TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Senator Grassley sent a letter to Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray, asking about whistleblower disclosures on political bias in the FBI and DOJ. The letter revealed that the FBI had 40 confidential human sources with derogatory information on the Bidens, but they shut them down and labeled it Russian disinformation. This exposes corruption within federal law enforcement and the media's complicity in covering up Democratic corruption. The corruption extends from the exoneration of Hillary Clinton to the crossfire hurricane investigation and the obstruction of the Hunter Biden investigation. There needs to be a thorough investigation, but the biased media is a hindrance.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about investigating allegations, but Speaker 1 avoids commenting. Speaker 0 expresses concern on behalf of millions of Americans and criticizes Senate Democrats and the media for not addressing the evidence. Speaker 0 asks if the informant who accused Joe Biden of taking a bribe was previously relied upon by the FBI, but Speaker 1 evades a direct answer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of refusing to answer and calls it disgraceful.

The FBI's alleged involvement with the Biden family has been confirmed by Senator Chuck Grassley. He revealed that the FBI had 40 informants within the Biden family for the past 15 years, providing criminal information to field offices. This suggests that the FBI has been aware of the Bidens' activities, including alleged blackmail and corruption. Grassley also claimed that FBI headquarters blocked attempts to investigate this criminal activity, labeling it as foreign disinformation. Meanwhile, the FBI has been accused of planting information against Donald Trump and manipulating evidence. The result is a compromised president and negative consequences for the American people, such as higher costs, open borders, increased crime, and difficulties managing international conflicts.

The speaker states that they have not interfered with the Hunter Biden investigation, and there has been no political interference. They cannot comment on whether Joe Biden is being investigated or if the Department of Justice (DOJ) said he is off-limits. The speaker refers to the ongoing investigation led by special counsel Weiss and mentions a long-standing policy. They emphasize the FBI's responsibility to remain non-partisan and deny opening an investigation into the attorney general. The speaker avoids discussing whether the FBI tipped off Hunter Biden's lawyer before executing a search warrant on a storage unit. They conclude by stating that the FBI is not accountable to Congress or the American people.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

Senator Grassley wrote a letter to the speaker, discussing the FBI's use of confidential human sources to provide criminal information on Joe Biden and his family. The letter questions whether the FBI tried to shut down the investigation. It alleges that an assessment by an FBI analyst was used to discredit negative information on Hunter Biden and halt the investigation. The letter suggests that there is political bias within the Justice Department and FBI, impacting decision-making at all levels. Senator Grassley urges the speaker to address this issue for the sake of our democracy.

A credible whistleblower claims that the Department of Justice has evidence of President Joe Biden's involvement in a criminal scheme with a foreign national. The whistleblower alleges that Biden exchanged money for policy decisions while he was vice president. Senator Chuck Grassley supports these allegations and is issuing a subpoena to the FBI and Chris Wray to release the document. The White House denies the claims, calling them unfounded and politically motivated. Former White House staffers and IRS whistleblowers provide additional evidence of Biden's involvement in corrupt activities. Hunter Biden's finances are also under scrutiny, with potential tax and gun charges being considered. Joe Biden has been absent from the public eye recently.

The FBI's alleged involvement with the Biden family has been confirmed by Senator Chuck Grassley. He stated that the FBI had 40 informants within the Biden family for the past 15 years, providing criminal information to field offices nationwide. This suggests that the FBI has been aware of the Bidens' activities, including alleged blackmail and corruption. Grassley also revealed that the FBI headquarters blocked attempts to investigate this criminal activity, labeling it as foreign disinformation. Meanwhile, the FBI has been accused of planting information against Donald Trump and manipulating evidence. This situation has led to a compromised president and negative consequences for the American people, such as rising prices, an open border, increased crime, and difficulties in managing proxy wars.

Senator Hawley questions Mr. Abadi about the existence of a document that alleges the President has received bribes from a foreign nation. Initially, the FBI director denied its existence, but later acknowledged it after Senator Grassley mentioned reading it. Senator Hawley asks why the document is not being released and if it is classified. Mr. Abadi confirms that the document is unclassified but does not commit to releasing it. Senator Hawley insists that the American people have the right to see it, suggesting that the source's name can be redacted.

