TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

During a question period, Pierre Polayev cited a Fox News report about a terrorist attack, which was the only outlet reporting it at the time. He was questioned about the responsibility of using media reports when the Canadian government was still learning about the situation. Polayev defended his statement by criticizing the Canadian press for making three corrections in one article. Another speaker pointed out that attacking the agency instead of addressing the question was not appealing in terms of leadership and constructive conversations. The discussion ended with the mention of a GTA voter who didn't appreciate the aggressive tone.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

You claim to be running against the Ottawa establishment, yet you've been part of it for a decade. Why should anyone believe you're not part of the establishment? People can see the dynamics of the race. I resigned because I recognized the need to focus on the threat posed by Donald Trump. Wouldn't you have had a better chance to help Canada by staying in cabinet? No, Canada is strong and will impress the world with our resilience. I take pride in rallying Canadians and advocating for our country every day.

It's alarming that a candidate running for leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada, potentially our next prime minister, learned of her disqualification via an email received by the media outlet interviewing her. While shocking, it's not surprising. Our internal polls showed my campaign was neck and neck with the front runner. They didn't want me on the debate stage or on the ballot. The Liberal Party wanted to ensure Mark Carney's coronation. The allegations against me are completely false.

All leaders performed relatively well in the debate, the first opportunity for Canadians to see them head-to-head. It was of particular interest how Mark Carney and Pierre Poliev would perform. Election debates typically only influence an election if someone does exceptionally well or terribly, which didn't happen. Mark Carney presented himself as the negotiator to handle Canada's crisis, appealing to concerns about Trump's threats and presenting himself as an economist. Pierre Poliev was a friendlier version of himself, after polls showed Quebecers were uncomfortable with his rhetoric. He focused on presenting a more personable version of himself. Jagmeet Singh had his best performance so far, appealing to Canadians to form a minority government. Yves-Francois Blanchet was in his comfort zone and less aggressive than expected, trying to win back voters looking at the Liberals.

I used to love Canada, especially Vancouver, but I won't go there anymore because of the current leadership. The country is heading towards tyranny with oppressive laws and erosion of rights. People there need to laugh, but they're getting caught up in hate speech laws due to their kindness. Compelled speech leads to communism enforced by violence. Canada used to be nicer than America, but now it's a scary place.

The speaker questions the accuracy of polls showing Carney's popularity, claiming the People's Party isn't polled and that mainstream media is biased against them. They allege the Canadian debate rules were changed to exclude the People's Party, preventing them from participating despite qualifying in the past. The speaker highlights concerns about Canada's electoral system, specifically the lack of mandatory photo ID for voting and the promotion of mail-in ballots. They believe being excluded from debates is censorship and undemocratic. The speaker intends to challenge the debate exclusion in court to ensure their voice is heard.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

I am not campaigning to be the governor of the fifty-first state. Initially, Canadians were sad because we consider Americans our friends and neighbors, but that sadness evolved into anger. The President of the United States is repeatedly suggesting using economic coercion to force Canada to become the fifty-first state. I take this seriously, and so do Canadians. I'm actively campaigning, and recently, a four-year-old girl named Ari approached me with her mother in Saskatoon. She asked me, with all the seriousness a child could muster, if I could stop Trump from invading Canada. We're now at a point where young children are worried about the possibility of an invasion.

Canada aims to ensure all citizens can freely and safely participate in democratic processes. Internationally, Canada is working with partners to address transnational repression, and the G7 will discuss a coordinated response under Canada's 2025 presidency. Domestically, Canada is taking a whole-of-society approach, with security and intelligence organizations at the forefront of detecting and countering threats. Canadians are advised that their vote is secret and secure, and it is an offense to threaten someone to change their vote. They should record details of any such incidents and report them to local police or the RCMP National Security Information Network for non-immediate threats. The panel mentioned has a high threshold for intervention and does not monitor individual opinions, perspectives, or perceived public influence.

Our government is committed to ensuring the safety of our research institutions amidst growing threats. We are investigating issues at the Winnipeg Labs and taking necessary actions. Unfortunately, the Conservative party is using this serious matter for political gain, spreading conspiracy theories and hindering progress. Responsible debates are welcome, but weaponizing national security is not the way to go. It's disappointing to see certain members suddenly vocal on security issues while remaining silent on other important matters. This behavior is not fitting for an official opposition.

There is a small fringe minority with unacceptable views on their way to Ottawa, but they do not represent the majority of Canadians. Canadians believe in supporting each other and following scientific guidelines to protect one another. This is the best way to safeguard our freedoms, rights, and values as a country.

Bomb-sniffing dogs searched bags to ensure safety. The Montreal police put up caution tape and escorted people out. Leaders of Canada's four parties didn't feel they could guarantee a proper environment, so they won't take questions from journalists. This is an important part of the ritual of elections, democracies, and accountability. It is part of the stress test that leaders go through as they seek to lead the country, spend tax revenue, and make laws. Serious things are being discussed, like criminal justice and using the notwithstanding clause. This requires a serious and mature debate, not financially motivated stunts. With everything going on with Donald Trump, the economy, and the world, this is where the national Canadian election debate has ended up.

