TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I believe around 500,000 people have died from the vaccine. We are currently representing clients affected by this. One client, Dani Baker, is severely ill; her spinal cord is damaged, her diaphragm isn't functioning properly, and she's struggling to breathe at just 40 years old. She took the vaccine due to her job. Dani, known as "course nurse" on Twitter, is a strong advocate, and we aim to highlight her case.

These ten deaths are the tip of the iceberg. There is a vast number of deaths in the peer reviewed literature. These have cases have already been vetted. We don't need FDA officials to comment to them on them. They're deeply concerning. And then our US CDC vaccine administration adverse event system, VAERS, has in total now, this is shocking for United States residents, nineteen thousand four hundred and eighty deaths. About two thousand of these have occurred right within forty eight hours of the shot, and then nineteen thousand two hundred seventy nine Americans reported to be permanently disabled. These are reported to VAERS by doctors like myself who have already determined the vaccine is the cause of the injury, disability, or death. Because if the vaccine was not the cause, then we wouldn't do the report to VAERS. So this is the VAERS does indicate causation by proxy of reporting. This is very important. The VAERS system, I'll say it again, indicates the vaccine is the cause of the problem because the doctor or the health care provider in the field at the scene who's examined the patient, examined the autopsy and the medical record information, examined the clinical record, the vaccine administration has determined the vaccine is the cause. Otherwise, a VAERS report would not be made. So this is very important. I would say at this point in time, both Macron and Prasad should immediately call for the COVID nineteen vaccines to be removed from the market. Every day they continue to delay on this, the more Americans will be hurt by boosters. We've already had several hundred deaths this year that have occurred on their watch. B, they should initiate a safety review of the 19480 deaths with an independent panel to review all the information. The CDC has the patients and their families' phone numbers, emails, addresses. There ought to be interviews of family members for the deceased, interviews of the patient themselves for injuries and disabilities to to get their side of the story. The CDC has all that information. The review should be done independently by people who are not CDC or FDA employees, And there should be multiple reviewers and should be an adjudication process and finally, a determination of causality for the vaccine. And then I would say, finally, the FDA officials, including Macari and Prasad, needs to start showing up to important proceedings in Washington. There have been multiple hearings on vaccine safety. One that I was the lead witness on, 05/21/2025. Yeah. We published a report indicating that there was a government cover up of COVID nineteen vaccine induced mild pericarditis, including fatal cases.

Speaker 0 states that one of their three children experienced health issues, including heart inflammation, after receiving the vaccine and subsequently lost their job for refusing further vaccination. This adverse reaction is officially registered. The speaker recounts a doctor advising their son against further vaccination outside a hospital setting, but later denying having said so. Speaker 1 says there is a good system for reporting side effects in New Zealand and finds no clear evidence of suppression of medical side effects of the Pfizer vaccine. Speaker 0 questions why the vaccine is still in use given the side effects. Speaker 1 responds that society decided to tolerate a certain number of adverse effects for the greater good, characterizing the speaker's family member's reaction as "taking one for the team."

Over 1.6 million adverse event reports have been filed to VAERS for COVID-19 vaccines, with a significant increase in 2021. The underreporting factor is estimated to be around 31 for severe events like hospitalizations and death. The speaker believes the mRNA platform was used to gather data for future gene therapy applications.

The speaker discusses an asserted link between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, claiming a strong association. They state that the information comes directly from the FDA and the CDC and promise to leave the study link in the comments. The speaker notes that “these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over,” and asserts that the items about to be listed are “a more likely determination.” The claim is that these are thresholds or criteria related to the studied association, and the speaker emphasizes that these are “times” of likelihood. Specifically, the speaker lists several neuropsychiatric outcomes and how much more likely they are purported to be following vaccination. They say: psychosis is “four forty times more likely.” Dementia is “140 times” more likely. Schizophrenia is “three fifteen times” more likely. They also mention “Suicidal thoughts,” but the transcript ends before the figure for suicidal thoughts is provided. The speaker frames these figures as a direct consequence of the injections, tying them to the referenced thresholds and thresholds being breached as evidence of a strong association. In summary, the primary claims presented are that there exists a strong association between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, supported by data from the FDA and CDC, with specific numerical claims that psychosis, dementia, and schizophrenia are markedly more likely post-injection, quantified as 440 times, 140 times, and 315 times more likely, respectively, with a forthcoming figure for suicidal thoughts that is not included in the provided transcript. The overall argument hinges on breached thresholds and the designation of these conditions as more likely determinations following vaccination, as presented by the speaker.

Dr. Umesh Adalja mentions a small segment may be harmed by any vaccine. However, recent statements from various sources suggest an attempt to downplay vaccine injuries as insignificant. Despite claims of minimal harm, data shows over 33 million Americans have been affected by the COVID-19 vaccine since 2021, with 1.1 million deaths, 4 million disabilities, and 28.6 million injuries leading to chronic illness.

