reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The USMCA is a good deal, but the speaker had a bad relationship with a person who worked for Trudeau's predecessor because they disagreed on the deal. The speaker claims to have called Trudeau "governor Trudeau," which may have hurt his election. The speaker questioned Trudeau about why the US was taking Canada's cars and suggested a 25% tariff on Canadian cars, to which Trudeau allegedly responded that it would mean the end of Canada. The speaker finds it hard to justify subsidizing Canada, potentially to the tune of $200 billion a year, while the US protects Canada militarily. The speaker believes it's hard for the American taxpayer to be happy about subsidizing Canada.

Do you support the prime minister's veto of the Northern Gateway pipeline? I understand the veto and believe it was the right decision for both environmental and commercial reasons. However, your company has invested $1 billion in pipelines in Brazil and the UAE over the last five years. Do you support those investments? There is a global energy system, and it's important to consider Canada's role in the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. So, you oppose pipelines in Canada but support them abroad? That’s not a double standard. You profit from foreign pipelines while shutting down projects here, which puts people out of work.

Canada has opportunities in carbon capture, small modular reactors, and hydrogen, and could be a clean energy superpower. Mark Carney's ideas about energy omit the fact that Canada produces less than 1.5% of total global emissions. Even if Canada were wiped off the map, it wouldn't matter. Also, about 96% of all the machinery for climate change is made in China.

According to Speaker 0, Canada's new prime minister threatened to seize capital from companies not advancing Canada's climate agenda. Speaker 1 stated the goal is for every financial decision to consider climate change, backing companies that are part of the solution and taking capital away from those who are part of the problem. Speaker 0 claims the prime minister is a fan of censorship and threatened American social media platforms, referencing a statement by Speaker 1 that large American online platforms have become seas of hate and are being used by criminals to harm children, and that his government will act. Speaker 0 asserts there is no free speech in Canada and that the prime minister wants to ban social media platforms, shut down dissent, and use the climate crisis as an excuse to steal from businesses and control their means of production. Speaker 0 concludes that while the friendship between the US and Canada will continue, the "free ride" is over.

In this video, the speaker aims to debunk myths about the carbon tax. They argue that the carbon tax is indeed a tax, despite the government's attempts to label it differently. They also claim that the carbon tax is not effective in reducing emissions and is instead a tax plan rather than an environmental plan. The speaker highlights how the tax drives production out of Canada and into countries with lower environmental standards, ultimately increasing global emissions. They criticize the idea of the carbon tax being revenue neutral, stating that most Canadians end up paying more than they receive in rebates. The speaker concludes by advocating for a different approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions through affordable alternative energies rather than taxing traditional forms of energy.

The speaker expresses concern about the cost of climate change and accuses the opposing party of not being honest with Canadians. They emphasize the urgency of the situation and the burden it places on future generations. The transcript ends abruptly.

Speaker 0: He's one of the greatest I've ever seen. Speaker 1: Don't mess with Whitey, I'm crazy. Speaker 2: Trudeau announced a 3-year exemption on carbon tax reform. Speaker 3: Will there be penalties or jail for not paying carbon tax? The government expects everyone to work. Speaker 1: We need to find ways to extract and use oil and gas with minimal emissions and carbon capture. Speaker 2: I demand the same carbon tax exemption for Saskatchewan families as others. It's only fair. Hopefully, it will be provided.

The speaker says he has always liked Elon Musk and is surprised by Musk's criticism regarding the bill. He would rather Musk criticize him than the bill because the bill is incredible, with $1.6 trillion in cuts, the biggest tax cut in history. The bill includes unbelievable benefits for small businesses, people, and middle-income individuals. Musk is upset because the EV mandate, which provided a lot of money for electric vehicles, was removed. Electric vehicle companies are having a hard time and want billions of dollars in subsidies. The speaker claims Musk knew about this from the beginning, and it hasn't changed.

Canada has opportunities in carbon capture, small modular reactors, and hydrogen, and could be a clean energy superpower. Mark Carney's ideas about energy omit the fact that Canada produces less than 1.5% of total global emissions. Even if Canada were wiped off the map, it wouldn't matter. Also, about 96% of all the machinery for climate change is made in China.

Okay, here is a concise transcript of the video: It seems there's still a chance for companies to transfer costs to consumers. But to clarify, when companies buy credits, it actually lowers their expenses. This, in turn, aids Canadians in cutting down their emissions. Now, let's consider the bigger picture.

