reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"Packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants." "Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA." "The possible consequences are unending." "Disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation can lead to cancer and to developmental defects." "Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable." "Cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist." "Contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must therefore be expected to be the rule and not the exception." "Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome, is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil."

Kevin McKernan recently discovered that there is contamination in the mRNA shots with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called SV40. SV40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and impairs tumor suppressor systems. This means that the shots not only promote cancer through SV40 but also inhibit our ability to fight cancer. The increase in cancer rates is undeniable, but the question remains: how much of this is due to the vaccines?

Speaker 0 argues that because it’s classified as a vaccine, they don’t have to worry about being sued. Speaker 1 counters that there is immunity from liability dependent on there having been no fraud, and asserts that there clearly was fraud, so in light of that... Speaker 0 expresses surprise at known caveats to liability. Speaker 1 confirms the caveats and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0 asks how fraud is defined in this context, noting that drugs were sold with many studies but only one was good. Speaker 1 responds, “Let's try this one,” and discusses safety testing: the insufficient amount of safety testing before release was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA. The product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids, with massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter (simian virus 40). The point is that safety testing was performed on one process, but people were injected with something different that had other components not tested, which Speaker 1 calls fraudulent. Speaker 0 asks for an explanation of the SV40 issue. Speaker 1 explains production methods: techniques to generate product using a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, allowing vats to grow the product before coating in lipid nanoparticle, with bacteria doing the work. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for residual DNA contamination. In this case, not only was quality control poor, but there was a much more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. As a result, vials given to Kevin McKernan, containing material actually injected into people, showed DNA contamination across the board. Speaker 1 states that leftover DNA includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is carcinogenic. This promoter is left over in vials from shots actually injected into people, implying that the claims about the potential for mRNA shots to integrate into the genome were incorrect. Speaker 1 asserts that there is DNA in the vials, not just some old DNA, and that it includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. Therefore, Speaker 1 concludes, this seems to be clear fraud: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing conducted with a product produced by a different process.

Moderna holds a patent for using RNA in vaccines, acknowledging that RNA is superior to DNA due to concerns about DNA-related problems like insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity. The FDA claims to be unaware of any issues, but Moderna's own patent raises the same concerns about DNA. It appears that DNA is present in the RNA preparation as a contaminant, as it is used in the process of making RNA. Recent findings by scientists revealed large numbers of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, including sequences that are not normally allowed in human use, such as an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40. These DNA fragments can potentially lead to DNA damage, birth defects, and cancer.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

The mRNA in vaccines can replicate, including the replication engine, leading to potential spread from person to person. Concerns exist about the inability to stop this replication, with unknown consequences for humanity. The spike protein in these vaccines can be toxic, affecting various tissues. Deployment of this technology in vaccines for humans is already happening, with over 4,000 people injected in Japan.

COVID-19 vaccines, especially mRNA ones, may promote cancer through impairing DNA repair, inhibiting tumor suppressor systems like p53 and BRCA, and containing DNA impurities. These impurities include fragments from circular DNA used in the manufacturing process, such as SV40, a known proto-oncogene activator. The vaccines could potentially initiate or accelerate cancer growth by weakening natural tumor surveillance systems. This phenomenon is referred to as "turbo cancer."

Dr. Chris Shoemaker warns of a new self-replicating RNA technology potentially approved in Japan, which could spread like a virus and cause mass, involuntary vaccination. This RNA could turn people into factories, producing spike proteins and vaccinating those nearby through exosomes. He claims mortality rates are already five times higher due to spike protein-generating mRNA injections, citing a Cleveland Clinic study showing increased COVID-19 illness in vaccinated staff. He alleges hospitals are quietly dropping vaccine mandates due to legal liability. Dr. Shoemaker states this new technology is more dangerous than the original virus and could lead to an explosion of early-onset cancers because Pfizer lied about the presence of an SV40 genomic component in their mRNA product, which promotes cancer. He urges the public to resist this technology, as existing treatments may be less effective against it. He believes this could be worldwide by March 2025.

