reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It is shameful that the democratic world expresses sympathy for the Jewish people while refusing to help them. The democracies claim they cannot take in Jews, despite having much more space than Germany. They also insist that Germany must allow Jewish immigrants to bring capital, ignoring the fact that Germany has historically received them without such conditions. The German nation has suffered greatly due to the actions of Jews and foreign powers, and we refuse to let foreign interests dictate our policies. We are committed to educating our own citizens for leadership roles, as German culture should be managed by Germans. The Jewish people must adapt to constructive roles or face dire consequences. If international Jewish financiers provoke another world war, it will lead to their annihilation in Europe, as nations will no longer sacrifice themselves for their benefit.

The decline of our culture includes contamination, decomposition of literature, and the poisoning of theaters. Millions of Germans are no longer participating because this art was not born from our people. It is foreign and has nothing to do with the German character. It was imposed by a subversive press. There is an assault against the education of our children's brains, tearing out memories of our German past and insulting the great men of our people. This removes its memory from the hearts and brains of German youth.

Hitler's speech emphasizes German nationalism and the exclusion of foreign influence. He advocates for educating German citizens to hold leading positions in the state. The speech also includes disturbing remarks about exterminating Jews.

The German nation seeks to maintain its interests without foreign influence, emphasizing that each nation should be governed by its own people. There is a commitment to educate intelligent children from the working class to take on leadership roles, ensuring that German culture is preserved and managed by Germans. The aim is to counteract forces that threaten national unity and economy, particularly against what is perceived as international Jewish financial dominance. Marxism, whether in social democracy or communism, can be challenged through a more truthful yet equally forceful approach. It is essential to resist impending doom and take proactive measures, which inspired the founding of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

I believe that without the Jewish international press and propaganda incitement, peace among nations would be quickly achieved. Attempts to provoke war and tarnish our relationship with the United States are fueled by political and financial interests. If another world war were to occur, it would result in the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe. This is not just a struggle for German freedom and security, but a battle for the future of Europe and the entire civilized Western world. Translation: The speaker discusses the impact of Jewish international press and propaganda on peace efforts, as well as the potential consequences of another world war on the Jewish race in Europe. The conflict is portrayed as not just a German struggle, but a battle for the future of Europe and the civilized Western world.

Germany seeks to maintain its sovereignty and prevent foreign influence, emphasizing the importance of educating its own citizens for leadership roles. There is a strong sentiment against allowing what is perceived as an alien culture to dominate German society. The speaker expresses frustration over the hypocrisy of other nations that criticize Germany while refusing to accept Jewish refugees themselves. He argues that the Jewish community must adapt to the societies they join or face significant consequences. He reflects on past prophecies regarding his rise to power and warns that if international Jewish financiers instigate another world war, it could lead to dire repercussions for the Jewish population in Europe.

The speaker asserts that Germany is undergoing a destructive process orchestrated by international forces, particularly Jews, who gained political power 120 years ago. He claims Jewish people form a state within a state and control the economy through the stock exchange, which is alien to other peoples. Western Europe, unlike Central and Eastern Europe, was less aware of this threat due to fewer Jews who assimilated and manipulated the masses through press propaganda. In Germany, a large Jewish population and aversion from the masses made political contamination more difficult, especially with the monarchy. The speaker claims Jews took control of the working class by founding social democratic and communist movements, inciting greed and ruthlessness. They corrupted the upper classes through intermarriage and manipulated the press to divide the population. Russia is presented as a ruined culture exploited by foreign capital. The speaker criticizes the lack of criticism towards these conditions and calls for resistance. He defines a true socialist as a nationalist who prioritizes the welfare of the German people. He urges young people to join storm divisions to protect Germany and fight against Jewish influence, believing this fight is inevitable for Germany's future.

We are at a turning point, with new ideas emerging. Victors and vanquished alike sense that reason has deserted mankind, replaced by hatred and fear. A new order is needed, especially in Europe, based on reason, logic, understanding, and mutual consideration. The Treaty of Versailles cannot be the foundation of this order. Germany strives for a new order that establishes equal rights and obligations. The restoration of the Reich's sovereignty should not be seen as intolerable. Germany does not dictate what other nations do within their borders, and expects the same respect. This is not just Hitler's opinion, but that of 67 million Germans. Germany wants twenty-five years of peace for Europe, not military alliances or the denial of sovereign rights. The German folk has been asked if they share this view and support the actions of their leaders.

