reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

We will have to explain to our kids what being a parent was like when they were kids. It's pretty crazy. The government was out of control, poisoning everything and sending our money to other countries. We couldn't pay our bills. We had to buy food from local farmers because the government poisoned everything. The medical industry was the number one killer, but we couldn't say anything because they were in control. We did things to preserve your fertility. That's why we're farmers. Any questions?

In 2008, a billion gallons of coal ash sludge spilled from a pond at the Kingston coal plant, covering 300 acres. Workers were sent to clean up what was then the worst environmental disaster. Many of these workers became sick, and some died, allegedly due to exposure during the cleanup. Workers described arriving for cleanup with breathing problems and bloodshot eyes. A lawsuit was filed, and the workers won. They claimed they were told the coal ash was harmless, even safe to eat. Despite their health issues, they were allegedly told there was no problem. The speaker emphasizes the importance of remembering this event and its implications for worker protections across industries. The workers felt lied to and taken advantage of, with deadly consequences for some.

The environmental movement traces back to the 1971 UN Stockholm conference and the "Only One Earth" report by Maurice Strong. Strong, a Rockefeller man, faced legal issues related to water exploitation and land development. Despite controversies, he inspired figures like Al Gore. Visit the speaker's private homeschool community and Cubs to Bears books.

The environmental movement originated in 1968 with the formation of the Club of Rome, a crisis think tank. Their goal was to create a crisis that would unite the world and promote global solutions. They identified pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famine as threats caused by human intervention. In 1975, Australia agreed to the Lima Declaration, which led to the redeployment of jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, resulting in the loss of agriculture and manufacturing in Australia. Agenda 21, a plan for global control, was introduced in 1992 by George Bush Senior and Maurice Strong. It aims to reorient society and redistribute wealth. The government's actions, such as increasing taxes and reducing services, contribute to wealth redistribution and control over citizens' lives. The legislative council is crucial for checks and balances. The Club of Rome and its members, including Ted Turner and Mikhail Gorbachev, advocate for depopulation and view environmentalism as a new world religion.

This is a green slush fund. The Biden administration parked $20 billion in an outside bank, giving it to eight NGOs, many created just to get this money. The EPA entered into an agreement with these entities, designed to tie the government's hands, so we don't know where the money is going. Only about 5% actually goes towards the environment. One CEO, serving on the White House Environmental Justice Council, received $20 million. Account control agreements were amended to reduce EPA oversight. The Justice Department and FBI are working with us, and we must ensure accountability. There should be zero tolerance for wasted money.

They work with local governments and have plans for them. In some areas, building back is not advisable. They have successfully convinced certain communities and people that buyouts are a better option.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

"The mercury is coming from those coal burning power plants." "According to CDC, the mercury there's one out of every six American women now has so much mercury in her womb that her children at risk for a grim inventory of diseases, autism, blindness, mental retardation, heart, liver, and kidney disease." "The Clinton administration recognizing the gravity of this national health epidemic reclassified mercury as a hazardous pollutant under the Clean Air Act." "That triggered a requirement that all of those plants remove 90% of the mercury within three and a half years." "It would have cost them less than 1% of plant revenues, and we know that it works." "When they stop emitting the mercury, it disappears within five years mostly from the fish and waterways downwind of those plants."

Devastating news: 12 out of 14 multigenerational small family farms in Point Reyes have forcibly signed a deal to shut down due to lawsuits from three environmentalist groups against the Point Reyes National Seashore. The farms can no longer afford to fight the lawsuits and are being forced to leave their ancestral homes. This is happening across the United States, not just in Sonoma and Marin Counties. The public is urged to attend the town hall meeting at 10AM in Point Reyes to show support and let people know this is unacceptable. The situation is characterized as a land grab or part of the vegan movement. It's claimed that in ten years, when the food system is strained, people will regret that the justice system didn't protect the farmers and the food system. This is described as an attack on everyone.

