reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The unidentified speaker reveals to Agent Mulder a conspiracy surrounding a viral outbreak and the power of FEMA to seize control. He references being watched as he talks, and questions why the outbreak is treated as a minor event when it is tied to far more ominous forces. He challenges Mulder to consider what the antivirus outbreak really was, and suggests that it was not merely a virus but something with a broader political purpose. He explains that the antivirus outbreak occurred in the Southwestern United States and was reported as a deadly virus spread by field mice in suburban Texas. He asserts that FEMA was called out to manage the outbreak and that FEMA’s real power is the ability for the White House to suspend constitutional government upon declaration of a national emergency. He asks Mulder to think about what such broad sweeping power is doing for a small viral outbreak. The conversation shifts to a past project from their military days. The unidentified speaker and Mulder were recruited for a project they were told was biological warfare or a virus. He asks what killed those men, and refuses to write about it, noting that there is no context for what killed them or the scale of what will be unleashed in the future. He speaks of a plague to end all plagues, describing it as a silent weapon for a quiet war: “The systematic release of an indiscriminate organism for which the men who will bring it on still have no cure.” He claims this has been in development for fifty years, and contrasts the world’s focus on outward conflicts with the clandestine negotiations by certain men toward an Armageddon. Mulder asks, “Negotiating with whom?” and the unidentified speaker hints at an intended collaboration with a hidden group, implying that the timetable is fixed. He states, “The timetable has been said. It’ll happen on a holiday when people are away from their homes. The president will declare a state of emergency at which time all government, all federal agencies will come under the power of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA, the secret government.” The exchange ends with the speaker urging Mulder to “Go back to Dallas, HM Muller, and dig, or we’re gonna find out along with the rest of the country when it’s too late.”

The conversation reveals a dark confession about the Umbrella Corporation and a hidden underground facility. It starts with Speaker 0 stating that “you and I have the same employer. We all work the Umbrella Corporation. The mansion above us is an emergency entrance to the hive. US security operators laced there to protect that end.” Speaker 1 asks, “What about this?” and Speaker 0 explains that “your marriage is a fake. Just part of your copper to protect the secrecy of the hive. And where is the hive? Children.” Speaker 1 then begins “Accessing schematic of the hive.” Speaker 0 provides a location and background: “Raccoon City, Eris Turbans. The mansion, where it was found, and through which we gained access to the train, which in turn brought us to the hive.” The hive itself is described as underground, “deep beneath the streets of Rackham City,” a “top secret research facility owned and operated by the Umbrella Corporation.” Its staff is substantial—“over 500 technicians, scientists, support staff”—who “live and work underground.” The research is said to be “of the highest importance” and “classified.” Their position on the map is indicated by heat signature, and Speaker 0 proclaims, “The planets will be mine. The king in black is awake.” Speaker 2 interjects, “I will kill your world,” to which Speaker 0 responds, “Everyone will burn you.” A dialogue ensues about power and faith: Speaker 1 calls for peace and a “strong link. Abandon your body to the will of our god.” The mood shifts to confrontation and urgency as Speaker 0 declares, “Savage.” Speaker 1 orders, “Ashley, run. Okay.” There are tactical exchanges and a sense of mounting conflict: “God, I thank for your gifts. You want it only?” and Speaker 1 responds, “Let's get up here.” Speaker 0 asserts, “Allow me to show you how it has—,” and Speaker 1 adds, “Let's go replenish the ranks.” The scene moves from ascent to combat, with Speaker 0 saying, “From here to under this armor. I'm not running from this one,” while Speaker 1 notes, “as much as I'd like to.” A moment of rebellion or resurrection is hinted at with, “Not every day you resurrected god.” The tension peaks with a grim resolve: “Darn. I'll not leave you for nothing to see. Already. We have no power here. Alright, Bugani now. They are in your very skin.” The exchange ends on a probing question and a shock: “What is it?” followed by Speaker 0’s question, “How, Derek? How?” indicating confusion or a reveal about a betrayal or transformation. Overall, the transcript centers on uncovering the hive beneath the mansion in Raccoon City, the scale and secrecy of the Umbrella facility, the existential threat posed by the awakening king in black, and the characters’ struggle to confront the revelations, protect allies like Ashley, and face the invasion or possession implied by those “in your very skin.”

