TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This video discusses the PCR test used for COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. It explains that the test amplifies a small amount of DNA to detect the virus, but if amplified too much, it can result in false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not meant for diagnosing viruses. The video suggests that the high cycle thresholds used in testing lead to inflated case numbers and a false sense of a pandemic. It also mentions the potential dangers of the test, such as the use of sterilizing solutions and the possibility of containing the vaccine. The video encourages critical thinking and research to understand the true nature of the situation.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explains that the test can detect almost anything in anyone if done properly. However, it was not designed to test for viruses. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to a high number of false positives, resulting in misleading results. Mullis also questioned the HIV-AIDS connection, stating that there was no evidence to support it. He believed that powerful individuals, including Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo, were involved in a cover-up. Mullis was outspoken about his concerns, but his warnings were largely ignored. He passed away in August 2019.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains that the test was not designed to detect viruses. The PCR test can find almost anything in anyone if done properly, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's meaningful. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. Mullis discovered that there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS when he was hired to measure HIV levels using PCR. He realized that no one had evidence to support the claim. Mullis also exposed how the CDC and high-level officials profited from the HIV/AIDS connection. Despite his willingness to challenge them, few people were interested in exposing the truth. Mullis passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19.

This video discusses the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. The test amplifies a small amount of DNA to detect the virus, but when run for too many cycles, it can produce false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not meant for diagnostic purposes. The CDC itself acknowledges the limitations of the PCR test and will be changing its method in 2022. The video also explores claims about the test containing sterilizing solutions, storing DNA, and even acting as a vaccine. It urges viewers to question the information presented and seek out alternative sources.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explained that the test can find almost anything in anyone if done well. However, he believed it was a misuse to claim it as meaningful. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing created false positives, skewing the results. Mullis also questioned the HIV-AIDS connection and criticized Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. He wanted to expose them and their actions, but not many people listened. Mullis passed away in August 2019, just months before the COVID-19 pandemic began, raising questions about the timing.

The test for COVID-19 cannot differentiate between live and dead matter, only detecting fragments of viruses, leading to guaranteed false positives. This was used to create cases for a public health emergency, enabling the use of untested vaccines. There are claims that true isolates of viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, do not exist; the viral genomes are only computer-generated. Historical evidence from the 1918 influenza pandemic shows no proof of transmission, as attempts to infect volunteers failed. Current symptoms attributed to COVID-19 may arise from various factors, including environmental toxins and EMF exposure, rather than a specific virus. The idea of a virus causing disease is questioned, and the evidence for SARS-CoV-2 remains unproven.

The widely used PCR tests for COVID-19 are too sensitive, meaning they can detect not only live virus but also dead virus and other materials. The problem is that the results sent to doctors and patients don't specify whether the virus is live or dead. Recent data from Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada showed that 90% of positive cases carried very little virus. If this trend applies nationwide, only a small fraction of positive cases would actually need to isolate and undergo contact tracing. To prevent unnecessary disruptions, it's important to test in a smarter way, focusing on the contagiousness of individuals. This approach would help schools reopen faster and make more sense overall.

Speaker 0: They use them for to amplify fear, to boost compliance, and, of course, push those vaccines. Well, joining me now is primary care physician and author of unavoidably unsafe childhood Reconsidered. Doctor Jeff Barky is with us. Doc, it's great to have you back on. Speaker 1: Hey, Grant. Thanks for having me. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: Alright. I know this comes as no surprise, this number, that only fourteen percent of the PCR positive turned out to be COVID in Germany. I would imagine it translates to The United States. But your reaction and now seeing this done by real scientists, real doctors in a real journal of medicine. Speaker 1: Well, there's no surprise by this study. We knew it all along. The PCR test was never designed to detect infection. What it detects is miniscule particles of the RNA virus, and then they would crank up the cycle threshold. They would amplify the test to create positivity. And so the problem is that you could test the side of a table and get a positive result, let alone that we were actually going to treat based on a test result. I was always taught in medical school, we don't treat test results, we treat patients. And that's what I tried to do. And then the government went out of its way to suppress effective repurposed medication, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This was a money game. This was a scam. This was all based on fear. No surprise out of Germany. Speaker 0: You know, I I believe it. And let's not forget because we always talk about the money and the vaccines and big pharma and their ties to government, and I know that was a lot. But let's not forget too. This was weaponized to keep people home so they wouldn't vote for president Trump during during that twenty twenty election. It was all part of the big steal. Speaker 1: These positives, they wanted lots of positives. They didn't want negatives. They wanted positives. Didn't they, doc? Speaker 0: They absolutely did for a variety of reasons. The more you can keep people in fear, the more likely it is they're gonna follow your directive. We've never seen anything like this before. The government imposing its will upon free citizens. They closed churches. They closed mom and pop stores. They forced healthy people to stay indoors, and they closed down hospitals and told sick people to stay away. I've never seen anything like that happen before. The sad part here, Grant, is I'm not clear that the American people learned their lesson. And when the government comes around and does this again, I just hope enough of us will stand up this time and say, hell no. Well

