reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker on David Chang's Netflix show stated they would eat human meat if a fancy restaurant served a tiny piece, even making Chang speechless. The speaker knew the statement wouldn't be well-received. They clarify they haven't eaten human meat, referencing the "Bodies" exhibit. They feel everything has been eaten in fine dining except human meat. The speaker then jokes about what body part they would offer to be eaten, such as their belly or arm, after passing away naturally. They suggest a thigh, saying it tastes like chicken.

The speaker on David Chang's Netflix show said they would eat human meat if a fancy restaurant served a tiny piece, which made Chang speechless. The speaker knew the statement wouldn't go over well. They clarify they haven't eaten human meat, but have been to the Bodies exhibit. They feel like everything has been eaten in fine dining, so the one thing that hasn't been served is human meat. The speaker would offer their belly or a piece of their arm to be eaten after they pass away naturally. They joke that a thigh would taste like chicken.

Climate change is a major problem with potential consequences like hunger, diseases, and coastal flooding. Scientists suggest geoengineering as a solution, but it is risky and could harm the ozone layer. An alternative approach is human engineering, which involves modifying humans biomedically. For example, reducing meat consumption can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions. To help people eat less meat, we could induce a mild intolerance to it by simulating our immune system's response to bovine proteins. This could be done through meat patches, similar to nicotine patches, which people can wear to curb their desire for meat.

On David Chang's Netflix show, the speaker mentioned that if given permission, they would eat human meat. However, they quickly clarified that they would never actually try it. The speaker also joked about making David Chang speechless with their comment. They discussed how they feel like they have eaten everything in fine dining, except for human body parts. They mentioned being willing to try certain body parts, like the arm, but ultimately concluded that it wouldn't taste much different from chicken.

You know, people go, oh, I'm allergic to ticks. You were injected with gelatin. That's why you're allergic to ticks. Tick goes to bite you because you were injected as a kid with gelatin, you have an allergic reaction. Why gelatin and ticks? How is that related? Something about the makeup of a tick and the gelatin. So I would assume something in their, like, skin. And when they go to bite you then when they put that into you, now what happens is their cells have transferred kinda into your cells, just kinda make it simple, and then you have that allergic reaction, but you don't actually have the Lyme. You know, Lyme is tested with a PCR test, number one, which is funny. And number two, you got EMF and heavy metal poisoning. It's wild how, like I said, everything gets flipped. You know, they target one thing and say it's the bug, but they don't say what's been injected into your body. They don't say the metal's going into your body, and they don't talk about the EMFs, are amplifying the metals. What is your favorite way of removing heavy metal or ways of removing heavy metals? We talked about chiluzhan and dragon's blood. Two of the best super foods to help pull things out, the fulvic acid and the tree sap, which is really beneficial. You can also get into organic moldy berry. Just one organic moldy blueberry, nice and simple. You can also do raw cream and raw butter, unpasteurized butter and cream. Fat is very good at pulling things out. People can look into turpentine. Turpentine is the old pine tree, you know, the sap of the pine tree, they can look into that. Doctor. Andrew Kaufman has a great protocol on that people can look into. You can get into the whole thing I've talked about with baking soda, you can get into Borax, you can get into grapefruits, the whole grapefruit one is a funny one. They tell you to stay away from the grapefruit. You know, big harm is always like, you know, don't don't don't eat the grapefruits. They interfere with the things we're trying to give you. Yeah. They're countering all of that. The other ones you can get into is apricot seeds. Big one as well too. I've been deleted many times for talking about that one.

mRNA technology, used in COVID vaccines, raises ethical concerns about potential control. Multiple genes and regulatory elements can be inserted, allowing for different vaccinations and antigens to be regulated. This could lead to unknown protein expression when consuming certain foods. S. Matthew Liao, a philosopher, suggests using human engineering to address global issues like meat consumption. By making people intolerant to certain proteins, it could reduce meat consumption and benefit the planet. Doctor Christina Parkes expresses ethical concerns about the regulation of genetic information through hormones, airborne substances, and the food supply. These discussions highlight the potential dangers and ethical implications of mRNA technology and human engineering.

The speaker discusses a conspiracy theory about the UN using food as a weapon and banning humans from eating meat. They claim that vaccines contain a bovine protein that causes an autoimmune response, making people allergic to beef. They argue that this is part of a plan to weaponize the food supply. The speaker also mentions the use of glyphosate in GMOs and its negative effects. They connect this to the tick-borne alpha gal syndrome, which causes an allergy to red meat. They suggest that the protein found in ticks is also present in vaccines. The speaker warns that the globalists are preprogramming people to stop eating meat and urges viewers to share the information.

Climate change may cause widespread suffering, and geoengineering, while risky, is being considered. An alternative solution is human engineering, which involves biomedical modifications. One example is reducing meat consumption, which could lower greenhouse gas emissions from livestock farming. To help people eat less meat, scientists could artificially induce mild intolerance to meat by stimulating the immune system against bovine proteins. This could create an aversion to eating eco-unfriendly food. Meat patches, similar to nicotine patches, could be worn to curb enthusiasm for eating meat.