The FDA is fast tracking self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine platforms, a technology similar to COVID-era mRNA injections, potentially creating transmissible biological agents. Arcturus Therapeutics received FDA fast track designation for its saRNA vaccine candidate for pandemic influenza A virus H5N1, funded by BARDA and the Gates Foundation. Unlike traditional mRNA, saRNA replicates within cells, increasing toxicity, extending persistence, and raising transmissibility concerns. Attorney Tom Renz expresses alarm, stating clinical trials are dangerous and saRNA vaccines could mutate and become transmissible. Yale studies show mRNA persisting in the system for over 700 days post-vaccination, raising concerns about saRNA lasting indefinitely. Renz cites potential SV40 contamination and recombination with wild-type viruses as risks. There are three mechanisms by which saRNA could become transmissible: recombination, contamination, and hyper-stability. Renz criticizes AI's biased assessment of vaccine safety, noting the need to argue extensively with AI systems to reveal potential issues. He warns against AI-driven personalized cancer drugs without long-term safety tests.

A new version of mRNA technology called self-replicating mRNA is emerging. This platform was a competitor to the mRNA platform that was settled upon. There are protests in Japan over self-replicating mRNA vaccines, also called replicons. The original mRNA platform turned people's cells into vaccine factories. To make the mRNA vaccines work, the mRNA transcript was stabilized with pseudouridine. All of the uracils were replaced by something chemically similar to stabilize the molecules. The claim that the mRNA molecules were short-lived was false, as they had been hyper-stabilized. Self-replicating mRNAs borrow machinery from alphavirus. They include the gene for the antigen along with genes for proteins that allow the RNA to copy itself. Instead of stabilizing a single mRNA molecule, the mRNA is allowed to duplicate itself.

The speakers discuss how initial kidney cells from monkeys used to make vaccines inadvertently gave people simian virus 40, which can lead to rapid cancer. One speaker says that this is one of the cancer-causing issues with the shots, explaining that it's supposed to stay out of the nucleus but can get in. One speaker says the initial claim was that the shot would stay local, in the arm, and dissipate quickly, but "they know that's not true." The other speaker mentions pseudouridine, a replacement nucleotide that is hard to break down, and that there's no study showing that it can be cleared from the body. This could be why some people have high antibody levels years later.

Self amplifying mRNA vaccine, which got fast track FDA approval a few months ago for the h five n one influenza. "That's even worse, quote, self replicating. We know Pfizer admits that their COVID shot is self replicating, thus sheds. This is officially sheds." "But now, when these self amplifying mRNA vaccines shed, they are shedding machinery that if you take it into your body, will start producing more mRNA." "There are women who miscarried when they were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna vaccine." "Pfizer told their officials that they had to report in the trial if any pregnant woman was exposed to anyone who was vaccinated." So shedding was a problem. So many people, like, didn't take it, but their spouse did. They got sick.

The speaker explains that there is contamination in the messenger RNA, including fragments of DNA called cDNA, with one of them being s v 40, a known cancer-promoting segment. The other speaker mentions that mainstream news reports estimate that millions of Americans had cancer due to SV 40 contamination in the past. The first speaker confirms that SV 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the shots promote cancer through SV 40 and suppress our ability to fight cancer. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing, but the extent to which vaccines contribute to this is still uncertain.

Speaker 0: They argue that because the vaccine is classified as such, they don’t have to worry about being sued. They claim immunity from liability is dependent on there being no fraud, and there clearly was fraud. Speaker 1: They say there is fraud. They note that immunity from liability depends on fraud, and in light of that, it matters. They explain that there was fraud. Speaker 0: Expresses surprise and asks for caveats about fraud. Acknowledges there were caveats. Speaker 1: Confirms there is fraud and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0: Asks how fraud is defined, noting that drugs were sold with multiple studies and only one was good. Speaker 1: Responds with a point about safety testing for the mRNA vaccines. States that the insufficient safety testing was done before release, and that the product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids. There is massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter from simian virus 40. The point is that safety testing for one drug was completed, but people were injected with something different that had other components that were not tested, which is described as fraudulent. Speaker 0: Requests an explanation of the SV40 issue for the audience. Speaker 1: Describes production techniques used to generate the product. Explains that a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, was used to produce the product in vats, with bacteria performing the production, later coated in lipid nanoparticle. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for DNA contamination, with limits that cannot be exceeded. In this case, the problem isn’t only poor quality control but that there was a more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. Consequently, leftover material in vials injected into people contained DNA contamination across the board. Kevin McKernan tested vials, finding DNA contamination in the samples. Speaker 1: Explains that the DNA left over includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is known to be carcinogenic. Since this promoter is left in the vials from injections given to people, it challenges the claim that the mRNA shots could not integrate into the genome. While acknowledging that there are cellular processes such as reverse transcription, the speaker asserts that even the claim of “no DNA” is false because there is DNA in the vials, specifically DNA with the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. The speaker concludes that this appears to be fraud: injecting a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was conducted with a product produced by a different process. Speaker 0: Reiterates the conclusion: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was done with something produced by a different process.

