reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Four companies—Pfizer, Merck, Blackstone, and Sanofi—produce all 72 vaccines and have a history of criminal behavior. Over the last decade, they collectively paid $35 billion in penalties for falsifying science, defrauding regulators, and causing harm. Merck's Vioxx, marketed as a headache pill, led to the deaths of up to 500,000 Americans due to heart attacks, while the company profited despite paying $7 billion in fines. No one was jailed for these actions. It’s difficult to believe these companies, known for dishonesty in other products, are suddenly trustworthy with vaccines. In the U.S., a law passed in 1986 prevents individuals from suing vaccine manufacturers, regardless of negligence or harm caused.

Pfizer in the UK breached regulations by promoting unlicensed medicines on social media, leading to a £30,000 fine. This ruling may pave the way for citizens to pursue legal action against Pfizer for vaccine injuries. The UK's compensation system for vaccine injuries could make it easier for affected individuals to seek recourse. The Telegraph highlighted the safety concerns surrounding the injections, potentially fueling lawsuits against Pfizer.

Two women are suing hospitals after their husbands died from COVID-19 treatment, not the virus itself. Both men were given remdesivir without being informed of the side effects. One widow's husband died from kidney failure after receiving the drug, while the other widow's husband died from organ failure. Both widows were not aware of the treatment their husbands were receiving and believe they would not have consented to it if they had known. They feel misled by the hospitals and are seeking answers.

Dr. David Graham discusses the Vioxx scandal, highlighting FDA failures in addressing heart attack risks associated with the drug. Despite evidence of increased heart attack risks, FDA did not take appropriate action, resulting in an estimated 100,000 excess cases. Graham criticizes FDA's focus on drug approval over safety, citing conflicts of interest and a culture that prioritizes industry interests. He argues for a more proactive and patient-centered approach to drug safety regulation.

Maddy DeGary, a participant in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trial for 12 to 15-year-olds, suffered serious injuries post-vaccination. Pfizer initially downplayed her condition as abdominal pain, misleading the FDA. Despite being wealthy, only after an email to FDA officials did Pfizer admit to DeGary's injuries. FDA's response was lackluster, showing no concern for Pfizer's misconduct. The failure to report all adverse events corrupts the trial process, with no repercussions for Pfizer's actions.

In 1986, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act removed liability from drug companies for vaccine-related injuries. Recently, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the COVID vaccine is not a true vaccine as it doesn't prevent disease or transmission. This could open up legal challenges against pharmaceutical companies, though the government may protect them. The outcome remains uncertain.

We are discussing a major medical mistake and corporate crime with vaccines causing serious harm like heart attacks and strokes. Research shows the risk of harm from the vaccine is higher than being hospitalized with COVID. This suggests the vaccine should never have been given. It's a scandal that many are unaware of, leading to a pandemic of vaccine injuries.

A Michigan jury awarded a woman $1 million for being fired over vaccine refusal, highlighting a need for accountability in vaccine manufacturing. It's concerning that vaccine makers have blanket immunity from lawsuits, unlike other businesses. This immunity, granted by Congress in 1986, shields pharmaceutical companies from liability, which is unjust. Everyone else faces risks in their professions, yet these companies operate without accountability. Transparency in government and vaccine trials is crucial to restore trust and eliminate corruption. If information is being withheld, it likely indicates wrongdoing.

Researchers are seeking volunteers for a US human trial of a new vaccine. A family shares their experience after their child participated in the trial and experienced severe adverse reactions. The child developed symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, fatigue, and neurological issues. Despite multiple hospital visits, doctors dismissed the symptoms as psychological and failed to conduct necessary tests. The child's condition deteriorated, and they are now wheelchair-bound, experiencing pain and other debilitating symptoms. The family feels abandoned by Pfizer and the medical community. A subsequent diagnosis revealed severe nerve damage related to the vaccine. The family hopes to raise awareness and prevent others from experiencing similar hardships. (150 words)

I shared a nurse's story about REM medication causing patients to deteriorate rapidly. Patients with high oxygen levels would suddenly crash after receiving REM, leading to organ failure and death. The nurse suspected the combination of multiple medications being administered simultaneously was causing organ failure, not just the virus itself. The nurse raised concerns about the medication's impact on patients' health and the need for further investigation.

