reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kimberly Strassel, a columnist for *The Wall Street Journal*, discusses the contrasting views on President Trump's leadership during the coronavirus crisis. She highlights the unprecedented nature of the pandemic and argues that while mistakes were made, it is unreasonable to place all blame on Trump, as many have criticized him since before his election. Strassel emphasizes the importance of the private sector's role in responding to the crisis, noting that the federal government initially struggled with testing but later embraced public-private partnerships. She critiques the reliance on public health officials without considering economic impacts, stressing the need for a balanced approach. Strassel warns against the dangers of increased government spending and the potential shift towards socialism, especially with Bernie Sanders still influencing the Democratic agenda. She expresses hope that the crisis could lead to a reevaluation of government roles and a return to free-market principles, advocating for more flexibility and less bureaucracy in future responses.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Vice President Kamala Harris's recent interview with the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), criticizing the lack of challenging questions compared to the tough inquiries faced by former President Trump. She highlights a Politico report stating that Harris did not stray from her talking points and expresses frustration at the perceived failure of journalists to hold her accountable. Kelly shares an example of a question posed to Harris about joy, which she finds trivial and uninformative, contrasting it with the aggressive questioning Trump received. Dave Rubin joins the discussion, expressing concern about the upcoming election and the media's role in shaping narratives. He criticizes the NABJ for their questioning style, suggesting it reflects a bias that favors Harris. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of media bias and the responsibility of journalists to challenge political figures effectively. Rubin mentions the significant amount of unspent infrastructure and pandemic funds, warning that if the administration pushes to spend these funds, it could lead to inflation. He discusses the potential consequences of government spending and the importance of protecting financial futures through investments like gold IRAs. The dialogue continues with Rubin addressing the recent indictment involving Russian influence in a podcast network he was briefly associated with. He clarifies that he was not accused of wrongdoing and emphasizes the need for transparency in media and politics. They discuss the implications of the indictment for conservative commentators and the media's tendency to discredit them. Kelly and Rubin then delve into the topic of Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General, highlighting a controversial case involving George Gage, who was convicted of sexual abuse. They criticize Harris for her handling of the case and the media's lack of coverage on her record, suggesting that it reflects a broader failure to hold political figures accountable. The conversation shifts to Robbie Starbuck, who discusses his efforts to dismantle Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs in major corporations. He explains how whistleblowers have provided information about companies like Harley-Davidson adopting woke policies and how his campaigns have successfully pressured these companies to change their practices. Starbuck emphasizes the importance of focusing on merit and neutrality in corporate policies and the need for individuals to take responsibility for advocating change. Starbuck shares his strategy of targeting companies individually rather than as a collective, noting that many corporations are now reconsidering their DEI initiatives in response to public pressure. He highlights the success of his campaigns in influencing major companies to abandon radical policies and return to a focus on fairness and merit. The discussion concludes with Starbuck expressing optimism about future campaigns and the potential for significant corporate changes, encouraging listeners to support his efforts in promoting neutrality and fairness in the workplace.

On September 10, 2021, Dave Rubin discussed the upcoming recall election of California Governor Gavin Newsom, expressing enthusiasm and concern over COVID mandates from the Biden administration. He criticized the government's overreach, particularly regarding vaccine mandates for companies with over 100 employees, and highlighted contradictions from politicians like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden, who previously claimed there would be no federal mandates. Rubin also addressed media bias, particularly against Larry Elder, who is running for governor, and shared an accusation from Rose McGowan that Newsom's wife attempted to silence her regarding Harvey Weinstein. He emphasized the importance of voting in the recall election and expressed hope for change in California, urging listeners to support Elder and fight against perceived authoritarianism. Rubin concluded by encouraging engagement in politics and maintaining hope for a better future.

