reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim that it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The goal is to establish a one-world government with centralized control. The speaker argues that sustainable development is not about recycling or resource allocation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and impoverishing large portions of the population. They emphasize the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to protect personal freedom.

Speaker 0: United Nations agenda 21, sustainable development. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century. And so many of us around the world think that a sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non governmental organizations, corporations, and government in order to dictate and what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. And the goal of agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implement it on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world while we are moving towards the endgame. We are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.

The video explores the concept of sustainable development and its connection to Agenda 21, a non-binding action plan signed by George H.W. Bush in 1992. It discusses how Agenda 21 aims to address issues such as overpopulation, resource depletion, and environmental degradation through the implementation of zoning laws and regulations at various levels of government. However, concerns are raised about the potential impact on individual freedoms and property rights. The video also highlights the role of NGOs in embedding sustainable development concepts into government programs and the United Nations' use of climate change to justify central planning and gain control over resources. It mentions organizations like ICLEI operating in the US to implement Agenda 21 without public knowledge or consent. The speaker argues that sustainable development may lead to a global police state and universal poverty.

Agenda 21 is a UN plan for total collectivism, aiming to make people dependent on the state by restricting private property and living in state-provided high-rise apartments. The goal is to control individuals by removing their independence, especially those living in rural areas with their own resources. The plan involves moving people to cities, making them reliant on the state for all necessities like food, shelter, and utilities. This is to ensure control over the population and prevent any threats to the collectivist society.

This video discusses Agenda 21, a United Nations plan for total control over land, resources, and people. It aims for a centralized world government and social equity by moving populations into city centers. The mainstream media ignores this, so individuals must educate themselves and resist indoctrination. The goal is to preserve personal freedom and work together to fight for it.

The United Nations Habitat one plan aims to relocate humans from rural areas to cities to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes will be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. The ideology of smart growth or new urbanism promotes living with only the necessary space. The goal is to make it financially and otherwise inconvenient to live in private homes and convince people that it is unsustainable. High-rise stack and pack dwelling units with smart meters and surveillance systems will ensure energy efficiency and monitoring. Those with gardens or single-family residences using excessive water will be removed. Agenda 21 seeks to remove self-sufficient individuals from rural areas and have corporations control food production. The aim is for everyone to walk or bike, leading to a healthier lifestyle, although genetically modified foods will still be consumed.

Agenda 21, a United Nations plan launched in 1992, aims to address global environmental issues but has been criticized for its potential to dominate all aspects of human life. Under the banner of social equity, wealth redistribution has rendered many American activities unsustainable and targeted for elimination by 2030. These include single-family homes, suburban communities, crop irrigation, pesticides, livestock production, privately owned automobiles, fossil fuels, mineral extraction, and timber harvesting. The plan also envisions reducing the global population to under 1 billion people, concentrating them in easily surveilled mega cities for greater control.

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to establish a totalitarian state with control over land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, Agenda 21 is not about recycling or resource allocation for all. Instead, it focuses on relocating populations to concentrated city centers and achieving centralized control. The plan's three pillars are economy, ecology, and equity, but social equity is used to impoverish large portions of the population and weaken developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and fight for freedom.

The speaker discusses the concept of 15 minute cities, which are areas where everything you need is within a 15-minute walk. They claim that this idea is not about convenience or saving the planet, but rather a way for authorities to control and lock down people. They mention that some places have already passed legislation to impose climate lockdowns. The speaker suggests that in the future, people may only be allowed to leave their immediate area a few times a year, with wealthier individuals being able to buy passes to travel more freely. They also mention a city being built in Saudi Arabia that could potentially house millions of people and be used for control. The speaker concludes by stating that all of these measures will lead to the complete enslavement of the population.

Agenda 21 is a United Nations plan to establish a collectivist society by eliminating people's independence. The goal is to make everyone dependent on the state for everything, including housing. The plan discourages individuals from living in rural areas and owning land, as they are seen as a threat to the collectivist agenda. The aim is to control mankind by concentrating them in large cities and making them reliant on the state for their basic needs. This is the hidden objective of Agenda 21.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

This is about Agenda 21, a United Nations plan for total control over land, resources, and people. It aims for a one-world government and moving populations into city centers. The mainstream media won't cover this, so people need to educate themselves and fight for personal freedom. We must work together as individuals to resist this totalitarian state and protect our freedom.

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim that it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The plan focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being about impoverishing large portions of the population. The speaker believes that major corporations support this plan to have unrestricted movement of workers and goods, reduce wages, and increase control. They emphasize the importance of educating oneself and others about this agenda and working together to preserve personal freedom.

Agenda 21 is a UN plan for total collectivism, aiming to make people dependent on the state by eliminating private property and forcing them into high-rise apartments provided by the government. The goal is to control individuals by making them rely on the state for everything, discouraging independence. The plan involves moving people from rural areas to cities, where they can be easily controlled. This strategy seeks to ensure that individuals are reliant on the government for food, shelter, water, and power.

Agenda 21 is a real plan to remove humans from rural and suburban areas. It has been implemented in the US and supported by every president. It is a global plan implemented locally in every city and town. It aims to control all aspects of life, including land, water, plants, animals, and human beings. The plan is called communitarianism, which balances individual rights with the rights of the community. The individual always loses in this philosophy. Agenda 21 is a stealth plan happening in plain sight. It includes smart growth and wildlands, which restrict mobility and shift land ownership from private to public. This is a takeover of our nation and an administrative coup d'etat. It is sold as an economic driver but is designed to fail.

