reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly discusses President Biden's potential reversal on lifting a major border restriction due to pressure from moderate Democrats fearing electoral consequences. She highlights Jen Psaki's refusal to apologize to border agents wrongfully accused of whipping migrants, despite their exoneration. The conversation shifts to the Washington Post defending reporter Taylor Lorenz for exposing the identity of the anonymous creator of the conservative account "Libs of TikTok," which curates far-left content from TikTok. Glenn Greenwald critiques Lorenz's actions, suggesting they reflect broader issues within corporate media, where journalists target less powerful individuals while aligning with elite interests. Greenwald argues that the media's focus has shifted from holding powerful institutions accountable to scrutinizing ordinary citizens expressing conservative views. He emphasizes the hypocrisy in Lorenz's victim narrative, given her history of targeting others. Kelly and Greenwald discuss the implications of Lorenz's actions, noting the lack of accountability from the media and the dangers of doxing individuals who wish to remain anonymous. The conversation also touches on the recent lifting of mask mandates on public transportation, with Kelly criticizing the media's portrayal of the judge who ruled against the mandate. They discuss the broader implications of COVID policies and the political motivations behind them, particularly regarding the Biden administration's handling of immigration and border security. Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, joins to discuss record migrant encounters and the potential chaos following the end of Title 42, which allowed for expedited removals during the pandemic. Judd explains that the Biden administration's policies have led to increased illegal crossings and a lack of resources to manage the situation effectively. He stresses the need for accountability and adherence to the rule of law in immigration matters, arguing that the current approach prioritizes political agendas over public safety. The discussion concludes with a call for practical solutions to the border crisis, emphasizing the importance of enforcing existing laws and deterring illegal immigration.

Megyn Kelly announces the launch of a new podcast called the AM Update, which will provide a 15-minute summary of the day’s top stories to help listeners start their mornings informed. This initiative is in response to audience requests for concise news updates. The podcast will be available on SiriusXM and various podcast platforms. The discussion then shifts to JD Vance's recent speech in Europe, where he emphasized the importance of free speech and criticized the erosion of democratic values in Europe. Michael Knowles argues that the media misrepresented Vance's message, framing it as a call to support far-right parties while ignoring the broader context of free speech rights being undermined. He highlights that the left's reaction to Vance's speech reflects a fear of losing political control as citizens increasingly turn to right-wing alternatives due to dissatisfaction with current governance. Megan and Michael discuss a recent 60 Minutes segment that portrayed Germany's strict free speech laws in a sympathetic light, contrasting it with the American perspective on free speech. They critique the lack of critical voices in the segment and the media's tendency to downplay the implications of such censorship. They argue that the establishment media's approach to free speech issues is misguided and fails to recognize the dangers of suppressing dissenting opinions. The conversation also touches on the backlash against the Associated Press for being excluded from certain press events during the Trump administration. Megan and her guests argue that the AP's claims of censorship are exaggerated, pointing out that they still have access to cover the White House. They discuss the broader implications of media access and the relationship between journalists and political power. The episode concludes with a discussion about a recent plane crash in Toronto, where all 80 passengers survived despite the aircraft flipping upside down upon landing. Aviation experts analyze the incident, attributing the hard landing to a high rate of descent and challenging weather conditions. They emphasize the importance of pilot training and experience, particularly in managing landings under adverse conditions. The experts express gratitude for the survival of all passengers and highlight advancements in aircraft safety that contributed to the positive outcome.

On November 8, 2023, Dave Rubin discussed the censure of Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, whom he labels a Hamas supporter and anti-American. He likens Tlaib to a terrorist sympathizer and criticizes her statements following the October 7 attacks in Israel, particularly her use of the term "resistance" and the slogan "From the River to the Sea," which he interprets as a call for the destruction of Israel. Rubin also highlights the emotional reactions from Tlaib's colleagues during the censure vote, particularly Ilhan Omar and Cori Bush, whom he describes as members of the "Hamas caucus." Rubin shifts focus to a bombshell report by Jim Jordan revealing government collusion with Big Tech to censor speech, particularly targeting conservatives. He emphasizes the need for legal recourse for citizens whose First Amendment rights have been infringed upon, discussing potential lawsuits against government officials involved in censorship. Harmeet Dhillon, a First Amendment lawyer, joins to elaborate on the implications of Jordan's findings and the necessity for a Bill of Rights for social media users. The conversation touches on the broader implications for free speech and the challenges facing the Republican Party, especially in light of recent electoral defeats.

Dave Rubin discusses the ongoing conflict between Elon Musk and Media Matters, emphasizing its implications for free speech and the ability to share information online. He highlights how left-leaning organizations aim to silence dissenting voices and manipulate narratives, particularly regarding Donald Trump and the mainstream media's portrayal of him. Rubin critiques a recent MSNBC segment where Congressman Dan Goldman called for Trump to be "eliminated," questioning the double standards in media reactions to such rhetoric. He connects this to broader issues of censorship and government collaboration with Big Tech, referencing past comments from Jen Psaki about misinformation. Rubin shares insights from his visit to Twitter, revealing how accounts were shadow-banned and manipulated. He details Musk's lawsuit against Media Matters for misrepresenting ad placements alongside extremist content, asserting that the organization created a misleading narrative to pressure advertisers. Rubin concludes by advocating for a collective pushback against censorship, encouraging support for platforms like X and Rumble that promote free expression.