A Pfizer whistleblower has revealed documents indicating over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from December 2020 to February 2021, including serious issues like spontaneous abortions. It is claimed that the FDA was aware of these reactions and sought to keep the documents hidden for 75 years, suggesting intentional harm. The whistleblower argues that the vaccine remains on the market despite serious concerns, highlighting a double standard compared to previous vaccine removals for fewer adverse events. There is a call for accountability for those involved in this situation.

The FDA was sued over tweets telling people "you're not a horse" regarding Ivermectin. The lawsuit argued the FDA doesn't have the authority to tell people not to take a certain drug, as that constitutes practicing medicine. Some believe the FDA's actions were a coordinated PR attack to promote COVID vaccines. One doctor claims the government's agenda was to force vaccines, which are now known to be "poison jabs." The case against the FDA was settled largely on the plaintiffs' terms, with the FDA taking down the "offensive tweets." One doctor claims to have treated over 6,000 COVID patients with Ivermectin, with none hospitalized as a result, and considers it safer than common medications. The lawsuit set a precedent, potentially tarnishing the FDA's reputation and limiting future overreach in advising patients on medical treatments. Some believe the suppression of early COVID treatments has caused hundreds of thousands of deaths and that the COVID vaccines have caused excess deaths and increased disability.

This is the story of Maddie, a 12-year-old girl who participated in Pfizer's COVID vaccine study for children. After receiving the second dose, Maddie experienced severe symptoms including chest pain, abdominal pain, and loss of feeling in her legs. Despite her deteriorating condition, doctors dismissed her symptoms as anxiety. Maddie was hospitalized multiple times and diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The family believes that Pfizer, the FDA, and the study leaders tried to cover up Maddie's case. The FDA granted emergency use of Pfizer's vaccine for children based on this study, but there were no official hearings on vaccine side effects. The family's trust in the government and medical professionals has been shattered.

Speaker 1 reveals that Bear Corporation knowingly sold medication infected with the AIDS virus. They pulled the product from the US market and dumped it in France, Europe, Asia, and Latin America to make a profit. Shockingly, no corporate executives have been indicted or investigated by the US Justice Department. The FDA allowed this to happen, resulting in the deaths of thousands of innocent hemophiliacs and their family members. The government is turning a blind eye to the situation.

Maddy DeGary, a participant in Pfizer's 12-15 year old COVID-19 vaccine trial, suffered serious injuries post-vaccination. Pfizer misrepresented her condition as "functional abdominal pain" to the FDA. Despite efforts to bring attention to her true injuries, the FDA showed little concern and failed to hold Pfizer accountable for withholding information. This lack of transparency undermines the integrity of the trial process.

The Oxford AstraZeneca COVID jab is facing claims of being defective and having vastly overstated efficacy. Two test cases have been presented in the high court, one involving a man who suffered a brain injury and blood clot after vaccination, and another involving a woman who died due to a vaccine-related adverse reaction. These cases could lead to numerous damage claims related to vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency has reported at least 81 serious adverse reactions in the UK linked to clotting and low platelets. The World Health Organization has stated that the vaccine is safe and effective, but this contradicts the evidence presented in the UK court. This could potentially lead to a wave of claims and raises questions about the WHO's advice.

Pharmaceutical companies like Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Glaxo have paid billions in penalties for dishonest practices, resulting in harm and deaths. The opioid crisis and Vioxx are examples of collusion between pharma and regulators, leading to thousands of deaths. Regulatory agencies have become puppets for the industry, depriving the public of informed consent.

The pharmaceutical industry is seen as untrustworthy, being compared to a criminal cartel due to the large penalties they have paid for their other products. Vaccines, however, are exempt from liability, meaning companies cannot be sued no matter how negligent or reckless they are. This lack of accountability may lead to a lack of caution in product development.

Billions of people have received contaminated products, which should not have happened. If meat at the grocery store is found to have toxins, it is immediately recalled. However, vaccines with known contamination are being administered to billions of people worldwide. This was revealed through our reporting. It is concerning that these contaminated products are still available in the consumer marketplace. When a crib causes the death of two children or a tire leads to multiple accidents, they are taken off the market. Yet, intentionally adulterated vaccines with undisclosed gene sequences are still being sold.