In this video, the speaker discusses a paid informant who provided information separate from Giuliani's claims in 2020. The informant advised Burisma against buying a US company while under investigation. Hunter Biden suggested that hiring him would help resolve their legal problems. The informant revealed that the owner of Burisma paid $5 million each to two Bidens as bribes to get the prosecutor investigating them fired. The owner claimed this was common practice in Russia and Ukraine. The informant also mentioned evidence of payments to Hunter and Joe Biden. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the FBI's cooperation and expresses frustration that the unclassified information is not being shared with the American people.

A confidential human source is someone who provides useful and credible information to the FBI and is expected to provide more in the future. They are paid $42 million a year. The speaker questions the credibility of these sources and then discusses Hunter Biden's involvement with a corrupt Ukrainian energy company called Burisma. The speaker mentions a document called FD 10/23, which states that Burisma hired Hunter Biden to protect them through his father. The speaker also brings up Victor Shokin, the prosecutor overseeing corruption in Ukraine, who was fired after Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees. The speaker accuses Joe Biden of bribery and calls for action to be taken.

Senator Grassley and Representative Comer are calling for an investigation into a document that allegedly describes a criminal scheme involving former Vice President Biden and a foreign national. They want to know if the Justice Department and FBI properly vetted the document and followed standard investigative procedures. The FBI has received a letter and subpoena regarding this matter but has not commented. Grassley emphasizes the importance of getting answers and ensuring that the executive branch enforces the law as required by the Constitution, regardless of political affiliation.

The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of discrediting themselves by avoiding questions about Biden's son and alleged corruption. Speaker 1 questions the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story, sourced from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. Speaker 0 insists it's a crucial issue to investigate Biden's alleged corruption involving China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 argues the story lacks verification. Speaker 0 counters by pointing out the laptop's existence and the Biden family's response. The conversation escalates as Speaker 0 emphasizes the significance of the scandal and Speaker 1 questions its validity.

A confidential human source is someone who provides useful and credible information to the FBI and is expected to provide more in the future. They are paid $42 million a year. The speaker questions the credibility of these sources and then discusses Hunter Biden's involvement with a corrupt Ukrainian energy company called Burisma. The speaker mentions a document called FD 10/23, which states that Burisma hired Hunter Biden to protect them through his father's influence. The speaker also brings up Victor Shokin, the prosecutor overseeing corruption in Ukraine, who was fired after Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees. The speaker accuses Joe Biden of bribery and calls for action to be taken.

The speaker discusses a letter written by Senator Chuck Grassley regarding alleged corruption within the Justice Department and FBI related to the Biden family. The letter highlights the FBI's knowledge of the Burisma scandal and Hunter Biden's involvement in a bribery scheme before the election, and their attempts to bury the information. Grassley requests information and records related to the investigation, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability. The speaker expresses concern about the potential compromise of the President and the urgency to address the corruption.

Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa has revealed that there may be audio recordings of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden with a Burisma executive in Ukraine. These recordings, if true, could lead to the impeachment or resignation of Joe Biden. Grassley also suggests that Joe Biden may have helped get Hunter Biden hired at Burisma. The FBI redacted the part about the audio recordings when releasing the document to the House oversight. If these tapes exist, they could have a significant impact on Joe Biden's presidency and candidacy. Grassley's revelations indicate that Joe Biden has lied about his knowledge of his son's activities in Ukraine. The media's lack of coverage on these issues raises questions about their integrity. Republicans are demanding the release of the tapes to ensure transparency and accountability.