Today at the committee, officials were set to discuss the Winnipeg Lab document scandal involving Justin Trudeau. The Liberals and NDP members did not show up, leading to the shutdown of the meeting. The scandal involves a national security breach at Canada's highest security lab, with the government accused of covering it up. The opposition is demanding answers from the top officials involved. This display of shutting down important work is seen as a betrayal of democracy and transparency promised by Trudeau. The fight for truth and accountability continues.

I haven't received official word from the Liberal Party about my disqualification. It's shocking that I learned about it from a news headline before receiving any direct communication. This is alarming. It speaks to the state of the Liberal Party that I'm finding out about my disqualification on air. It's not surprising, though. Our internal polls showed we were neck and neck with the frontrunner. They didn't want me on the debate stage or on the ballot because the Liberal Party of Canada wanted to complete the coronation of Mark Carney. All allegations are completely false and fabricated. I won't allow the Liberal Party of Canada or anyone to smear my name or the name of thousands of volunteers in our campaign.

Justin Trudeau's office has been the target of protests by individuals who believe that showing up in front of a terrorist's office is necessary. The speaker questions how many times this needs to happen before they can move on.

All of the leaders performed relatively well in the debate, the first opportunity for Canadians to see them head to head. It was of particular interest how Mark Carney and Pierre Poliev would perform in this scenario. Election debates typically only influence an election if somebody really knocks it out of the park or does terribly, which didn't happen. Mark Carney presented himself as the negotiator to handle Canada's crisis, appealing to concerns about Trump's threats. He presented himself as the economist who knows how to navigate difficult times and had a relatively good French presentation. Pierre Poliev was a much friendlier version of himself, after polls showed Quebecers were uncomfortable with his rhetoric. He focused on presenting a more personable version of himself. Jagmeet Singh had his best performance so far, appealing to Canadians to form a minority government. Yves Francois Blachat was in his comfort zone and was less aggressive than expected, trying to win back voters looking at going to the Liberals.

My name is Kian Bexy from the Countersignal, an accredited journalist at the Alberta Legislature. We're in Edmonton, and access is being blocked by someone who doesn't even claim to be part of the campaign. This individual is preventing multiple journalists from entering the building to cover a potential future prime minister's appointment. Is this the kind of country he aims to create? This behavior is unacceptable, especially when a diverse group of journalists, including students and accredited professionals, are waiting to enter.

The Conservative Party of Canada, all MPs are on side with the ostriches. The Charles Darwin Foundation, one of the largest foundations on the planet is on side with the ostriches. They have given their full support, and they should be issuing something soon to the public stating such. The speaker was there to coach them on social media security—how to handle an aggressive person, deescalate conflicts, and police themselves. The RCMP's guard right now is coming down. They are openly chatting with everybody. The only thing that will shut down a chat with the RCMP here is if you pull out a camera and shove it in their face. it was a pleasurable conversation because I didn't show the camera in their face. If you guys see something online that questions start popping up in your head, send it to me.

In 2015, I emphasized rejecting divisive politics, hate, and fear. It's unacceptable. Recently, unacceptable views were discussed. A security breach at a sensitive lab led to a snap election before the news broke. China interfered to help win. Admiration for China's dictatorship was expressed. Trudeau was called a disgrace to democracy.

Opposing or questioning the president, his administration, or policies in Canada can lead to being labeled an enemy of the state. The autocratic leader in Canada has used authoritarian tactics to suppress peaceful protests, including emergency powers, freezing bank accounts, seizing children, and destroying livelihoods. This situation raises the question: what are they afraid of? The answer is simple: they fear a free people and a free society. Thomas Jefferson's words about leaders preferring despotism over liberty seem fitting. They fear the freedom that allows us to seek truth, speak freely, and question their decisions. They fear losing power, even though our founders believed in the people's right to alter or abolish a destructive government.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

I am here to ask Justin Trudeau basic questions about the carbon tax. Seven premiers oppose the tax hike, including Danielle Smith. The police are behaving strangely, following me and not allowing me to approach the prime minister. We just want answers to questions that Canadians care about. This behavior is outrageous and unnecessary.

We decided not to use the emergencies act, but due to weeks of dangerous and unlawful activities, harassment in neighborhoods, small businesses closing, stalled trade, and jobs at risk, we had to take action. The National War Memorial was desecrated, and there was evidence of increased ideologically motivated violent extremism across the country. Canada was flooded with misinformation and disinformation, including from foreign sources. Illegal blockades and occupations received foreign funding to destabilize our democracy. Local and provincial authorities needed more tools to restore order and protect people.

Trudeau announced that the Canadian Armed Forces can now be deployed against civilians, a move criticized by some. This action would not be accepted in the United States. Spread the word about this concerning decision.