The speakers discuss their deceptive practices and claim to manipulate people's beliefs. They mention stealing and sacrificing children, as well as using their bodies in food products. They also mention their control over McDonald's. They acknowledge their differing perspectives due to having different fathers. The speakers mention a forthcoming collision between two forces, with one claiming they will take over the world. They argue about their fathers, with one asserting that the other's father is Satan. The conversation concludes with one speaker stating that it is too late for the other group and that their teachings have not been successful in gaining followers.

The speaker asked for an explanation about the children's role in their beliefs. The person they were talking to explained that the children have a different perspective. They see themselves as fighting against God and view children as the closest thing to God because they are innocent and haven't been corrupted. The more a baby or young child suffers, the more they believe they are defeating God. This is their main focus and nothing else matters to them.

Hundreds of millions of Americans are willingly getting vaccinated, unaware that the vaccine is designed to sterilize them and halt human reproduction for three generations. The creator of this plan believes it is necessary to save the planet from the destructive nature of humans, who are wiping out other species. The speaker sees this as a cure for the world's problems, even though it may lead to the extinction of humanity.

They want us dead. That's what they want.

In this video, Tad O'Malley claims that people have had their DNA tampered with without their knowledge. Agent Einstein dismisses it as science fiction, but Agent Mulder believes it cannot be discounted. They discuss the Spartan virus, which removes a gene from the DNA, weakening the immune system. The virus uses a process called CRISPR Cas9 to cut genes. They suspect a government conspiracy to depopulate the planet and take over America. They mention various tactics, such as weather wars, aerial contaminants, and surveillance. The video ends with the mention of a security action and the detonation of electromagnetic pulse bombs.

The speaker argues that government plans to augment or control citizens through bioengineering cannot be done without asking people first, and that the authorities have stated they will not ask. They claim a plan to induce a novel virus and to use weather warfare for manipulation, and they describe a hidden core in secret systems—secret communications and microfluidics for routing blockchain—as sources to ignore or erase. The speaker asserts that the new economy will be a bioeconomy built around cognitive cities, and that people will be compelled to augment in order to get a job or to live in a city, effectively forcing participation. They warn that the same coercive dynamic will be used to push augmentation as was seen with earlier acts of coerced compliance, comparing it to those who took a doughnut or a COVID-19 shot. They reflect on historical oppression, noting that those who resisted in the past were “mowed under” or placed in asylums, and tie this to fear that wireless updates trigger new diseases, linking disease frequency to cellular voltage and individual cell state. The speaker invites listeners to join in, appealing to empathy and humane treatment of fellow humans who are breathing, and states that if others refuse to accept the invitation, it will be because they prioritize their paycheck over the survival of the species. They declare that there will be some who are brave enough to speak out, and that those who do not join are part of a “cult,” insisting there are far fewer of them than of the speakers. They express a personal stance: they do not want to be a cyborg or have insectoid DNA inserted into their body without knowledge, consent, or permission, and say many people have already been convinced by “cute little tattoo and their new bio cyber interface” to feel differently about it. The speaker accuses certain individuals of being eugenicists who will not stop until their mission is achieved, and identifies their primary system for communication and for eliminating others as the core of their operation. They urge others to figure out why this topic isn’t being discussed and to determine if there is a reason that prevents wider understanding. Finally, they condemn the idea of humans tethered to a remote system controlled by the same military entities responsible for widespread harm, and they note that even military personnel have criticized those in power for years.

