reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes dislike of social media is growing, complicating consensus-building in democracies. Traditional arbiters of fact have been undermined, and people self-select news sources, creating a vicious cycle. Curbing social media entities to ensure accountability on facts is difficult due to the First Amendment, especially when sources spread disinformation. Winning the right to govern, and thus implement change, requires winning enough votes. The speaker questions whether democracy can survive unregulated social media, suggesting democracies are struggling to address current challenges effectively. The speaker implies the upcoming election is about breaking the fever in the United States.

The speaker believes Trump's poll numbers show Americans don't trust the media. The speaker claims Trump hasn't been charged with insurrection, and if there was any chance of conviction, he would have been charged. The speaker argues it wasn't an insurrection because those involved were unarmed, and Trump told people to protest "peacefully and patriotically." The speaker believes the focus on January 6th is because the Democratic party is scared of Trump. The speaker accuses journalists of being cowardly and part of a propaganda outlet. The speaker questions why the January 6th pipe bomber hasn't been caught and suggests looking at reporting from Revolver News.

I will bring back free speech in America because it's been taken away. The fake news is a threat to this country; most of them are terrible human beings. They will write that I spoke before a small crowd of people, even though that's not true. They write the opposite of the facts, and people lose faith in the press. I will sign an executive order banning any federal employee from colluding to limit speech, and we will fire every federal bureaucrat who is engaged in domestic censorship under the Harris regime.

I'm proud of the term "fake news." When we began this journey in 2015, their approval rating was at 92%, but now it's even lower than Congress, which is in the low twelves. I've exposed them for being fake, but the term "fake" doesn't fully capture their issues. They're not just fake; they're corrupt, similar to "crooked Hillary." While not all of them are corrupt, about 91% are.

The speakers discuss the prevalence of biased and false news on social media, with some media outlets publishing these stories without fact-checking. They emphasize that this is extremely dangerous to our democracy, repeating this statement multiple times.

The speaker notes the mainstream media's lack of coverage regarding a specific release, particularly from newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York Times. When coverage does occur, it reportedly focuses on criticisms, especially from Democrat politicians, rather than addressing the actual revelations and evidence presented in the released intelligence reports. The speaker emphasizes that the media avoids dealing with the truth that has been revealed.

The speaker discusses misleading headlines and quotes from a news segment. They clarify that a statement about imposing tariffs on cars from China was taken out of context to create a false narrative. The speaker did not actually call for violence if not elected. This behavior is described as deceptive. Translation: The speaker talks about misleading headlines and quotes from a news segment. They explain that a statement about imposing tariffs on cars from China was twisted to create a false story. The speaker did not actually call for violence if not elected. This behavior is labeled as deceptive.

The speaker states that, based on their experience, the term "fake news" is not strong enough to describe some reporting. They claim that some stories are written with a pre-determined narrative, and facts are then manipulated to fit that narrative. As an example, they cite a New York Times story that claimed the IRS had a 50% headcount decrease. The speaker says that the story used unnamed sources and was intended to create turmoil during tax season.

The media and punditry threw everything they had at me, but they didn't win. Now they want to drive a wedge between Elon and me, even suggesting I've ceded control of the presidency to him. But it's so obvious what they're doing. They're not even good at it. If they were, I never would have become president. I get 98% bad publicity, but the people are smart. They see what's happening.

Demoralization includes influencing through various methods such as infiltration, propaganda methods, and direct contacts across different areas where public opinion is formulated or shaped. The result is that the power structure slowly is eroded by bodies and groups of people who do not have either the qualification or the will of the people to keep them in power, yet they do have power. One such group mentioned is the media. The speaker questions who elected the media and how they have acquired so much power, almost monopolistic, over people’s minds. They can “rape your mind.” They question who elected them and how they have the nerve to decide what is good and what is bad for the president and his administration, who were chosen by the people. The speaker references Spiro Agnew, who was hated by the liberal left, and who described the media as a bunch of enfeebled snobs. That description is presented as illustrative of what the speaker believes the media are. The media are characterized as a reflection of mediocrity within a large establishment, such as the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and major television networks. According to the speaker, you do not have to be an excellent journalist to succeed in such environments. You only have to be a mediocre journalist. Excellence is not required to survive; competition has diminished. As soon as you smile for the camera and perform your job, that suffices. There is no longer meaningful competition. The speaker further asserts that the media’s power and influence are sustained by a lack of competition, ease of survival, and comfortable income. The implication is that the media operate with little incentive to excel, maintain high standards, or challenge the status quo, because stability, good pay (for example, “$100,000 a year” is cited), and public-facing performance are enough to ensure their continued position.

