reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

23andMe is mentioned, prompting a warning against using their services due to data selling practices. It is claimed that 23andMe sells user data to other entities, including Russia. Nathaniel Johnson, a policy advisor for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is introduced. The claim is made that 23andMe's contract contains a clause allowing them to share information with shareholders, some of whom are pharmaceutical companies based in other countries. These foreign pharmaceutical companies are allegedly owned by entities such as the Ministry of Defense in Russia or are based in China.

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

Leftlezer investigates why the Dutch C7NLD assault rifle—a standard weapon of the Dutch military—appears in the hands of the Russian Volunteer Corps (RDK), an extreme-right group fighting on Ukraine’s side, and what the Netherlands’ weapon exports mean for who ultimately uses them. Key findings and claims presented: - The Russian Volunteer Corps is described as an extremist group that fights for Ukraine but is led by a Russian founder, Dennis Capushtin, born in Moscow and later active in Germany. Capushtin is portrayed as having organized extensive neo‑Nazi-leaning activity, including fighting trainings and weapon training; the German Interior Ministry labeled him one of the most influential neo‑Nazi activists in Germany, effectively barring him from entry. - The RDK portrays itself as a political-military organization serving the Russian nation, aiming to dismantle the current political regime in the Russian Federation, with a core of fighters engaging in armed struggle. It claims leadership under the Ukrainian Military Secret Service and asserts involvement beyond defending Ukraine, including sabotage networks in Russia. - Reports describe RDK’s ideology as including esoteric nationalist elements, with public references to Hitler as a spiritual figure. A Tulefest event hosted bands such as Hitlers Hamer, Adolf-cult, and Apartheid, which Bellingcat describes as esoteric nationalism blending neo-Nazism with occult ideas. - The video notes a shift in 2023 where Dennis’s activities reportedly extended to attempting to “invade” Russia, with some weapons (including Scars) appearing with the RDK in Russia. This is used to argue that the stated aim of defending Ukraine had broadened to actions against Russia. - The central concern is whether Dutch-made Cold 7 NLD rifles, exported under Dutch defense ministry rules, ended up with the RDK or other extremist actors. The Netherlands exports large quantities of weapons, including to Ukraine, and Dutch law requires end-user declarations and possible EU/UN oversight. There is a nuance: some RDK activities are described as operating under a Ukrainian authority, which could complicate end-user controls. - The ministers and officials are pressed on why and how the Netherlands allowed a transfer of Cold 7 NLD rifles that might have landed with extremist groups. The Dutch export licensing process is explained: weapons supplied to Ukraine may be used by Ukrainian forces under international law, with end-user terms set forth in end-user declarations; transfers to other parties require Dutch government permission. - The defense ministry responds with a standard position: Netherlands supplies military materiel to Ukraine to assist against Russian aggression, with use governed by international law; the exact distribution among units or sub-units is not disclosed. The ministry refuses to confirm specific end-use details and notes that they cannot reflect on subunits that weapons may reach. - The interview includes attempts to question a former minister (Brekomans) about signing export licenses, and the current stance is that the details are handled by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the defense ministry. The current ministry of foreign affairs provides a response about broad policy and the possibility of rapid EU-wide assessments; the defense ministry declines to confirm the specific distribution of weapons to extremist groups. - The program concludes by asserting significant public interest and calls for further scrutiny of Dutch spending on Ukrainian defense—requesting readers to donate for more critical reporting. Notes on responses: - The program presents a narrative linking Dutch C7NLD rifles to the RDK and to far-right networks, while presenting official positions that emphasize general end-use rules and the broad objective of aiding Ukraine, without providing a definitive public confirmation that the weapons were used by RDK or other extremist groups. The documentary style emphasizes ongoing information requests and the lack of explicit disclosures from relevant ministries.

Elon Musk denied Starlink services to the Ukrainian military's submarines as they planned to attack the Russian Navy. Despite providing Ukraine with $1 billion worth of free Starlink services, Musk refused to extend it further, fearing it would escalate the conflict. He believed that complying with the request would make SpaceX complicit in an act of war. Musk's decision led to accusations of treason and calls for the US government to seize his company. However, it is important to question whether private companies or foreign governments have an obligation to fulfill every demand of the Ukrainian military. Refusing such demands does not necessarily make one pro-Russian.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine, claiming it benefits American defense contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed through NATO expansion. They criticize the large sums of money being allocated to Ukraine, suggesting it is a money laundering scheme benefiting companies like BlackRock. The speaker highlights loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, leading to the sale of government assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the exploitation of Ukraine's valuable agricultural land by companies like DuPont and Monsanto, ultimately controlled by BlackRock. The speaker concludes by emphasizing a strategy to keep the population divided and distracted by internal conflicts.