A lawsuit is in jury trial regarding hospital protocols where a young woman with Down syndrome was allegedly euthanized. According to the speaker, the hospital gave her a DNR order, even though she didn't have one. The speaker claims this is because "they need the bed" and "they're gonna die anyway." The patient was in the hospital for COVID. The speaker alleges that hospitals gave patients morphine and insulin to kill them. In this case, the hospital allegedly gave the patient a DNR (do not resuscitate) order. The family is suing for battery to get around the PREP Act, which protects doctors and hospitals from wrongdoing during COVID. The trial started in Wisconsin.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

The speaker claims to be the only person in the U.S. with a viable lawsuit against the PREP Act, which has shut down approximately 100 other lawsuits. The speaker's lawyer, Michael Connet, believes a loophole exists because the lawsuit is based on a contract with specific commitments that were allegedly not met. The court date is set for October 29th. The drug company's defense relies on the PREP Act. The speaker argues that because they were in a vaccine trial, the initial contract should hold the company responsible. The speaker believes this case could set a precedent and is fighting for all Americans who could face similar situations with vaccines or pharmaceuticals. They contend that fundamental constitutional rights, such as free speech and fair jury trial, should not be suspended for public health or pharmaceutical profits.

I've stated since May 2020 that remdesivir will result in at least 30% death in those who receive it in the hospital. I had data pulled for Medicare patients in New York, and found that 26.9% of those who received remdesivir died. As of October 2020, the cardiovascular toxicology journal found that remdesivir causes death of heart cells and can lead to cardiac arrest. Yet, in December, the NIH decided to update all guidelines for treatment drugs allowed for COVID-19, and remdesivir was the only FDA-approved drug for hospitalized Americans, despite the WHO publishing that it causes increased acute kidney failure. As of January of this year, the FDA extended an emergency use authorization, making remdesivir the only authorized medication that can be administered to newborns to 18-year-olds.

Although I am not a doctor, I’m a nurse. On the front lines we knew what was happening. When we asked for ibuprofen, they said no. When we asked why we weren’t giving steroids, the answer was “we’re just following orders.” Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths in these hospitals. I didn’t see a single patient die of COVID. I’ve seen a substantial number die of negligence and medical malfeasance. When I was on the front lines of New York, I became globally known as the nurse in the break room sobbing, saying they were murdering my patients. Pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice on the minorities, the disadvantaged, the marginalized populations with no advocates, because the very agencies that should protect them were closed while we were sheltering in place. While I was there, pharmaceutical companies rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients, which we all saw was killing the patients. And now, it’s the FDA-approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States. As nurses, we’ve collected a descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors. Doctors do quantitative data; we do qualitative data with a humanistic, phenomenological approach in nursing research. We’ve collected data from patients across the country for which we’ve helped patients through the American Front Line Nurses and the advocacy network so nurses could advocate for these patients. This data pool shows that as these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than twenty-five percent chance of survival if they get more than two doses. Now they’re rolling it out on children as well and into nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities as early intervention, even though doctors Pierre Corre and Merrick have demonstrated that there are cost-effective medications out there, and we are going to see the amplification of death across the country. We haven’t even touched on vaccines, which our expert panels have described; I won’t touch on that since many are far superior to me. Two days ago I flew out my first 10-year-old with a heart attack and had to fight the ER doctor because he said, “ten-year-olds don’t have heart attacks.” I argued for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG and found a STEMI; the 12-lead EKG lit up. He said it wasn’t possible, and I said, “was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible.” People contact me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate, because there’s victim shaming—“it’s anxiety,” “it’s this.” But if they acknowledge it as a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic may not get reimbursed, so it’s labeled as anxiety, neuropathy, or Guillain–Barré syndrome, when it’s very realistically a vaccine injury. I’ve traveled to South America, India, and South Africa, working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus and doing early intervention. Nowhere in developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in the United States. I’m a very proud American citizen from a family of immigrants. Our level of health care has deteriorated to substandard third-world-nation health care. You are better off in South America in a field hospital than in level-one trauma designer hospitals in the United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, water, or basic care. How come a patient hasn’t been fed in nine days? Why do I need a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn’t intubated and who would like food? If they’re on a ventilator, they’re not given water or basic care. We’re not allowed to take a BiPAP mask off to help someone eat. I’ve had patients who haven’t been bathed, haven’t been fed, and haven’t been given water, or been turned. This isn’t a hospital; this is a concentration camp. Nowhere in the United States do we isolate people for hundreds of hours with no human contact; it’s not allowed even in prisons. In hospitals, we isolate patients from their families for days, and you have to say goodbye over an iPhone, or you have to shuttle people in to see them. I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to say the last rites to their family. Thank you, Senator Johnson, for giving nurses the opportunity to represent our patients, because we’re not often thought of as leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. Thank you for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.