reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker demonstrates the inverse square law for light using an overhead projector. They start by projecting a square onto a wall from a distance of 1 meter and outlining it. Then, they move the projector to 2 meters away and outline the new area. The same process is repeated at a distance of 3 meters. The speaker explains that as the distance doubles, the same amount of light is spread out over an area four times larger, resulting in less concentration and brightness. They conclude that if the distance is tripled, the brightness becomes 1/9th of the original.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the tactical sequence surrounding a man who approached a roof and the purported loophole used to take a shot. They note a distinction between “a guy walking up and getting on a roof” and “getting on a roof” in a way that suggests exploiting a loophole. They describe a tactic of banging a hole through one side, stepping back, and shooting through that hole, creating an opportunity they characterize as a loophole. They ask for a quick description of that loophole again. They reference a site: the Lucy Center behind the Sorensen Center, and explain that from their position they cannot see that area because it is not their area of responsibility; their focus is threats directly in front of them. They estimate about 3,000 threats in front of them, with a larger backdrop described as “an 18,000 foot mountain” in front and a “36,000 foot mountain” behind, suggesting limited visibility of the broader area. They note that if the shooter had stopped slightly to the right, the Sorensen Center would have been in the way and would block the view. Speaker 1 emphasizes that it is a very specific point, not just climbing onto the roof to gain a vantage point. Speaker 0 suggests there was “blind luck” involved—no crawling, no secondary shooter stuck in the weeds; instead a “boom on, boom run to, boom take the shot.” They ask whether the event had to have been rehearsed, and Speaker 1 indicates the vantage point was roughly seven feet high, a small area that would require search for that vantage point if one didn’t know where to look. They discuss the possibility of footage existing to show how the shooter reached the point or whether he searched for it. Speaker 0 suggests that a drone could have provided footage, lamenting its absence, and jokes about wanting to deploy a drone to examine the scene. They frame these as tactical questions: their team drills include rapid movement—running 300 yards, jumping a wall, taking a shot—with an example of a 35-foot declination at 200 yards. They acknowledge that even trained shooters sometimes miss under duress, noting it’s not merely the shot itself but the broader conditions. They also compare the current shooter to “old men that shoot stuff on sandbags,” underscoring the pressure of real-world conditions.

Math suggests that due to the Earth's curvature, a 40-foot tall object should be invisible from 20 miles away. However, people have seen the Edelkapa Arch, which contradicts this math. A math professor confirmed that, according to calculations, it shouldn't be visible. Many of us won't reach altitudes above 73 miles, but observations from hot air balloons show that without fisheye lenses, the horizon appears differently. As the balloon ascends, the horizon distorts, but when it crosses the center of the lens, it provides a more accurate view of what is actually seen.

A couple tested the alleged earth curvature and found no evidence of it over water. They placed a laser 16.42 miles away from the observer, who was 4 feet above the water. According to calculations, the observer should have been 130 feet high to see the laser source. However, the observer's camera was only 2 feet above the water, yet they could still see the laser source. This raises concerns about the accuracy of the globe model.

The speaker explains that the apparent movement of the horizon throughout the day is due to changing atmospheric conditions, not a physical obstruction. They compare it to the convergence of the ceiling and ground at the end of a long hallway. The horizon is defined as where the sky appears to meet the ground. The speaker emphasizes that the horizon is an apparent location and not a physical hump. They also discuss atmospheric refraction, stating that it is a distortion of what is already in the field of view. They argue that the flatness of the ocean disproves the idea of a curved Earth and challenges the globe model.

Speaker 0 suggests going high enough to verify an agreement made 500 years ago.

In this video, the speaker demonstrates a proof of the Earth's curvature. They are 21.29 kilometers away from the other shore and show that there is a 40-foot hump of water obstructing the view of a mirror flash. They explain that if you try this experiment yourself, you will notice that as soon as the mirror is blocked, the flash disappears completely. This experiment serves as evidence for the curvature of the Earth.

The ASH experiment is one of psychology's oldest and most popular pieces of research. A volunteer is told that he's taking part in a visual perception test. What he doesn't know is that the other participants are actors, and he's the only person taking part in the real test, which is actually about group conformity. Please begin. The experiment you will be taking part in today involves the perception of line length. Your task will be simply to look at the line here on the left and indicate which of the three lines on the right is equal to it in length. The actors have been told to match the wrong lines. In the first test, the correct answer is two. Group dynamics is one of the most powerful forces in human psychology.

In this video, the speaker discusses a new proof of the flat Earth from a frozen lake in Manitoba, Canada. The test involved setting up lights at different distances from the camera and observing if there was any curvature. The lights were all on the same flat plane, with no Earth bulge or physical globe horizon. By lowering the camera to different heights, it was shown that the lights should have been below the horizon if the Earth was curved, but they remained visible. The speaker emphasizes that this observation proves the Earth is flat and questions the lies perpetuated by those in control of education, media, government, and major institutions. The speaker encourages independent thinking and breaking free from mental controls.