The United Nations Habitat 1 plan aims to relocate people from rural areas to cities, known as human settlements, in order to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes will be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. The concept of smart growth or new urbanism suggests that people should only have the space they need. The goal is to make private transportation and homeownership unsustainable, while promoting high-rise living with smart meters for energy management. The stack and pack approach allows for easier monitoring and control of residents. Those with gardens or single-family residences using excessive water or resources are deemed unsustainable and need to be removed. The ultimate objective of Agenda 21 is to have people living in urban areas while corporations control food production.

The speaker discusses the Agenda for the 21st Century, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They explain that sustainable development is not about recycling and resource creation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and controlling all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The speaker emphasizes that social equity is not about providing clean water and air, but rather about impoverishing large portions of the population and bringing down developed nations. They argue that major corporations want unrestricted movement of workers and goods to reduce wages and exploit and control populations. The speaker urges individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together for personal freedom.

In 1976, the United Nations introduced the Habitat 1 plan at the Vancouver Convention, which aimed to relocate people from rural areas to cities, now called human settlements. The idea behind this plan was to concentrate populations in specific areas to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. As a result, people would stay at home more, potentially even working from home, and rely less on cars and energy. The UN's focus on sustainable development led to the phasing out of single-family homes, which they considered suburban sprawl. Instead, people would live in apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. This concept of "smart growth" or "new urbanism" advocates for using only the necessary amount of space. The overall goal is to make private transportation and owning homes less desirable, promoting the idea of being a responsible global citizen.

Several speakers present a cohesive, alarmist view of a global move toward centralized, technocratic governance: - A long-standing desire to control others is fueling a push toward globalization and centralization of power in unelected officials at supranational bodies. They claim the aim is to have all the world’s resources “in their pocket.” - The larger project is described as an attempt to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with a global technocracy. A “coup” is alleged, with the argument that rules could replace currency, creating a system of control without money. - The situation is likened to an inverted prison: people may seem free to roam, but “everything you want to access is behind lock and key.” The potential for social control is described as gigantic and potentially irreversible. - The plan reportedly includes commandeering land, reducing farming, radically changing the food we eat, transforming the electricity supply, and dictating how it is used, while replacing currency with a system of credits. All three strategies are said to be premised on a climate-crisis narrative centered on carbon dioxide. - One speaker disputes the climate-crisis premise, stating they do not think there is a climate crisis and that the government pushes a catastrophic story; another adds that no single science paper proves conclusively that humans control all or most of the climate. - Europe is criticized for a “mad dash towards net zero,” described as economic suicide that deliberately impoverishes ordinary people and de-industrializes Europe, raising questions about what is being saved if it’s being paved over. - A global war on agriculture is claimed, with many farms selling up and concerns about looming food shortages. There is a suggestion that shifting people from “real food” to “pharma food” would enable control through publicly traded stocks. - The speakers call the movement “the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world” and, more broadly, a blueprint and action plan. They warn that life on Earth will be radically changed and that everything will be monitored, with environmental consequences of every human action. - A chilling point is made that once a digital ID is in place, “it's game over for humanity,” and that the general population cannot fathom the psychopathy of the vision they describe. Overall, the discussion centers on a perceived coordinated effort to centralize power globally, erode traditional democracy, redefine currency, reshape agriculture and energy systems, and surveil all human activity under a climate-justified technocracy.

In 1976, the United Nations introduced the Habitat one plan, which aimed to relocate people from rural areas to cities, now called human settlements. The idea behind this plan was to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage by concentrating populations in specific areas. As a result, people would stay at home more, potentially working from home and using their cars less. The UN's focus on sustainable development led to the phasing out of single-family homes, which they considered suburban sprawl. Instead, people would live in apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. This concept of smart growth or new urbanism promotes the idea of not having more space than necessary. The overall goal is to make private transportation and owning homes seem unsustainable, encouraging people to embrace a more communal and sustainable lifestyle.

In 1976, the United Nations introduced the Habitat one plan, which aimed to relocate people from rural areas to cities to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes were considered suburban sprawl and would be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities. The concept of smart growth or new urbanism promoted the idea of living in spaces that are only necessary, eliminating excess. The goal was to make private transportation and owning a home seem unsustainable. High-rise buildings with smart meters and surveillance systems would ensure efficient energy use, and those who exceeded limits would be monitored by the energy police. The agenda behind this plan was to remove people from rural areas and have corporations control food production. The ultimate aim was to create fit and healthy individuals who would rely on genetically modified foods.

Humans living in rural areas will be relocated to cities, known as human settlements, in order to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. The UN aims to phase out single-family homes and promote apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. These dwellings will adhere to UN building codes and sustainable development practices. The concept of smart growth or new urbanism advocates for living spaces that match actual needs, discouraging excess space. There is an apparent effort to discourage private transportation and homeownership, with incentives to convince people that these practices are unsustainable. The goal is for humans to live in transit villages and smart cities while animals roam freely in continental corridors.

The United Nations Habitat one plan aims to relocate humans from rural areas to cities to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes will be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. The ideology of smart growth or new urbanism suggests that people should only have the space they need, discouraging excess. The goal is to make private transportation and owning homes seem unsustainable, pushing people towards living in high-rise buildings with smart meters and surveillance systems. The focus is on managing and monitoring residents' energy usage. Those with gardens or single-family residences are seen as using too much water and are deemed unsustainable. The ultimate objective of this plan is to remove people from rural areas and have corporations control food production. The goal is for everyone to walk or use bikes, promoting fitness, although the genetically modified foods they are forced to eat may affect their health.