Some people have a weakness for juicy steak and can't resist it. However, there is potential to use human engineering to make us intolerant to certain types of meat, similar to how some people are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can cause meat allergies if it bites you. By applying human engineering, we may be able to tackle significant global issues.

Human engineering has the potential to solve major global issues like climate change. For instance, reducing meat consumption could greatly benefit the planet, but many people are unwilling to give it up due to their weakness of will. However, through human engineering, we could make individuals intolerant to certain types of meat by manipulating their biology. An example of this is the long star tick, which, when it bites, can cause meat allergies. By applying similar principles, we can use human engineering to tackle significant world problems.

We are eating human meat. There aren't enough plants to produce as much meat as we consume. I'm visiting Good Harvest, where six tons of human meat are engineered daily. This processing plant has been running for over eight months. Mick Ross oversees the production line, managing 60 staff who engineer 50,000 steaks daily. How do we grow human meat? We use nutrient vats to process thin slices of tissue in a nutrient-rich mix, where cells grow and fuse into a large "cake" over 24 hours. This 30-kilogram protein cake yields nearly 100 steaks, all grown from one person's cells. We've mastered engineering human cells to create the flavors and textures of steaks. I would feed my family human steaks, and I already have. This is engineered human meat.

Climate change is a major problem with potential consequences like hunger, diseases, and coastal flooding. Scientists suggest geoengineering as a solution, but it carries risks like destroying the ozone layer. Another approach, human engineering, involves modifying humans to address climate change. For example, reducing meat consumption, which contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, could be achieved by inducing mild intolerance to meat through immune system stimulation. This could be done using meat patches, similar to nicotine patches, to curb the desire to eat meat.

People eating too much meat is a problem for the planet, but many are unwilling to give it up due to weakness of will. One solution could be using human engineering to make people intolerant to certain types of meat, similar to how some are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can make people allergic to meat if it bites them. Through human engineering, we have the potential to address significant global issues.

The University of Nebraska's study suggests that raising more cows could help combat carbon emissions because cows are carbon negative, producing more oxygen than methane and carbon. Eating more cheeseburgers or steaks could potentially save the world.

Speaker 0: If you live in these parts of the country, which is practically half of The US, you should start taping up your legs like this guy every time you go outside. There's this tiny little bug called the Lone Star tick causing massive problems. A single bite from this guy reprograms your entire immune system causing Alpha gal syndrome, which makes you allergic to red meat, and it can be life threatening. Now, what's crazy to me is that these ticks have apparently been around for over two hundred years, but there was no recorded cases of Alpha gal syndrome until just about twenty years ago, and now we're seeing a hundredfold increase in cases. The official explanation is that these ticks are spreading because of climate shifts and growing deer populations, but I find it awfully ironic that the same people pushing the global warming agenda while simultaneously investing in the solutions for it are also pushing the agenda to eat lab made and plant based meat, which are miserably failing. We also know about Lyme disease, another devastating tick borne illness, and its relationship to Bioengineering Lab two fifty seven on Palm Island, just nine miles away from Lyme, Connecticut. Now, don't know about you, but it's interesting that as thousands of people are healing and feeling better incorporating red meat back into their diet, there just so happens to be this exploding population of ticks that could forever prevent you from eating it. Speaker 1: We can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogues of this in life. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat.

Speaker 0 presents two examples. First, he notes that people eat too much meat, and if they reduced meat consumption, it would help the planet. He observes that people are not willing to give up meat; some will be willing, but others lack willpower. He admits personal weakness, saying, “Wow, this steak is just too juicy. I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way.” He then suggests a thought: we know about intolerances, such as his milk intolerance and others being intolerant to crayfish. He proposes that human engineering could make it the case that people become intolerant to certain kinds of meat, specifically bovine proteins. He points to an analogue in life—the long star tick—where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. He mentions that he can describe the mechanism. He then asserts that this is something that could be done through human engineering. In summary, he suggests that human engineering might address large global problems by altering human tolerances to certain foods, including meat, as a potential solution. The second example is implied but not elaborated in the transcript beyond the assertion that human engineering could address big world problems by enabling intolerances to particular foods, thereby influencing behavior and environmental impact. The overall argument centers on leveraging biological or engineered intolerances to reduce meat consumption as a means of benefiting the planet, supported by the reference to naturally occurring meat allergy mechanisms such as the long star tick.

