TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Trump and his lawyers seem to forget that they are not yet the president. If the Supreme Court grants the president complete immunity from prosecution, what would stop the actual president, Joe Biden, from launching a preemptive strike on Mar-a-Lago to engineer regime change? However, I don't believe Biden has the authority to attack his political rival, as it would violate Pazzi Conicatus and murder laws. If Biden were to do so, he would likely face prosecution. Trump and his supporters fail to understand that the powers he claims for himself would also apply to future presidents.

Speaker 1 asserts: "Yes. Yes. I mean, obviously, he fears for his life, and I was told that he feared for his life before the two assassination attempts, one coming within a millimeter of striking his head." He adds: "I mean, I've been told, yes, that Israel is a major source of concern for Trump." He warns: "If he suspended arms to a country that carries out assassinations all across the globe, that specializes in assassinations, that has an entire wing of its intelligence services, that conducts assassinations including with household goods like pagers, would you not be scared?" "So, yes, Trump is scared." He concludes: "And what I learned... is that during one of Netanyahu's many visits to The US this year, some figures in his retinue, Israeli agents, placed electronic devices on emergency response secret service vehicles. The secret service found them, they reported this to the White House. You know, these would be emergency response vehicles, that would respond to an incident potentially involving the president."

The administration is taking threats against President Trump seriously, with the Secret Service director leading the investigation. A recent Rutgers study found that over 55% of respondents felt that murdering President Trump would be "somewhat justified." The study also indicated an "assassination culture" is emerging on the extreme left. The speaker asserts that people must be held accountable for publicly calling to assassinate the President of the United States, regardless of political affiliation.

I've never seen so many people wanting to see a president dead. I didn't see this level of anger when Biden pushed the '94 crime bill, opposed schooling for Black children, or made the "you ain't black" comment. Where was this outrage when Reagan put pharmaceuticals in inner cities? Trump wants to change things, and everyone loses their minds. I question whether the anti-Trump people are really Americans. Today's Democratic Party seems more like an immigrant party, not caring about Americans, but replacing you with people from other countries. They're taking your money and giving it to foreigners. When are you going to wake up? Why do you want to see Trump dead? Where was this energy when politicians were really doing bad things?

Concerns are growing that those opposed to Trump, having exhausted other means to undermine him, may resort to instigating a world war to prevent his return to power and the potential exposure of their actions. The focus of Washington is on foreign policy and military power rather than domestic issues like border control or the drug crisis. A war with Iran, which is now allied with major global powers, could escalate into a world war involving Russia and China. The ongoing situation in Ukraine is seen as a failure, with no clear victory in sight. Anyone advocating for conflict with Iran or Russia lacks the wisdom necessary for leadership.

Donald Trump has survived two assassination attempts, including one this weekend outside a golf course. The speaker believes it's too late to address the rhetoric surrounding Trump, arguing that claims of him being a threat to democracy and that the country will end if he's re-elected may have contributed to the attempts on his life. The speaker wants Democrats to acknowledge that if Trump wins, democracy, the Constitution, and the country will not end, and that there will be no dictatorship or bloodbath. They believe hyperbolic statements about Trump should stop, as they have not been true in the past.

Speaker 0: Did you hear Trump's take on the JFK assassination, why he didn't release the files? Yeah. I know what Trump's take is. He said that if you knew what I know, you wouldn't tell people either, which is crazy. Well, and What does that mean? That's his position on the UAP thing as well Yeah. Actually. And that's a lot of people's position on it. I mean, you know, Trump is saying, of course, the CIA had knowledge of it. That is known. I mean, I mean, the whole it sounds like it's so funny. There's so many levels and there's so much I don't understand. But the whole JFK conspiracy industry, and it really is an industry, more books written on that than almost any historical topic, is is filled with wackos. Right? There are a lot of wackos in there. But it obscures that fact obscures the larger fact which is the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. Yeah. And so whatever. I could get into it at great length. But yeah. Yeah. They're they're still classifying documents sixty one years later. Both Trump and Joe Biden have, in violation of my read of federal law, kept those documents secret. There's no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination. It was a couple generations ago. There's no one person whose whose secrets are being protected. It's an institution or maybe countries. There may have been countries involved too. I mean, don't know the answer, but there's clearly something worth protecting. And I know that when I I spoke to someone who'd seen the documents, okay, two years ago and I got I got one fact out of him, which is, yes, the CIA was involved. And by CIA, CIA is a huge organization, but James Jesus Angleton, the head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this, which I think is well known. But that that's the view of someone who saw the documents. So I thought that was news, so I went on TV and said that. The next day, I'll never forget it, I went quail hunting, and I was driving back and I got a phone call from Mike Pompeo's lawyer. Mike Pompeo was the Secretary of State, but before then he was the Director of the CIA. And in that position, he plotted the murder of Julian Assange, so he is a criminal as far as I'm concerned. But his lawyer called me and said, you know, you should know that anyone who tells you the contents of classified documents has committed a crime. He's threatening me. It's in my car. I'll never with my dog sitting next to me. I'll never forget this. And I said, are you really saying that to reveal that the US government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president to say that out loud, that's the crime? What about the actual crime which is murdering a president? Like, you're covering up for that, Mike Pompeo. He had no no response at all. And so Mike Pompeo is the one who pressed Trump to keep those documents secret. And so it's like, what's crazy to me is not just that Pompeo did that. I think Pompeo was a really sinister person and a and a criminal. I think that. I think that because the facts suggest that. He was caught. Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff wrote a long piece on this several years ago. His employees went to Mike Issachoff and said, hey. Mike Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange who's never even been charged with a crime in The United States as CIA director. That's illegal. You're not allowed federal employees are not allowed to just kill people they don't like. Okay? Just to set the baseline here. So that's who Mike Pompeo is, but he somehow intimidated Trump into not releasing this. Well, okay. That's all bad. Right? I think it's criminal behavior. What's crazy is how Mike Pompeo is treated. He's treated as like a republican pooh bah in good standing. He fully expects to become the secretary of defense in a Trump administration, which is like completely insane. Why would you get criminal and give him nuclear weapons? Okay. That's my view. I think it's a common sense view. And like he goes to fundraisers and dinners and everyone's like, hey, Mike Pompeo. It's like, no. You're the guy who kept information the public has right to know secret. You're the guy who plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime. You are the outlaw. You are the bad guy. But no. He's treated as like, you know, like a pillar of republican Washington. I think that's I think it's mind bending to watch that.