Hitler and the National Socialists did not view other races as subhuman, contrary to post-war propaganda. The term "master race" was a mistranslation, referring to Germans being masters of themselves and their country. "Lebensraum" means living space, not brutality against other races. Jewish supremacists use race to describe their own, projecting the idea of an Aryan master race onto Germans to deflect from their own racism.

Adolf Hitler opens with a May Day address, declaring the day sacred for the Deutsche Volksgenossen and calling on the German people to recognize that all who contribute to national work must stand together, pledging to defend German honor, equal rights, and European peace. He proclaims that the Führer has spoken and that the German people should stand behind him in steadfast loyalty. Speaker 1 emphasizes that he speaks with the authority of someone who has grown from among the people, having stood beside them in wartime and through hardship, and who rose through diligence, learning, and hunger. He asserts personal continuity with his earlier self and recalls his experiences during the war, noting a rise from within the common ranks. Hitler or the extemporaneous speakers describe the labor force and the masses, noting perceived achievements within three months of focused effort and claiming that the German people have engaged in national tasks only tied to their own volk (people). The text asserts that the nation’s struggle was borne by the German farmer and worker, and that the people should not be meddled with by outsiders who “live everywhere and nowhere,” a critique of rootless international interest groups. Speaker 3 laments that Volkerstrife is fomented by a small, rootless international clique seeking to prevent peace, and emphasizes that the volk is bound to its soil, homeland, and living conditions. The speaker envisions a future where the German Volk can finally be treated with respect in international affairs and where peace is attainable if the nation remains united. Speaker 4 articulates a request for the German people to judge him for his work, urging them to vote in his favor if he has served them well. He addresses the common German, criticizing those who resist sacrifices and who fail to understand the benefits of shared burdens, such as the “Eintopfsonntag” (one-pot Sunday) and broader wartime austerity, arguing that these measures supported millions of people, including children. Speaker 1 reflects on the denial of Marxism as a political objective and frames the split in the nation as a betrayal of workers, contrasting it with a supposed commitment to a peaceful, unified Germany that does not threaten other nations. He praises a disciplined, orderly implementation of National Socialism and recounts how the movement, once small, has grown through sacrifice and loyalty to the Führer. Speaker 5 and Speaker 2 discuss the Party’s long-term goals: the movement started with two principles—be a true world-views party and seize power in Germany. They claim the nation’s future rests on a unified, disciplined people with a strong political leadership alongside the army. The youth are envisioned to be educated to reject class distinctions, to endure hardship, and to perpetuate German unity even after the older generation passes. The movement promises a peaceful future and asserts that Germany will now pursue collaboration with other nations, while insisting that no German must reject the communal labor that binds the Reich together. In closing, Hitler/Hitler-adjacent speakers celebrate the creation of a “new Germany” symbolized by the spade as a sign of a new community, a revolution accomplished by the people’s will, with a warning to enemies that the nation will stand firm and endure, and that unemployment has fallen as the nation builds a shared future. The address asserts that the next collective appeal will once again demonstrate the unity and resilience of the German Volk.

The speaker discusses the Jewish population in Poland and their perceived negative impact on society. They criticize the living conditions of Jews, their lack of cleanliness, and their focus on business rather than productive work. The speaker claims that Jews are a parasitic people who exploit other nations for their own gain. They also highlight the influence of Jews in finance, politics, and the arts, and argue that they are a dangerous force that needs to be eradicated. The speaker concludes by stating that the Nazi party, under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, will ensure the elimination of Jewish influence in Germany.

True nationalism celebrates global diversity by valuing each race's unique heritage and culture. National Socialists believe in preserving individual characteristics in their own countries. Globalism and cultural Marxism aim to erase racial identity, promoting a homogenized society. Forced mass immigration and miscegenation are seen as threats to a nation's beauty and culture.