In Keeping It Real’s episode Trump VS The Press: Who’s Really Winning, Jillian Michaels sits with Ainsley Earhardt to unpack the dynamics between political power, the media, and faith. Earhardt defends Fox News’ role as a torchbearer for transparency, arguing that the media should hold leaders accountable, including Trump, Biden, and their administrations. She contends that coverage has often skewed negative against conservatives and praises gunmetal-strong moments of candor she believes reveal truth, while acknowledging that all outlets claim to be fair despite perceived bias. The conversation traverses the boundaries between journalism and opinion on cable news, the responsibilities of anchors, and the need for journalists to tell multiple sides of a story without surrendering discernment. Earhardt stresses that trust in institutions depends on what she calls a fair, balanced approach from both sides of the aisle. The discussion delves into the broader culture war over faith in public life, asking how religion is treated in media, schools, and political arenas. Earhardt reflects on her own faith journey, the role of family and tradition in shaping moral choices, and how a public figure can model grace while speaking openly about beliefs. The hosts examine the impact of COVID-era messaging, vaccine debates, and whistleblowing on democratic norms, touching on whistleblowers, censorship, and the ethics of publishing sensitive information. They debate whether pressure from government or NGOs shifts coverage, how to verify facts, and what it means to cover controversial topics with integrity in an age of rapid social media amplification. The episode also highlights personal stakes: education, parental responsibility, and the quality of civic discourse. The talk returns to themes of unity and mutual understanding, asking how people with different political loyalties can engage productively. Earhardt shares experiences from the field, including concerns about cognitive decline narratives, media bias, and the importance of faith in shaping character. They close by considering practical changes listeners can pursue, from seeking diverse sources to supporting transparent institutions, all while honoring the principle that truth-telling should be the bedrock of a functioning democracy.

Megyn Kelly opens with a political headline: Hunter Biden is in a public faceoff with Melania Trump. Melania is demanding that he apologize for saying that Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump and she says she will sue him if he doesn't back down on that claim. Biden refuses to back down, and the show promises to display exactly what he said and her legal threat. The discussion then moves to other developments, including a DC arrest tied to President Trump's crime crackdown.\n\nSolomon's segment recounts revelations about Obama's Justice Department and the FBI. Three FBI field offices investigated pay-to-play allegations against Hillary Clinton and her Foundation, and top officials obstructed the investigation. A memo cited by Cash Patel references Sally Yates, then deputy attorney general, allegedly ordering agents to 'Shut it down.' The timeline runs from March 2016, when Little Rock was told to stop, to August 2016, when SDNY and EDNY declined to support the Clinton Foundation probe. The discussion revisits IRS whistleblower claims about Hunter Biden's taxes and overseas earnings, framing a pattern of protection for Democrats.\n\nMarch through May 2016 is described as a perilous moment for the Democratic Party, with pay-to-play probes and Clinton Foundation scrutiny alongside Clinton's email issues. Sally Yates allegedly told investigators to shut it down, and deputy director Andy McCabe is portrayed as blocking action. The discussion connects a tarmac meeting between Clinton and Loretta Lynch to later decisions, and notes this context alongside the Clinton Foundation and email server as part of a broader pattern of protecting allies while pursuing rivals.\n\nAdditionally, the program discusses how Trump has been indicted twice by Biden's DOJ, and how Clinton-related investigations were treated differently. A memo from a DOJ lawyer describes the FBI's effort to investigate Clinton pay-to-play, with reported top-official obstruction, and mentions the possibility of grand juries in Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, and Florida. The speakers describe a potential criminal conspiracy and stress the importance of a transparent, thorough process, arguing against selective prosecutions and leaks.\n\nOn media integrity, the guests discuss a 'steel curtain' of agency barriers and note possible cross-state grand jury activity. They also cover the Hunter Biden–Melania Trump defamation thread, including Michael Wolf's Daily Beast claims and the outlet's later retraction. The hosts stress the role of journalism and the importance of facts, warning that personal narratives can distort reporting. The discussion ends with reflections on the slow, ongoing effort to uncover truth behind intertwining political scandals and the need for transparent, evidence-based coverage.

