TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks Chris where his mom is, and he explains she's not home from work. Chris admits he didn't call anyone when he realized she was missing because he was scared. He feels paralyzed and sinks into a sunken place, reflecting on doing nothing in the past.

A woman tells her mother that she's dropping off her three kids because she wants to live a child-free life with her new partner. The mother refuses to take responsibility for the kids, stating that it's not her plan to be a grandmother raising someone else's children. The daughter argues that her mother never taught her how to be a mother, but the mother explains that she was working full-time. The argument escalates, and the daughter eventually drives off, leaving the kids behind. The mother is shocked and tells the kids to go inside the house.

Milo is asked if he's okay and his dirty mask is pointed out. They mention watching something and being out of the water. The power went out around 5:30.

Speaker 0 questions why Rick parked so close. Rick responds that he is not supposed to be within 200 feet of a school.

Is everyone accounted for? Ma'am, is there anyone else inside? Let's get someone up here to stay with the family.

Nick Shirley initiates the exchange by stating his name and pressing for permission to record, noting that the other person “doesn’t have any permission to record me, period.” He proposes, “Can we talk outside? Permission to record.” The other person counters that there is no permission from either party, saying, “She doesn’t either have she doesn’t have permission or … for me. You cannot stop people on the street and question them.” Nick states, “We can ask them,” and the other person repeats, “Have any permission.” The dialogue shifts to a concern about the whereabouts of children. Nick asks, “Where are the children?” The other person responds, “I will sue you. You don't have any permission. We have nothing to do with this. Okay, sir? And are there … So leave.” Nick persists, asking again, “Are there children here?” The other person repeats, “Please leave.” Nick inquires, “Where are the children?” and the other person insists, “Leave. Leave.” Nick questions, “We’re wondering what's happening. Tell us what's happening here then.” The other person commands, “I said leave.” Nick clarifies, “We're wondering what's happening.” The other person states, “We are not a childcare. We have nothing to do with it. We're the common people walking. Yes. We're not … we're not accusing you. We're asking where the children are at.” The other person repeats, “Don't ask me anything.” Nick emphasizes his intent: “We're not accusing you. We're asking the daycare centers.” The other person refuses to answer, “I am not gonna answer. You have.” Nick presses, “Where are the children … who do you work for? My name is Nick Shirley.” The other person asks, “Who do you work for?” Nick responds, “I work for myself. Nick Shirley.” The other person inquires, “Okay what are you recording?” Nick answers, “We're wondering where are the children $2,660,000 for the Minnesota child care center. You're not talking to the right person. Are there children that come here?” The other person demands, “Answer the question. Are there children?” Nick states, “There's no children inside the building.”

Speaker 0 confronts someone who followed their daughter home from school. They demand an explanation and mention calling the police. Speaker 0 insists that the person knows their daughter and demands answers. They become angry and use strong language. The confrontation ends with Speaker 0 denying any wrongdoing.

A woman states she doesn't think children should be taken away from these girls without her kids present. She asks how white people feel about stopping a Black woman from going to work, pointing out the line of people they are causing. She claims she is not trying to cause problems and that they are just trying to be.

They have knives. Where is Arden? It's a nice day. What's happening up there? Where's Aaron?

A child tells his mother that Uncle Remus is gone and asks why he left. The mother responds that she doesn't know but suggests that "mother" is to blame. Another person, Miss Sally, reports that Uncle Remus is getting in a wagon to leave.

Speaker 0: Just got back from the beach and noticed all the surfers were guys. I have a question: on cloudy days, the water looks sudsy and not clear blue. Does the sun make the algae disappear? I didn't go to college, so I'm not sure.

Carmela is asked if she has anything to say to the victims' families. She is then questioned about why she was armed at school and asked to explain how it was self-defense.

A family, including several children and their mother, is leaving the building. We're wondering if this is the Auto Hotel in New York. No, it's not.

