reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker describes digitally verified ID and its growth in China. In China, a traffic camera can catch you jaywalking, and the digital ID system has your blood, genetic code, and photograph, plus it can identify how you walk. So even without a visible face, you can be picked up by gate. It will convict you of jaywalking and take money out of your bank account with no intermediating judiciary at all and show a picture of you to the people in the neighborhood, so they know that you have jaywalked and reduce your social credit score. If your social credit score falls below a certain level, then you can't you can't buy drinks from a vending machine. You can't play video games. You can't go on a train. You can't get out of your fifteen minute city. All that's already in place in China. Do you think that that's that would be helpful or unhelpful? It would be I think it would bring in and has already in China. I think it'll bring in a totalitarian tyranny. So 100% complete that it would make George Orwell's 1984 look like a picnic.

In China, if caught jaywalking by a traffic camera, the digital ID system with your blood, genetic code, and photo can identify you by your walk. It convicts you, deducts money from your bank account, and publicly shames you, lowering your social credit score. A low score restricts buying drinks, playing games, riding trains, or leaving your city. This system is already in place in China.

Speaker 0: What about the public attitude held by millions of everyday Americans? All I've got on a computer is pictures of my family, CCTV cameras that are prevalent in a ton of American cities and overseas capitals. Those cameras are your friend if you're innocent and have nothing to hide. Speaker 1: Well, I'd say that's very much what the average Chinese citizen believed or perhaps even still to this day believes. But we see how these same technologies are being applied to create what they call the social credit system. If any of these family photos, if any of your activities online, if your purchases, if your associations, if your friends are in any way different from what the government or the powers that be of the moment would like them to be, you're no longer able to purchase train tickets. You're no longer able to board an airplane. You may not be able to get a passport. You may not be eligible for a job. You might not be able to work for the government. All of these things are increasingly being created and programmed and decided by algorithms, and those algorithms are fueled by precisely the innocent data that our devices are creating all of the time constantly, invisibly, quietly right now. Our devices are casting all of these records that we do not see being created, that in aggregate seem very innocent. Even if you can't see the content of these communications, the activity records, what the government calls metadata, which they argue they do not need a warrant to collect, tells the whole story. And these activity records are being created and shared and collected and intercepted constantly by companies and governments. And ultimately it means as they sell these, as they trade these, as they make their businesses on the backs of these records, what they are selling is not information, what they are selling is us. They're selling our future. They're selling our past. They are selling our history, our identity, and ultimately, they are stealing our power.

Speaker 0 argues that for many years, dating back to the 1990s, looking at China today reveals what might be planned for the West tomorrow. In particular, China has millions of cameras in the cities equipped with facial recognition technology, enabling them to locate you in minutes wherever you are. This system operates alongside a social credit framework: people earn points for behaviors that align with the government’s preferences and lose points for actions that don’t. If you lose enough credits, you are excluded from mainstream society. The speaker notes that during the COVID-19 period, people who refused to get the jab or to wear masks were excluded from mainstream society, describing that as a pre-run or preview of where society could be headed. The argument is that, in China, losing enough credits means you cannot board trains or planes and you cannot function within mainstream society. The speaker contends that this social credit system is rapidly moving into the West, facilitated by digital identity, digital currency, and AI-driven control over many aspects of life. The transcript highlights examples of ongoing surveillance- and control-related measures in Western contexts, such as supermarkets that require a QR code for entry. It questions what happens to those who do not want to participate in such a system, asking what if someone doesn’t have a smartphone. It notes that in some cases, entry to places like supermarkets could be denied if you lack the required digital credentials. The speaker also points out that payments might be made with a fingerprint, indicating that this is part of a broader shift toward pervasive digital and biometric controls. Overall, the speaker presents a narrative in which China’s social credit and pervasive surveillance serve as a template for Western adoption, suggesting a future where digital IDs, digital currencies, AI governance, and biometric verification create a tightly controlled social order, with access to everyday activities and services contingent on compliance with the system.

We must not allow the elimination of cash. If we rely solely on central bank digital currencies, the computer will anticipate our actions and prevent us from doing certain things. For instance, if there is a restriction on traveling beyond 5 miles from home and you attempt to buy water 6 miles away, you will be denied. There are numerous reasons why it is important to keep cash.