A colon biopsy from a Pfizer-vaccinated individual who died a month after tumor emergence revealed SV40 in the origin of replication from the Pfizer vaccine. Preliminary sequencing suggests the presence of Pfizer's vaccine. The vaccine DNA copy number was greater than the human genome, indicating replication. PCR signals suggest the vaccine concentration is similar to or higher than the original vial, despite dilution in the body. This indicates the mammalian origin of replication in Pfizer's vaccine is active in human tumors. This finding may explain shedding, which is not supposed to occur because the COVID vaccine is not intended to alter DNA. However, evidence suggests that the vaccine may be altering DNA, making it a VGBT (genome altering) product. This could mean that spike proteins are continually created, and shedding is real.

A peer-reviewed paper confirms Pfizer's mRNA vaccine is contaminated with DNA and SV40 enhancers, considered dangerous. Pfizer used bacterial plasma DNA during mass production, leading to contamination with spike protein genes, antibiotic resistance markers, and SV40 enhancers. Researchers found 4-5 times more DNA than the safe limit. The DNA fragments could integrate into the human genome due to the SV40 enhancer. Injected vaccine samples caused super strong kidney cells to produce spike protein, excreted via exosomes, potentially spreading body-wide. The vaccines were toxic to these cells, causing pathological changes. The DNA, tucked into lipid nanoparticles, could integrate into the human genome, turning the jab into accidental gene therapy. The SV40 enhancer drags DNA into the nucleus. The study suggests the inclusion of SV40 enhancers was deliberate, not accidental, and scrubbed from regulatory paperwork. Experts theorize this contamination could be linked to an explosion of turbo cancers. The study concludes mRNA shots should be suspended until safety is determined. Another study found vaccine spike protein expressed in cerebral arteries of stroke patients for up to 17 months, accompanied by an autoimmune response.

Recent findings suggest that DNA contamination in COVID jabs may act as a self-replicating infectious agent. Initially believed to be RNA, evidence shows billions of DNA copies coding for the spike protein in the vials. If this DNA integrates into bacteria or human cells, it could replicate and spread, potentially causing mutations linked to cancer. A case study revealed a patient, who had received four jabs, developed cancer with high levels of plasmid DNA in their tumor. This raises concerns about gut health and the inflammatory nature of the spike protein. It’s crucial to be proactive about detoxifying the gut and maintaining health. Resources and protocols for addressing these issues are available on my website.

A peer-reviewed paper confirms Pfizer's mRNA vaccine is contaminated with dangerous DNA and SV40 enhancers. During production, bacterial plasmid DNA led to contamination with spike protein genes, antibiotic resistance markers, and SV40 enhancers. Researchers found four to five times more DNA than the safe limit; these DNA fragments could integrate into the human genome due to the SV40 enhancer. Experiments showed the vaccines were toxic to cells, causing pathological changes and spike protein production, potentially spreading body-wide via exosomes. The DNA contamination, tucked into lipid nanoparticles, could lead to unintended gene therapy. The SV40 enhancer, deliberately added but removed from regulatory paperwork, raises questions about Pfizer's intentions. Experts theorize this contamination could be linked to an increase in "turbo cancers," coinciding with Pfizer's acquisition of a cancer drugmaker. An epidemiologist noted the study found DNA from the manufacturing process way over regulatory limits, including the cancer-promoting SV40 promoter enhancer and spike-producing DNA. A separate study found vaccine spike protein expressed in cerebral arteries of stroke patients for up to seventeen months, potentially contributing to autoimmune responses. There are now 11 independent reports that have found, DNA contamination within these shots of up to 60000% above regulatory limits.

