reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker questions the presence of weapons at Al Shifar Hospital, mentioning that the images shared by the IDF show only a few rifles, Qurans, discs, and a laptop. They express surprise and state that even in Texas, assault rifles are not kept in hospitals. The speaker emphasizes that a hospital should not have any assault rifles.

Hamas receives aid meant for civilians, but it should only get the minimum to survive until hostages are released. Prioritizing hostages over aid is justified, even if it causes a humanitarian crisis. Hamas disregards rules and holds civilians, justifying the decision to withhold aid.

Let me affirm. The suffering Syria endured, we wish upon no one. We are among the peoples most deeply aware of the horrors of war and destruction. For this reason, we stand firmly with the people of Gaza.

Today marks day 6 of the IDF's successful operation against Hamas and Islamic Jihad at Shefa Hospital. 170 terrorists were neutralized, with 100 suspects linked to Hamas or Islamic Jihad captured. These terrorists were involved in the October 7th massacre. Hamas and Islamic jihadists are now barricaded inside the hospital, using it as a base to attack IDF forces. Despite this, the IDF has provided medical aid, supplies, and restored electricity to the hospital. This operation highlights Hamas' tactic of using hospitals and civilians as shields in their warfare. Translation: The IDF has conducted a successful operation against Hamas and Islamic Jihad at Shefa Hospital, capturing terrorists and providing aid despite their attacks on the hospital.

We must support those fighting for their cause, like Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the PFLPs in Gaza. We need to choose a side: the side of the fighters.

I shook hands with a Hamas activist because they treated us well and were considerate. They took care of my mom's needs and were prepared. They provided shampoo and conditioner for women. I didn't ask about what was happening outside.

Wanna get on to Ukraine. But, given that Israel is signaling it doesn't like the, Al Qaeda operative, Jelani in Damascus, and we know Tulsi Gabbard is something of an expert on Syria because she exposed the lies and the, phony war in Syria when The United States was supporting the ISIS and Al Qaeda rebels there. How do you and Trump has been very brave arguably saying, he's not gonna, start sending loads of money like Britain is to Tchelani. There's still thousands of American troops, though, in Syria. What is American Syrian policy Syria policy? America's policy towards Syria is basically Israel's policy. And what The United States was bent on doing was wrecking Syria and keeping it wrecked. That's the Israeli objective here. This is what the Israelis wanna do with Iran. They don't simply wanna do away with Iran's nuclear capability. They surely do wanna do that, but they wanna wreck Iran. They wanna turn Iran into Syria. And what the Israelis are doing in Syria is going to great lengths to make sure that Syria remains, a dysfunctional state. They don't want Syria to become, a formidable adversary. They want it to remain broken. And, of course, The United States will support the Israelis in that regard. So, of course, the Israelis are not gonna allow the Americans to give huge amounts of aid to Jalani so that he can produce a viable Syrian state because that's not Israeli policy. Just look at what they're doing in Iran. I mean, excuse me, what they're doing in Lebanon. It's a similar situation.

Reports indicate that Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters, including those from the Nusrah Front, an Al Qaeda affiliate. While this raises concerns, the primary motivation for treatment is humanitarian. Tactical considerations exist, but the immediate focus is on humane treatment. There is skepticism about potential blowback from aiding Nusrah fighters, as the dynamics in Syria differ from other conflicts. However, when it comes to Hezbollah, the situation is different due to their history of actions against Israel, which makes treating them unacceptable. In summary, Israel is willing to treat Al Qaeda fighters but not Hezbollah fighters due to their distinct relationships and past actions.

Images of babies lacking fuel and resources in Shifa hospital have gained global attention. The interviewer questions whether Israel will consider the humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave. The Israeli army representative defends their actions, stating they are a democratic state defending against fascism and Islamist terrorism. They argue that their operations are not bound by international law. When asked about using hospitals as military bases, the representative deflects, accusing the interviewer of having a political bias. The conversation becomes heated, with both parties accusing each other. The interview ends abruptly.

The speaker was asked about the IDF's use of AI, specifically Lavender, to identify Hamas targets. The speaker stated they are not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel and their bias is to defer to Israel. They believe it's not for others to second guess everything and that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they're broadly in the right. That is the perspective they come back to.