The podcast delves into the ongoing political strife, particularly on the American right, arguing that the intense debate over who is a "Nazi" or "antisemite" is a deliberate diversion from the true underlying issue: US foreign policy, specifically the push for a regime change war in Iran. The hosts contend that this push is primarily driven by Israeli interests, with figures like Benjamin Netanyahu seeking American military support against Iran, which Israel views as its main regional threat. They assert that those advocating for this war intentionally frame any opposition as antisemitism to silence legitimate debate about whether such intervention serves American interests, especially given the US's past failures in similar Middle Eastern conflicts. The discussion criticizes prominent conservative media figures like Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro for employing inflammatory rhetoric, engaging in identity politics, and promoting censorship. Levin is accused of using extreme language, including calling opponents "Nazis" and advocating for collective punishment, which the hosts equate to the dangerous concept of "blood guilt" and a precursor to genocide. Shapiro is critiqued for showing contempt for ordinary Americans' concerns, dismissing social issues, and prioritizing economic metrics (like GDP) and foreign interests over the well-being of US citizens, including their ability to afford housing, retire, or escape predatory debt. The hosts emphasize the importance of personal accountability, controlling one's own behavior, and avoiding the hate-filled rhetoric of opponents to prevent further political polarization and potential violence. They share personal anecdotes of apologizing for past inflammatory statements and highlight the dangers of dehumanizing political adversaries. Anna Kasparian recounts a physical assault she experienced due to being labeled an "anti-Semite" for her criticism of Israel, underscoring the real-world consequences of such rhetoric. A central theme is the call for an "America First" foreign policy that prioritizes the needs of American citizens over foreign interests, especially when those interests lead to costly and ineffective wars. They argue that the US government's focus on foreign conflicts, coupled with the immense national debt and neglected domestic issues like healthcare, social security, and predatory lending, demonstrates a fundamental betrayal of its citizens. The podcast concludes by advocating for a unified American identity that transcends partisan divides and group-based identity politics, urging listeners to challenge narratives that distract from genuine national problems and to foster reconciliation rather than permanent enmity.

The left views allowing free speech for opponents as authoritarian, with 48% believing figures like Trump shouldn't have a voice. This sentiment extends to government actions, as the Biden administration allegedly coordinates with big tech to censor dissenting opinions, reflecting a troubling cultural divide.

The discussion begins with Steven Crowder and NotGay Jared reflecting on their controversial parody videos, including one featuring Bob Ross painting Muhammad, which led to a cease and desist from the Bob Ross estate. They argue that parody should be protected under free speech, but they face challenges with YouTube's demonetization policies, particularly regarding conservative content. They recount a meeting with YouTube where they questioned the inconsistency in content moderation, highlighting the absurdity of certain videos trending while their conservative content faced restrictions. They discuss the challenges of navigating YouTube's policies, including a case where a public protester tried to have their image removed from a video despite being in a public space. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of censorship and the perceived bias against conservative viewpoints on platforms like YouTube. They express concern over the lack of transparency in content moderation and the potential for a double standard in what is deemed acceptable. The hosts delve into the topic of free speech and the consequences of silencing differing opinions, arguing that it emboldens the left and stifles meaningful discourse. They share anecdotes about various encounters with leftist activists and the absurdities they witnessed, including a transgender town hall meeting where they posed as a gay couple to expose extreme views on transitioning children. They critique the left's reaction to differing opinions, emphasizing the need for open dialogue and the dangers of labeling opposing views as hate speech. The conversation touches on the complexities of identity politics and the implications of pushing progressive ideologies on children, particularly regarding puberty blockers. The hosts also discuss the cultural climate surrounding political correctness and the challenges faced by those who express conservative viewpoints. They highlight the importance of authenticity in their content and the need for comedians and entertainers to remain true to themselves despite societal pressures. As the discussion progresses, they address the rise of conspiracy theories and the role of social media in shaping public perception. They express skepticism about the motivations behind certain narratives and the potential for misinformation to spread unchecked. The conversation concludes with reflections on the current political landscape, the challenges of navigating free speech in a polarized environment, and the importance of maintaining a sense of humor while addressing serious issues. They emphasize the need for continued dialogue and the value of questioning prevailing narratives in order to foster a more informed and open society.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Elon Musk's conflict with Media Matters, a progressive organization known for pressuring advertisers to withdraw from conservative platforms. She criticizes Media Matters for attempting to damage X (formerly Twitter) by claiming ads from major brands appear next to anti-Semitic content. Musk plans to file a lawsuit against Media Matters, asserting that they rigged the algorithm to create misleading reports. Emily Jashinsky and Eliana Johnson join the discussion, emphasizing Media Matters' role as an advocacy group that pressures corporations to censor conservative voices. They argue that the organization manipulates data to create narratives that harm advertisers' reputations. The conversation shifts to President Biden's 81st birthday and his declining approval ratings, with polls indicating a significant drop in support among independents and Democrats. Jashinsky and Johnson express concern over Biden's ability to fulfill his duties, noting that his age and performance are becoming increasingly evident to the public. They discuss how Biden's incumbency advantages are undermined by his lack of effective communication and public appearances. The hosts also touch on the GOP primary race, highlighting Trump's strong polling against Biden and the struggles of other candidates like Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley. They analyze the dynamics of the race, noting that while Trump remains the frontrunner, Haley is gaining traction in New Hampshire. The discussion includes the implications of endorsements and the potential impact of candidates dropping out. Later, they address the controversy surrounding Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro, focusing on Owens' recent comments about Israel and her relationship with the Daily Wire. David Horowitz criticizes Owens for her stance, suggesting she has strayed from her original mission to support the Republican Party. The hosts reflect on the broader implications of free speech and the responsibilities of media platforms in managing controversial figures. Finally, Kelly shares a personal anecdote about her shopping experience, expressing frustration with modern retail practices that require personal information for purchases. She concludes the show by wishing everyone a happy Thanksgiving and teasing the next episode featuring a former mobster turned motivational speaker.