Most Americans lack individual perspective and are like robots. The treatment of the president shows that America wants to assert control and embarrass him. However, he cannot go to prison due to his status and secret service protection. The focus on his taxes and alleged misconduct with women is irrelevant to me. The real issue is that he is fighting back against attempts to break him and show he is not in control. Meanwhile, Biden is giving money to Ukraine, which highlights the issues Americans have and why they are treated the way they are.

President Trump, a smart and experienced individual, will find a solution after enduring significant challenges in his fight to reclaim the Oval Office. It's shocking how uncivilized tactics have been used against him, including multiple assassination attempts, and I believe he remains at risk. The attacks on Trump extended beyond him to his family, which is particularly troubling. In Russia, even criminal gangs avoid targeting children and women during conflicts. This behavior reflects poorly on the political system in the United States, highlighting its decline.

The speaker dismisses the idea that Iran would be responsible if something were to happen to Trump, stating they have a long list of other suspects. The speaker suggests blaming those who spied on Trump, created the fake Russian dossier, and the FBI for legitimizing false claims. They also mention those who impeached him, the 51 intelligence officials who dismissed Hunter Biden's laptop, and those who allegedly rigged the 2020 election. Further, the speaker includes those who raided Trump's house and charged him in multiple jurisdictions, like Fannie Willis, Alvin Bragg, and Letitia James. Neocon warmongers who were upset that Trump didn't want to initiate wars are also on the list. The speaker believes Iran is a scapegoat and that the real threat is in DC.

The recent assassination attempts on Trump raise serious questions. The first involved a shooter with no apparent motive, advanced skills, and no online presence. Secret Service failures are glaring, particularly the lack of surveillance on a nearby rooftop. A second attempt, weeks later at a golf course, involved an assailant with an AK-47 and body armor. These incidents, barely covered by the mainstream media, suggest a potential conspiracy. The lack of investigation into these attempts, and the continued lack of security around Trump, is deeply concerning. Trump’s reaction to these events, demonstrating resilience and a continued focus on his duties, is remarkable. His calm demeanor and focus, especially during his recent inauguration, show a change in him since the attempts. The incidents highlight a worrying lack of accountability within the government.

The Prime Minister of Israel claimed Iran tried to assassinate Donald Trump twice. One speaker believes Iran is actively trying to murder Trump and has hired hitmen in the United States over the last 18 months to two years. The other speaker questions the evidence and asks why there haven't been any arrests or military responses. The speaker cites the attempted assassinations of Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, and Brian Hook, noting that the State Department spent $2,000,000 a month providing them security. Iranian hitmen were arrested at John Bolton's apartment complex. The speaker says the military and intelligence community have been aware of Iran's attempts to murder Trump for the last two years, and that Iran even released a video about murdering Trump. The other speaker expresses surprise, stating they had never heard evidence of hitmen in the United States trying to kill Trump and suggests military action against Iran if true.

Speaker 0 joked that no one is bothering to try to kill Kamala because it's pointless, as she is just a "puppet." Speaker 1 agreed, stating she is irrelevant and replaceable. Speaker 0 clarified that some people misinterpreted the joke as a call for assassination. The speakers contrasted this with the two attempts to kill Trump with actual guns and bullets. Speaker 0 noted that Trump doesn't seem rattled by the attempts, attributing it to his strong constitution, despite his unhealthy diet and lack of exercise. Speaker 2 confirmed that Trump didn't seem like a man who'd been the subject of assassination attempts. Speaker 0 agreed that Trump seemed of sound mind and body with a strong backbone.