The speaker demonstrates drawing lines from the polar star to two points, forming a triangle. They also highlight rays from the black sun, forming another triangle. They mention the principle of "as above, so below" from Hermes Trismegistus, found in the emerald tablet and the Kybalion. The speaker erases intersections and draws the sun and moon, indicating rotation. They use arrows to show that both the moon and sun are approximately 3,300 miles or 5,310 kilometers away.

Speaker 0 presents a deep-dive critique of globe Earth claims, arguing there is legitimacy to a flat-Earth view. He starts by examining NASA’s most recent globe image from outer space, noting stars in the background and claiming the picture is from twenty-something years ago, and comparing two NASA globe images showing the United States at different sizes “in the very next year,” questioning how that is possible. He asserts the globe image has “copied and pasted clouds” and asks if the globe was made in Photoshop. He then discusses a moon picture with the earth behind it, urging attention to the sides and asking how the earth could be drastically smaller when observed from the moon, yet drastically larger when you’re about 50,000 miles away from the moon. He claims that, when put into context, “they’re completely lying to our faces,” and describes the lunar module as looking “absolutely ridiculous,” calling it a replica and a toy, and questions whether the buttons have real functions and why ten thousand buttons would be needed. He questions who recorded the lunar module launch, noting that there were no fully autonomous cameras or drones at the time, and asks “Who got left on the moon?” He asserts that the moon landing was implanted as a false reality on the subconscious mind to govern conscious behaviors, linking Apollo 11 to symbolic numerology (11) and stating that the moon and sun are symbolic pillars representing subconscious and conscious realms. He claims the moon landing was a symbolic act to capture imagination and limit consciousness. He asks if the Earth were a globe, one would have to sit at eye level with water to have a perfectly flat horizon, implying a flat horizon because Chicago’s skyline is visible from about 40 miles across Lake Michigan. He states that curvature would be eight inches per mile squared, so buildings would have to be level with the floor and would appear to lean if the Earth were globe. He claims there is no detectable curvature on any body of water, and that the horizon is merely how far the eye can see. Regarding circumnavigation, he asserts there is no proof of east-to-west circumnavigation but no evidence of north-to-south circumnavigation, arguing that north is the center on a flat map and that circumnavigating north to south would leave the magnetic field. He mentions Antarctica’s average elevation and its role in “holding all of the waters in,” and notes no country has a flag shape for its nation, while Antarctica does. He calls attention to the Antarctic Treaty and contrasts it with Greenland, and mentions crepuscular rays as evidence of a local sun, and claims that if the sun were 93 million miles away, light rays would be perfectly parallel and seasons would be explained differently. He claims the moon gives off its own light, with a few degrees colder Fahrenheit than the surrounding atmosphere, which would not be possible if the moon merely reflects the sun’s light. He references a model visually and asserts that what is shown makes no sense if the Earth is a globe. He concludes by saying the video is “the tip of the iceberg,” asserting that observing no curvature and the sun and moon appearing the same size and moving across the sky might reflect what’s actually happening. He ends with, “But of course, the earth is a globe and I made everything up,” and states, “This video was for entertainment purposes only.”

A person questions the roundness of the Earth and presents camera footage from 110,000 feet in the air without a fisheye lens. They argue that there is no curvature and that the sun does not appear to be 93,000,000 miles away. The person believes that some individuals are too indoctrinated to accept this evidence and urges them to wake up.

All lines in the video converge at the same vanishing point, regardless of their height. The speaker explains that the wooden planks represent true perspective lines, while the calculations are based on nonperspective lines. The observer sees converging lines, representing the reality of the sun traveling down. The speaker points out that the sun's apparent height increases as it crosses parallel lines, leading to the misconception that the sun would be visible all the time on a flat Earth. The speaker emphasizes the importance of perspective and criticizes the incorrect calculations and angles presented. The concise summary highlights the speaker's argument that the sun will set on a flat Earth.

The speaker questions the truth and asks where the curve is. They point out a 95 feet tall target, the Port Weller Lighthouse, which is visible from 42.5 kilometers away, proving it's not an illusion. Despite being at nearly the same elevation, the speaker mentions that even the floor and streetlights can be seen. They then mention visiting Saint Catherine's to confirm what they saw, specifically the blinking lighthouse and the yellow and red lights behind it.

Speaker 0 asks where the sun is if the Earth is flat. Speaker 1 responds that everyone has their own sun, and there is no "the sun." Speaker 0 is confused and asks if there are different suns in different locations. Speaker 1 confirms that each person sees their own sun. Speaker 0 questions how many suns there are, and Speaker 1 explains that there are as many suns as there are viewers. Speaker 0 brings up airplanes and wonders why the sun doesn't appear bigger when closer. Speaker 1 compares it to a rainbow and states that the sun is not a physical object. Speaker 0 is frustrated and Speaker 1 claims the sun is cold.