The discussion focuses on the idea that new “COVIDs” could emerge in the form of ticks, specifically ticks that cause a rare dangerous red meat allergy. The speakers reference that this concept has been heard before, including at Davos. The question raised is what precautions people can take against ticks that trigger red meat allergy. Speaker 1 argues that the phenomenon could involve human engineering, suggesting that people can become intolerant or allergic to certain foods or proteins, and that there may be analogs in nature. Speaker 1 cites existing examples of intolerances, including milk intolerance and intolerance to crayfish. Speaker 1 then points to a specific example: the lone star tick. Speaker 1 says that if the lone star tick bites you, “you will become allergic to meat,” and indicates that the mechanism can be described. Speaker 1 frames this as something that could be done through “human engineering,” claiming that it might be possible to make it the case that people become intolerant to certain kinds of meat or certain kinds of bovine proteins, and also states that addressing “really big world problems” might be possible through human engineering. Speaker 0 then shifts to a discussion of messaging and media influence, saying that Tucker Carlson—described as “controlled opposition”—came out and told some of the truth, that this “is part of what controlled opposition does,” and that it involves telling people some of the truth “in your face,” but “most people won’t even listen.” Speaker 2 provides additional claims about tick-borne disease and alleged historical activity. Speaker 2 says that the “same organism” causes Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and calls it “the most deadly tick borne disease in The United States.” Speaker 2 also states that it was a germ being weaponized by the US military “at the time,” and that they tried to “stuff it in ticks.” Speaker 2 then asks what tick weaponization is, and recounts comments attributed to Willie. According to Speaker 2, Willie said he spent “over a decade” in the biological weapons program, as a contractor to Fort Detrick, working on weaponizing fleas, ticks, and mosquitoes. Speaker 2 says that Willie’s work involved mass-producing them, “trying to make new diseases,” and “mixing bacteria and virus in ticks,” with the intent described as “the perfect stealth weapon,” likened to “poor poor man’s nuke.” Speaker 0 responds by saying the material is hard to digest and “so evil,” and that it is hard to believe it could happen in the United States. Speaker 0 then agrees with the earlier point that it did “and maybe,” but the statement ends there.

Speaker 0: The University of Nebraska just completed a study stating the way to save the world on carbon is to raise more cows. Cows are carbon negative; they produce more oxygen than they emit as methane and carbon. The takeaway is to eat more cheeseburgers or steaks to save the world.

Human engineering has the potential to solve major global issues like climate change. For instance, reducing meat consumption could greatly benefit the planet, but many people are unwilling to give it up due to a weakness of will. However, through human engineering, we could make individuals intolerant to certain types of meat, similar to how some people are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can make people allergic to meat. By utilizing human engineering, we can address significant world problems.

Human engineering has the potential to solve major global issues like climate change. For instance, reducing meat consumption could greatly benefit the planet, but many people are unwilling to give up meat due to their weakness of will. However, by using human engineering, we could make individuals intolerant to certain types of meat, similar to how some people are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can make people allergic to meat if it bites them. Through human engineering, we can tackle significant world problems.

We stumbled upon articles revealing we're consuming human cell lines. Under an electron microscope, immortal cells resemble "The Thing," gobbling others—scientists describe it as "the blob." This factory food is sickening, like eating cancer. If these cell lines can be engineered, what else can be added? We worry about foreign DNAs assimilating into our cells from DNA vaccines, but creating entire cell lines means manipulating their DNA. Factory-made fake meat is essentially cancer, grown rapidly in a growth medium. It's like throwing a blob into sugar water and watching it grow, devouring other cells. Who knows what this immortal cell line does? This may be from Henrietta Lax's cells or other sources. They add beef blood and other genetic material to engineer a new substance. We must ask, are we trusting organizations like the USDA and FDA enough?

Some people are unwilling to give up meat, even though reducing meat consumption would greatly benefit the planet. This is due to a weakness of will and the enjoyment they derive from eating meat. However, human engineering could potentially help address this issue. For instance, by making people intolerant to certain types of meat proteins, similar to how some individuals are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can cause individuals to develop an allergy to meat. Through human engineering, we may be able to tackle significant global problems.

Cows contribute about 5% of global emissions, primarily due to methane produced by gut bacteria. Vaccination could potentially eliminate these bacteria. In a recent discussion with Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology, concerns were raised about the current bird flu situation. Despite its long history, the urgency surrounding it seems disproportionate, especially since the mortality rate is low and it doesn’t spread easily among humans. There are fears that the government may exploit this situation to increase regulatory control over food supplies, similar to actions taken during the 2020 pandemic. Additionally, reducing meat consumption could significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions. Strategies like "meat patches" could be developed to create aversion to meat, promoting a shift towards more eco-friendly diets.

People should eat less meat to help the planet, but many struggle to give it up due to a weakness of will. One solution could be using human engineering to make people intolerant to certain types of meat proteins, similar to how some are intolerant to milk or crayfish. For example, the lone star tick bite can make people allergic to meat. By utilizing human engineering, we may be able to address significant global issues. Translation: Eating less meat can benefit the planet, but many find it hard to give up due to a lack of willpower. One idea is to use human engineering to make people intolerant to certain types of meat proteins, like how some are intolerant to milk or crayfish. For instance, the lone star tick bite can cause meat allergies. Through human engineering, we could potentially tackle major world problems.