reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A group of people, including the Carlos Slim family, invested in the movie production. Carlos Slim is one of the wealthiest men globally. The speaker mentions having various accounts like Nike and Mark Jacobs. They discuss being in LA and getting a hat. They talk about their pockets being full.

We are blessed to have people like George Soros who fearlessly step up when our country needs us. Soros is willing to engage in the electoral process in America for the first time, feeling the urgency to take action.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake in this game. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and talking to the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been easy or smooth.

I am fundraising to support our cause and trying to convey the message that we are reasonable and won't destroy everything or take away people's assets. If someone were to invest $10-20 million a year, we would have a different outcome. This is not a significant amount for those who have billions at stake in this game. I am engaging with the business community to explain our intentions. We have a big job ahead of us.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake for those involved. I'm conveying this message in my fundraising efforts. Our goal is to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what happens. However, this task has not been easy so far.

I invested $10,000,000 in a supplement to help during the pandemic, facing backlash from big pharma and media. Plans to distribute to Israel, the Philippines, and Brazil were thwarted. Despite warnings, I continued to fight for saving lives.

We are in a monetary revolution where the power needs to be taken back from the private families and central banks that print money. The government is not in control. This is why we can't see change in congress or have a government that works for us. We need a peaceful revolution, a monetary revolution, where we stop using their money and instead invest in assets like gold, silver, Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Global Boost. These assets can't be inflated or seized. Remember your seed phrase and keep it secure.

We should expand our support to see a different outcome, even if it requires a significant investment. This amount of money is small compared to what those involved in this game have at stake. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and engaging with the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been smooth so far.

This is an ATM. I am transforming the traditional banking industry with x.com. I am not your typical banker. I have raised $50 million through phone calls for x.com, my new internet banking and mutual funds company. I have invested most of my net worth into x.com. It has the potential to be a multibillion dollar success in the largest sector of the world.

I became rich by investing wisely and keeping money circulating. Stagnant money is useless. Investing in a corporation requires understanding financial reports. After investing, there is a consultation fee. Money should always be put to work to grow. Investing wisely is an art that stimulates the economy.

I run a Pelosi stock tracker and an app with the slogan "invest like a politician." At 25, I quit my finance job in New York and moved to Bali. When COVID hit, I connected with co-founders to build an app that allowed users to follow their friends' stock portfolios. During the GameStop era, I built a Nancy Pelosi portfolio. Politicians were getting called out for their trades, especially during COVID, like Richard Burr's scandal involving COVID trades and insider information. We started tracking Pelosi's trades in 2022. She was up 54% last year, outperforming most hedge fund managers. We've got millions invested alongside her through our app. Our mission is to instill trust back into institutions.

We need to focus on funding as the central thread running through the discussions. The speakers discuss private money as a partial source, but highlight a broader funding landscape that includes black budgets, academic budgets, and private interests. - The dialogue identifies funding or lack thereof as the common denominator, with questions about available money and private investment, including whether angel investors are involved. - Speaker 1 explains the banking and funding landscape: black budgets are well funded; academic budgets are nonexistent because they’re considered acceptable to be so; and there are random billionaires who fund anti-gravity or fringe projects because they want recognition beyond their primary business. They mention several examples of private funders: - The church’s fried chicken billionaire funded the Hathaway Lab. - Robert Bigelow, associated with Bigelow Aerospace, is another billionaire funder. - There are other anonymous or less well-known funders who support such projects. - The core problem identified is consistent: money is the barrier, not technology or talent. The project team has observed government and academic research, noting that funding is the persistent obstacle. - To address this, Speaker 1 describes building an institute that pools money from these hobbyist billionaires into a large, stable pot. The goal is a safe, well-funded sandbox for bright people to pursue research without being affected by government budget cycles, tenure concerns, or a single investor’s changing interest or withdrawal. - This institute would select promising projects to fund, creating a new vehicle for financing this type of research. The idea is to avoid overreliance on a single wealthy patron and to maintain stability. - The conversation touches on the strategic value of private funding in the “black world” versus an open, illuminated world, noting that the illuminated world can be a spawning ground for ideas that may eventually benefit broader programs. There is a suggestion that it’s not in the black world’s interest to keep everything completely closed, given potential cross-pollination of ideas. There is mention of Griffin’s position and his connection to DARPA and UAH, implying overlapping influence or interest. - The speakers reflect on whether NASA is still a research organization, and discuss the risk to innovators who fear disappearing when working in public or private sectors. - Speaker 1 notes that ether in space is claimed by some, and expresses interest in talking to more people who hold similar views. - A concluding thread from Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 reiterates the tension between public and private funding, the need for stable, diverse funding sources, and the ongoing interest in discussions about ether and related space phenomena.

I spend $10 million a year offsetting personal emissions by buying electric heat pumps for low-income housing and installing solar panels. I avoid less proven methods like tree planting. Some believe trees alone can solve climate change, but that's nonsense. Are we guided by science or ignorance?