A woman in Nanjing follows social ranking rules to maintain a good social credit score. Her purchases, like nappies, reflect positively on her. Only 18,000 out of 8,000,000 people are model citizens in this city. Good scores bring discounts on public services, while low scores lead to loss of rights. Those with a score of 0 are blacklisted, like journalist Liu Hu who uncovered corruption. Being blacklisted means no bank loans, starting a business, or buying an apartment.

I tried making payments in a Chinese supermarket without money, card, or phone. I scanned my face and the payment was done in seconds. What do you think? Is this amazing technology or just weird and unnecessary? Let me know in the comments.

Leo Hu, a journalist, was banned from flying and placed on a list of untrustworthy people after a court deemed his apology for tweets insincere. He reports being restricted from buying property and sending his child to private school. China is assigning every citizen a social credit score that fluctuates based on behaviors; community service and buying Chinese products can raise it, while fraud, tax evasion, and smoking in non-smoking areas can lower it. Surveillance cameras, capable of recognizing over 4,000 vehicles, enable this system. SenseTime CEO Shu Li says their smart cameras can identify adults, children, males, and females. Ken DeWoskin says the scoring system's workings are secret and could be abused by the government to impact and shape behavior. The government may use the system to punish those deemed not loyal enough to the Communist party, and there is no due process to fight the score.

You're in London on a business trip, staying in Greenwich and looking to buy food. At a local shop, you're stopped by a barrier requiring a QR code to enter and make purchases. This setup is seen as the start of a digital prison.

I don't have money because my account hasn't been deposited with 3,600 pesos yet. I'm not sure if it goes into my bank account. Can you check? Also, is there any balance on that card?

A person in London attempts to enter an Aldi's grocery store in Greenwich but is stopped by a barrier. To enter, customers must scan a QR code at the entrance. The speaker suggests this is the beginning of a "digital prison."

In London, a person on a business trip in Greenwich wants to buy food at a local Aldi's. However, they encounter a barrier at the entrance that requires a QR code to be scanned before entering. This situation is seen as the initial steps towards a digital prison.

The speaker describes Thailand implementing a biometric-based system that consolidates everything under one roof and ID folder, enabling authorities to “switch you off at the touch of a button.” Suddenly, over 3,000,000 people had their bank accounts shut down, causing a banking crisis as biometric data is used in every facet of life. Every banking transaction is monitored and scrutinized; any perceived discrepancy is flagged as fraud and punished without due process. Regulations overwhelmed the system, resulting in a full-fledged banking crisis. Over 3,000,000 Thai bank accounts were frozen instantaneously without warning. Transactions are denied, and when people contact their bank to understand why payments failed, they learn that their entire account has been frozen. The bank is investigating them for suspicious activity and potential money laundering or fraud, with no warning, no call or letter, and no clarification about which transaction was flagged. People are completely locked out of their accounts, losing the ability to purchase, fill their gas tanks, or buy groceries. They have been removed from the financial system, and there is no indication of when, or if, they will regain access to their funds. This is the reality for millions of people banking in Thailand. The situation caused widespread fear and panic, leading retailers to stop accepting cards and demand cash, as they also worry about being removed from the banking system. Confidence in the government and the entire banking system evaporated. People rationally fear that their accounts will be targeted next without warning. Government overreach backfired, causing people to withdraw from the banking system altogether, and the speaker notes this as a positive development to see people keeping cash alive. The speaker suggests the episode serves as a test case for what digital ID is going to do and as a warning against accepting it. The closing remark states that the controversy over Charlie Kirk is less important than what will be done with this technology. What matters, according to the speaker, is what they’re going to do with it.