Does the president fear for his life? Yes. I was told he feared for his life before the two assassination attempts, one within a millimeter of striking his head. Israel is a major source of concern for Trump. He suggests that suspending arms to a country "that carries out assassinations all across the globe, that specializes in assassinations, that has an entire wing of its intelligence services, that conducts assassinations, including with household goods like pagers" would be terrifying. So, yes, Trump is scared. Citing a Trump insider, during one of Netanyahu's visits, "some figures in his retinue, Israeli agents placed electronic devices on emergency response secret service vehicles." The Secret Service reportedly found them and informed the White House. You know, these would be emergency response vehicles, that would respond to an incident potentially involving the president.

This message is directed to everyone on the deep state target list. The speaker believes that if any political presidential candidate, like RFK or Trump, is assassinated, America will respond in kind. They claim to have created a list of those involved. The speaker hopes this won't happen, but if it does, they believe option 2 behind Trump would be better for them. They even suggest that killing Trump would be the best case scenario for them, as it would lead to a quick and effective cleansing, resulting in game over for the deep state.

Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.

President Harris stated that Trump would turn the US military against the American public to promote his agenda. However, the Biden-Harris administration allegedly enacted a directive two weeks ago that changes the law, making it legal for the U.S. military to use lethal force against American citizens on American soil. Under this directive, the U.S. military can legally shoot and kill Americans who engage in political protest because they disagree with White House policies. This initiative came from the Democratic party, not during the Trump administration.

It's not just blackmail or bribery that makes people obey, but also the threat of violence. Every US president has been threatened with violence implicitly because of the murder of John F. Kennedy. Presidents understand the outlines of what happened, but no one has released all the files. The message is clear: if you get too far outside the boundaries, you could wind up like JFK. The forces that murdered the sitting president in 1963 probably placed those boundaries.

If Ukraine assisted in the assassination of Donald Trump, even at a low level, serious consequences should follow. Ryan Routh, who communicated with a Ukrainian number, had connections to Ukraine, fought there, and recruited for them. Someone in the Ukrainian military tried to use an RPG to attack the president. Unraveling the Ukraine assassination plot against Trump will implicate too many Republican senators and members of Congress. Many members of Congress use anonymous LLCs and Shell Corps in the Cayman Islands to receive undisclosed payments, often in crypto, which is why they are pro-war. Elements of the deep state working with Ukrainian elements tried to take out the president.

Some believe the president is being cagey because not all MAGA embrace Netanyahu's "bomb fetishes." Some within the MAGA base do not want the U.S. engaged in foreign conflicts, prioritizing American interests. While acknowledging policy differences, one speaker applauds any group steadfast in a diplomacy-first posture. However, this group's reluctance to commit the military overseas doesn't extend to America, as some believe President Trump should deploy the military in the streets of LA. The MAGA mindset appears to be, "We didn't vote for foreign wars. We voted for civil war." Some believe the battle for America will take place in Los Angeles and that the city is occupied, requiring force to retake it. The strategy is to inflate the threat the country faces to rile up the base, making the left a legitimate military target. They are looking for any pretense to use force against Democrats.

Trump was considered good on foreign policy, including getting out of Syria and defeating ISIS, but he was always hawkish on Iran. Zionists wanted a full conflict with Iran but only got the Soleimani assassination. Despite popular belief, Trump was allegedly pursuing regime change in Iran throughout his term, even getting close to overthrowing the Iranian government. This was also happening in Venezuela. Trump ripped up the JCPOA, and the rhetoric now suggests that such events wouldn't occur if Trump were president. Trump is trying to run even further to the right, making it hard to say no to war with Iran. Iran will be in the crosshairs regardless of the administration, especially for Israel, making them more of a target for the United States.

President Trump, an experienced individual, will find a solution after enduring significant challenges in his pursuit of the Oval Office. It's shocking that uncivilized tactics have been used against him, including multiple assassination attempts, and I believe he remains at risk. The attacks on Trump extended beyond him to his family, which is particularly troubling. In Russia, criminal gangs typically do not target women and children; they fight among themselves. This behavior reflects poorly on the political system in the United States, highlighting its decline.

Calls for violence against Trump are intensifying, with some openly advocating for assassination. The rhetoric is alarming, as it encourages dangerous actions and validates extremist thoughts. The left's disdain for Trump is palpable, and there are fears that if he were harmed, the repercussions would be severe for those involved. The climate of hostility is being fueled by media and public figures, creating a volatile situation. The need for security around Trump is critical, especially with threats coming from various groups. The discussion highlights the broader implications of such violence, emphasizing the chaos it would unleash. The focus should be on protecting leaders rather than inciting harm.

It is very likely Trump might be elected again, which would likely be a death blow to what remains of the global order. Many politicians present a false dichotomy, a false binary vision of the world. They act as if one has to choose between patriotism and globalism, between being loyal to one's nation and being loyal to some kind of global government.

You know what's interesting about assassination? Well, not only does it change those popularity polls in a big fucking hurry, but it's also interesting to notice who it is we assassinate. Do ever notice who it is? Stop to think of who it is we kill. It's always people who've told us to live together in harmony and try to love one another. Jesus, Gandhi, Lincoln, John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers, Malcolm x, John Lennon. They all said, try to live together peacefully. Bam. Right in the fucking head. Apparently, we're not ready for that. Yeah. That's difficult behavior for us.