We should expand our efforts to receive more funding from those who can afford it. Even $10-20 million annually would make a significant impact. Engaging with different online communities is crucial. We must consider protesting, civil initiatives, and asset redistribution. This is the essence of my work, which is no small task.

I don't care about money. I have hundreds of millions in Bitcoin but don't spend it on fancy things like real estate or yachts. My focus is on Telstra. I don't own big assets like an island in Hawaii because my priority is freedom.

This is my coin. This is my face, my reputation on the line, and this is my word. So if you believe in our message and if you believe in me and if you believe in our movement, then you have the opportunity to invest in that movement.

I invested $10,000,000 in a supplement to fight COVID-19, facing backlash from big pharma and media. Plans to distribute to Israel, Philippines, and Brazil were thwarted. Eventually made a deal with Pfizer. Despite warnings, I believed in saving lives.

Let's talk about where money is being spent. We've got $520 million for environmental, social, and governance investments in Africa and to mobilize private sector resources. There's $25 million to promote biodiversity in Colombia, $40 million to improve social and economic inclusion of migrants, and $42 million for Johns Hopkins to research social and behavior change in Uganda. Then we see $70 million for Purdue to research solutions to developmental challenges, $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique, and almost $10 million for UC Berkeley to train Cambodian youth. Plus, millions more are going to various projects, including election and political processes strengthening, voter turnout in India, fiscal federalism in Nepal, biodiversity in Nepal, and learning outcomes in Asia. It's a lot of money going to a lot of different places.

I discovered a way to work the system, like George Soros. He realized you could establish an NGO with relatively little money. You then lobby politicians to allocate significant funds to that organization. For instance, a $10 million donation could be used to establish a nonprofit and turn it into a billion-dollar NGO. These organizations often have appealing names, such as the Institute for Peace, yet they're essentially graft machines. There are hardly any requirements associated with the funds they receive. The government largely assumes they're doing good work, although many officials are aware that this isn't the case; it's simply a massive system of graft.

Where's the money going? $520 million for environmental, social, and governance investments in Africa. $25 million to promote biodiversity in Colombia. $40 million to include sedentary migrants. $42 million for Johns Hopkins to research social change in Uganda. What about us? $70 million for Purdue to research solutions to developmental challenges. Then, $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique, $9.7 million for UC Berkeley to develop Cambodian youth enterprise skills. $2.3 million to strengthen independent voices in Cambodia, $32 million to the Prague Civil Society Center, $14 million to improve public procurement in Serbia, $486 million to strengthen elections, including $21 million for voter turnout in India. It continues: $20 million for fiscal federalism in Nepal, $19 million for biodiversity in Nepal, $1.5 million for voter confidence in Liberia, and $47 million for improving learning outcomes in Asia. This involves hundreds of billions of dollars, and I could continue reading examples all day.

The discussion centers on who is funding the film project and who is involved in backing the production. One speaker states that “Jim’s” name is funding the movie and that a great group of people have come together to invest in the production. They note that “the Carlos Slim family is involved from Mexico,” highlighting their participation in the financial backing. When asked to introduce Carlos Slim for those who may not know who he is, the speaker identifies him as “one of the wealthiest men in the world” and explains that his business interests are in telecommunications in Mexico and Latin America. The speaker adds that Carlos Slim’s son, Patrick, serves as the point of contact for the Slim family and is described as being very passionate about the work they are doing and about fighting trafficking. A second speaker adds context by stating that Carlos Slim is the largest shareholder in the Times. They reiterate Slim’s Mexican origin and claim that he has given “many millions of dollars to the Clintons and their initiatives.” They further assert that Carlos Slim is the largest owner of the newspaper from Mexico and offer a provocative claim about reporters at the New York Times, stating that they are not journalists but “corporate lobbyists for Carlos Slim and” for Hillary Clinton. The exchange emphasizes a narrative about financial influence and media relationships, linking Carlos Slim’s wealth and ownership to political connections and advocacy. The dialogue ends with an incomplete utterance, “Carlo,” which appears to be cut off and does not form a complete thought or claim within the transcription.

You need to invest in this movement. Everyone has a story to tell, and I receive countless ideas daily. My next step is to clone myself by teaching others how to expose corruption and create impactful content. The truth is at stake, and exposing it requires courage and community. Power hates sunlight, and together, we can stand up against it. This Wednesday at 7 PM, I will teach the fundamentals of storytelling at o'Keefewebinar.com. Join us as we build a movement that expands into every state and community. We the People are coming together to hold the corrupt accountable.

Speaker 0: This is my coin. This is my face, my reputation on the line, and this is my word. So if you believe in our message and if you believe in me and if you believe in our movement, then you have the opportunity to invest in that movement. Speaker 0: This is my coin. This is my face, my reputation on the line, and this is my word. So if you believe in our message and if you believe in me and if you believe in our movement, then you have the opportunity to invest in that movement.

A group of investors, including the Carlos Slim family, are funding a movie production. Carlos Slim is one of the wealthiest men globally. The speaker mentions various accounts like Nike and Mark Jacobs. They discuss keeping money in their accounts and shopping in LA. The conversation also touches on a hat and making money.