There have been reports that Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters in its hospitals on the border, including fighters from Nusra front, which is, of course, the Al Qaeda proxy in Syria. Do those reports worry you that Israel's helping wounded Al Qaeda aligned fighters? Speaker 1: "As I said before, in a different context, it's always useful also to deal with your enemies in a humane way." "the main consideration, the immediate consideration is humane." "I didn't say there's no tactical, I said the main consideration, the immediate consideration is humane." Speaker 0: "So purely humanitarian you say, so there's no tactical or political strategic" Speaker 1: "No. I don't think so. I don't think there's going to be blowback." "the rules of the game in Syria are such that you can do anything that is not able is not possible to be done anywhere else." Speaker 0: "Would you also treat Hezbollah fighters? No." Speaker 1: "I would not treat Have" "A We different account with Hezbollah, a totally different account because Hezbollah has carried out the type of, actions against us which preclude us from going into what the Al Qaeda has done." "Al Qaeda, to the best of my recollection, has up to now not attacked Israel." Speaker 0: "But has attacked your number one ally and sponsor in The United States Of America."

Dr. Ghassan Abusita, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon, was called to Al Ali Hospital to help treat the overwhelming number of wounded patients. While operating, a missile struck, causing part of the ceiling to collapse. Outside, he witnessed children's bodies and injured individuals, some with amputations. Dr. Abusita assisted in carrying a wounded person to an ambulance, surrounded by body parts and piles of bodies. He returned to Shifa Hospital, where families had sought refuge, only to find them dead or critically wounded. Israel's warning of attacking Palestinian hospitals has become a reality, and those who unconditionally support Israel's actions bear responsibility for this war crime. If Israel faces no consequences, more war crimes will occur, and hospitals will continue to be targeted.

Images of babies lacking fuel and resources in a hospital in Shifah are circulating worldwide. The journalist asks if the Israeli soldiers will consider the humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave. The Israeli soldier responds by stating that they are a democratic army defending Israel and all its citizens, regardless of their religion. They argue that the Hamas has also killed Muslims and that their operation is not bound by international law. The journalist questions whether entering a hospital aligns with international humanitarian rules, to which the soldier responds that hospitals should not be used as military bases. The journalist accuses the soldier of behaving like the Hamas, and the soldier requests respect. The conversation ends abruptly.

Israel has been reportedly treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters, including those from the Al Qaeda proxy Nusra Front, in its hospitals. When asked if these reports were worrying, Speaker 1 responded that it is useful to deal with enemies in a humane way. While the immediate consideration is humane, Speaker 1 did not say there were no tactical considerations. Speaker 1 does not believe there will be blowback against Israel for treating Nusra Front fighters because the rules of the game in Syria allow things not possible elsewhere. Speaker 1 would not treat Hezbollah fighters because Hezbollah has carried out actions against Israel that Al Qaeda has not. Al Qaeda, to the best of Speaker 1's recollection, has not attacked Israel.

The speaker addresses the use of artificial intelligence or Lavender by the IDF in identifying Hamas targets. They state they are not on top of all the details of what’s happening in Israel and that their bias is to defer to Israel. They say it’s not for us to second guess everything. They conclude that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they’re broadly in the right.

Hospitals have become part of the war in Gaza as Hamas uses them as a cover to conduct terrorism. They deliberately embed themselves in civilian places like schools, kindergartens, and hospitals, using the sick and vulnerable as human shields. Recently, in the Avantisi hospital, a Hamas company commander held 1,000 patients, medical staff, and innocent people hostage while conducting terrorism. This tactic has been used by Hamas for years, exploiting the resources and the most vulnerable individuals.

Israeli doctors supported IDF bombing hospitals in Gaza, sparking outrage. Speaker condemns politicizing healthcare, emphasizing the need for moral consistency in treating all patients. Criticizes lack of support from medical associations and highlights underreported casualties in Gaza conflict. Calls for accountability and justice for victims.

Israel is praised for its moral actions despite the conflict with Palestinians. The speaker jokes about the number of Palestinians killed. They discuss the need for American support in various international arenas. Gratitude is expressed towards President Biden and the US Congress. The speaker believes that if Israel wins, it will benefit the civilized world. Personal growth is mentioned at the end.