The speakers discuss whether the Earth is flat or round. Speaker 1 argues that it's not okay to say the Earth is flat, citing pictures from space as evidence. Speaker 2 mentions video footage of a rotating spherical Earth. Speaker 3 makes a random comment about robot polishers. Speaker 1 explains that if you observe a boat on a lake, it gradually disappears over the curved horizon, which wouldn't happen if the Earth were flat. Speaker 4 defines science and mentions an experiment by Eratosthenes to determine if the Earth's surface is curved. They discuss the scientific process and the difference between pseudoscience and regular science. Speaker 5 mentions Einstein's explanation of gravity and the possibility of better models in the future. They also touch on the use of light to understand the composition of things. Speaker 7 talks about the conflict between science as a belief system and science as a method of inquiry. Speaker 8 briefly mentions evidence suggesting the Earth's surface is either flat or much larger than believed. The video ends with a comment about academia's role in seeking truth.

The speaker discusses anomalies in eclipses and suggests using a real-life scale model to study shadows. They explain that in total solar eclipses, the source of light should be the same size as the object that eclipses it. Using a scale model, they find that the shadow is 16 times bigger than it should be. They criticize CGI cartoons for inaccurately depicting eclipse shadows. They argue that in the flat earth model, the diameters of the sun and moon are about 32 miles. They suggest using AutoCAD and Natura software to verify shadow sizes.

A couple tested the idea of Earth's curvature and found that there was no curvature over water, suggesting that there is no globe. They conducted a test with a laser placed 16.42 miles away from the observer, just 4 feet above the water. According to calculations, the observer should have been 130 feet high to see the laser source. However, the observer's camera was only 2 feet above the water, and they could still see the laser source. This raises questions about the accuracy of the globe model.

The speaker begins by looking up flights from New Zealand to Argentina on Google Flights. They find a flight with two stops: Los Angeles and JFK. The speaker questions the logic of flying all the way up to the United States and then back down to Argentina, as shown on a standard map. They then present a flat earth model, suggesting that the flight would be a straight line from New Zealand to LAX and then down to Argentina.

At 9.35 feet above the lake, a target 17.82 miles away was observed at 2.79 feet above the surface. Calculations show a hidden height of 131.9 feet due to curvature. Use this to debunk claims of lake curvature. Visit f e core dot org for more information.

The speaker demonstrates a process, stating, "I flip this to l two, and then I bring this to 1, and fire." The result is described as "15Fire. 68Fire9Fire." The speaker then notes that the result is "vertical."

Infrared technology shows objects that should be hidden by Earth's curvature. Questions arise about Erastosthenes' shadow experiment proving Earth's roundness. The sun's size relative to stars and moonlight's coldness are discussed, along with shadows being warmer at night. Translation: The video questions the curvature of the Earth based on infrared technology, Erastosthenes' experiment, the sun's size, moonlight's temperature, and shadow temperatures at night.

Speaker 0 asks if the descent in the air is straight or if there is a dip. Speaker 1 confirms it is straight but suggests a slight adjustment with the nose. Speaker 1 then asks if there is any curvature while up in the air, to which Speaker 0 replies no, it's all flat. Speaker 2 confirms that the pilot believes the Earth is flat. Speaker 2 questions the speed of the ground's movement and its relation to landing direction, but Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 dismiss it, stating that the ground appears still. Speaker 2 mentions the possibility of seeing landmarks from Kansas, but Speaker 0 explains visibility depends on weather conditions. Speaker 1 interrupts to ask if they adjust for curvature while flying, and Speaker 0 replies that they fly slightly over a curved surface.

Water naturally finds its level, so whether it's in a cup or a large body of water, it appears flat. NASA admits to photoshopping Earth images, but they claim it's necessary. They also acknowledge that we can't go beyond low Earth orbit, which is much closer than the moon. However, when observing distant skylines or islands, there is no visible curvature as expected. The Michelson Morley experiment failed to prove Earth's motion, leading to the theory of relativity. The sun's claimed distance of 93 million miles is questioned due to the angle of its rays. Lunar eclipses have occurred with both the sun and moon visible, contradicting the explanation of shadow causing moon phases. Moon phases remain consistent despite the Earth's supposed orbit. The speaker, after unbiased research, believes the Earth is flat, questioning the accepted model of a spinning globe.

Ancient civilizations understood the true shape of the earth, indicating that we live in an enclosed geocentric realm. This suggests the presence of a barrier that allows the sun's light to reflect off it. The video also offers basic experiments for viewers to try themselves.