reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Our borders will extend from Lebanon to Saudi Arabia and from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, where the Kurds, our allies, are located. We have the Mediterranean behind us and the Kurds in front, with Lebanon needing Israel's protection. Additionally, we plan to take Mecca, Medina, and Mount Sinai to purify these significant locations.

Israel will remain in the Missouri corridor and eventually expand to all of Gaza, turning it into a resort with golf courses and beachside communities. The speaker believes people will prefer this over Tel Aviv.

We are taking over houses in this area to make it a Jewish neighborhood. Our goal is to make all of East Jerusalem like West Jerusalem, the Jewish capital of Israel. We will continue to the next neighborhood to fulfill our dream.

Petzales Mothritch a une vision maximaliste de la terre promise. Elle inclut les territoires palestiniens, mais aussi des territoires en Jordanie, en Syrie, au Liban, en Irak, en Égypte ou encore en Arabie saoudite. **English Translation:** Petzales Mothritch has a maximalist vision of the promised land. It includes the Palestinian territories, but also territories in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt, and even Saudi Arabia.

Malia Domino interviews Daniela Weisz, a founder of the settler movement. Weisz reveals her close collaboration with Ariel Sharon to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state by strategically spreading Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria. Despite international criticism, settlements continue to expand. When asked about the hope for a Palestinian child to have their own state, Weisz asserts that the land was promised to the Jews by God, making any historical or political changes irrelevant. She firmly believes that Palestinians have no chance of achieving statehood at any point in history.

Je suis prête à envoyer mon fils à l'armée pour récupérer nos terres, peu importe les dommages collatéraux. En tant que juif, c'est notre devoir. Nous devons guider les autres, mais ne sauvons pas les vies des Gazaouis. Nous devons agir pour notre peuple, même si cela va à l'encontre de l'opinion publique. Il est temps d'agir sans se soucier des conséquences.

Ayman Ramel from Beirut sent in a super chat saying today was very tough as Southern Lebanon faced ongoing devastation, with the scene described as Israel’s continued bombing of Southern Lebanon in real time. The IRGC (Iran) characterized the attacks as an Israeli savage massacre, claiming hundreds killed in one of the biggest strikes on its capital, and pledged revenge. Tehran called the action a breach of the ceasefire with the United States and claimed it represented a historic and crushing defeat for the US, promising retaliation against Israel. Israel’s IDF spokesperson said they would continue operations against Hezbollah as long as Hezbollah threatened Israeli civilians, accusing Hezbollah of targeting civilian infrastructure and displaying video of attacks in a populated city center. An initial casualty figure cited before the broadcast was around 256, but the number was believed to be higher. Ben Swan, an independent journalist, joined to provide on-the-ground context from Beirut. He reported that numbers of dead ranged from about 280 to 350, with injuries around 1,500. He noted more than 100 locations bombed that morning, highlighting the dynamic and fluid casualty count. He observed that Israel did not issue the usual warnings—no leaflets or cell-phone alerts indicating where strikes would occur—leading to civilians, including women and children, being killed with little or no forewarning. He emphasized that the affected areas in Southern Lebanon are historically Christian and home to long-standing communities, noting connections to biblical sites in the region (e.g., Cana’s wedding and Peter’s burial site) to illustrate the demographic being affected. He claimed Israel’s stated objective is to take Southern Lebanon up to the Litani River and to integrate it into a broader “Greater Israel” project, with Netanyahu’s office reportedly warning Lebanon’s army to move away from a bridge crossing the Litani River as a strategic target. This would geographically separate Northern and Southern Lebanon, according to the narrative aired. The discussion touched on broader political themes including debates about whether Israel’s actions reflect a broader tactic to project power or to distract from other regional pressures. The conversation linked the conflict to perceptions of American influence and strategy, including whether the United States has leverage to influence Israel’s actions. Some participants argued that US influence exists and that global opinion has grown more critical of Israel, citing condemnation from European leaders and shifts in international sentiment. They argued that Israel’s messaging has been effective in focusing attention on Iran, potentially allowing actions in Lebanon to proceed with less scrutiny. The speakers explored the idea that the conflict is part of a broader geopolitical strategy, including claims that the war serves to advance the so-called “Greater Israel” project, and discussed how Western powers, notably the United States, are perceived as entangled in regional dynamics. They contrasted perceived Israeli tactics with Russia’s more deliberate approach in Ukraine, suggesting Israel’s strategy aims to destroy civilian infrastructure to prevent return to the territory, whereas Russia has pursued more selective destruction. The program suggested that if China and other nations condemn the actions, international pressure could intensify, potentially escalating beyond a regional conflict. The speakers referenced a report from Breaking the Silence about Israel’s past Gaza operations, describing it as a “construction project” of destruction, to illustrate a pattern of strategic demolition of civilian infrastructure. In summary, the segment described an intensified conflict in Southern Lebanon with high casualties and widespread bombings, alleged lack of civilian warnings, and discussions about strategic objectives, US influence, and broader geopolitical implications, including potential global ramifications if international responses intensify.