Checklist: - Identify setting, actions, and sequence of moments. - Preserve key quotes that drive meaning and plot. - Track relationships and motivations (family dynamics, vigilante context). - Condense repetitive dialogue; keep unique or surprising details. - Highlight notable elements (Medal of Honor moment, “French seventy five,” pronoun usage). - Do not add interpretation or opinions; present claims as in transcript. The scene unfolds around two central figures amid danger and family history. Speaker 0 builds a closed circuit and cautions, “Very important to keep your cap shunted like this so you don't accidentally detonate your charge.” Speaker 1 counters, urging, “Don't stop. I want you to create a show. This is an announcement of revolution. The message is clear.” The tension escalates with a veiled threat: “I'll be seeing you very soon.” Then Speaker 1 pivots to a public confrontation: “for bringing justice to the vigilante group known as the French seventy five, we are here to award Stephen Lockjaw with the Medal of Honor.” A cryptic dynamic follows as Speaker 0 states, “You have to understand the will of you.” The dialogue shifts to family history and peril: “Me and mom, we used to run around and do some real bad.” “They got hurt. Now they're coming after us. I'm sorry.” “I didn't ask for this. That's just how the cards were rolled out for me.” The retort lands: “It's not cards. You don't roll cards. It's dice.” The exchange intensifies: “Dad, what is wrong with you?” “You're right.” The speaker announces a plan: “Let's go. I got a tunnel. What? What's going on? I need a weapon, man.” A resource constraint and protective impulse come through: “All you got is goddamn nunchucks here. You know, I can get a gun.” The protective motive is explicit: “I wanted to protect you from all your mom's stuff and all my stuff even though I know that's impossible.” The threatenings’ line of no return arrives: “This is the end of the line. Not for you.” A moment of uncertainty about new allies follows: “Woah. Who's this?” “Oh, they're just my friends.” The pronoun question—“Now is that a he or a she or a they?”—is answered: “It's not that hard. They, them.” The response seeks politeness: “Okay. I just wanna be polite. Yo. Say it. Say it, baby.” A brief affection is exchanged: “Love you, Bob.” “Love you too.” The closing conveyance frames a philosophy of liberty: “You know what freedom is? No fear. Just like Tom Cruise.”

The discussion claims that an “antivirus” was a “deadly virus spread by field mice in the Southwestern United States” several years ago, and that a newspaper reported FEMA was called to manage an outbreak of this virus in suburban Texas. The speaker then argues that FEMA’s “real power” is allowing the White House to suspend constitutional government upon a declaration of a national emergency. They question what an agency with such sweeping power is doing managing a “small viral outbreak,” and dispute the idea that the outbreak was limited, stating “No.” When asked what virus it was, the speaker says it was not Hanta virus and connects the topic to a military project they describe as being recruited for when they were young men. They claim they were told it involved biological warfare or a virus, and that they know “what killed those men” but “won’t even write about” it. They say there is “no context” for what killed those men or an appreciation of the future scale “it’ll be unleashed in.” The transcript introduces a claim of a coming “plague to end all plagues,” described as “a silent weapon for a quiet war.” It asserts “the systematic release of an indiscriminate organism” for which “the men who will bring it on still have no cure,” and says “they’ve been working on this for fifty years.” It further claims that while the rest of the world fought conflicts against “gooks” and “commies,” these men were “secretly negotiating a planned armageddon,” and asks “Negotiating with whom?” The speaker claims the timetable has been “said” to involve an event “on a holiday when people are away from their homes.” They say the president will declare a state of emergency, during which “all government, all federal agencies will come under the power of the Federal Emergency Management Agency,” described as “the secret government.” The speaker ends by telling “agent Muller” to go back to Dallas and “dig,” warning that otherwise “we’re gonna find out along with the rest of the country when it’s too late.”

People are driven by the need to know what happens next. The speaker reveals that they have embedded a world-changing virus in a flu vaccine, causing panic and demand for the facts. They explain that the virus is not deadly but aims to sterilize people and halt overpopulation. The speaker believes that overpopulation is the root cause of global issues such as global warming and food shortages. They argue that if action is not taken, the world will experience privations and wars over resources. The speaker sees themselves as a stern parent protecting humanity from its own self-indulgence and believes they can form a new society. They claim ownership over someone who was created by the speaker's father. The person objects, stating that their father was protecting them from the speaker's virus. The speaker dismisses this and asserts their control over the person.

Think about it, Sam. We've taken vaccines that claim to reverse aging and cancer, yet here we are. I feel overwhelmed by the science. Are you in Joe yet? Not yet; we just have to keep trying. They still let me keep an office in Washington. I could give you a checkup, but they said I was fine. You've been trying for almost three years, and your scan shows damaged ovaries. Why didn't the doctors tell you? I want to find out why. The global birth rate has dropped 91% in two years, likely due to the anti-aging vaccine. This has been done deliberately. It’s a slow, methodical approach to sterilize the population. If this continues, there will be very few humans left. What can we do? Fight back.