In response to questions about how the White House can reach frustrated voters and improve their sense of the situation, Speaker 0 opens by noting that lower inflation and gas prices are key, and asks what the White House can do to make those voters feel better or convince them the situation is improving, also pointing out that they are being told lies by the media, a problem he says Republicans have long faced. Speaker 1 replies by emphasizing a central point derived from polling: there is overwhelming support for President Trump across every issue and dimension. He asserts that the most important point to hammer is that under Trump there was no inflation, whereas Biden’s presidency devastated the economy. He states that there was double-digit inflation overall from when Biden entered to when Biden left, and that prices “went up 30% in four years.” He then claims that when Donald Trump “comes back in,” inflation is “down to near benchmark rates of 2% within months,” describing this as astonishing and asking rhetorically, “How’s that even possible? I mean, we we knew the man was an economic wizard.” He reiterates the question, asking how inflation could move from 30% to nearly 2% in a few months, suggesting that Trump “defied what everybody said was possible.” The exchange centers on contrasting perceptions of economic performance under the two administrations, with Speaker 1 arguing that Trump achieved a rapid and substantial reduction in inflation after a period of high inflation under Biden, and framing this as evidence of Trump’s economic prowess. The dialogue also frames political popularity and media messaging as factors in the public’s views, positioning Trump’s economic record as a core issue for persuading voters who feel left behind.

The speaker claims that millions of Americans witnessed the president's mental incompetence, leading to the country's decline, but the media avoided reporting on it. Right-leaning reporters who did cover it were criticized. The speaker recalls discussing Joe Biden's mental incompetence during President Trump's campaign and being accused of creating deep fakes to mislead the public. The speaker believes the media's actions constitute a major cover-up and scandal in American history, contributing to the decline in trust in legacy media.

The speaker contends lies persist, directing attention to Rupert Murdoch. "These lies continue tonight." "Rupert Murdoch, who has admitted they were lies and said he regretted it, has a special obligation to stop Tucker Carlson from going on tonight now that he's seen how he is perverted and slimed the truth and from letting him go on again and again and again." "Not because their views deserve such opprobrium, but because our democracy depends on it." The speaker frames these remarks as defending democracy and accountability, urging Murdoch to intervene to curb Carlson's appearances. The statements are presented as a critique of media influence and the integrity of public discourse.

The speaker believes the United States' reputation has "gone way up" under their presidency and that the country is respected again. They claim the previous president was "laughed at all over the world" and was "grossly incompetent," unable to walk up or down stairs or across a stage without falling. The speaker accuses ABC of being "fake news" and "one of the worst."

In 2016, the speaker voted for Hillary Clinton and was confused and outraged by Trump's victory. The speaker initially condemned Trump for mocking a reporter's disability. However, the speaker now believes the media intentionally misleads the public to control their thinking. The speaker claims the media exploits emotions, citing a Time magazine cover of a child who was never separated from her mother. They allege the media falsely reported Trump called all immigrants animals, omitting his reference to MS-13 gang members. The speaker accuses the media of lying about Brett Kavanaugh, children in cages, and the Walk Away movement. They state the media was wrong about the election outcome, the Covington kids, Jussie Smollett, and Russian collusion.