The speakers present a nationalist and xenophobic framing of national interest and ethnic conflict. The first speaker argues that “The German nation does not wish its interest to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation,” listing France, England, and America—repeatedly emphasizing different nations as external controllers. He states, “This … we are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land and to oust it.” A second portion asserts that “This is all done on purpose. None of this is an accident,” claiming that “what they do is they construct as many divisions amongst the peasants as possible.” He describes attempts to inflame societal tensions by promoting division: “Make sure the blacks hate the whites. Men hate the women by promoting degeneracy in the whole month of June.” He adds, “Republicans hate the Democrats,” and that people are “so busy fighting with each other they can laugh from the talk.” The first speaker then shifts to a statement about historical anti-Jewish policy, claiming, “Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time. He wanted to expel the Jews.” He asserts, “For Europe cannot settle down until the Jewish question is cleared up.” He concludes with a call to collective action: “Workers of all classes and of all nations, recognize your common enemy.” The dialogue ends with a reframing of political conflict: “It's not right versus left. It's about right versus wrong.” Throughout, the speakers articulate a conspiracy-theory style narrative centered on foreign influence, ethnic and racial antagonism, and the alleged manipulation of social divisions to achieve political ends.

There are three choices before us: communism, a destructive plutocracy, or a true revolution that embraces nationalism and socialism. I believe our civilization, built over 2,000 years, cannot be destroyed by opposing ideologies. The victory of liberators, whether from the east or west, signifies a Jewish victory that would lead to the downfall of our civilization, akin to the fates of Babylon, Athens, and Rome. We risk entering a dark, barbaric era if we fail to defend our heritage. To create a better world, we must unite under one leader. Regardless of our political views, if we wish to save our civilization, we must rally behind the German army and Adolf Hitler.

Speaker 1 argues that emancipation, granting Jews citizenship in European nations, marked the beginning of a catastrophe. He claims this granted equality to a people who have always existed “as a nation within nations,” and that this transformation happened gradually, leading to Jews obtaining every right of native Germans. He connects this to changes in economic life, asserting that a new international financial order centered in the stock exchange and banks operates “according to principles entirely foreign to the German character,” with foreigners’ interests opposed to the welfare of their people. He contrasts Western Europe and Central Europe, noting that in England and France industrialization drew farm workers into cities but the foreign element remained small and blendable, whereas in his view the German experience differed. Speaker 1 then critiques democracy as manipulation of the masses, describing it as the rule of quantity over quality, designed to make people believe they are free while serving purposes they do not understand. He explains a cycle of two or three opposing parties, a public spectacle of choice, and a constant invocation of “freedom” that forfeits real freedom as opinion is controlled by others. Germany’s path is described as different: loyalty has historically centered on the monarch, the army, and the state, with German industry having the potential to unite workers with traditional German institutions rather than oppose them. When the workers’ movement is captured, the working class’ legitimate grievances are diverted into an international, class-based struggle rather than a national one. Speaker 1 condemns Marxism as teaching that property is theft and that everything must be held in common, arguing that honest Germans would reject such a doctrine. He laments the replacement of leadership with professional agitators whose loyalty lies elsewhere, citing Russia as the final destination of this power: a once-great civilization reduces to chaos, churches plundered, productive classes destroyed, millions starving, and a nation transformed into a colony exploited by those in power. He asserts that Germany’s economy deteriorates daily, prices rise, wages fall, and both the stock exchange and speculators prosper while workers suffer. Political life is described as a circus, with foreign powers displacing Germany’s interests. He contends that “powerful interests” profit from German weakness, and that disarmament and submission were met with continued disrespect and demands. Speaker 1 states that Germans are awakening, rejecting old slogans, and recognizing that international solidarity harms them. He proposes an alternative path: a genuinely national and social movement, where the welfare of the nation precedes profits of speculators and theories of internationalists. He defines socialism as recognizing that prosperity depends on all Germans and that a nation cannot thrive while millions live in misery. Nationalism is framed as recognizing a unique German character, heritage, and destiny, with a duty to the German people first. He envisions a movement where workers and managers, farmers and scholars, unite for common goals, resisting those who exploit German weakness. Speaker 0 contextualizes: this speech was delivered in Munich in 1922; eleven years later, Hitler became chancellor, and the ideology would lead to World War II and the Holocaust, with 6,000,000 Jews and millions of others perishing. The primary source is presented for historical and educational purposes.

"Hitler claims in his book that the Jews are communists." "They made the Russian revolution." "They killed their 30,000,000 Russians, all the intelligent ones, in a cruel and horrific way." "And that's their plan for the entire world. The next country in line is Germany." "If we don't defeat them now, they will eliminate us, and they will slaughter another 20,000,000, all the intelligent people." "The Russian revolution was made by the Jews." "The Russian army was built by Trotsky, who was an incredible genius and antisemite like no other." "Who founded the KGB? Jews." "The Jews destroyed religion and faith." "Out of nine large German newspapers, seven were owned by Jews." "Now you understand why they don't teach it in schools?" "Because who writes the curriculum? Those same leftists." "They spread in Germany the heresy in God." "I feel like the messenger of God to exterminate the Jews because they don't believe in him."