The speakers exchange pointed claims about vaccination status and social policy. Speaker 0 asserts that vaccinated people are the problem and that it is the unvaccinated who are responsible. Speaker 1 counters with a stance that the unvaccinated should be shamed and blamed, and asserts that it is time to start blaming the unvaccinated, not ordinary people. The dialogue emphasizes distrust of the unvaccinated, with Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 associating the unvaccinated with negative behavior and calling for punitive approaches. Speaker 1 argues that the unvaccinated include children and people acting like children, and contends that it’s time to stop tolerating “the idiots in this country” and to mandate vaccination. The speakers discuss shaming the unvaccinated and refuse to call them stupid or silly by implication, while also stating that those who are not vaccinated will “end up paying the price” and that the unvaccinated should be taxed or pay more for health care. Speaker 0 suggests treating the choice to remain unvaccinated like driving while intoxicated, implying it should be addressed with similar seriousness. Speaker 1 claims that only the unvaccinated are dying and condemns misinformation, urging shaming and shunning of those who spread it, calling for turning people away. The dialogue advocates exclusion for the unvaccinated: Speaker 0 says unvaccinated individuals should be denied entry to offices or places of business, and Speaker 1 argues that if you don’t get vaccinated, you can’t come to work. The phrase “Ew. Screw your freedom” expresses a rejection of individual freedom in this context. Speaker 1 contends that the unvaccinated have put everyone in a bad position and asserts that it is not a good place. The conversation ends with a provocative statement about freedom and power, declaring that “Freedom is a fragile thing, and it's never more than one generation away from extinction.” The closing lines add, “Ice of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. They were wrong. Question everything.”

The speaker asked someone to explain the focus on children, admitting they have a problem understanding it. The explanation given was that "they" don't define children or the world the same way. Their choices are different, and everything is defined by their purpose: to defeat God. Children are seen as the closest thing on Earth to God because humans are created in God's image and haven't had time to be corrupted. Therefore, the younger you are, the closer you are to God, and the more pain inflicted on a baby or small child, the greater the victory over God. This is described as their only consideration.

The scene centers on a tense, improvisational act that mixes technical danger with the formation of a rebellious mission. Speaker 0 is shown building a closed circuit, insisting on keeping a cap shunted “so you don’t accidentally detonate your charge,” and pressing to “create a show,” framing the moment as “an announcement of revolution. The message is clear.” Speaker 1 responds with a chilling promise: “I’ll be seeing you very soon.” The conversation then pivots to a ceremonial claim: “for bringing justice to the vigilante group known as the French seventy five, we are here to award Steven Lockjaw with the medal of honor.” The dialogue hints at love and loyalty with the line “You have to understand who will love you.” A personal vignette emerges: Speaker 0 recalls, “Me and mom used to run around and do some real bad / They got hurt. Now they're coming after us. I'm sorry.” The exchange reveals a sense of fatalism, as Speaker 0 asserts, “I didn't ask for this. That's just how the cards were rolled out for me,” only to be corrected by the other voice: “It's not cards. You don't roll cards. It's dice.” A moment of familial friction follows: “Dad, what is wrong with you? You're right.” They prepare to move on with “Let's go.” The scene shifts to a tunnel-like tension: “Tunnel. What? What's going on?” and a practical but desperate plea for weaponry: “I need a weapon, man. All you got is goddamn nunchucks here. You know where I can get a gun?” The dialogue then reflects a concern to protect “you from all your mom's stuff, from all my stuff, even though I know that's impossible.” A stark line marks a turning point: “This is the end of the line.” “Not for you.” A new character arrives: “Woah. Who's this?” They explain, “Oh, they're just my friends,” and dialogue turns to pronouns: “Now is that a he or a she or a they? It's not that hard. They, them. Okay.” A brief courtesy follows: “I just wanna be polite.” Then an intimate moment: “Yo. Say it. Say it, baby.” Endearments are exchanged: “Love you, Bob. Love you too.” The closing vibe asserts a philosophy of freedom: “You know what freedom is? No fear. Just like Tom Cruise.”