Speaker 2 stated he doesn't think they can change Donald Trump at this stage. Speaker 1 believes Pierre Poilievre, like Trump, will focus on the American worker, securing borders, ending fentanyl, and securing the world. Speaker 2 said he and Poilievre have a lot in common, but Speaker 1 says Poilievre is willfully blind to threats facing the country. Speaker 2 stated the U.S. doesn't want cars, steel, or aluminum from Canada because they want to make their own. Speaker 1 questioned how much steel is used these days. Speaker 2 recounted a conversation with Trudeau, whom he called "Governor Trudeau," about tariffs on Canadian cars. Speaker 2 claimed Trudeau said a 25% tariff would mean the end of Canada. Speaker 2 believes the U.S. subsidizes Canada to the tune of maybe $200 billion a year and that it's hard to justify. He added that the U.S. protects Canada militarily.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work because of a Biden EO, can expect to get their promised green jobs. I welcome you to present data showing these people won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka wished the President had paired the Keystone EO with a plan for creating new jobs. The Laborers International Union of North America says the Keystone decision will cost thousands of existing and projected jobs. The President plans to share details of a plan to create millions of good union jobs and tackle the climate crisis in the weeks ahead. Many believe investment in infrastructure will boost the US economy, create good-paying union jobs, and advance our climate and clean energy goals.

I will not entertain Mr. Poliyev's temper tantrums. We were supposed to debate Bill C50, which focuses on sustainable jobs and Canada's future. Canada ranks 3rd in the world for foreign direct investment because we understand the importance of fighting climate change. However, Mr. Poliyev and his conservative members added 198 amendments to an 11-page bill, causing more voting chaos. He wants to bring American-style extreme right-wing politics to Canada. Instead, I suggest they take a break, reflect on their obstructionist politics, and talk to real Canadians. Their actions have been irresponsible.

Speaker 0 says that the richest people in the world have recently started telling people they need to produce more energy, which they find “a little weird” because the same group has spent at least the past fifteen years—since Al Gore became famous—telling people the opposite. Speaker 0 claims they said energy is not the source of life or the base of civilization, but instead the cause of humanity’s downfall: the destruction of the earth and the main reason for climate change. Speaker 0 further states that CO2 is the reason it is getting warmer and that this warming happens because climate cycles are part of nature, including the example that glaciers existed and now do not. Speaker 0 says this group previously taught that burning fossil fuels was not only bad for the environment but a sin, and that society should be organized around being “carbon conscious” because they “love the earth.” Speaker 0 then claims that the same people, including Larry Fink of BlackRock, have since said they are going to take a pause on concern about global warming and that society needs more electricity. Speaker 0 states that most electricity on Earth is produced by boiling water to move turbines, and that a small portion uses radioactive material in nuclear reactors, while most generation is from coal, then natural gas, and some oil. Speaker 0 characterizes this as essentially industrial-age technology: refining and cleaning, but fundamentally the same process of burning fuel to boil water and generate power. Speaker 0 says these figures who previously framed that technology as inefficient and morally wrong are now calling for a massive expansion of it. Speaker 0 links this shift to AI, describing artificial intelligence as a dramatic, quantum increase in processing power that enables computers to reason and mimic human thinking, replacing a lot of human labor. Speaker 0 states that AI is incredibly demanding of power and will require far more electricity than most people understood. Speaker 0 concludes that society will need to put on hold—and invert—its concerns about global warming in order to build AI.

A speaker asks the Deputy Secretary of Energy how much global temperatures would decrease if the U.S. spent $50 trillion to become carbon neutral by 2050. The Deputy Secretary states that every country needs to act, and the U.S. accounts for 13% of global emissions. The speaker repeats the question, but the Deputy Secretary says it's a global problem and the U.S. needs to reduce its emissions. The speaker asks how much of a reduction would result if the U.S. does its part. The Deputy Secretary reiterates that the U.S. is 13% of global emissions, and if the U.S. went to zero emissions, that would be 13%. The speaker accuses the Deputy Secretary of wanting to spend $50 trillion without knowing if it will reduce world temperatures.

The speaker claims the prime minister is a climate zealot and eco extremist. They assert the prime minister has pushed for net-zero banking for decades, intending to prevent banks from investing in oil and gas. The speaker alleges the prime minister plans to increase carbon taxes on the oil and gas industry to eviscerate it, referencing the prime minister's book as evidence. According to the speaker, Canada's national identity, unity, freedom, and future are at a monumental crossroads.