A Chinese study published in Nature conducted 10 million PCR tests in Wuhan and found that out of the 300 asymptomatic cases, none produced a live virus in the lab setting. This suggests that high cycling of PCR was generating false positives. PCR detects nucleic acid, not disease, and is typically followed up with confirmatory tests. The study did not confirm the presence of infectious viral particles through culture-based methods. False positives occur when healthy individuals with residual viral DNA are magnified due to high cycling. PCR can detect viral RNA long after the disappearance of the infectious virus.

The existence of the virus is questioned due to the initial PCR test methodology being based on a computer model virus, not a purified isolate from real patients. China did not have a pure isolate, so they used elements of a genetic code to create a computer model sequence. This sequence became the basis for the PCR test. The WHO document states that the diagnosis of SARS CoV-2 should not rely on isolating the virus. The virus has never been purified, and the disease is based on generic symptoms that could be anything.

The PCR test, used to determine COVID-19 cases, amplifies RNA fragments to detect the virus. However, the high amplification can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to avoid false positives. When labs reduced the cycles, case numbers significantly decreased. False positives can occur almost half the time, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. In the past, PCR tests have caused false epidemics. The test requires skilled technicians and careful handling, but it is currently being conducted on a large scale with hastily trained personnel. Therefore, it is important to question the accuracy of reported case numbers.

Misusing PCR isn't quite accurate; it's more about how results are interpreted. PCR can detect almost anything in a sample, leading to the belief that everything is present in the body. While PCR amplifies a single molecule for measurement, the implications of finding something like HIV are less straightforward. The measurement for HIV isn't precise, unlike measuring tangible items like apples. Tests for HIV rely on invisible components, making results inferred rather than definitive. PCR itself is a method for amplification and doesn't indicate illness or the potential harm of what is detected.

Dr. Kary Mullis won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test, which can find almost anything in the body if amplified. The PCR test for COVID-19 has led to false positives due to high amplification levels. Mullis discovered there was no proof linking HIV to AIDS, exposing a sham in the medical community. He criticized the CDC for profit-driven motives and called out Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. Despite his efforts to expose the truth, Mullis passed away in 2019, leaving many questions unanswered.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explained that the test can find almost anything in anyone if done well. However, he believed it was a misuse to claim it as meaningful. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing created false positives, skewing the results. Mullis also questioned the HIV-AIDS connection and criticized Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. He wanted to expose them and their actions, but not many people listened. Mullis passed away in August 2019, just months before the COVID-19 pandemic began, raising questions about the timing.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explained that the test can find almost anything in anyone if done well. However, using it to claim meaning or diagnose a virus is a misuse. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. 30 years ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci pushed for higher doses of the drug AZT for AIDS patients, despite lacking evidence. Mullis discovered there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS. He questioned the CDC's profit motives and the involvement of high-level officials. Mullis wanted to expose Fauci and Gallo but faced little attention. He passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19, leaving many questioning the timing.

Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, believed the test could find anything if amplified enough. He criticized the misuse of PCR for COVID-19 testing, claiming false positives were skewing results. Mullis questioned the HIV-AIDS connection pushed by Anthony Fauci and CDC for profit. Despite his willingness to expose Fauci, Mullis passed away at 74, sparking mystery.

This video discusses the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. The test amplifies a small amount of DNA to detect the virus, but if it is amplified too much, it can result in false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not meant for diagnostic purposes. The video also questions the use of the PCR test for diagnosing COVID-19 when the CDC itself states that it should not be used for this purpose. Additionally, there are claims that the PCR test contains sterilizing solutions and may even contain the vaccine. The video encourages critical thinking and further research.