"So those people are going to be like the Japanese soldiers who were on Pacific Islands and didn't know the war was over." "This another reason why this is the worst, worst, worst social contagion that we'll ever have experienced." "A lot of people have done the worst thing that you could do, which is to harm their children irrevocably because of it." "Those people will have to believe that they did the right thing for the rest of their lives, for their own sanity and for their own self respect." "The entire organization gets paralyzed by that one person." "And you know you can't." "And if we don't, there's no way back for them and their child." "They've sold their child a bill of goods that they can't deliver on, I'm the one who has to be bullied to try to force me to deliver on it."

Why did you do that? You told him that you were mister need Philip. He's with Ian. Roy has no idea where his brother is. But when Ian discovers that we've killed Roy, well, he has a mother. Killed? No. Wait. Just hang on a minute. In a few days, I'm gonna call either Paul or one of the other two. I'll give a command, a command that only I know. And in about ninety days, that person will release the most deadly flu this world has ever seen. Everyone will take the vaccine. Everyone will willingly take Janus. It'll be chaos. It will, but in less than a hundred years, there'll be no more than 500,000,000 people on this planet. We will have created Utopia.

The speaker claims there is a “mask,” described as a controlled revelation and as part of a narrative presented for decades in *Mission: Impossible*, involving masks, doubles, impostors, and progressive normalization. The speaker says the same pattern appears with Jim Carrey, and that this year “they officialize anomalies for a controlled awakening.” The speaker asserts that a 1995 “Illuminati card game” already encoded these elements, including impostors, “unmasked cabals,” assassination attempts, Donald Trump, a fake pandemic, quarantine, adrenochrome, “NASA in studio,” a fake space conquest, UFOs, climate manipulation, and events tied to September, the Pentagon, and the Twin Towers. The speaker states that these events are coded to create maximum confusion, with the goal of pushing people to leave their biological bodies and be assimilated by entities “we called or.” The speaker then claims the focus has shifted to Silicon Valley, artificial intelligence, and Neuralink, arguing that the invasion is not external but internal. The speaker concludes that the “worst” part is that individuals finance their own disappearance.

Speaker A and Speaker B discuss the Alpha Draconids. They claim 1,833 of the Alpha Draconids have been living underground, between 100 and 200 miles beneath the surface, and that they have lifespans of thousands of years. They are carnivorous and not friendly to mankind, with a preference for eating living humans, specifically children. They reference the Andromedans, stating they’re responsible for 31,712 children disappearing in the last twenty-five years from the United States, and say these children were food. They mention Westchester County, New York, where 3,000 children have vanished in the last five years, asking where they’re going and why people are in denial. Regarding how the Alpha Draconids operate, they claim there are tooling systems everywhere and that the Draconians are being helped by the Grays, with groups within a higher echelon aiding them. Humans abduct children and deliver them to the Grays, who in turn give them to the Alpha Draconians. They assert that the Alpha Draconids won’t come up as long as people feed them down there, describing it as humans selling themselves out. The conversation highlights an echelon attitude, stating that the needs of the few outweigh the needs of humanity.

Speaker 0 (John) explains that the other side “got tired of me winning, so he joined our side,” and asserts he has no animosity toward him, only regret that it became personal for some people, not for him, because it’s always about the survivors. He describes a reversal: after months of fighting, the speaker, the attorney general, the FBI director, the president, and the vice president could save everyone if they’d done the right thing four months ago. He questions whether Congressman Greene truly supports the release now, suggesting he’s only backing it because the president told him to support it, and attributes this to Mike Johnson. Speaker 1 asks if John believes the president’s current stance, given weeks of opposition and now support. John says he is concerned the president is opening a flurry of investigations and fears they may use those investigations as a predicate for not releasing the files. He believes they will try to use a legal provision allowing withholding materials if they are the subject of an ongoing investigation and would harm that investigation. Speaker 2 notes that the focus is on President Trump: he initially blocked the release and now has the power to release the full files anyway. Speaker 0 summarizes that for four months the president thought secrecy was best, but someone convinced him the releases are better; if serious, they should release them now. Speaker 1 asks why John thinks the president has resisted for so long. John contends the files implicate billionaires and friends of Trump and his donors, plus Epstein’s ties to intelligence agencies, which is why there’s effort to stop the release. He predicts attempts to stop it will occur elsewhere and that this will backfire. Speaker 1 asks if the president will sign the bill; John says he thinks he will sign and would like to be at the signing party, joking about being invited to sign his own bill. John addresses personal attacks: the president attacked his wife, calling Margie Taylor Greene a traitor. John says the attack was a new low for him, but he laughs it off; his wife joked about inviting Trump to their wedding, and she blames him for not inviting him, which she says led to the anger. John remains optimistic the bill will pass tomorrow, with a veto-proof majority, and thinks the speaker will begrudgingly support it. Speaker 1 asks about the public breakup with Marjorie Taylor Greene over the Epstein files. John says Greene represents the base—the populist movement that brought Trump to the White House—and when Trump told supporters they are no longer his supporters if they want the Epstein files released, Trump lost many supporters, but Greene did not, and she remains in favor of seeking justice for the survivors. Speaker 1 asks if Trump has lost touch with the MAGA base. John believes Trump has strayed on fiscal responsibility, starting wars overseas and regime change, and on releasing the death steam files, away from the campaign promises that defined the MAGA base.