The speaker describes a system introduced in Thailand that centralizes biometric data and requires all ID and financial information to be under one roof. They claim this led to an immediate, nationwide disruption: "simultaneously, over 3,000,000 people had their bank accounts shut down." Thailand is framed as a case study for the use of biometric data in every facet of life, with "Every banking transaction [being] monitored and scrutinized." Any perceived discrepancy is said to be flagged as fraud and punished without due process. According to the speaker, regulations overwhelmed the system, resulting in a "full fledged banking crisis." They assert that "Over 3,000,000 Thai bank accounts were frozen instantaneously without warning as a result of government overreach." When people attempt to check why a payment failed, they are reportedly told that their account has been frozen. The claim is that "All of your accounts for that matter" are frozen, and the bank is "investigating you for suspicious activity and potential money laundering or fraud." There is said to be "no warning, call, or letter, and there is no clarification as to what transaction was flagged." The outcome is described as being "completely locked out of your accounts," losing the ability to purchase, fill your gas tank, or buy groceries. The speaker notes that millions are facing this reality in Thailand, and that the situation has "freaked the entire country out." They add that "thousands of accounts are frozen each week" and that panic has ensued. Retailers are no longer accepting cards and are demanding payment in cash as they worry about being removed from the banking system. Confidence in the government and the entire banking system is said to have evaporated, with people "rationally fear[ing] that their account will be targeted next without warning." The speaker asserts that government overreach has backfired, leading people to remove themselves from the banking system entirely, which they describe as "a really good thing to see, folks." The narrative frames this as a backlash that demonstrates the necessity of keeping cash alive and relying less on a digital system. It is presented as a test case for what the digital ID will do, and a warning against accepting it. The speaker contends that many warnings have been issued for a long time, and emphasizes the need for people to see what is happening. In closing, they say, "All everyone's been arguing over whether Charlie Kirk died or whether he didn't. It doesn't matter. What matters is what they're gonna do with it."

I implanted an RFID chip in my hand to open doors, but it doesn't work. I also have a scar from the procedure.

Three Australian cases illustrate bank overreach amid crypto, Know Your Customer rules and digital-ID talk. A woman known as Mantra Moments says a bank froze her account after a crypto purchase; after a second attempt, staff asked for private information about a friend. “Your restriction stays for two more days,” and “We’re keeping you safe,” she says, leaving her unable to pay rent. In another case, a customer withdrawing cash for construction faced demands for invoices; maximum without proof is $4,000 a day; “we need proof” and “there's a lot of scams... protect you from being reckless.” A third story: Katie McMaster was locked out of HSBC, told to verify identity with “100 points of ID” after no suspicious activity; recall of “know your customer” and warnings that digital ID/digital currency/social credit are coming. Promo: free webinar Oct 9 privacyacademy.com/pulse.

The speaker received their phone back from the feds today, and it was completely destroyed. It was a thousand dollar Samsung phone. The speaker is upset and questions why the phone was destroyed. The SIM card is also missing. The speaker believes the SIM card was kept because it contained videos from January 6 showing cops beating people. The speaker plans to sue.

Zhang Yingjie cosigned a loan for a friend who defaulted, and despite paying his share, his social credit score was affected. Consequently, he was among millions blocked from purchasing high-speed train tickets and flights due to low social credit. To improve his score, Zhang donates money at a community office, believing it will go to charity, though he doesn't monitor where the donations actually go. Despite the system negatively impacting him, Zhang supports the government's social credit system. By 2020, China intends to track, rate, reward, and punish all citizens, converting personal experiences into transactions. Zhang, having regained his high score, is content with the system.

Access. I say it's a total loss of privacy and it's set up for control. Miss it, and you'll be stuck in immigration. Airport shut down, flights grounded, not dictated by the OECD, where one late payment dings your score. What's for sure is Vietnam is the test and America is next. I've seen this movie in other countries. The trailer says efficiency, the plot twist is control, leaving room for abuse. Vietnam sells this as part of agenda twenty forty five, and the fallout was apocalyptic. This exposes the trap. One glitch and you're practically locked out of your own life. Picture this. You are sipping your cafe sedan in Saigon and scrolling your banking app, and boom, your bank account vanishes in thin air. No email. No warning. Just a digital black hole where your money used to be. Sounds like a nightmare.

Tickets for Fazil Fears, regular or VIP. Can't take a large bill. Use my debit instead. Need ID or driver's license. Gotta make a copy every time you swipe. New policy. Don't want copies of my cards everywhere. Don't want it stolen? Not responsible. Can pay with cash. It's fine. This place feels weird. Strange policy. When did it start? 3228. What? Hold on. Tried to pay with a 100, they said... Let's get out of here.

Zhang Injie cosigned a loan for a friend who later skipped out, resulting in him being blocked from buying high-speed train tickets. To improve his social credit score, Zhang donates money at a local community office, although he doesn't know where the donations go. China plans to track, rate, reward, and punish all citizens by 2020. Despite the system causing him some suffering, Zhang supports the government's efforts. In another scene, the speaker is in a Walmart in London, noticing surveillance cameras in unexpected places like the meat and egg sections. The speaker questions the purpose of these cameras.