In this episode of Counterpoints, hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti interview Greg Casar, the new chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Casar discusses his diverse Texas district and the challenges of representing constituents while navigating Congress. He emphasizes the need for federal solutions to local issues, particularly as state governments become more extreme. The conversation touches on AOC's recent oversight committee vote, highlighting the mixed support within the caucus. Casar reflects on the importance of maintaining a broad coalition within the Progressive Caucus, advocating for a bigger tent that includes various perspectives. He critiques the Democratic brand, particularly on cultural issues, and stresses the need for authenticity and economic populism. Casar also addresses foreign policy, linking it to domestic concerns, and calls for a more cohesive approach that resonates with everyday voters. He concludes by urging progressives to balance principled stances with the necessity of winning elections to effect real change.

Dave Rubin discusses his upcoming book "Don't Burn This Country," set for release on April 12, 2022, and reflects on the first copy of his previous book, which was chewed by his dog. He critiques Vice President Kamala Harris, highlighting her unpopularity and perceived incompetence, particularly regarding her handling of inflation and foreign policy. Rubin emphasizes that criticism of Harris is often dismissed as racist, a narrative he finds problematic. He also addresses Bill Maher's recent interview with Ben Shapiro, where Maher discusses the left's shift away from traditional liberal values, particularly regarding free speech and wokeness. Rubin argues that Maher has not changed, but the political landscape has, urging him to recognize the implications of supporting Democrats who promote these changes. He concludes by discussing Florida's "Don't Say Gay" bill, defending it as a measure to protect parental rights and criticizing Disney's opposition to it. Rubin calls for a reevaluation of liberal beliefs in light of current political realities.

Dave Rubin hosts Michael Knowles and Andrew Klavan to discuss the significance of the Holy Land amidst current events. Klavan shares his journey from secular Judaism to Christianity, emphasizing a deep connection to Jewish identity and the historical relationship between Jews and Christians. He argues that anti-Semitism often stems from a hatred of God and highlights the ongoing persecution of Jews. Knowles reflects on his recent trip to Israel, noting the historical ties of Jews to the land and the mischaracterization of Israel as a colonial state. They discuss the implications of Zionism and the rise of radical left movements, linking them to global conflicts. Klavan critiques the rhetoric surrounding Israel, asserting that Jews are indigenous to the region and that accusations of apartheid are misleading. The conversation touches on the political responses to the conflict, including reactions from figures like Nikki Haley and Tucker Carlson, emphasizing the need for clarity in addressing the complexities of the situation.

Dana Perino discusses her experience during the book tour for George W. Bush's memoir, "Decision Points," where she encountered a Huffington Post article claiming Bush plagiarized from Bob Woodward. She emphasizes that the source quoted was actually Bush himself. Perino reflects on the pandemic, expressing gratitude for the forced pause in her busy life, allowing her to reconnect with her husband and explore cooking. She shares insights on the changing media landscape, noting how social media has transformed political communication since her time as press secretary. Perino highlights the importance of maintaining good processes in press briefings and the evolving perception of conservatism. She acknowledges the challenges of navigating media biases and the need for careful communication in politics. Perino also shares her love for dogs, emphasizing their role in bringing people together. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted moment featuring her dog, Jasper, showcasing the human side of political discourse.

Dave Rubin discusses various topics in his show, starting with the CDC's mask guidelines, criticizing Democrats for promoting mask-wearing despite new CDC recommendations. He shares his experience in Texas, where mask mandates are less enforced, contrasting it with his return to Los Angeles, where he faced pushback for not wearing a mask. Rubin highlights the mixed messaging from the CDC and government officials, particularly Rochelle Walensky and Jen Psaki, suggesting they are not following scientific guidance. He also addresses the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, emphasizing misinformation and the complexities of the situation, particularly regarding Israel and Hamas. He praises Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's responses to media questions about civilian casualties and critiques the international community's expectations of Israel. Additionally, Rubin comments on the U.S. Army's focus on climate change as a national security threat, arguing it distracts from more pressing issues like China and Russia. He concludes by promoting a positive outlook, encouraging viewers to find humor in current events and to engage with his content on various platforms.

