TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

In the 2020 Maricopa General Election, 120,867 ballots, or 6% of the total, were compromised through forced adjudication. This represents 9 times the deciding outcome of the election. The compromise was an intentional and avoidable paper and ink hack, where control over the ballot stock was necessary. The use of Sharpie pens, which were encouraged for the first time in history, combined with inferior ballot paper, caused bleed-through votes that confused the scanning machine. This allowed for extra votes to be counted, leading to potential election manipulation. The net effect of this hack in Maricopa County was approximately 120,867 compromised ballots.

I found that there were approximately 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and circles, unlike the perfect PDF printing. The imperfections were consistent across all the ballots, suggesting they were not genuine. These 25,000 questionable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's margin of victory by over double.

In my examination of the photographs, I found that there were approximately 5,000 different ballots produced by the election subcontractor for each zone or district in Maricopa County. These ballots were specific to the issues relevant to each area. However, I discovered that around 25,000 ballots were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and breaks in the circles or ovals, which were consistent across all of them. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent more than double the margin of Joe Biden's 10,457 vote lead.

We found around 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not created from the usual PDF used for elections. The ballots are tailored to different neighborhoods and come in English and Spanish versions. These ballots are pre-made for mail-in voting and early voting locations. However, we discovered that the quality of these pre-made ballots was significantly lower than expected, indicating a potential issue with the printing process.

There were odd patterns in the ballots, with repeated anomalies over multiple days. Some ballots had a pattern of 7 for Biden and 1 for Trump, which is statistically unlikely. The patterns were reported, but it's unclear if they were included in the final report. The physical recount aligned with the claimed numbers, but behind the scenes, there were over 17,000 duplicate mail-in ballots. The audit suggests that over 60,000 counted ballots may be illegal, which could significantly impact the election outcome. Voting is considered the most important right in the United States, and having it stolen is devastating.

Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the usual PDF format for the election process in Maricopa County. These ballots are tailored to specific geographical areas to account for different voting preferences. The ballots are created in advance in PDF format for mail-in and early voting convenience. However, the quality of the printed ballots in this case was significantly lower than expected, indicating a problem with the printing process.

Maricopa County reported over 923,000 ballots dropped in drop boxes during the 2020 election. However, documentation accounts for only 189,167 ballots, leaving a deficit of 733,000 ballots. This indicates the election was not secure, and there are problems with the process. Laws were not adhered to or complied with. All evidence has been turned over to the attorney general. Every Democrat voted no in committee.

The number of 420,987 failed signatures in the 2020 election was determined by reviewing a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes in Maricopa County. Trained workers followed guidelines to analyze each voter record individually, leading to the extrapolation of the final number. This analysis focused solely on Maricopa County's ballots.

Out of the 1.9 million ballot envelopes, around 10% were mismatched according to one calculation, while another calculation showed a 12.7% mismatch. This means there were more than 236,763 mismatched signatures on ballot envelopes and over 163,458 mismatches on early votes. Taking the smallest number, 127,186, which is more than 7 times the margin of victory in the governor's race, it is projected that there were more than 7 times the margin of victory in mismatched signatures in 2022. Besides signature mismatches, there were other failures in Maricopa County in 2020. This is summarized from Ms. Bush's presentation and Dr. Daugherty's declaration.

The speakers assert that there is evidence of direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). In the forensic images, they note that on November 5 an anonymous user logged onto the EMS remotely and performed actions with escalated privileges, making changes to the database during attempts to retabulate the election. They describe this as a major development, because it demonstrates that the machines were accessed remotely, and crucially, that the remote access was by an anonymous user who possessed elevated privileges within the system. They present this as a significant point for those who oppose forensic auditing or who are against non-forensic reviews. They also reference visible features on ballots, specifically the black boxes along the side of the ballot. The ballots reportedly contain 59 of these black boxes. In the forensic images, they indicate that certain blocks—numbers 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44—were intentionally modified. The described modifications concerned the height, width, and overall shape of these blocks, with the stated purpose of generating errors. Regarding the consequences of these modifications, the narrative claims that by altering these specific blocks, errors were created that led to rejections of Republican ballots. In other words, ballots cast for Donald Trump that were processed through the machine allegedly faced a higher likelihood of being rejected due to these block modifications. The asserted outcome is that such ballots were rejected at a rate of 20% more than ballots cast for Joe Biden.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s track when ballots are sent, and EB33s track when they are received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots were tied to specific individuals, but we lack proof they were sent to them.

There are six affidavits from veteran election officials alleging that up to 30,000 of the 147 ballots in question are counterfeit. The evidence includes different paper used for these ballots, the absence of folds despite being absentee ballots, the same bubble mark on a large number of ballots, and the claim that the marks were made by a machine, not a pen or pencil. Additionally, an analysis of 950 military mail-in ballots showed that all 950 votes went to Joe Biden, while none went to Trump, and they were in sequential order. These findings are considered highly unlikely and raise questions about the integrity of the election.