On Monday, June 17, 2024, a narrative centers on the Kingdom of the Netherlands with a company-like reference: overseas entity number OE miljoen 92714, registered May 11, 2023, at Rijnstraat 8, the address of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The managing officer is Hano Wirtner, identified as Deputy Ambassador UK, linked to the number ending in 714. The Foreign Affairs SG is Paul Huyts, who has attended the Multiconic Forum and is described as knowledgeable about the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 agenda; he previously served as coordinator of intelligence and security services and as Secretary-General of General Affairs. On May 29, Paul Huyts was appointed ambassador to the United Kingdom by the King. His successor is Christiaan Rebergen, described as Thesaurus-generaal and treasurer-general of the Ministry of Finance, who is said to be a 100 percent implementer of the Millennium Development Goals and the Sustainable Development Goals. The text asserts that both Huyts and Hano Wirtner are deeply involved in the described structure, with Wirtner in London as managing officer of the whole operation. The speaker raises explicit questions: Is the Kingdom of the Netherlands, as an overseas entity, written out of the Netherlands if registered elsewhere? Who approved this arrangement? What is the collateral and under what conditions is Hano Wirtner a straw man (stroomman)? The claim is made that as managing officer of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, this is a significant position, and that the Netherlands is an unidentifiable company (no known beneficial owner). The speaker asserts involvement of ABE Top Consults, all top Dutch civil servants, the Top Management Group, and intelligence and security services, including mentions of Gert-Jan Puytendijk and CTIVD officials, in relation to “what is going on.” The speaker announces a visit to Rijnstraat 8 to illustrate, noting the address as the overseas entity address and that Olh Huyts is the secretary-general of Foreign Affairs and former secretary-general of General Affairs, described as the coordinator of all intelligence and security services. It is stated that Paul Huyts is to become the new ambassador to the UK in London, that Huyts attended Davos for the World Economic Forum, and that a man (not identified by name) appears at the scene, possibly associated with ABD Top Consult or the Top Management Group. Further details describe Krissian Rebergen as the successor to Paul Huyts, serving as thesaurier-generaal and treasury-bearer of the Kingdom, and a 100 percent implementer of the MDGs and SDGs, with knowledge of the Millennium Development Goals. The structure is suggested to place Hano Wirtner in London as the managing officer, prompting questions about a potential straw man and absence of a known beneficial owner. The speaker remarks on the size of the Rijnstraat 8 building, its proximity to Den Haag Centraal Station, and questions about whether the Netherlands is effectively the “BV Nederland” housed in London, asking what is happening and calling for accountability. The account ends with the mention of Rijnstraat 8 as the building of Paul Huyts, described as the protector of Sandra Pellegrom, the coordinator of SDG Nederland.

Wilders has several other viewpoints, such as speculating that the Netherlands should leave Europe and stop providing aid to Ukraine. When asked if these are up for discussion, the response is that if they were to stop aiding Ukraine, it would result in Ukraine having to surrender to a Russian credit agreement. The speaker mentions previous instances where Russia has invaded Moldova, Chechnya, and Georgia. They argue that if Russia has a piece of Ukraine, they won't stop there and will likely target other countries. The speaker emphasizes the need to find a way to deal with an aggressive Russia, but stopping aid to Ukraine is not a viable solution.

Up to half the weapons we send Ukraine are being sold off, often to drug cartels at our border. This isn't speculation; it's fact. Our intelligence agencies know this is happening. They, and likely the CIA, are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. Zelensky recently denied these claims, and the media reported his denial. But it's true: anyone can easily buy Ukrainian weapons online. This is a crime, and no one is talking about it.

Up to half the weapons we send Ukraine are being sold, not by guess, but by fact. A significant portion ends up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. Intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they profit from it. Billions of dollars' worth of arms are being stolen and sold to our enemies. Zelensky denied these claims in an interview, and the media simply reported his denial. However, it's a fact that one can easily purchase Ukrainian weapons online. This is a crime.

23andMe is mentioned, prompting a warning against using their services due to data selling practices. It is claimed that 23andMe sells user data to other entities, including Russia. Nathaniel Johnson, a policy advisor for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is introduced. The claim is made that 23andMe's contract includes a clause allowing them to share information with shareholders, some of whom are pharmaceutical companies based in other countries. These foreign pharmaceutical companies are allegedly owned by entities like the Ministry of Defense in Russia or are based in China.