The speaker claims that Israel's borders will eventually extend from Lebanon to the Great Desert (Saudi Arabia) and from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates. The Kurds are described as being on the other side of the Euphrates and as friends. Lebanon is said to need Israel's protection. The speaker believes Israel will take Mecca, Medina, and Mount Sinai and purify those places.

Gaza, malgré un blocus et la famine, est aujourd'hui complètement détruite par l'armée israélienne, considérée comme la plus morale du monde. Soixante-dix mille tonnes de bombes ont été envoyées sur la population civile, soit l'équivalent de quatre à cinq fois Hiroshima et Nagasaki. Benyamin Netanyahou a effacé la Cisjordanie, intégrant tous les territoires palestiniens à Israël. Gaza est complètement détruite, car Israël sait que le monde est à genoux devant eux. Les États-Unis, l'Europe et la France soutiennent ce génocide, cette opération ethnique et cette colonisation. **Translation:** Gaza, despite a blockade and famine, is now completely destroyed by the Israeli army, considered the most moral in the world. Seventy thousand tons of bombs were sent to the civilian population, the equivalent of four to five times Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Benjamin Netanyahu has erased the West Bank, integrating all Palestinian territories into Israel. Gaza is completely destroyed because Israel knows that the world is on its knees before them. The United States, Europe, and France support this genocide, this ethnic operation, and this colonization.

Greater Israel refers to Israel's control over territories including the West Bank, Golan Heights, and East Jerusalem, all captured in 1967. Netanyahu has stated that these areas will not be returned, citing safety concerns and a reluctance to negotiate peace or a Palestinian state. Additionally, some religious zealots believe that biblical texts justify claiming land from the Nile to the Euphrates, which could extend Israel's territory to parts of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Egypt. These beliefs drive a faction within the government that seeks to expand Israel's borders based on religious convictions.

There is no such thing as a Palestinian, and this has been a political tool to try to force land away from Israel. A two-state solution, if it means two governments holding the same piece of real estate, is irrational and unworkable. If there is a two-state solution, the Palestinian state needs to be outside the boundaries of the nation of Israel. There is plenty of land in the world to create a Palestinian state. There is no such thing as a West Bank; it's Judea and Samaria. There is no such thing as a settlement; they are communities, neighborhoods, and cities. There is no such thing as an occupation.

We are determined to make history and change the entire landscape. We believe that the Jordan River to the Middle East belongs to us, as it was promised. We do not acknowledge the existence of a Palestinian nation. We consider ourselves superior and have recently abandoned our moral compass. We support and advocate for more bombings, particularly in Baghdad. We view this as a battle between good and evil. The only innocent people in Gaza are the hostages, and once they return to Israel, we plan to take control of hospitals and tunnels. We firmly believe that we are the center of the world, and this is widely recognized.

For 30 years, I've been consistent in saying that the conflict isn't about a Palestinian state, but the existence of a Jewish state. Every time we've given up land, we faced terror. Israel must control the entire area from the river to the sea. A prime minister must be able to say no to even the best of friends, to protect our country. Translation (if needed): The speaker emphasizes the importance of Israel maintaining control over the entire region to prevent terrorism, and the need for a prime minister to be able to say no when necessary.

The speaker discusses the expansion of Israeli settlements into the Jordanian territory and expresses their belief that the borders of Israel should extend from the Nile to the Euphrates. They state that any land conquered by Israel will become part of the country and that the role of the Israeli people is to conquer the land and remove non-Jews from it. The speaker openly admits to being racist, preferring Jews over Arabs in various aspects of life. Another speaker briefly mentions the American conquest of Native American territory.