Dave Rubin discusses several key topics in his July 12, 2021, episode. He critiques Vice President Kamala Harris for suggesting that rural Americans can't photocopy IDs, arguing this reflects a "soft bigotry of low expectations." He highlights massive anti-government protests in Cuba, emphasizing that demonstrators seek freedom from a communist regime, contrasting their motives with the Biden administration's framing of the protests as COVID-related. Rubin also addresses the White House's promotion of systemic racism and critical race theory in education, asserting that the administration is misleading about the teaching of American history. He criticizes CNN for its aggressive stance against unvaccinated individuals, citing calls for vaccine mandates and the potential consequences for those who choose not to comply. Rubin concludes by reflecting on the political landscape, noting the divide within the Democratic Party and the future of the GOP, while encouraging viewers to engage in discussions on these pressing issues.

Senator Elizabeth Warren’s interview sharply rebukes the abundance movement and the prioritization of corporate donors in Democratic messaging. She argues the party must confront oligarchs and tackle rising family costs, advocating concrete, supply-boosting policies and a broader, trust-based coalition with working people. The discussion emphasizes why Democrats should not dilute their approach to please billionaires, instead pushing a robust agenda that lowers costs, expands housing supply, and strengthens consumer protection through measures like credit card caps and streamlined taxation. Warren recounts a recent phone call with Donald Trump in which she claims he signaled openness to action on credit card rates, but she insists on real, enacted solutions rather than rhetoric. The conversation also highlights a bipartisan housing bill she helped advance with Tim Scott and the obstacles it faces in the House, underscoring the gap between political talk and legislative progress. The message calls for bold leadership that centers ordinary families and democracy over billionaire-backed interests, and frames the upcoming election as a test of Democratic resolve.

The episode centers on a charged on-air exchange between Bill Maher and Ana Kasparian, using their debate as a lens on media narratives, political alignments, and cultural fault lines. The host frames the confrontation as a test of honesty and accountability, pressing Kasparian on how she would navigate dress and autonomy in conservative Middle Eastern contexts while noting how ideological commitments can trap public figures in contradictory positions. The discussion broadens to immigration, crime, and national policy, with the host arguing that destabilization abroad and supply of migrants must be weighed against safety and civil liberties at home, and he challenges a left-leaning stance that often avoids naming hard realities about risk and behavior. Throughout, he anchors his claims with selective data points and anecdotes about crime rates, policy decisions, and migration, inviting listeners to scrutinize mainstream narratives and consider how media framing shapes public perception. The conversation pivots to domestic U.S. politics, spotlighting Minnesota crime statistics, Somali and immigrant communities, and the balance between law enforcement and civil rights. The host contrasts what he sees as bureaucratic complicity or “woke” excuses with calls for law-and-order measures, while he also critiques media coverage and political rhetoric that he views as overblown or hypocritical. He threads in remarks about the 2024-25 political climate, Trump’s foreign policy wins, and how international actions intersect with domestic concerns, arguing that patriotic governance should pursue clarity, accountability, and practical results rather than ideological purity. The segment also touches on vaccine policy, transparency in medical data, and debates within public health discourse, framing these issues as test cases for trust in institutions and the public’s right to information as policy evolves. The episode closes with reflections on personal responsibility, culture, and spirituality as counterweights to pervasive cynicism. A recurring theme is how technology, media ecosystems, and political activism shape collective beliefs, sometimes at the expense of measured analysis. The host uses cultural examples, from social media discourse to school district debates, to illustrate how quickly narratives can become tribal and how audiences demand simplified certainties. He ends by highlighting Charlie Kirk’s book as a touchstone for personal discipline and balance, while inviting viewers to tune into the postgame discussion and consider how informed, nuanced conversations might counteract sensationalism in today’s public square.