The panel discusses replication (replicon) vaccines and their potential dangers, focusing on how they differ from conventional messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and what new risks might emerge as this technology develops. Key points and concerns raised - Replicon vaccines concept and fundamental differences - Replicon vaccines use replication-capable genetic material, so the embedded genetic information not only makes antigen proteins but also multiplies inside the cell. They are described as having both constitutive function (the ability to make proteins) and, crucially, the capacity to replicate, which distinguishes them from traditional, non-replicating mRNA vaccines. - It is explained that replication introduces additional mutation and recombination opportunities, because the RNA genome is copied more than once, and the process can produce variants that differ from the original design. - Central dogma exceptions and viral biology - The speakers explain that while the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) generally governs biology, some viruses violate this, with RNA viruses that replicate via RNA-dependent replication and even some reverse-transcribing retroviruses that convert RNA to DNA and integrate into genomes. This context is used to frame why replicon vaccines could behave unpredictably. - Potential risks of replication and spread - A core concern is that the replicon approach might allow the vaccine genome to spread beyond the initial target cells, potentially reaching other cells and tissues, or even spreading to other people via exosomes or other means. Exosomes can transport DNA, RNA, and proteins between cells; thus, the replicon genome could in theory be disseminated. - The possibility of homologous or heterologous recombination between replicon genomes and wild-type viruses could yield new variants. The panel emphasizes the difficulty of controlling such recombination in a living system. - Specific material and design considerations - The use of viral components like spike protein genes in replicon vaccines raises concerns about how these proteins might mutate or recombine during replication, potentially altering antigen presentation or safety. - A concern is raised about the lack of repair mechanisms in RNA replication (as opposed to DNA replication), which could make error rates higher and lead to unpredictable changes. - The panel notes that current replicon vaccine designs (including those using alphavirus backbones) inherently carry high mutation and recombination risk, and that the replicating systems may encounter unpredictable evolutionary dynamics inside the human body. - Safety signals and clinical anecdotes - The speakers cite cases of adverse events temporally associated with vaccines, including vascular inflammation and thrombosis, stroke-like events, and myocarditis, to illustrate that immune responses to vaccines can be complex and occasionally severe. They emphasize that such observations do not establish causality, but argue they warrant careful scrutiny. - There are references to cases of acute vascular and neural complications following repeated vaccination, and to broader immune dysregulation phenomena, including IGG4-related disease and immune dysregulation syndromes that can involve multiple organs. - One example concerns a patient who developed sudden limb problems after the third dose, requiring surgery; another describes myocardial involvement after multiple doses and subsequent inflammatory sequelae. - DNA contamination and analytical findings - Kevin McKernan’s analysis of certain Japanese CoronaVac vaccines is cited: both DNA contamination and the presence of SV40 promoter elements were detected in some vaccine lots, with DNA amounts exceeding some regulatory benchmarks in at least one case. The concern is that DNA contamination, or the presence of promoter sequences, could influence integration or expression in unintended ways. - It is noted that vaccines using lipid nanoparticles can potentially deliver nucleic acids into cells; in the presence of exons or promoter sequences, there could be unintended cellular uptake and expression. - Implications for public health and policy - The panel underscores the need for caution, thorough investigation, and long-term observation of any replication-based vaccine platform before broad deployment. There is a call to evaluate risks, monitor long-term outcomes, and consider the possibility that replication-competent constructs could drive unforeseen evolutionary dynamics within hosts or communities. - There is contention about how information is communicated to the public, with particular emphasis on avoiding misinformation while ensuring that scientific uncertainties are transparently discussed. - Broader scientific context and forward-looking stance - The speakers discuss how the field’s approach to gene-based vaccines is evolving rapidly, and they stress that the compatibility of replicon systems with human biology is not yet fully understood. - They frame their discussion as not merely about current vaccines but about the trajectory of vaccine platforms: if replication-based or self-dispersing systems prove too risky or unpredictable, the prudent path might be to favor conventional, non-replicating strategies until safety, efficacy, and containment of unintended spread are more firmly established. Closing and takeaways - The session closes with emphasis on careful evaluation of replicon vaccines, awareness that viral genetics can behave differently in humans than in theory, and a call for continued discussion, independent verification, and transparent communication as the technology develops. - Throughout, speakers acknowledge the complexity of immune responses to vaccines, the potential for unexpected adverse events, and the importance of safeguarding public health while advancing vaccine science.