The speaker claims to have solved internal problems without harming others, seeking no glory through violence. They assert Germany has not caused suffering, taken anything unjustly, or threatened anyone, repeatedly offering friendship. Despite this, they allege a smear campaign persists, falsely claiming Germany will invade Austria, fueled by agitators who desire no peace. These agitators are identified as a small, international clique that thrives on stirring up mistrust, known from within Germany itself. The speaker praises Germany's unified leadership and the growing consideration among its people, expressing pride in being their Fuhrer. They describe being moved by the sight of German workers and believe other nations, if they saw this peaceful, laboring folk, would reject the agitators and understand Germany's role as a guarantor of European order and human culture. The speech concludes with a call to pledge dedication to the German Volk and Reich.

In connection with the Jewish question, it is shameful that democratic nations sympathize with Jews but refuse to help. They claim they have no space, yet Germany has room. They say Jews need capital to immigrate, but Germany helped them before. Germany has suffered due to Jews' actions. Germans have endured hardships and do not want foreign control. They aim to educate their own people for leadership roles.

Der Rundfunk sollte nicht unkontrolliert sein, sondern ausgewogen zwischen Unterhaltung, Bildung und Politik sein. Experimente gehören nicht ins Programm. Adolf Hitler wird als treibende Kraft der politischen Veränderungen genannt, die Deutschland wieder zu Ehre, Arbeit und Brot führen sollen. Translation: The broadcast should be balanced between entertainment, education, and politics. Experimentation should not be part of the program. Adolf Hitler is mentioned as the driving force behind political changes aiming to restore honor, work, and bread to Germany.

Speaker 0 argues that it’s logistically absurd to claim the Holocaust involved gassing millions and hauling bodies from so-called gas chambers, noting the inefficiency of that method. He points out the irony that the person most famous for gassing people refused to use gas that could have won the war, because he would not be the first to use gas, despite having 20,000 kilograms of tabun and sarin. He asserts there were no counters to that chemical weapon, yet the decision not to use gas led to the downfall of his country. Speaker 1 adds that Hitler was gassed himself at the end of World War I, which blinded him. During the fall of the Kaiser’s empire, the Reich’s collapse and the emergence of Bolshevik and Weimar structures occurred as some German states did not join the Weimar Republic and became sub-states or Soviet-like entities. Speaker 0 emphasizes that anyone uncertain about Hitler’s legacy should read Mein Kampf and hear from Hitler’s own words to understand why he held his beliefs. He claims Hitler did not begin as an anti-Semite intent on killing Jews, and describes Hitler as someone who admired and observed the universe, was a truth-seeker from day one, engaged in political discussions, and was fascinated by philosophy, German history, the British Empire, and America. He notes Hitler was well-read and well-spoken, but deprived economically, working as a day laborer with little work available to feed himself. He claims Hitler went days without food to afford a book, showing a love of knowledge, and that he wasn’t a failed artist; he was a talented artist whose path could have been architecture rather than drawing. Speaker 0 contends that smear campaigns against Hitler fail and are “nonsense.” He dismisses more extreme claims as false, such as insults about Hitler’s sexuality or anatomy, and mentions that such accusations are common against many figures. Speaker 1 comments that a lot of the negative rumors about Hitler (e.g., perverse claims) are typical allegations made against many people, implying they are not unique to Hitler.

Our nation does not want foreign control. France is for the French, England for the English, and America for Americans. We must prevent outsiders from seizing power and displacing us. These divisions are deliberate, pitting people against each other: black versus white, men versus women through degeneracy, Republicans versus Democrats. While we fight amongst ourselves, they manipulate us from above. Originally, the goal wasn't extermination, but expulsion. Europe will remain unsettled until the Jewish issue is resolved. Workers of all nations, recognize your true, common enemy. This isn't about right versus left, but right versus wrong.