There's skepticism about government involvement in health: 'make America healthy again' ... 'it's actually been to our detriment.' They recall: 'make yourself healthy again?' 'No.' We were at a table in Florida when it came up. They commit to being 'accountable for our own health and for our families' and for grassroots teaching so families grow. They work in schools; 'beekeepers' have found private schools more open than public. The aim is to share what they've learned so that 'your students now are able to do what you taught and ... it's spreading.' Speaker 1 says: 'This is a movement of people around the world who are taking back control of their health.' They warn governments are 'not heading in the right direction, especially when it comes to their health,' and say people are returning to 'beekeeping and natural ways' like 'the way that humans used to do things.'

Between 2012 and 2022, Congress created 500 new crimes. A woman working for NOAA in Honolulu bought a boat with a friend and offered whale watching tours. While on a tour, someone on the boat whistled at an orca eating a seal. The FBI later raided the woman's house, seizing DVDs, computers, and her cell phone. She was charged with a felony count of interfering with the feeding of a wild animal under the Endangered Species Act. She fought the charge for five years, lost her boat, her business, and her federal pension after NOAA fired her. Eventually, the charge was reduced to a misdemeanor with a small fine, but she had already lost everything. The speaker concludes that 50 new crimes a year is too much.

I fought battles against big pharma, big agrochemical companies, big tech, and Washington, DC. I took action because they were not being honest, harming our children, selling children online, and engaging in dirty tactics.

A thick layer of toxic froth has resurfaced at the Yamunag Hut in Kalindi Kunj, making large stretches of the Yamuna nearly invisible. The froth accumulated heavily along the riverbank, clinging to their sides, with dust particles visibly embedded in the froth. Environmentalists who conduct a cleanliness drive every Sunday at the Kalandi Kunsh Ghat say that water in December and January has been a lot more polluted than it was before the Chhat festival in October. They acknowledge that the measures taken by the Delhi government to clean the Yamuna during Chhat were effective and would have vastly improved the situation today had the government sustained that momentum. Solid waste management and freshwater flow officials active continued. Volunteers from Earth Warriors groups also voiced concerns about pollution at Yamuna Ghats, highlighting serious health risks posed by toxic froth along the river and the strong stench it emits. They noted that people continue to dump waste directly into the river despite authorities imposing a fine of 5,000 rupees under the polluter pays principle. The volunteers stated that a toxic froth at Yamuna not only harms human health but also disturbs the river’s ecology, with the froth blanket preventing oxygen and natural sunlight from reaching the riverbed, resulting in degraded water quality. DPCC reports indicate that environmentalists have repeatedly raised concerns over the pollution at Yamuna, urging the Delhi government to ramp up their efforts not just to clean the river but also to increase public awareness to prevent waste dumping.

A federal criminal investigation is needed because the EPA region 4 is the worst in the United States. Rockdale County has been out of federal compliance for 4 decades. A company put a guy on a ballot illegally. Warrants are being pulled, and the company is scared. One company was going to explode, but no one listened, and now that company needs to be removed from the community. Another company, Pratt, smells of chlorine at night and has 1.7 tons of recycled paper. There are not enough qualified inspectors to inspect these companies. $150,000,000 of taxes went to this company to kill us. A federal criminal investigation is needed.

Out of 190 million Americans, imagine 40 million refusing to pay bills and demanding better conditions. The speaker advocates for collective action to negotiate with the government. Using Hollywood as an example, they highlight the power of unity. They emphasize the need for courage, collaboration, and planning to create change. The speaker urges a shift in mindset towards limitless possibilities and overcoming obstacles as lessons to learn from.

Speaker 0: A federal grand jury in Detroit today charged the 13 top leaders of the weathermen with plotting to bomb public buildings in Chicago, Detroit, New York, and Berkeley, California. A weatherman are the militant faction of the students for a democratic society. Speaker 1: Dedicated revolutionaries working to exploit our weaknesses for the ultimate destruction of The United States system of government as we know it. Speaker 2: Whatever it cost, whatever, you know, destructive kinds of activity we could do against the US government, the bat Speaker 0: What we wanted to do here was deliver the most horrific hit that The United States Government had ever suffered on its territory. Speaker 2: I brought up the subject of what's going to happen after we take over the government. You know, we we become responsible then for administrating, you know, two fifty million people. And there was no answers. No one had given any thought to economics. How are you going to clothe and feed these people? Speaker 0: The only thing that I could get was that they expected that the Cubans and the Vietnamese and the Chinese and the Russians would all want to occupy different portions of The United States. They also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called revolution. And they felt that this counter revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing reeducation centers in the Southwest, where we would take all the people who needed to be reeducated into the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be. I ask, well, what is going to happen to those people that we can't reeducate, that are die hard capitalists? And the reply was that they'd have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further, they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25,000,000 people in these reeducation centers. And when I say eliminate, I mean kill. 25,000,000 people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25,000,000 people. And they were dead serious.