The speaker believes mRNA shots are a "festering wound" impacting everyone that cannot be ignored. The speaker urges the new administration to address the issue, citing 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline, 33 of which are self-amplifying. Self-amplifying means they are designed to replicate indefinitely, which the speaker finds "terrifying" because current mRNA shots already lack an "off switch." The speaker claims these self-amplifying shots are already in use in Japan, India, and the EU. The speaker believes the one in the US pipeline is for H1N1, so it may not be used unless there is an issue, but they are still experimenting with it.

The conversation centers on concerns about self-replicating mRNA (replicon) technology. The speaker argues that, given media coverage in 2024 about side effects of regular mRNA and reports of deaths in Japan, the government should immediately halt self-replicating mRNA. They reference a Substack article titled "Japan's plan to destroy the world," claiming replicon technology is extraordinarily dangerous—“beyond nuclear weapons.” The speaker describes a replicon as “the nuclear weapon of biology,” comparing it to a device that can copy itself and set a timer to explode years later (one year, ten years, fifty years). They emphasize that a replicon has the power to copy itself and to steal genes from other species, calling it “omnipotent” and “the omnipotent virus.” The doctor (referred to as Doctor Nagasaki) is pressed for comment, with the speaker noting that more copies of a replicon in the environment increase the likelihood of producing a deadly variant that can spread with minimal symptoms. They explain, from a natural selection perspective, that the evolutionary pressure on a replicon is to cause as few symptoms as possible to allow the host to continue normal daily activities, thereby maximizing transmission. The discussion also includes a brief mention of monitoring a chat discussion, indicating engagement with the audience.

We are working on a protocol to detoxify the spike protein and have proposed using small interfering RNA to deactivate Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. These RNA molecules can bind to and inactivate messenger RNA, allowing the body to clear it out. We need an off switch for these synthetic messenger RNA shots, as they may make people sick without a way to remove them from the body. Companies should consider this technology to help address this issue.

The video discusses the presence of SV40 (simian virus 40) in COVID genetic vaccines and its potential link to cancer. The speaker clarifies that while the vaccines do not contain the entire virus, they do contain the promoter and enhancer from SV40, which could increase the risk of DNA integration and potential oncogenesis. The speaker also mentions the role of lipid nanoparticles in vaccine delivery and the need for further research on their toxicity. Additionally, concerns are raised about the biodistribution of the vaccines and their potential impact on the germline. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding these risks and considering alternative approaches to respiratory virus vaccination.

Speaker asserts that extremely dangerous self-amplifying replicon mRNA injections are currently being deployed for humans and animals worldwide. A few days ago, the UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics’ self-amplifying COVID-19 injection for adults over 18, and previously the European Union approved the same replicon injection for adults, so it is in the EU and the UK. Japan approved it in 2023, and India has approved these replicon injections as well, indicating rollout across the globe. In the United States, it is claimed that the USDA approved the self-amplifying mRNA particle injections for dogs and cats, specifically Novavax NXT by Merck, suggesting active injection into pets and potential shedding onto human owners in the US. The speaker states that the FDA fast-tracked an H5N1 bird flu replicon injection trial, raising concern given the alleged dangers of these products. The speaker emphasizes the potential for shedding of replicating genetic material from humans or from pets to humans, and the possibility that these replicating constructs could recombine with wild viruses to create chimeric mutants. They highlight a high rate of adverse events associated with the Arcturus Therapeutics injection, claiming that eighty-five percent suffered systemic adverse events and fifteen percent required medical attention. A recent study in Uganda is cited, alleged to have induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety-three percent of recipients, including thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia, with immune systems degraded and increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. The report also claims that eighty-five percent experienced vomiting and high fevers, and felt absolutely terrible. The speaker concludes that this self-amplifying assault on humanity needs to end, calling for these injections to be pulled from the market and banned for human use.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.