The speaker emphasizes that the US will need to send their sons and daughters to war just like they currently do. They stress that this is a natural consequence and that people will die, which they find to be a terrible thing.

The speaker recounts a conversation about why children are targeted. The explanation given was that "they" don't define the world or children the way "you" do. For "them," everything is defined by their all-consuming purpose: to defeat God. "They" believe the true gods are themselves and Satan. Children are seen as the closest thing on Earth to God because humans are created in God's image and haven't had time to be corrupted. Therefore, the younger you are, the closer you are to God, and the more pain inflicted on a baby or small child, the greater the victory over God. This is claimed to be their only consideration.

In the future, we'll have to explain to our kids what it was like being parents. It was pretty crazy. The government was out of control, poisoning everything and sending our money to other countries. We struggled to pay our bills and had to buy food from local farmers because the quality was so bad. The medical industry was like the mafia, killing people but we couldn't speak out. We did a lot to preserve your fertility. That's why we became farmers.

Speaker 1 states that the Andromedans have 1,833 individuals living underground between 100 and 200 miles beneath the surface. They have lifespans of thousands of years, are carnivorous, and are not friendly to mankind, at least the ones that are here. They eat living humans, not dead ones, with a preference for children. They claim there are other groups who say not to talk about the reptilians, but Speaker 1 says otherwise. According to the Andromedans, these beings are responsible for 31,712 children disappearing in the last twenty-five years from the United States, and these children were food. Speaker 1 adds that 3,000 children in Westchester County, New York have vanished in the last five years, asking why this is happening and why people remain in denial. Speaker 0 asks how these beings are able to come up from underground and do this. Speaker 1 explains that they have cooling systems everywhere that are aided by the Grays, and there are groups within the higher echelon that help them acquire this. In addition, human beings abduct the kids and get them to the Grey Zoo, which in turn hands them to the Alpha drug contest, as part of the deal. They won’t come up as long as humans feed them down there. Speaker 1 reiterates that it’s about human beings selling themselves out, describing the echelon attitude as the needs of the few outweighing the needs of humanity, and that this is not right. Speaker 0 comments that humanity will have to rise up and take a stand, suggesting people turn off their televisions, get in their cars, and fire everyone in Washington, DC who knows and does nothing. They argue that apathy must end, or the way we live will end. They emphasize that they are not speaking from a fear space, but from anger about the apathy. Speaker 1 complains that lectures try to tell people, but others want to stand up and fight; indications are everywhere, saying the truth is now an obscure thing and the lie is the norm. Speaker 0 apologizes for seeming crazy, and Speaker 1 reassures that they are not.

The bad extraterrestrials can no longer control the planet due to the disclosure process; their methods of secrecy and manipulation are ineffective. With the good extraterrestrials now in a position of power, it makes no sense for the bad ones to continue fighting. Instead, they will likely retreat to save their resources. This realization brings clarity to the disclosure process, which is set to unfold soon, although the exact timing remains uncertain due to necessary coordination. The conversation reveals a comprehensive and effective plan that could genuinely work, marking a significant moment of understanding.