In January, a federal judge ordered the CDC to release text entries from a survey where individuals shared their experiences after receiving the COVID vaccine. The first two batches, totaling 780,000 reports from about 523,000 people, revealed numerous health issues, including heart inflammation, facial paralysis, and tinnitus. The data showed a variety of post-vaccination problems, such as miscarriages and seizures. For example, one report described a loss of consciousness and seizure immediately after the injection, while another mentioned a diagnosis of Bell's palsy due to facial numbness and paralysis.

The speaker expresses concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines, stating that they believe these vaccines are the most toxic and damaging pharmaceutical products ever released. They highlight the profitability of the industry, mentioning the revenues of Pfizer and other companies. The speaker claims that around 10-15% of vaccine recipients have experienced serious injuries, with 1% being permanently disabled and 0.1% dying. They emphasize that these statistics are based on CDC and US insurance data.

There have been unprecedented injuries, disabilities, and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. By January 22, 2021, 182 deaths were reported to the US vaccine adverse event reporting system. The FDA and CDC, who co-administer the program, lack experience in vaccine campaigns. Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths within 90 days of their vaccine but kept it confidential. Moderna has not released their data. There are over 34,100 peer-reviewed papers on vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths.

In November 2022, Medsafe discontinued regular reports on adverse events following COVID injections in New Zealand. They acknowledged that the reporting system captures only a small fraction of the actual number of adverse events. By that time, Medsafe had received 65,000 adverse event reports, suggesting that around 1.3 million New Zealanders experienced adverse events. Among these reports, there were 3,688 serious cases, nearly 6,000 for young people aged 5 to 19, and 184 deaths. The numbers of adverse events and deaths following COVID injections far exceed those from other vaccines. Similar trends are observed globally, with thousands of deaths and millions of adverse event reports for COVID vaccines. The impact on individuals and families is significant and unprecedented.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

They discuss the number of people who have experienced long-term health issues after receiving the vaccine. The speaker asks if it's hundreds or thousands, and Helen responds that it's actually around 10. She mentions a report from April 2023, which states that there were 11,289 medically significant or serious reports. Out of those, 1,062 were listed as disabled, 118 were considered life-threatening, and 184 resulted in death. Helen clarifies that the long-term consequences are not in the hundreds or thousands, but rather around 10.

The speaker discusses the vaccine's link to death and disability, citing over 37,000 deaths globally reported on VAERS. They criticize regulators for not addressing this issue earlier and mention a conversation with Francis Collins about vaccine-related deaths. The speaker also mentions a conversation with Dr. Redfield, who admitted downplaying vaccine injuries to avoid creating hesitancy. Dr. Redfield acknowledged that there are more injuries than reported.

The speaker discusses the recognition of side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine by public authorities. After two years of conspiracy theories, the link between the vaccine and various health issues is now acknowledged. Only 72 out of 241 cases have received compensation for vaccine-related adverse effects. The main incidents recognized are cardiac disorders, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis. Neurological disorders, such as facial paralysis, and severe vascular issues like strokes, thrombosis, and pulmonary embolisms, have also been reported. The difficulty in reporting adverse events and the low number of victims seeking compensation are highlighted. The speaker suggests that the media downplayed the severity of these effects during vaccination campaigns.

The speaker states: "We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots." They add: "We also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well." The speaker emphasizes timing: "Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well." They conclude: "And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely." The speaker claims: "We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in."

The speaker expresses concern that only 5% of adverse reactions are reported in the database, suggesting it's just the tip of the iceberg. Another speaker reassures that the vaccine is safe and there is no evidence of it causing deaths. Prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, an average of 1500 adverse event reports were received annually for all vaccines in New Zealand, resulting in one or fewer reported deaths per year.

The speaker describes a severe post-vaccination experience, saying the vaccine “took my immune system and just shook it around again,” and noting that “that’s still going on.” They reference reading evidence about adverse reactions, including “damage to the immune system,” and acknowledge they were not made aware of these risks beforehand. They recount losing the use of their hands for about three weeks and realizing they were “in real trouble.” The speaker was invited by Robin Monarchy to discuss the experience, and by that time they realized they “weren’t the only one that was suffering.” They contrast this personal ordeal with a sense of media over-saturation, saying they have “stopped watching TV.” They share a cartoon memory of a guy interviewing two Quakers who ask, “How come none of your community has got COVID?” and the Quakers respond, “Well, we don’t watch TV,” remarking, “It’s so true, man,” and noting that “so much of the sickness is in our heads now.” They describe feeling trapped between trusting what “your heart tells you is right” and what appears to be the prevailing narrative, and they emphasize the difficulty of communicating their feelings to family. The speaker mentions taking a risk by speaking out, noting they were “pleased to see that it went around without too much of flack,” but they did experience some backlash, particularly from people they least wanted to upset. A central concern expressed is fear about what vaccination could do to their children, describing it as perhaps “the biggest part of the reason” for speaking out and talking to their daughters about the possibility that they “may not be able to have kids.” They acknowledge that at that point in life, their daughters “don’t probably care,” implying a tension between present concerns and future implications. The speaker concludes with that vaccination remains a source of personal risk and disclosure within their family discussions.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to explain why the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis. Speaker 1 mentions rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with vaccination but does not provide a clear explanation. Speaker 0 insists on understanding the mechanism and questions why the vaccine is considered safe without addressing the risks. Speaker 2 intervenes, suggesting that Speaker 1 will address the question later. Speaker 1 talks about the benefit-risk ratio and the global recommendation of health authorities. Speaker 0 reiterates the question, to which Speaker 1 agrees to provide a response later. Speaker 2 confirms this agreement.