We're withdrawing funds to pay the workers today. I've noticed banks are becoming more difficult. To withdraw $5,000, they're asking for a Social Security number and ID at Bank of America and Chase. It's strange because when we opened the account, they only asked for a passport, and we opened it with $200. Now, they're asking for many requirements, maybe policies are changing. I hope this doesn't affect loans. I used to get loans with just a number, though the interest was a bit high. I want to see if I can still submit documents to buy a house, and I'll keep you informed. It's concerning because when you enter the bank, they look at you with suspicion. We'll see how things continue according to the laws. Greetings to all, and let's keep moving forward.

Speaker 0: Once you've got everything under one roof and you've got all your ID together in one place, it means you can be switched off at the touch of a button. So they brought this system in in Thailand, and suddenly, like simultaneously, over 3,000,000 people had their bank accounts shut down. Thailand has become a case study for the use of biometric data in every facet of life. Every banking transaction is monitored and scrutinized. Any perceived discrepancies flagged as fraud and punished without due process. Regulations have overwhelmed the system resulting in a full fledged banking crisis. Over 3,000,000 Thai bank accounts were frozen instantaneously without warning as a result of government overreach. Transaction denied, you'd contact your bank to see why the payment failed only to learn that your account has been frozen, all of your accounts for that matter. The bank is investigating you for suspicious activity and potential money laundering or fraud. There was no warning, call, or letter, and there is no clarification as to what transaction was flagged. You're completely locked out of your accounts. You have lost the ability to purchase. You cannot fill your gas tank. You cannot purchase groceries. You've been completely removed from the financial system, and you do not know when or if you will regain access to your funds. This is the reality for millions of people banking in Thailand. That's crazy stuff, folks, and this freaked the entire country out. But the article goes on to say, thousands of accounts are frozen each week. Panic has ensued. Retailers are no longer accepting cards demanding payment in cash as they too are worried that they will be removed from the banking system. Confidence in the government and the entire banking system evaporated. People rationally fear that their account will be targeted next without warning. Government overreach has backfired, and the people are removing themselves from the banking system entirely. And that's a really good thing to see, folks. Yeah. So it backfired, and it caused the people in Thailand to see how much they need to keep cash alive and depend on cash. And it's saying it serves as a test case for what this digital ID is gonna do. Well, it also serves as a test case for why you shouldn't accept it. And so many of us have been warning about this for so long, folks, and it's imperative that people see this because this is what's been going on. All everyone's been arguing over whether Charlie Kirk died or whether he didn't, it doesn't matter. What matters is what they're gonna do with it.

In China, there is a disturbing situation where I am unable to buy food. My uncle and cousin helped me get a cell phone linked to a Chinese bank card, but now it has been flagged. I have to go through facial recognition verification just to use my gift card balance on this debit card. It's terrifying to open my mouth for verification. Thankfully, the Chinese app is not racist, but unfortunately, I did not pass the verification.

Speaker 0 asserts that the control grid arrived in America via Apple, stating they worked for Apple for seventeen years and still hold stock, so they find no joy in revealing this. They claim there are no good guys here and argue that we need to shut it down while we can. They state that Apple just rolled out digital ID integration and acknowledge it sounds convenient, but warn that every convenience has a price. According to them, once identity goes digital, it becomes programmable, and once programmable, it becomes controllable. They contend that individuals are handing over their entire identity wrapped in a product, a file that can easily be deleted. If one does not comply, access is lost; if opinions are not liked, accounts are frozen. They claim that stepping out of line results in travel restrictions, bank transfer blocks, and loss of benefits. They insist this is not speculation and that it is already live. Examples are offered to illustrate the claim: Thailand has programmable digital currency; Europe introduced biometric wallets; Canada froze accounts during protests; China is described as having started the pilot and now in full production mode with a live social credit system. They assert that China is secretly building the infrastructure at a global level right now, not through laws or force, but through updates and convenience. They claim that in Vietnam, 86,000,000 bank accounts were deleted because people wouldn’t agree to a digital ID. Concerning the European Union, they state that by 2027, large cash payments will be outlawed, forcing people onto digital rails that can be controlled. They describe this as just the on ramp, arguing that freedom becomes conditional when identity is controlled by a corporation or a government that can revoke it with a keystroke. They describe the arrival of dystopia as occurring not with tanks or force, but with app updates or convenience. They conclude by urging listeners to pay attention and push back while they still can. The message ends with an appeal to “Let’s go,” emphasizing urgency to resist the rollout of digital identity and programmable control embedded in convenient updates and services.