The speaker believes the reputation of the United States has "gone way up" under their presidency and that the country is respected again. They claim that the previous president was "laughed at all over the world" and was "grossly incompetent," unable to walk up or down stairs or across a stage without falling. The speaker accuses the media of knowing this but not reporting it due to being "fake news," singling out ABC as "one of the worst."

The speaker claims that someone received 14,000,000 votes but was thrown out of office. The speaker states this action is a threat to democracy. The speaker also claims that this person hates the woman who ran instead of him and cannot stand her.

The new press secretary is described as being very prepared. It is asserted that it's ridiculous to suggest President Trump is doing anything for his own benefit. He supposedly left a life of luxury and a successful real estate empire for public service, not just once but twice, and the American public reelected him because they trust he acts in the best interest of the country and puts the American public first. It is claimed that this president has actually lost money for being president. The speaker doesn't remember these types of questions being asked of the previous president, described as a career politician who was clearly profiting.

The speaker asserts that decreased fentanyl seizures at the U.S.-Mexico border are due to the current administration's strong border policies and strengthened relationship with the Mexican president. They claim there is no mystery to the drop in fentanyl seizures and criticize a Washington Post headline suggesting otherwise. The speaker accuses the Washington Post of intentionally manipulating Americans and alleges that the newspaper refused to publish the office's reasons for the drop in fentanyl seizures, calling this "despicable."

Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, released new evidence alleging that former President Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The speaker asserts that while Obama publicly appeared to support a peaceful transfer of power, privately he took steps to sow discord and sabotage Trump, including manufacturing and politicizing intelligence that was used to justify baseless smears against the new president. The claim is that Trump had no involvement with Russia and that the Russia collusion narrative was a massive fraud, known to Obama and others involved, including former CIA director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and others. The speaker reiterates that DNI Gabbard’s report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, attributing any wrongdoing to Barack Obama and the “weaponized” intelligence agencies of the time. The Russia hoax is characterized as a blatant lie manufactured by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some personally harmed by the false narrative. The speaker notes that much of this occurred during Trump’s first two years in office, consuming vast resources, time, and political capital to debunk the allegations at the highest levels of government. According to the speaker, nearly a decade later, declassification of documents by DNI Gabbard, alongside contributions from CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, supports a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. This report reportedly found the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin sought to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was allegedly preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. The narrative claims that, at the time, Obama’s unusual stance led the intel community to publish implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. The speaker asserts this constitutes one of the greatest political scandals in American history, noting that legacy media outlets such as the New York Times and the Washington Post were rewarded with Pulitzer Prizes for propagating political disinformation. The claim is made that those awards should be stripped from journalists who disseminated out-of-context and false intelligence to push a political narrative in service of the Democrats and associated intelligence actors.

The speaker criticizes the media, particularly the CIA's influence on it. They mention specific journalists like Rachel Maddow, Anderson Cooper, Joy Reid, and Sean Hannity, accusing them of lying. The speaker also expresses their belief in the effectiveness of vaccines. They claim that the media's morals and code are a joke and that they will turn on each other when faced with difficulties. The speaker emphasizes their commitment to preventing America from failing and providing better representation. They believe that the media is driven by money and that the country deserves better.

If you believe what the media says, you've gained a valuable ally who essentially works for you without charge. I want to be clear, I admire President Trump. I genuinely believe he's a good person. There's something admirable about him. The president has faced relentless and unfair attacks in the media, which is truly outrageous. In my experience, having spent considerable time with him, I have never once witnessed him acting in a mean, cruel, or unethical manner.

The biggest threat to America is the media, which is the enemy of the people. Before the Trump-Biden debate, the media promoted Biden and dismissed claims of his senility as right-wing conspiracy theories. After the debate, the media changed its tune, acknowledging Biden's cognitive decline. The media then ushered in Kamala, attempting a coup on Biden, despite no one voting for her to be the Democratic nominee. The media is now fully on board with Kamala, claiming she is ahead in the polls, though the speaker questions the validity of these polls. The media causes racial, familial, and political divide, as well as fear and uncertainty. The media are liars, cappers, frauds, and scammers.