Dave Rubin announces an upcoming interview with former President Donald Trump, emphasizing that nothing is off-limits. He discusses the current political landscape, asserting that Democrats have shifted towards socialism and are attempting a federal takeover of elections, which he believes contradicts the Constitution. Rubin critiques White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki for her handling of election-related questions, linking state voting laws to the January 6th insurrection narrative. He highlights Georgia's SB 202 law, arguing it aims to enhance election security rather than suppress voting. Additionally, he comments on the Emmys' decision to eliminate gendered awards, suggesting Hollywood's shift towards wokeness is damaging the industry. Finally, he notes Coca-Cola's diversity policies may violate anti-discrimination laws, indicating a backlash against woke corporate practices. Rubin encourages audience engagement for his Trump interview and promotes his local community platform.

Megyn Kelly discusses the recent turmoil in corporate media, including Joy Reid's firing from MSNBC and the backlash against Jeff Bezos for influencing the Washington Post's opinion page. She highlights the media's outrage over Elon Musk's involvement in a Trump cabinet meeting, contrasting it with the lack of criticism when Jill Biden attended a similar meeting. Buck Sexton argues that the media's criticism of Musk is desperate, noting his success in addressing inefficiencies in government. They discuss the misuse of foreign aid, with Representative Tim Burchett revealing that U.S. funds have been sent to terrorist organizations, including Hamas. Sexton emphasizes that USAID should focus on advancing U.S. interests rather than funding terrorism. They also touch on the internal culture of intelligence agencies, suggesting that leftist ideologies have infiltrated these institutions, compromising their effectiveness. Kelly and Sexton express concern over the White House's decision to control the press pool, arguing that an independent press is vital for democracy. They debate the implications of the administration selecting who covers the president, emphasizing the need for experienced reporters in critical roles. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the changing landscape of media and the importance of accountability in both government and journalism.

Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, has referred documents to the DOJ regarding alleged criminal behavior by former President Obama, claiming he led the creation of a manufactured intelligence assessment. Gabbard suggests this constitutes a treasonous conspiracy against the American people and President Trump. The core allegation stems from a House Intelligence report analyzing the Obama administration's intelligence on Russian interference, which Gabbard claims relied on flawed intelligence to support a narrative of Trump collusion. The report indicates that the assertion of Putin's preference for Trump was based on weak evidence. Additionally, it was revealed that the FBI suppressed a briefing stating Russia lacked the intent to hack election infrastructure. The discussion highlights the complexities of the situation, including the political motivations behind the allegations and the challenges of pursuing charges against a former president.

On October 20, 2022, Dave Rubin discusses the political landscape, focusing on AOC's declining popularity and the potential for conservatives to regain power. He emphasizes the need for a post-woke world where Americans can unite across political lines. Rubin highlights Tulsi Gabbard's departure from the Democratic Party and her alignment with Republicans, suggesting that figures like MLK and JFK would lean towards conservatism today. He critiques Stacey Abrams for her controversial comments linking abortion to inflation, arguing that such rhetoric is out of touch with voters' concerns about daily living costs. Rubin also addresses the Democrats' strategy to maintain power amid unfavorable polling, including Biden's release of oil reserves to lower gas prices before the midterms. He contrasts this with the previous administration's energy policies and discusses the Republican agenda, which includes repealing new IRS agents and focusing on economic issues. Rubin concludes by advocating for a return to foundational American values, urging viewers to engage in the electoral process and support candidates who prioritize freedom and unity.

