of hidden power, possibly containing old world technology, and hints at ongoing discoveries to come. Speaker 1 later acknowledges sponsors and promotes related content and apps, which are not central to the core narrative summarized above.

The speaker discusses building AI factories to run companies, describing it as more significant than buying a TV or bicycle. They state that the world is building trillions of dollars worth of AI infrastructure over the next several years, characterizing this as a new industrial revolution. The speaker compares AI factories to historical innovations like the steam engine and railroads, but asserts that AI factories are much bigger due to the current scale of the world economy. They claim that with a $120 trillion global GDP, AI factories will underpin a substantial portion of it, suggesting that trillions of dollars in AI factories supporting a hundred trillion dollars of the world's GDP is a sensible proposition.

The speaker starts by mentioning numbers on a terminal, starting at 182 and jumping to 215, then 487, and finally 801. They continue to mention jumps to 1,085 and 1,278. They also mention that someone else's numbers are increasing as well. The speaker then jumps to 13:49 and mentions another jump to 13/71. They conclude by saying that everyone will be on a voted list.

The speaker discusses a financial lever that could change outcomes if funding were provided at a high level. They note: "we'd have a little money if somebody would spend, I don't know, $1,020,000,000 dollars a year supporting this, we would see quite different picture." They emphasize that "$1,020,000,000 dollars a year" is not a large amount for people who have billions at stake in this game, suggesting that substantial funds are already involved at very high levels. The speaker then states the strategy or consequence of such funding: "everything and take away their assets, things like that." This hints at a broader aim to influence or disrupt opposing financial resources or holdings as part of the effort. They acknowledge that the outcome of deploying such funds would be observable: "So we'll see what comes out of that." The speaker reflects on their role, summarizing, "this broadly describes what I do," indicating that the described activities and approach are representative of their work. They conclude with a candid remark about the nature of the field: "We have in not a small not a smooth job," acknowledging challenges and the complexity of the work involved. Overall, the speaker outlines a situation where substantial funding could shift results, implicates asset-focused strategies, and positions their work as broadly characterized by these dynamics, while recognizing the difficult and non-smooth nature of the efforts.

To put Canada on the right path, we can increase immigration. With a population of 100,000,000, urban centers like Toronto, GTA, Montreal, and Vancouver would see significant growth. Toronto would have 17,000,000 people, GTA 34,000,000, Montreal 11,400,000, Vancouver 7,000,000, and Greater Vancouver 12,000,000. Canada would become a nation of mega regions. Translation: To put Canada on the right path, we can increase immigration. With a population of 100,000,000, urban centers like Toronto, GTA, Montreal, and Vancouver would see significant growth. Toronto would have 17,000,000 people, GTA 34,000,000, Montreal 11,400,000, Vancouver 7,000,000, and Greater Vancouver 12,000,000. Canada would become a nation of mega regions.