Director Wray, the speaker expresses concern about the politicization of the Department of Justice and the FBI during the Biden administration. They believe that senior officials have allowed these institutions to be politicized. The speaker mentions FBI agents who are unhappy with the weakening of institutional integrity due to the DOJ being treated as a political weapon. They focus on the investigation into corruption allegations involving Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. The speaker presents a WhatsApp text message from Hunter Biden to a senior Chinese communist, suggesting that Joe Biden would retaliate if a commitment was not fulfilled. They mention an IRS whistleblower who testified that the DOJ blocked attempts to obtain GPS data on Joe Biden's phone. The speaker questions whether the FBI tried to determine the locations of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden when the text was sent. Director Wray defers to the ongoing investigation led by special counsel Weiss. The speaker accuses the DOJ and underlings of trying to stop the investigation and allowing the statute of limitations to expire. They mention another testimony from the IRS whistleblower, alleging that an Assistant US attorney stated that a search warrant would not be approved due to political optics. The speaker questions whether the FBI allows political optics to hinder corruption investigations. Director Wray reiterates that they follow the facts and cannot discuss ongoing investigations. The speaker criticizes Director Wray for not doing the work and hiding behind the attorney general.

Last week, I spoke about the FBI hiding an unclassified document, known as the 10/23, from Congress and the American people. The FBI eventually agreed to show the document to Congress, but it was heavily redacted. The 10/23 allegedly involves a bribery scheme between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and a foreign national. The Justice Department then announced charges against former President Trump for mishandling classified records. This senator is committed to fighting political corruption in the Department of Justice and the FBI by promoting transparency. The 10/23 contains references to audio recordings of conversations between the foreign national and the Bidens. It is crucial for the American people to have access to the unredacted document to understand the truth and hold the FBI and Justice Department accountable. Congress must continue to fight for transparency and release the document without unnecessary redactions.

A US senator claims that there are recordings of Joe Biden asking for bribes, which the FBI possesses but has not acted upon. The speaker criticizes the media for not pressuring Biden and his son, Hunter, for their alleged corruption. They argue that the lack of media pushback resembles a regime-style media. The speaker questions the absence of fact-checkers from the Washington Post and reports from the New York Times, specifically mentioning journalist Maggie Haberman.

In this video, the speaker discusses information from a paid informant by the FBI, which is separate from Giuliani's information in 2020. The informant advised Burisma against buying a US company while under investigation. Hunter Biden suggested they buy a US company to raise more money. The informant also reveals that the owner of Burisma paid $5 million each to two Bidens as bribery to get the prosecutor fired and end the investigation. The owner claimed this was common practice in Russia and Ukraine. The informant believes it was illegal for a US vice president and their family members. The owner mentioned evidence of payments to Hunter and Joe Biden. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the FBI cooperating and sharing unclassified information with the American people.

Speaker 0 asks if the FD 1023 and the 17 recordings will be provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee to assess the evidence of Joe Biden taking a $5,000,000 bribe. Speaker 1 responds that they will work with the committee and provide the information within the process. Speaker 0 insists on a direct answer, but Speaker 1 repeats that they will take it back and work with them. Speaker 0 concludes that Speaker 1 is not answering the question.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.

A senator questions Deputy Director Abadi about allegations of a $5 million bribery scheme involving President Biden and his family. Abadi refuses to comment on the existence of a report or 17 voice recordings related to the allegations. The senator accuses the FBI of stonewalling and damaging its reputation. Abadi maintains that they operate within established parameters and will work with the committee to provide information. The senator criticizes the FBI for not being accountable and demands the release of the report and recordings. Abadi avoids directly answering questions about the investigation and the informant's reliability. The senator expresses concern that the evidence is being covered up by Democrats and the media. The exchange becomes heated and ends with the senator calling Abadi's behavior disgraceful.

Chuck Grassley's audio recordings allegedly show conversations between Joe and Hunter Biden, contradicting Joe Biden's claim of no contact with Burisma. The laptop also reveals Hunter paying for a cell phone for his father, suggesting a back channel of communication. The Oversight Committee plans to subpoena phone records to confirm these conversations. The committee is relying on previous research to issue subpoenas and gather more evidence. The Bidens received $83,000 a month from Burisma, with an additional $5 million separate from that. The family has received around $31 million from China, $5-7 million from Ukraine, and $3.5 million from Russia. The total foreign money received by the Bidens is estimated to be over $50 million. The Bidens' lack of a legitimate business raises questions about the legality of their dealings.