The episode dissected a tense town hall exchange involving Alyssa Slotkin, framing questions about her stance on Israel, APAC funding, and how Democratic base voters perceive her positions. The discussion emphasizes the tension between party moderation and the activist left, highlighting how Slotkin’s responses were interpreted as defensive and out of step with a base that is increasingly critical of Israel’s policy direction and the influence of pro-Israel lobbying money. Hosts and guest contributors debate the accuracy and implications of donor networks, arguing that identifying APAC influence requires careful scrutiny of funding pathways and the differences between government policy positions and the broader political discourse. They also critique how questions about anti-Semitism are asked and received, noting how framing and terminology can affect voters’ trust and the perceived sincerity of politicians facing scrutiny. The conversation then shifts to polling and messaging, with analysts presenting Michigan primary data showing strong correlations between perceived APAC stances and voter trust in a candidate to represent Michiganders on other issues. The dialogue underscores that voters across age groups and ideological leanings expressed varying levels of familiarity with Hassan and Abdul El-Sayed, while showing a clear pattern: standing up to APAC is a litmus test that can significantly shape support. The panel remarks on the broader media ecosystem’ s handling of Israel-related questions, the role of independent outlets in shaping public understanding, and the strategic moves by candidates to craft a middle-ground image in a highly polarized environment. Throughout, the emphasis remains on the policy implications, not personal affiliations, and on how campaigns’ messaging about Israel, advocacy groups, and fundraising shapes electoral dynamics.

In this episode of Breaking Points, the hosts dissect how large MAGA accounts based overseas surged after Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover, revealing a pattern of foreign-origin voices shaping American political discourse for profit. They highlight a slide of accounts—MAGA Nation, Ivanka Trump News, Ultra Maga, and others—whose bases are in Bangladesh, Nigeria, Japan, New Zealand, and beyond, and discuss how monetization and verification changes attracted international players to fuel division for cash. The conversation moves from curiosity to concern about the authenticity of online influence, noting that many of these accounts are misspelled, impostor, or clearly foreign-operated personas designed to harvest engagement. They argue this ecosystem inflated perceived support for certain ideologies, misled Republicans about popularity, and worsened polarization. The hosts admit personal monetization on Twitter is modest compared with other platforms and emphasize skepticism toward online claims, urging viewers to verify origins rather than assume authenticity.

In this a16z podcast episode, Margot van Maha's discusses media evolution with Claire Cain Miller (New York Times), Alexis Madrigal (Atlantic), and Connie Guglielmo (CNET). They explore the impact of internet disruption on traditional media. Alexis highlights the challenge of adapting to rapid changes, noting that Facebook dominates traffic. Connie, as CNET's new editor-in-chief, emphasizes the need for engaging storytelling in a digital landscape, advocating for a return to long-form journalism. Claire introduces the Upshot, a new analytical section at the Times, focusing on interdisciplinary reporting that goes beyond mere news delivery. The conversation also touches on the importance of analytics in shaping content and distribution strategies, with a consensus that deeper, more analytical stories resonate better with audiences. They discuss the evolving role of technology in journalism, the necessity for compelling narratives, and the challenge of maintaining journalistic integrity amid commercial pressures. Ultimately, they stress the importance of understanding the "so what" behind stories to engage readers effectively.

Dave Rubin shares his excitement for Thanksgiving, encouraging viewers to enjoy the holiday without engaging in divisive discussions. He discusses Jen Psaki's evasive responses regarding President Biden's comments on Kyle Rittenhouse, highlighting her failure to apologize for labeling him a white supremacist. Rubin also mentions a recent Trump interview where he criticizes the mainstream media as corrupt and the "enemy of the people," asserting that their biased reporting prevents national unity. He notes MSNBC's realization that progressive policies are harming cities like San Francisco and Portland. Lastly, he humorously addresses Nancy Pelosi's move to Florida, questioning her wealth and hypocrisy regarding climate change, and suggests a sitcom idea about her life in a conservative community. Rubin concludes by wishing everyone a happy Thanksgiving and expressing gratitude for his audience.