Eric Spakane, a forensic chemist and forensic document analyst, testified that there were about 25,000 ballots not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. He said the printing process and appearance are completely different than what you would get from a first generation PDF printing. He explained that in Maricopa County there were approximately 5,012 or a little over 5,000 different ballot permutations and combinations due to different races and districts, and this is multiplied by two because there is a Spanish version for each ballot. In total, about 5,000 different ballots are created ahead of time and are created in PDF. These PDFs are prepared in advance for mail-in ballots and for early voting, which uses vote on demand, allowing someone to vote in a downtown location using a ballot from their area. He noted that PDFs are high quality, and when printed they should look roughly the same as the PDF, but he found that the quality of these ballots degraded when printed, compared to on-demand or third-party provider printing. Spakane stated that in the group of ballots he examined, the election subcontractor Minion produced ballots for each zone or district involved in the area he looked at in Maricopa County. He reiterated that there were about 5,000 approximately different ballots, reflecting the various races and jurisdictions (e.g., two different senator races, multiple house races, and all permutations and combinations). He claimed that about 25,000 ballots were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot, and that the printing process produced marks that did not align with the perfect lines and breaks seen in the PDFs. He observed that early voting ballots and election-day ballots from various polling locations showed printing with breaks in all the same places around an oval, indicating imperfections in the lines at the same spots on every ballot. Speaker 1 stated that these 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent over double Joe Biden's 10,457 vote mark. He framed this as a comparison to the election results. Speaker 2 claimed that in July 2021, and even in June earlier, they suspected that there were 25,000 plus counterfeit or inauthentic ballots. He attributed this to propaganda by the GOP’s attorney and other conservative operatives who allegedly planted the seed that “you can't trust that.” He asserted that everyone up there knew this in advance, even before the hearing, and criticized those involved for not reacting to prevent duplication in 2022, saying they did nothing and allowed it to be done again.

Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the PDF used for the election process. The election provider creates specific ballots for different geographical areas. In Maricopa County, there were over 5,000 different permutations and combinations of the ballots, with a Spanish version available for each. These ballots are created in advance as some are sent out by third parties and for early voting. However, the quality of the ballots in this group is significantly worse than the PDFs that are printed on demand or by the regular provider.

In the 2020 election, Maricopa County reported over 923,000 ballots dropped off at the drop boxes, but only 189,167 can be accounted for. This leaves a deficit of over 733,000 unaccounted ballots. This raises concerns about the election's security and the need to address process issues and comply with laws. The evidence has been given to the attorney general. Additionally, it's worth noting that all Democrats voted against this in committee.

In the 2020 election, Maricopa County reported 923,000 drop box ballots, but only 189,167 have documentation. This leaves 733,000 ballots unaccounted for. The election was not secure as claimed, with many process issues and non-compliance with laws. Evidence has been given to the attorney general, with all Democrats voting against in committee.

Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up. After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes. He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation. To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies. Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.

In recounting votes, I've noticed that simply comparing hand counts to machine counts doesn't address the origin of the ballots being counted. Often, we don't even know which precinct a ballot came from, especially when dealing with two-sided ballots. We focus solely on the vote itself without considering the front of the ballot. Additionally, the image quality of these questionable ballots in Pennsylvania and Arizona is not being examined during the recount process.

In the 2020 election, Maricopa County reported 923,000 drop box ballots, but only 189,167 have documentation, leaving 733,000 unaccounted for. This shows election insecurity. Evidence was given to the attorney general, with all Democrats voting against in committee.

Eric Spakin, a forensic chemist and document analyst, examined ballots from the Arizona audit. He found that approximately 25,000 ballots did not match the official Dominion PDF printing, showing imperfections in their lines. This discrepancy exceeds Joe Biden's victory margin of 10,457 votes. Additionally, Spakin noted a statistical anomaly where 61 groups of 200 ballots showed over 90% support for one candidate, with 58 favoring Biden and only 3 favoring Trump. This suggests potential manipulation in sorting ballots. Arizona's early voting process allows ballots to be counted weeks before election day, raising concerns about election integrity and the need for safeguards to ensure accurate results that reflect voters' choices.

Maricopa County reported over 923,000 ballots deposited in drop boxes during the 2020 election. However, documentation accounts for only 189,167 ballots, leaving a deficit of 733,000 ballots. This indicates the election was not secure, with process problems and a failure to adhere to laws. All evidence has been given to the attorney general. Every Democrat voted no in committee.

I estimated that around 80-90% of the ballots I observed were for Joe Biden, which seemed statistically impossible. In traditionally conservative neighborhoods like Cobb County, Georgia, we don't typically see a 100% Biden vote, yet the military ballots in those areas were between 80-90% Biden. Fulton County reported 93% of military ballots for Biden, which also seemed statistically impossible.

The speaker noticed a batch of absentee ballots that stood out because they were in pristine condition, unlike the others which were worn. These ballots had no folds and felt different. One ballot had a white eclipse in the bubble where it should have been filled. As they sorted the ballots, they realized that a significant number of them were exactly the same, with no folds. One ballot in the stack was also misaligned. Additionally, instead of the usual 100, this batch had 110 ballots, which was unusual.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no clear record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s show when a ballot is sent, and EB33s show when it's received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but 74,000 came back without proof of being sent to them.