Yesterday, my last patient of the day, a healthy woman, got the vaccine and the booster. Four days after the booster, she's paralyzed, wheelchair bound. "Really? And four days." "Alan, you and I have been doing clinical trials long enough to know that that's a serious adverse event, right?" "Sure." "Nobody reported it. So nobody's looking at it. It's like, oh, no problem. A good site will eventually report that." "I mean, will eventually have to come out of me because that, I mean, we would Might have reached out to her and tried to mitigate to not have her speak too much." But we're seeing it. "I'm seeing it every day. I mean, I have hundreds of people that have been vaccine injured. So"

The speaker expresses concern about the COVID-19 vaccines, stating that they believe these vaccines are the most toxic and damaging pharmaceutical products ever released. They mention the profitability of pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson. The speaker claims that 10-15% of people who received the vaccines have experienced serious injuries, with 1% being permanently disabled and 0.1% dying. They emphasize that these numbers are based on CDC and insurance data. The speaker concludes by noting that 0.1% may seem small, but it represents 1 in 1000 deaths.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about a report stating that serious adverse reactions occur in 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals. Speaker 1 claims to be unaware of the report but mentions routine screening of literature for adverse events. When asked about Moderna's rate of serious adverse events, Speaker 1 cannot provide the information. Speaker 0 expresses frustration and finds it extraordinary that a multinational company cannot provide this data. Speaker 1 offers to provide the information later but states that no safety concerns were observed in their clinical trials. Speaker 0 concludes that the conversation is a waste of time.

I spent 9 months researching the Pfizer vaccine with whistleblowers and scientists. Trials showed a 1 in 800 risk of serious harm from the vaccine, higher than COVID hospitalization rates. Other vaccines were pulled for less harm. Serious harm included hospitalization, disability, and life-changing events, with 40% related to clotting disorders.

Speaker 0 asks if people are not afraid of the side effects of the Covid vaccine. Speaker 1 responds that they are more afraid of long-term effects of Covid itself than the vaccine's side effects. They mention that billions of people have been vaccinated with no major side effects reported. Speaker 1 also addresses the concern that women are more affected by vaccine side effects, stating that there is no scientific evidence to support this claim. They mention not having any information from the COVAS (the organization responsible for scientific surveillance) or any published studies on this matter.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to explain the process of how the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis. Speaker 1 mentions rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with vaccination. Speaker 0 insists on an explanation of the mechanism, but Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer. Speaker 1 emphasizes that all medicines have benefits and side effects and refers to the benefit-risk ratio. Speaker 0 continues to press for an explanation of the biochemical pathway, but Speaker 1 agrees to provide a response later. The transcript ends with Speaker 2 confirming Speaker 1's agreement to give a further response.

Speaker 0 states that death rates from the vaccine are extraordinarily high, claiming there have been more deaths in eight months than in all the billions of vaccines combined over the last thirty years for this one vaccine, totaling seventeen thousand recorded deaths in the United States, and asserts the death rate is much higher, “probably 40 times.” The speaker says the risk from the vaccine is completely untenable and that if people knew the truth they would not be taking this vaccine, and that the benefits after six months are apparently zero or even subzero. Speaker 0 references British data, claiming that people who are vaccinated are actually more likely in many age categories to get COVID than people who are unvaccinated, and asserts this outcome was predicted. The speaker alleges that Pfizer knew this would happen, citing their clinical trial, which they say was only six months long; at the end of that period, they claim twenty people died in the vaccine group and fourteen in the placebo group of all-cause mortality. They further claim there were five heart attacks in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group, concluding that the chance of dying of a heart attack when vaccinated is five hundred percent greater than if one is unvaccinated. Speaker 0 contends that Pfizer knew they were going to kill a lot of people and proceeded to do so anyway. They insist that people need access to those studies to understand what they describe as deceptive, criminal deception that has supposedly been imposed upon them.