We have excluded Jews from public life in Germany, preventing them from speaking on behalf of the German nation in theaters, films, and newspapers. In our enemies' camps, Jews dominate and hold power. They are seen as the true carriers of globalism, connecting Moscow, London, and Washington. We face the most dangerous enemy in the world, as they initiate and lead wars from the background. However, their power can be overcome, as we have already defeated their ideology within our own country for fourteen years. We must now confront their external threats.

The speaker discusses the persistence of claims that Adolf Hitler was Jewish, Zionist, or connected to Jewish heritage, and argues that these claims are unfounded and perpetuated by rumor rather than solid evidence. He notes how the Internet has changed information dissemination, making it easy for unvetted claims to spread globally. Key points: - Two prevalent themes in the Patriot movement are (1) that the Nazis took over America, with claims like Jim Mars promoting this fraud, and (2) the claim that Adolf Hitler was Jewish, used by some to distance themselves from antisemitism. - Adolf Hitler was not Jewish. The speaker cites Martin Kerr’s 1982 essay, The Myth of Hitler’s Jewish Grandfather, to outline why the Jewish-grandfather claim is unsubstantiated. - Kerr explains several versions of the myth: - The notion that Alois Hitler’s fatherhood came from a Jewish grandfather named Frankenberger or a Rothschild figure, which Kerr states are unsupported by evidence. The speaker notes that Alois Hitler’s paternity can’t be linked to such figures, and a photo does not support those genealogies. - The claim that a Polish Jew named Hitler (a name shared by a Jewish newspaper figure) was Hitler’s grandfather is invalid because that Jew was born in 1832, only five years older than Hitler’s father, making him impossible as the sire. - Claims from an anti-Hitler German who was part Jewish are dismissed as unfounded. - Hans Frank’s memoirs (In the Face of the Gallows) are discussed, where Frank claimed he investigated threats to expose Hitler’s alleged Jewish ancestor, but the speaker notes it’s impossible to document a Jewish grandfather for Hitler. Werner Maeser, a German historian, is cited: no Frankenberger family lived in Graz in the 1830s, a Jewish presence there was absent, and Maria Schickelgruber (Hitler’s mother) could not have been impregnated by a Jew in Graz prior to Alois’s birth. - Ian Kershaw is cited as noting there was no evidence of a Jewish Frankenberger in Graz; Frankenreiter existed but was not Jewish. - The speaker emphasizes that Hitler’s alleged Jewish ancestry is unsupported by credible scholarship. He mentions that some narratives arise from a book sometimes titled Hitler, Founder of Germany or Hitler, founder of Israel, which he criticizes as poorly translated and unconvincing evidence. He mentions Colonel Don DeGrand Prix referenced this questionable book, but the speaker asserts the book’s content is weak. - He distinguishes that while there were Jews in Hitler’s military due to Nuremberg Laws’ definitions, and some individuals of Jewish descent fought in German forces, this does not prove Hitler was Jewish or Zionist. - He asserts: Hitler was not Jewish, not Zionist, and not Rothschild-connected. He warns against repeating rumors and urges reliance on solid research. - He reiterates that the idea of Hitler being Jewish, a Zionist, or connected to the Rothschilds is a myth, and insists listeners should abandon it and seek verifiable evidence. He ends by stating there were elements in Hitler’s government that supported Jewish immigration to Palestine for strategic reasons, but that does not equate to Hitler being Zionist or Jewish.

Hitler's speeches are now being translated into English, revealing his focus on German interests and preventing the influence of foreign peoples in the country. He emphasizes educating German youth for leadership roles and promoting German culture over Jewish influence. Contrary to expectations, the speeches do not explicitly mention exterminating Jews.

The speaker asserts that democratic nations feign sympathy for Jewish people while refusing to accept them, using excuses that highlight Germany's situation. Germany, unlike these nations, supposedly received Jews for centuries despite their alleged diseases and manipulations that exploited the German nation. The speaker accuses Jews of instigating Germany's inflation and economic ruin after WWI, while democratic nations showed no consideration. The speaker dismisses sentimental appeals, citing the suffering inflicted on Germans after the war. The speaker declares that Germany is for Germans and will prevent Jews from holding leading positions, favoring the education of German peasants and workers. The speaker suggests the world should be grateful Germany is making these culturally valuable people available. Europe cannot settle down until the Jewish question is cleared up. The speaker claims the Jewish race cannot continue as parasites on other nations. The speaker prophesizes that if Jewish financiers instigate another world war, it will result in the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe, not Jewish victory.