In October 2023, Hamas terrorists invaded Israel and abducted over 200 innocent people, taking them to Gaza. Two hostages were brought to Shefa Hospital, which is connected to Hamas' network of tunnels. Despite other hospitals being closer, Hamas chose Shefa Hospital for its cover and easy access to their tunnel system. The terrorists' motives for bringing the hostages there are questionable, considering the brutal acts they committed against civilians.

The speaker criticizes the excessive response in Gaza and mentions that initially, President Sisi of Mexico did not want to allow humanitarian material to enter. However, the speaker managed to convince both President Sisi and Bibi (presumably referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu) to open the gate for humanitarian aid.

Hamas is seen as a troublemaker, but Israel values every life and aims to bring aid trucks in. Many organizations will be pleased with this commitment. The former house speaker is now joining the conversation. Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister, for your time.

Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters, including those from the Nusrah front, in its hospitals on the border. When asked about concerns regarding helping Al Qaeda-aligned fighters, the speaker emphasizes the importance of humane treatment, regardless of political considerations. They believe that the immediate concern should be the well-being of the wounded. When questioned about potential blowback, the speaker does not anticipate any negative consequences, citing the unique circumstances in Syria. However, they clarify that they would not treat Hezbollah fighters due to past actions against Israel. The speaker distinguishes between their approach to Al Qaeda and Hezbollah based on their respective histories of attacking Israel.

The speaker has never heard of soldiers or intelligence agents dressing as females or healthcare workers to enter a hospital and kill patients. The speaker is not surprised if Israelis did this, claiming they disregard the rules of war because the United States protects them. The speaker finds the cruelty inflicted on Palestinians disturbing, stating Israelis seem to take joy in inflicting punishment. The speaker believes this is another instance of Israelis not caring about basic rules and acting in a cruel and evil way.

Speaker 0 discusses working with the Israelis, describing them as “very American” and noting that they could get into shouting matches during meetings over whose idea was best, followed by casual lunch and reconciliation. He emphasizes that Israel is a good ally that the U.S. needs to protect and support, and he asserts that CIA and Al Qaeda had worked closely together in Iraq and in Syria, and that there are times when covert action allowed meetings with the “quote unquote, enemies” to try to bring things down as CIA officers. Speaker 1 adds that most of the world has a problem with Al Qaeda and ISIS/Daesh, but there is less of a problem because the CIA worked with ISIS/Daesh and Al Qaeda. He suggests that if the CIA worked with them, it would be better to understand what they were doing, and if the plan is for the U.S. to work with them on a security agreement, which has been done with enemies before, then this has been done in concert with diplomats and other countries involved. He indicates he wouldn’t be surprised if that was happening and would call it possibly hopeful. Speaker 0 continues by noting that newspapers in the United States once celebrated Qasem Soleimani as a fighter with American troops against ISIS and Al Qaeda. He states that Soleimani “was, and now it's switched,” implying a shift in perception or policy. The overarching theme is the idea of collaboration or coordination with hostile or extremist groups in pursuit of broader strategic objectives, including countering Iran, and the possibility that such collaborations could be framed as necessary or hopeful within a complex web of alliances and covert actions. Speaker 0 ends by reiterating the shift in stance: “Now we have to go to al ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against Iran.” This underscores a cyclical or ironic pivot in U.S. strategy, moving from partnering with certain adversaries against common threats to reengaging those same groups to counter another adversary. The dialogue presents a candid view of realpolitik, suggesting that relationships with seemingly incompatible actors and shifts in alliances occur as part of broader geopolitical objectives, with collaboration sometimes described as acceptable when it serves strategic goals, and public narratives sometimes contrasting with behind-the-scenes actions.

Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan from the IDF shows evidence of Hamas using hospitals for military operations. In the Shefa Hospital, Israeli troops found obstructed security cameras, hidden weapons, and a backpack with important intelligence. They discovered AK-47s, ammunition, and grenades in closets and behind MRI machines. Another grab bag contained military equipment and a laptop with incriminating evidence. The IDF is analyzing the laptop and other documents found. The video also includes a picture of an Israeli hostage who was rescued. This evidence confirms that Hamas violates international law by using hospitals for illicit military purposes.