The Prime Minister defends the carbon tax as revenue neutral, citing the parliamentary budget officer's report that 8 out of 10 families benefit from the rebate. He accuses conservative politicians of misleading Canadians, stating that the tax puts more money in families' pockets and helps combat climate change by making polluters pay. The Prime Minister argues that conservatives oppose climate action and the tax helps low and middle-income families.

Speaker 2 questions why the United States federal government is allowing foreign corporations to own American utility companies. Speaker 1 responds that they like seeing a free flow of capital among allies and friends. Speaker 2 argues that the discussion resembles arguments about the benefits of globalization made for 30 years, which they say prioritize elite economists, out-of-touch politicians, and big corporations. They contend that upstate New Yorkers should not be forced to pay money to utility companies each month with that money shipped overseas to foreign corporations. Speaker 2 describes seniors on fixed incomes who are cutting medicine in half due to the utility costs. They also cite public school teachers who take second jobs because of the NYSEG bill, and a union woman whose husband, after retiring, must get another job to pay the NYSEG bill rather than spending time with his grandchildren. Speaker 2 states that the money paid each month goes to a corporate boardroom in Spain and asks whether Speaker 2 will look into the issue and use authority to get foreign corporations to stop owning American utility companies. Speaker 2’s question receives the response: “I will look into that issue.” Speaker 0 adds that foreign countries are being allowed to buy American utility companies, including Spain, Canada, and the UK. Speaker 0 says this is happening across multiple states: Connecticut, Maine, Arizona, Minnesota, Illinois, Rhode Island, and Vermont, calling it widespread.

The owner of the resource asserts their responsibility to manage emissions and rejects the idea that the federal government can do it better. When asked about public support for an emissions cap, the speaker questions the numbers and provides examples of emissions reduction in electricity and methane. They mention industry efforts to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 through technology rather than production cuts. The speaker argues against shutting down production, stating the negative consequences it would have on revenue and healthcare. They emphasize that Albertans and the federal government should not support such a production cut.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work due to the Biden EO, will get their promised green jobs. When can they count on this? Well, present your data showing that they won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka noted the need to pair the Keystone EO with job creation. The Laborers International Union of North America said the Keystone decision will cost union jobs. The President plans a climate plan with transformative investments and infrastructure, creating millions of good union jobs while tackling the climate crisis. He plans to put forward a jobs plan. People need money now. When do they get their green jobs? The President believes that investment in infrastructure creates good-paying union jobs, advances our climate and clean energy goals, and he plans to share more details in the weeks ahead.

The speaker questions the need to spend trillions of dollars to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, arguing that the problem doesn't exist and may even be worsened. They mention that carbon dioxide is essential for plant life and killing it would have negative consequences. The other speaker disagrees, stating that human activity is significantly contributing to climate change and that the consensus among world leaders supports taking action. The first speaker dismisses this as a money-making scheme.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling economic independence and strength against the Americans. Regarding criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting critics don't understand the tax code. The speaker also acknowledges that the biggest component of cost was building.

The speaker alleges that Mark Carney and Justin Trudeau are setting up a system where companies must buy carbon credits from companies like Brookfield if they are not "eco and green." They claim Brookfield will profit immensely from this. The speaker points to SEC filings showing Carney has 209,000 shares of Brookfield at $35 and 200,000 shares at $40, potentially netting him $6.8 million if sold. They suggest Carney's promotion of net-zero policies could greatly increase Brookfield's stock value, further enriching him. The speaker demands transparency regarding Carney's investments, questioning if he owns additional shares of Brookfield. The speaker plays audio of Carney discussing a $100 billion a year market in carbon offsets and stating that financial institutions expect to "make a lot of money off of this" transition to net zero. The speaker concludes that Carney has significant conflicts of interest and should not be Prime Minister.

The speaker addresses potential retaliatory tariffs from Canada and others, stating that Canada cannot win a trade war with the U.S. According to the speaker, President Trump aims to level the playing field, claiming that Canadian leadership has unfairly disadvantaged American farmers and manufacturers for decades. The speaker asserts that the U.S. will reciprocate actions against its industries to protect American manufacturing and jobs. They state that the President intends to end America's role as the world's "piggy bank," alleging that other countries have exploited the U.S. by using it to absorb excess economic production, resulting in declining manufacturing jobs, lower middle-class wages, and hollowed-out towns. The speaker emphasizes the importance of rebuilding the American manufacturing sector for national security, advocating for American-made weaponry. They conclude that fighting back against unfair economic practices, even with allies, will lead to higher wages, more manufacturing, and greater economic security for Americans.