Sam: I hope that someday anybody who’s gone over there and touched that wall will never be able to walk out in public without hanging their head in shame ever again. Brian: It’s funny, Sam, because Tim Ballard was going through crazy lawfare. Glenn Beck helped him build underground railroad—they were best friends. When Sam needed or Tim needed to break a story about child trafficking, Glenn Beck was his guy. Then, when Tim was considering running for senate (or congress) and would have momentum after the Sound of Freedom release, attacks started. Glenn Beck threw him under the bus, and Sam shows him a video where Beck pledges allegiance to Israel; he’s bought and paid for, not Tim’s friend, controlled by our intelligence agencies, Israel’s bitch. He watched that video and was shocked. Sam: Brian, you probably know this. Most people don’t know this. The child ring Tim Ballard busted up in South America, the one portrayed in Sound of Freedom, was Israeli-run. It was run by Israelis. The head of that ring escaped to Portugal where a judge let him go, and nobody knows where he ended up. So that’s the real story of Sound of Freedom. It was an Israeli-run sex trafficking ring. You’re not told that. You should go research and find out who was running the ring. So a lot of intro—it’s always them, man. It always comes back to them. Brian: Every single time. Every single time. It’s like 6,000,000 to 1 odds. You know? It’s just strange how that happens. But you wanna wrap it up, Sam? Sam: Yeah. Let’s wrap it up. Listen, everybody. Twitter is not an open, superhighway of information. It is a military application. It is a propaganda operation. It is highly bodied, highly artificial, highly synthetic and manipulated. And I’m not saying don’t use it. I use it every day. We absolutely must use it as best we can. But I need everybody to be aware that not everything is as it seems on this platform. You cannot take this platform at face value. Many of the big accounts that these mainstream accounts you see coming through your feed, you cannot take them at face value. You must be aware that they’re running campaigns. They’re being paid. They’re boosted. The algorithm is being manipulated. There are bots and unauthentic accounts and fake accounts. You must be aware of the battlefield on which you’re engaging. I’m not telling you to go leave. On the contrary, I want you here, battling, but it is not what it seems. There’s a lot of smoke and mirrors and shadows and espionage and spy games on this platform. You really need to be aware of that. You need to get savvy to it. And I don’t want you to develop a mistrust of everybody. I want you to develop a more wary eye of what’s going on. I want you to look at people’s Twitter profiles. Scroll through their feeds and see who they’re retweeting, who they’re boosting, who they’re following, who their little networks are, who’s using the same messaging. Why? Brian: Because— Sam: they...

Speaker 0 opened by saying that over the last week he has interacted with over 300,000 plus real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evoke the Civil War or the Confederacy, to say that law enforcement is a sickness, while the other person has over 150 sworn CPD officers on his detail. He asked what the other person would say to those people and whether he would ask his 150 sworn officers to stand down if he and his wife Stacy are ever attacked, shot at, or rammed with a protester’s vehicle. Speaker 1 responded with sarcasm about the large number, joking that the interactions had “gone down to 300,000,” and claimed he had checked the other person’s comments. He asserted that the addiction on jails and incarceration and the addiction of militarism is evil, referencing Doctor King, and said it is incumbent to ensure that “the real Chicagoans” or the real people of America receive attention, suggesting we should spend billions of dollars overseas on the people in Chicago instead. Speaker 0 pushed back, saying that the real Chicagoans he talks to, mostly Black and Brown, feel that the other person does not distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens, and that he is siding with illegal aliens over communities. He asserted that a recent incident involved “an illegal alien from Nicaragua” who grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. He asked whether, if that had been the other person’s wife, Stacy, he would want ICE to deport that illegal alien, and asked for a yes or no answer. Speaker 1 pressed to get a direct answer, asking for a response “as a man, not as mayor,” and repeated the question about whether ICE should deport the rapist. Speaker 0 reiterated his question and stated that the answer for real Chicagoans is the deportation of the rapist, and that was the “answer for real Chicagoans.” Speaker 1 then apologized for being late, blaming traffic, and the other person quipped about the traffic, noting, “You’re not blaming me for the traffic, are you?” and said he had been watching.

Where are they? Where are they? They arrested him. They were in a paddy wagon. Where? Down there. So we just got word they arrested Katie and Karen.

A woman states she doesn't think children should be taken away from these girls without her kids present. She asks how white people feel about stopping a Black woman from going to work, noting the line of people they are causing. She claims she is not trying to cause problems and that they are just trying to be.

The speaker, who lives in the Central Valley, asks for an explanation of blue-colored rainwater.

Carmela is asked if she has anything to say to the victim's family. She is questioned about why she was armed and present at the school. She is asked to explain her self-defense and how her actions constitute self-defense.

They're all pointing and looking at someone on the roof. Gary is laying down up there. That's what's happening.

A child was sent home from school with measles, characterized by red freckles, a slight temperature, and a big smile. No medicine or shots are needed. All the Brady kids have had the measles, as did one of the parents years ago. Alice hopes she is getting the measles. A child is told to go to school. Seven students are confirmed to have measles, with four others possibly infected, despite having been vaccinated. Some moms never vaccinated their kids and lied about it, believing vaccines are harmful. A child is turning blue, and someone is told to call 911.

Jimmy is asked to cover the speaker while they take a bathroom break. The speaker reassures Jimmy that everything is under control and they will be back soon.

The speaker, who lives in the Central Valley, asks for an explanation of blue-colored rainwater.

Carmela is asked to explain why she was armed at school and how it constitutes self-defense.

Carmela is asked if she has anything to say to the victims' families. She is then questioned about why she was armed at school and asked to explain how it was self-defense.