I will propose a comprehensive investigation into the funding of political parties and politicians, as well as their connections with Russia. Additionally, I suggest excluding parties like Forum for Democracy and PVV from confidential briefings to the Second Chamber. We cannot tolerate any form of interference, both from external sources and within our own parliament. It is crucial to safeguard our democracy not only from Russian influence but also from internal threats.

De annexatie van de Krim en de bezetting van Oost-Oekraïne door Rusland leidden tot een hybride oorlog met desinformatie en cyberaanvallen. Politici zoals Wilders en Baudet worden in verband gebracht met Russische invloeden, maar hard bewijs ontbreekt. Wilders prees Poetin in Rusland, terwijl Baudet een adviseur heeft met Kremlin-connecties. Onderzoeken suggereren banden tussen PVV en het Kremlin, maar concrete bewijzen ontbreken. Translation: The annexation of Crimea and the occupation of Eastern Ukraine by Russia led to a hybrid war with disinformation and cyberattacks. Politicians like Wilders and Baudet are linked to Russian influences, but solid evidence is lacking. Wilders praised Putin in Russia, while Baudet has an advisor with Kremlin connections. Investigations suggest ties between PVV and the Kremlin, but concrete evidence is missing.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine and claims that Russia tried to settle on favorable terms. They argue that the expansion of NATO benefits military contractors like Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics Boeing, and Lockheed, who gain a captive market. The speaker criticizes the large amounts of money committed to Ukraine and suggests it is a money laundering scheme benefiting BlackRock, the owner of the military contractors. They also mention loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, including extreme austerity measures and the sale of government-owned assets to multinational corporations. The speaker highlights the sale of Ukrainian agricultural land to companies like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, all owned by BlackRock. They conclude by stating that the strategy of keeping people divided allows those in power to continue their actions without consequence.

The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.

In this video, the speaker discusses the MH17 incident and a deal made by Dutch Prime Minister Rutte with a company called Rosteck. The European Union placed Rosteck on the sanctions list for supplying weapons, including the Buk missile that shot down the plane. Despite this, Rutte personally visited the Kremlin and did not offer asset protection. The speaker criticizes Rutte for not taking action and sending a message to other oil companies. They mention the spread of fake news claiming the plane was Ukrainian and highlight the lack of assistance from Serge Aegimezel, the manufacturer of the missile. The speaker also mentions Jesse Klaver from GroenLinks questioning Rutte about the deal, but Rutte claims privacy laws prevent him from discussing it.

**Summary in Dutch:** Het gesprek draait om de huidige situatie in het Midden-Oosten, met name de rol van Israël en de reactie van de VVD hierop. Er wordt kritiek geuit op de vermeende dubbele standaarden in het buitenlandbeleid, waarbij snel conclusies worden getrokken over Rusland en Iran, maar terughoudendheid wordt betracht als het om Israël gaat. De aankoop van wapens uit Israël, die mogelijk op burgers in Gaza worden getest, is een ander punt van discussie. Ook de steun aan oppositiegroepen in Syrië, inclusief jihadisten, komt aan bod. Verder wordt de financiering van defensie besproken en de vraag waar dit geld vandaan moet komen. De geïnterviewde geeft aan kritisch te zullen zijn als dit niet duidelijk in het verkiezingsprogramma staat. **Summary in English:** The conversation revolves around the current situation in the Middle East, particularly Israel's role and the VVD's response to it. Criticism is voiced regarding alleged double standards in foreign policy, with swift conclusions about Russia and Iran, but reluctance when it comes to Israel. The purchase of weapons from Israel, potentially tested on civilians in Gaza, is another point of discussion. Support for opposition groups in Syria, including jihadists, is also addressed. Furthermore, the financing of defense is discussed and the question of where this money should come from. The interviewee indicates that they will be critical if this is not clearly stated in the election program.

This war never should have happened. Russia tried to settle with terms beneficial to Ukraine and us, mainly keeping NATO out. Military contractors want new NATO countries because it forces them to buy weapons from specific companies like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed, creating a trapped market. We've committed billions to Ukraine, money that could have housed every homeless person in the US. Mitch McConnell admitted this money largely goes to American defense manufacturers, essentially a money laundering scheme. BlackRock owns these companies. The "loan" to Ukraine will never be repaid. The conditions include extreme austerity and the sale of government-owned assets, including its valuable agricultural land, to multinational corporations like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, which are also owned by BlackRock. BlackRock even got the contract to rebuild Ukraine. They're doing this openly because they keep us divided and fighting each other.