Greenpeace and American environmentalists are blamed for the environmental degradation in Vietnam. The speaker, who is from Vietnam, expresses astonishment at the ability to speak English. They show the extent of the trash in the area, which used to be a popular tourist destination. The trash, including medication, clothes, diapers, condoms, and garbage, flows down the river during floods and ends up in the Pacific Ocean. The speaker criticizes Democrats and leftists for their supposed hypocrisy in pretending to care about the environment while causing such pollution in places like Panama.

We're working to keep the Isle's Boardwalk and Dublin's streets safe, and we're getting a great response. We need more people involved to protect our community. Let's keep Dublin, Dublin, and Ireland, Ireland. It's up to us to clean up and preserve our home.

Miley Kaczynski, who lives 1.6 miles downstream from the Beaver Dam Meta Data Center, describes a natural creek on her property that has flowed for nearly fifty years but began behaving drastically after upstream construction of the data center. She states the creek, 20 feet wide and up to four feet deep, stopped flowing even with no rainfall, became cloudy and opaque with enough force to cause drastic erosion, and has dried up half of the past construction season. Dust from the construction covers her yard, turning grass white, and visibility on the road is severely reduced by thick dust clouds. She notes this behavior is not consistent with natural variability or weather patterns and has never happened before. Kaczynski explains she attempted to report the issue to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), but found the system fragmented: reports are passed between departments and can be lost, and she was informed there is no single entity responsible for downstream effects of large-scale construction on a water system. She says multiple permits govern activities at local, county, state, and federal levels, with no one looking at the whole picture or what happens beyond the project boundary. She emphasizes this is a policy failure rather than a failure of individual agency staff. She asserts the creek’s flow appears correlated with upstream industrial activity during construction, including daily blasting with dynamite; when discharge stops, the creek stops, and when it resumes, water returns abruptly. She claims corporations receive fast approvals, tax incentives, and limited review, while residents must prove damage after the fact at their own expense against billion-dollar companies. She has turned this into a part-time research effort, estimating costs for water sampling (shipping at $121 and testing around $400 per sample) and water treatment to block elevated metals like strontium. Kaczynski warns that nearly 1,000 acres of her backyard will be converted from permeable land to paved industrial space, reducing groundwater recharge and altering a community of farmers and working families. She laments rural Wisconsin losing its identity to data centers, noting that another data center is proposed in Beaver Dam. She describes the annexation of the land by the city, with Alliant Energy facilitating deals with farmers to sell collectively, and explains that after annexation the land goes to county rezoning with a “rubber stamp” process, making it difficult to halt. She claims damage cannot be legally proven before construction, so the process requires action at the city level, but the city did not focus on the data center in its hearings, making residents feel unrepresented and unable to vote or speak fully. She concludes that there is a lack of a working system to ensure permits are followed, with only one mining permit officer for the entire state, and she demands transparency and action from authorities, asking who will save her retroactively and expressing that her safety net is gone. She ends by asking for help and acknowledging the late start for her opportunity to speak.

The FBI conducted massive arrests, including US city mayors, politicians, and religious leaders, requiring buses for transport. New Jersey's corruption problem is considered one of the worst in the nation, ingrained in its political culture. Religious charities controlled by rabbis allegedly laundered cash. The 10-year operation uncovered international money laundering, corruption, and the sale of human organs in the US, Switzerland, and Israel. One rabbi allegedly dealt in human kidneys for transplant for a decade, exploiting vulnerable people for profit. The arrests included community leaders, and the scale of corruption has outraged New Jersey residents. Despite efforts to reduce corruption, Hudson County remains corrupt. The number of arrests was remarkable, even for New Jersey, where over 130 officials have been convicted of corruption in the last 10 years.