TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 repeatedly asks Speaker 1 to give them a call. They express concern about what Speaker 1 has done to Dylan, a baby, and accuse Speaker 1 of lying. Speaker 0 mentions that they didn't know the doctor had to report something to the authorities and that they went to ensure Dylan's well-being. Speaker 0 describes Dylan's behavior, including holding her vagina and being scared of Speaker 1. They express guilt for not being there to protect Dylan. Speaker 0 concludes by saying they don't understand how Speaker 1 can live with their actions.

A person is told to grab whatever they need, like their phone or purse. They ask if their husband is coming with them. They are told he is taking his phone number down and that they are staying in touch with him. They are also told that they are just going down the road, about ten minutes away. The person says they would prefer their husband be with them. They ask if they are in trouble and state they are lost. They are offered a tissue and a bag because they feel like they are going to throw up.

Amy is asked why she is wet and where the kids are. She explains that the kids are in school, even though it is Saturday.

Speaker 0 is stuck and scared, asking for help. Speaker 1 suggests using the car to get up. Speaker 0 is afraid of calling for help and hopes to get up on their own.

The speaker describes her husband's attempted murder as a horrible experience, and expresses distress over the silence surrounding the event. She questions why law enforcement didn't arrest the shooter before the speech. The speaker believes there is more to the story and emphasizes the need to uncover the truth.

The speaker repeatedly says "Hold on" and emphasizes that someone is not going anywhere. They mention that the person just ran.

The speaker confronts someone named Monica, accusing her of being involved with the wrong person. They repeat this accusation multiple times, emphasizing that it wasn't them but the other person. The speaker urges Monica to go help their friend who is being attacked, calling her a coward. They question who the speaker is and whose friend they are, and someone else confirms that the speaker is indeed their friend.

The speaker is praying that someone is pulling the missing person out of the river. The last communication was a text message indicating they were landing in twenty minutes. The speaker shared the text message about landing. Subsequent texts were not delivered, which made the speaker realize something might be wrong.

Speaker 0 asks if they can go out and expresses concern about getting arrested or shot.

The speaker wonders why someone is agitated and scared. They notice the person digging and scratching, and they mention that the person is talking to Jason. They also comment on the person's facial expression and shaking. The speaker observes that the person is eating some toys and sees something on the floor that they have never seen before.

A mother shares her struggle of not being able to provide breakfast for her children. She emphasizes the importance of eating healthily and how it can affect their future. Her daughter questions why they always have to figure out what to eat, while her son remains silent. When the mother walks with her son, he finally reveals that he stays quiet because he is crying. He blames it on the wind, but the mother reassures him that she will always think about their well-being.

Nick Shirley initiates the exchange by stating his name and pressing for permission to record, noting that the other person “doesn’t have any permission to record me, period.” He proposes, “Can we talk outside? Permission to record.” The other person counters that there is no permission from either party, saying, “She doesn’t either have she doesn’t have permission or … for me. You cannot stop people on the street and question them.” Nick states, “We can ask them,” and the other person repeats, “Have any permission.” The dialogue shifts to a concern about the whereabouts of children. Nick asks, “Where are the children?” The other person responds, “I will sue you. You don't have any permission. We have nothing to do with this. Okay, sir? And are there … So leave.” Nick persists, asking again, “Are there children here?” The other person repeats, “Please leave.” Nick inquires, “Where are the children?” and the other person insists, “Leave. Leave.” Nick questions, “We’re wondering what's happening. Tell us what's happening here then.” The other person commands, “I said leave.” Nick clarifies, “We're wondering what's happening.” The other person states, “We are not a childcare. We have nothing to do with it. We're the common people walking. Yes. We're not … we're not accusing you. We're asking where the children are at.” The other person repeats, “Don't ask me anything.” Nick emphasizes his intent: “We're not accusing you. We're asking the daycare centers.” The other person refuses to answer, “I am not gonna answer. You have.” Nick presses, “Where are the children … who do you work for? My name is Nick Shirley.” The other person asks, “Who do you work for?” Nick responds, “I work for myself. Nick Shirley.” The other person inquires, “Okay what are you recording?” Nick answers, “We're wondering where are the children $2,660,000 for the Minnesota child care center. You're not talking to the right person. Are there children that come here?” The other person demands, “Answer the question. Are there children?” Nick states, “There's no children inside the building.”

A speaker describes a situation in which police officers were hiding behind a car. The speaker says, “I tried to grab one of their guns. They grabbed me and says, no. I'm trying to grab for his gun.” The speaker asserts that these police officers know who he is and expresses a wish that they are hearing this. He accuses the officers by saying, “You are weak. You could have saved so many more people's lives.” He claims the officers were simply standing there, listening and watching the events unfold, and that they were holding him back. He questions where the other officers were, asking, “Not there. Nobody was there. Everyone, the public, helped. Nobody else.” The speaker recounts that his three-year-old child was saved by a pregnant woman who saw the child crying and screaming, “mommy, daddy.” He emphasizes that “We were there.” He questions the response time of the police, asking, “do you know how long did it take for police to come? How long did it take?” He describes the crowd’s reaction as “No. Everyone was too scared.” Across these statements, the speaker juxtaposes a perceived inaction by police with the immediate aid provided by bystanders, including a pregnant woman who intervened to protect the speaker’s child. The speaker emphasizes personal danger in attempting to disarm or confront the authorities and highlights a sense that authorities did not respond promptly or effectively, contrasting it with public intervention and rescue efforts.