We believe in keeping Gaza Strip part of Israel. We plan to build towns there with 500 families ready to move in. It's too valuable to leave to terrorists.

Nous, les catholiques, avons commis la Shoah et avons fait payer les musulmans après. Les Palestiniens ont été trompés par Israël. La souffrance continue, et la terre promise conquise par Israël remet en question sa légitimité. La promesse d'Israël est en réalité pour toute la terre, basée sur la foi en Dieu et en l'amour. Translation: We, Catholics, committed the Shoah and made Muslims pay for it. Palestinians were deceived by Israel. The suffering continues, and the land promised to Israel questions its legitimacy. Israel's promise is actually for the entire earth, based on faith in God and love.

Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea.

Speaker 0 explains that Netanyahu evokes Jewish history in his religious text and sentiment to rally support for attacks, and that Nurode explains this increases right-wing sentiment in Israel. Speaker 1 notes that when Netanyahu announced the offensive against Iran, he did not just discuss threats but invoked Jewish history, drawing parallels with Jews rising up against Persian enslavement more than two thousand years ago. Speaker 2 adds: “My brothers and sisters, in two days, we celebrate the holiday of Purim. Two thousand five hundred years ago in ancient Persia, an enemy rose against us with the exact same goal of destroying our people.” Speaker 1 continues: “A day later, Netanyahu invoked scripture describing the government in Tehran as Amalek, the ultimate enemy in the Old Testament, the enemy whose memory and existence must be erased.” Speaker 2: “We read in this week's Torah portions. Remember what Amalek did to you. We remember and we act.” Speaker 1 remarks that this is not the first time Netanyahu has used the Amalek reference to justify violence against an adversary. In fact, his reference to Palestinians as Amalek was cited during hearings in the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. Speaker 0 states that inciting religious fervor is not unique to Netanyahu; it’s a popular tactic among right-wing and populist leaders to rally support, and it often pays off. She cites opinion polls to illustrate how widespread these sentiments are: a Hebrew University poll on Israel’s war on Gaza found 75% of Jewish Israelis believe there are no innocence in Gaza; a survey by the Institute for National Security released last month shows 78% of Israelis consider Iran a serious threat. Speaker 1 adds that mixing scripture with mainstream politics is playing with fire and has led to talk of a greater Israel spanning from the Euphrates to the Nile River and erasing existing Arab countries in the process, an ambition referenced not only by Netanyahu but also by the head of the opposition in Israel. Speaker 0 concludes with the attribution: Jahan Bin.

The speaker discusses the Zionist plan for the Middle East, known as Greater Israel. They aim to expand their territory into Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Egypt, including historic Palestine. The speaker expresses concern about this plan and suggests that Zionists will try to claim land in these countries by dividing them into smaller, weaker states, similar to what they did to the Palestinians. The speaker believes that this is why Israel's neighboring countries do not like them, as it is seen as a threat to their sovereignty. The speaker concludes by emphasizing that Zionists are determined to achieve their promised land by any means necessary.

Our borders will extend from Lebanon to Saudi Arabia's Great Desert, and from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates. On the other side of the Euphrates are the Kurds, who are our friends. Lebanon needs Israel's protection. Additionally, we aim to take control of Mecca, Medina, and Mount Sinai to purify those places.

Israel must assert its strength and declare to the United States, the international community, the European Union, and France that Jerusalem will never be divided. They do not want a Palestinian state because the borders are indefensible. The Judea and Samaria regions are the birthplace of Judaism and an integral part of Israel. It is up to us to respond with more firmness than before.

In 1946, Palestine was much larger, but has since shrunk to Gaza and the West Bank. Without a peace agreement, more Palestinian land may be taken by Jewish settlements. Israelis argue they have the right to live anywhere, but this impacts the future Palestinian state. The changing geography maps shown previously were inaccurate. Translation: In 1946, Palestine was larger, but now it's just Gaza and the West Bank. Without peace, more land may be taken by Jewish settlements. Israelis believe they can live anywhere, affecting the future Palestinian state. The maps shown before were wrong.

The speaker states to the Israeli leadership that they do not support expansionist ideas. They say the indigenous people of the land have rights that cannot be ignored, and that a fair solution must be found, not one dictated by any single group.

I support Israel keeping its borders where they are now and Palestine finding a new place to live. It may sound harsh, but that's what I believe.