reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Dr. Eithan Haim, a general and trauma surgeon in Texas, has emerged as a whistleblower against Texas Children's Hospital, the largest children's hospital in the world. He describes witnessing a shift in medical practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, where ideology began to overshadow evidence-based medicine. This shift included the implementation of practices like lockdowns and mask mandates that he claims were not scientifically justified, leading to a culture of censorship within the medical community. Haim recounts the emotional toll of his experiences, particularly the increase in child abuse cases he observed during the pandemic, which he attributes to the lockdowns. He became increasingly aware of the harm being done to children, especially regarding gender-affirming treatments, which he believes are being administered without proper oversight or consideration of the long-term consequences. In March 2022, Texas Children's Hospital announced it would shut down its transgender clinic due to potential criminal liability, a claim Haim knew to be false based on his firsthand knowledge of ongoing procedures. He later witnessed hospital directors discussing these practices openly, despite the hospital's public statements. Haim's concerns culminated in his decision to go public with his story in May 2023, leading to significant media attention and legislative action in Texas to ban certain medical interventions for minors. However, shortly after, he faced an investigation by federal agents, who accused him of illegal access to medical records. Haim believes this is a politically motivated prosecution aimed at silencing whistleblowers. He emphasizes the importance of truth in medicine and the moral obligation to protect children from harmful practices. Haim expresses a deep commitment to fighting for the integrity of the medical profession and the well-being of future generations, despite the personal risks involved. He has also established a legal fund to support his ongoing battle against the charges he faces, highlighting the financial strain this situation has placed on him and his family.

Dr. Jared Ross, affiliated with the organization Do No Harm, discusses alarming findings regarding gender-affirming treatments for minors in the U.S. Their recent database revealed that between 2019 and 2023, approximately 14,000 minors underwent sex change treatments across nearly 2,000 hospitals, including 6,000 surgeries and 63,000 prescriptions for cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers, amounting to $120 million in insurance claims. Ross criticizes the medical community for endorsing these treatments, arguing that minors cannot provide informed consent and that these practices represent a significant moral failing. He highlights the psychological and physical harm inflicted on vulnerable children, particularly those from broken homes or with histories of abuse. Ross emphasizes that the medical profession has become complicit in a "growth industry" focused on gender transition, often prioritizing profit over patient welfare. He calls for a reevaluation of these practices, suggesting that the medical community has failed to self-regulate and that such surgeries should be banned. The organization aims to raise awareness and mobilize public action against these treatments, urging people to visit their website for more information and involvement.

On Origins Podcast, Lauren Schwarz and Arthur Rousseau discuss their chapter in The War on Science, focusing on gender-affirming care (GAC) and medical standards. They argue that the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) wields influence, with U.S. medical bodies deferring to it, while the UK’s Cass report and countries have begun to curtail such care. They describe WPATH’s standards of care (SOC 8) as presenting itself as evidence-based, lifesaving care, yet note published reviews finding the strength of the evidence often low or indirect, and that guidelines are not always consistent with the underlying literature. They recount that Johns Hopkins underwent political pressure to withdraw systematic reviews and that WPATH later imposed an approval mechanism over future publications. The speakers condemn the reliance on “lived experience” over rigorous evidence, and highlight concerns about age restrictions being removed and consent for minors to hormonal or surgical interventions. They cite a lack of long-term outcome data, no conclusive evidence that gender-affirming care reduces suicide, and cases illustrating the risks of messaging to afraid families. They call for better education, transparency, and a return to science-based medicine, while referencing the Tennessee minors’ care case and urging global alignment.

Michael Shellenberger discusses the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and the release of internal documents revealing troubling practices regarding gender dysphoria treatment. He argues that WPATH lacks evidence-based support for radical interventions like puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. The documents show discussions about treating minors, including a 13-year-old with developmental delays, raising concerns about informed consent and the long-term consequences of such treatments. Shellenberger describes the situation as one of the greatest medical mistreatment scandals in history, comparable to lobotomies and the Tuskegee experiments. He emphasizes that many medical professionals involved seem to be aware of the lack of informed consent but continue their practices without questioning their validity. He criticizes the medical and psychological associations for their complicity, suggesting they prioritize ideology over patient welfare. He highlights the confusion between gender distress and broader emotional issues like anxiety and depression, arguing that many who express gender confusion may simply be experiencing identity crises. He points out that most children with gender dysphoria will likely identify as gay if left alone until adulthood. The conversation also touches on the societal implications of these practices, including the role of maternal instincts in decision-making and the potential for political and ideological manipulation. Shellenberger calls for accountability, suggesting that those who have transitioned minors should lose their licenses and face legal consequences. He notes recent shifts in public opinion, citing the UK's National Health Service's ban on puberty blockers, as a sign that awareness and resistance to these practices are growing. The discussion concludes with a call for a return to values that affirm human development and the importance of protecting children's rights to grow up without medical intervention.