Our fighters liberated Sviatohirsk and found commercial documents in a children's home regarding child trafficking, with links to British private military companies. Coca-Cola was one of the payers. This issue is crucial - 7% of Ukraine's budget income, $2 billion, comes from illegal organ trafficking. This system is state-sanctioned.

The video discusses the delivery of parts from the Netherlands for the F35, also known as the Joint Strike Fighter, to Israel. It is mentioned that these parts are used in airstrikes on Gaza. The speaker confirms that the F35 is indeed being used in these bombings, along with the F15 and F16. The use of the F35 is not a point of debate, and it is acknowledged that there is a risk of human rights violations. Given the evidence of the devastation on the ground, it can be assumed that the F35 is being used in these airstrikes.

Speaker 0 questions Meneer Markushauer about why he could not become vice premier, implying it would have happened if it were up to Geert Wilders. The questions prompt whether he should ask Wilders about the matter and suggest that not everything passed the AIVD security check. The line of questioning then shifts to which foreign intelligence service Markushauer actually works for, asking him to declare whether he works for any foreign security service and specifically referencing the Turk. The questions continue to press: what foreign affiliation does he have, if any, and whether he has ties to a foreign intelligence agency. The speaker mentions the Stichting bij Leven en Welzijn and asks about firearms, suggesting this is a recurring topic in related groups. There is an insinuation that Denk might nominate a member of parliament who works for the Turkish security service, and the speaker urges Markushauer to answer plainly if there is nothing to hide. The conversation also notes that ANP (the news agency) wants an answer from Markushauer, signaling media interest in his affiliations and security clearance. The overall point is to probe Markushauer’s possible connections to foreign intelligence services, questions about his eligibility for high office based on security checks, and to obtain a clear admission or denial regarding any such affiliations, with an emphasis on transparency given political risk and media attention. The exchange presents a sequence of provocative questions intended to challenge Markushauer on loyalties, security vetting, and potential foreign influence, while underscoring public and media demand for clarification.

Mark Rutte, the former prime minister, has been appointed as the secretary general of NATO. The speaker claims Rutte ruined the country by flooding it with immigrants, destroying the economy, and targeting farmers. The speaker alleges Rutte bought his position in NATO by spending billions of taxpayer euros on Ukraine and constantly hugging Zelensky. According to the speaker, Rutte, not even in office for one day, stated that Ukraine should be part of NATO and that its path to membership is irreversible. The speaker believes Rutte is determined to drag everyone into World War 3 and is a threat to society and the world.

- "This is a war that should have never happened." - "The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine." - "March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000." - "it's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme." - "And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock." - "Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe." - "500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine." - "And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra."

A photo shows the signing of a major contract between Dutch and Russian officials. The Dutch company DSM supplies products to Rostec, Russia's largest arms manufacturer. Rostec is known for producing aircraft, missile systems, and bulletproof vests. Interestingly, Rostec operates in the Netherlands as a defense concern and benefits from a tax arrangement. However, instead of generating profits for the country, it seems to be a fiscal construct that primarily benefits a few individuals. This arrangement has reportedly cost Dutch taxpayers around 30 million euros. It's surprising to think that the Netherlands is indirectly supporting the supply of weapons to countries like North Korea, Sudan, and Syria.

The speaker states that they personally know the current NATO Secretary General, Mr. Rutte, who is a former Prime Minister of the Netherlands. They mention having visited the Netherlands for a discussion, describing Rutte as an intelligent, systemic, and effective example, and noting that the Netherlands’ economy is in good shape, “this part of his merit.” The speaker then criticizes Rutte for what they perceive as push for war with Russia, asking rhetorically what Rutte is saying about war with Russia and asserting that “they want to prepare for war with Russia.” The speaker contends that Rutte should read a specific source: the new US National Security Strategy. According to the speaker, the United States is a key player in NATO, its creator, main sponsor, and “all the main means come from the US.” They claim that “money, technologies, weapons, ammunition” all originate from the United States, calling this the foundation of NATO’s resources. The speaker asserts that in the new NATO national security strategy, Russia is not identified as an enemy or a target. Despite this, the General Secretary of NATO is preparing with them for war, and the speaker questions whether Rutte can read, implying a belief that the strategy does not designate Russia as an enemy, yet there is a push toward preparing for conflict. Overall, the speaker juxtaposes Rutte’s economic leadership in the Netherlands with a narrative of impending confrontation with Russia, emphasizing the reliance of NATO on U.S. resources and critiquing the alignment between the US strategy and the perceived stance of NATO leadership toward Russia.