Speaker 0 expresses anger that there are kids like him in the country who have had to go through this not once but twice. Speaker 1 notes that after shootings such as Parkland, there is typically a moment of expectation that there might be change and actual action, but it fades. He references that pattern after Sandy Hook, after Parkland, and after Uvalde, sometimes with some incremental progress, but nothing seemingly consequential. He says that has to be frustrating as a victim of this. Speaker 0 responds by stating it is not possible to put into words how frustrating it is, and identifies a common denominator inaction by Congress. He argues that time and time again, Congress has failed to show that they actually care about their constituents, and if they did, they would immediately pass comprehensive gun violence prevention bills. Speaker 1 asks how Speaker 0 is doing right now, noting that there is still a shelter in place on campus and in the area. He asks whether Speaker 0 is still in a shelter in place order. Speaker 0 confirms that he is safe in his dorm, but they cannot leave their dorms or buildings. He says physically he is safe and that he has had many friends and family reunited. Speaker 1 asks about Speaker 0’s family, acknowledging that they went through this with him once before and must be concerned tonight. Speaker 0 says the first person he called was his mom, which is the same thing that happened with Parkland. He describes seeing his mom go through those emotions all over again and feeling bad for her. He says it feels like he is 12 again, and it feels like it’s twenty eighteen again for his family as well, with them going through the exact same emotions.

The speaker expresses relief that her husband is missing and describes him as controlling. She mentions being interviewed by the news but doesn't want help or for him to come back. She pretends to miss him on camera to avoid suspicion but admits she doesn't care. She mentions going to jail for holding her last boyfriend and worries that people will think she's responsible for her husband's disappearance. She asks for his return but claims her tears have dried up. She pleads for someone to let her husband go and emphasizes her love for him.

The speaker is in a state of panic, describing a distressing situation where they found their fiance on the floor with blood. They explain that they had gone downstairs to work out and when they returned, the door was latched and their fiance was unresponsive. Another person questions the speaker's actions, suggesting that they didn't make enough effort to help their fiance. The speaker defends themselves, stating that they had to break the latch to enter the room. They clarify that there was no sign of a break-in.

The speaker is in extreme distress, alternating between shock and urgency. They immediately exclaim, “What the fuck is wrong with you? Oh my god. My Oh my god,” expressing disbelief and anger. They repeat with: “What the fuck did you just do? The fuck did you just do?” signaling they believe an action was taken by someone that is unacceptable or shocking. The speaker then directs another person named Liz to take action, saying, “Liz, somebody call the ambulance.” They repeat the urgent instruction, adding, “Somebody call the ambulance. Somebody needs to call 911,” emphasizing the need for emergency assistance. Continuing to express disbelief, the speaker says, “I can't believe they just did that. Holy shit.” They struggle with their emotions, saying, “Just can't get come on. Come on. Oh my god. Oh my god.” There is a moment of heightened attention to the scene as the speaker states, “I can't believe I'm seeing it. Can't believe I'm seeing it. Oh my god. Come on. Come on, Samantha.” They direct Samantha to come closer, insisting, “Come here. Come on. Come here. It is.” The final fragment, “It is,” remains incomplete but underscores the sense of something unfolded or observed that the speaker wants to highlight. Overall, the transcript captures a rapid sequence of shock, blame, and urgent calls for medical help, with the speaker addressing Liz and Samantha and repeatedly expressing disbelief at what they are witnessing.

A child tells his mother that Uncle Remus is gone and asks why he left. The mother responds that she doesn't know but suggests that "mother" is to blame. Another person, Miss Sally, reports that Uncle Remus is getting in a wagon to leave.

Yo. The speaker is freaked out and identifies the location as the 83rd floor of Power 2. The speaker then mentions their mom.

The speaker alerts someone, referred to as "Holmes," that their "crack is out." The speaker then addresses "Ma," urging her to look away from something. The speaker questions someone's actions, stating there are kids and the speaker's mother present. The speaker calls someone "sickos."

The speaker expresses frustration and confusion, repeatedly stating that someone is the wrong person. They question what the person named Monica did and express anger. They mention that someone's friend is in trouble and urge them to go help. The speaker also calls someone a coward and mentions that someone else is responsible for the situation. The speaker ends by saying that something was crazy and asking who they are.

The speaker is caught trespassing and witnesses a commotion with police surrounding a building. They hide behind a tree and discuss what they saw, including someone being seriously injured. The speaker interacts with others present, asking for names and confirming details heard on the police radio.

The speaker describes her husband's attempted murder as a horrible experience, and expresses distress over the silence surrounding the event. She questions why law enforcement didn't arrest the shooter before the speech. The speaker believes there is more to the story and emphasizes the need to uncover the truth.

The speaker expresses concern about someone's health, noting their poor color and fast breathing. They feel that their concerns are not taken seriously and that their mother is unwell. They are frustrated that they have to wait two days to speak to someone and ask for the doctor to wait. They repeatedly plead for the person not to take someone away.

The speaker asks an officer what is happening and what is going on. The speaker repeats, "What's that?" and "What?" The officer responds that they can't describe exactly what's going on, stating, "It's an ongoing investigation." The speaker repeats the word "crime" multiple times.