The speaker discusses the issue of cycle thresholds in PCR testing. They explain that the original protocol used a cycle threshold of 45, which amplifies the results by 10. This means that even unlikely findings, such as particles from Mars, could be detected. The speaker suggests that by using a high cycle threshold, it is possible to create a pandemic by testing healthy individuals and spreading the myth of asymptomatic spread. This is how cases are created, according to the speaker.

This video discusses the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. It explains that the test amplifies DNA to detect the virus, but when amplified too much, it can result in false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not designed for diagnostic purposes. The video also questions the use of the PCR test for diagnosing COVID-19 when the CDC itself states that it should not be used for this purpose. It suggests that the high cycle thresholds used in testing contribute to false positives and that the test may contain harmful substances. The video encourages critical thinking and research to uncover the truth.

PCR is a process that can amplify molecules in the body, making it possible to find almost anything in anyone. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the presence of a molecule indicates illness or harm. The measurement for HIV, for example, is not exact and is based on invisible factors. PCR itself is just a method to create more of something. It doesn't determine sickness or potential harm.

In the early pandemic, 2020–2021, eighty six percent of PCR-confirmed COVID cases were not real infections. The speaker asserts that all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, and all of those policies that destroyed livelihoods and the economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. A study is described that compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks, noting that the antibody test indicates whether you got antibodies to COVID. The speaker states that only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It is claimed that it may even be up to ninety percent weren't real infections. The speaker concludes that this fraud is confirmed and calls for accountability for all the people who lost their jobs and were forced to take injections based on this fear campaign, which was based on this false test.

The speaker discusses the PCR test used by the medical system to diagnose illness, asserting that technicians “crank up that machine” to confirm illness and then “crank it down” to show the opposite, implying the test is manipulated. They claim the PCR test is used to sell treatments and to poison people for illnesses they do not have, referencing Lyme disease as an example. The discussion broadens to the pandemic, noting that the Tanzanian president observed a link between a pawpaw fruit and COVID and that this connection was explored further. The speaker then reports that they looked up what the inventor of the PCR technology has said, stating that the inventor insisted time and time again that PCR tests “do not prove causation and cannot diagnose illnesses.” They acknowledge potential pushback but maintain that “the system lies to you to poison you and make money off you,” suggesting that PCR tests are used for multiple deceptive purposes. According to the speaker, these tests are also used to fake pandemics, convict people who aren’t guilty, and put people in jail. They claim PCR testing is used to say things about individuals or to enable GMO practices so small farmers can be sued. The speaker further asserts that gene testing, paternity testing, and culling animals are controlled by these mechanisms to influence the food supply. The overarching claim is that whenever someone suggests you might have an illness, you should question the professional and their motives, and consider why they might be “dancing.” To support these ideas, the speaker directs listeners to read Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullens, implying that the book explains the lies being described in the discussion. A number of provocative connections are presented as part of the argument: the manipulation of PCR tests, the exploitation of diagnostic claims for financial gain, the alleged use of tests to influence legal and agricultural outcomes, and the suggestion that public messaging around illness is part of a broader scheme. The reference to the Tanzanian president’s observation about pawpaw fruit and COVID is used to illustrate how seemingly unrelated elements were brought into consideration in evaluating the pandemic. In closing, the speaker reiterates that the inventor of PCR has stated that PCR cannot prove causation or diagnose illness, and they urge listeners to scrutinize the claims of professionals who discuss illnesses, the pandemic, and related technologies, while endorsing the book Murder by Injection as a deeper explanation of the purported lies.

The PCR test, used to detect the presence of the SARS CoV-2 virus, has come under scrutiny for its reliability and potential for false positives. The test amplifies RNA fragments to identify the virus, but it can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Testing at high cycle thresholds can result in false positives, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to reduce false positives. Lowering the cycle thresholds has led to significant reductions in reported cases. The misuse and misinterpretation of the PCR test has contributed to inflated case numbers and unnecessary panic.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains how the test can find almost anything if amplified enough. The PCR test for COVID-19 has been misused to create false positives. Mullis discovered there was no proof linking HIV to AIDS, exposing a sham in the medical industry. He criticized CDC's profit motives and called out Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. Mullis wanted to expose the truth on TV but faced little support. Despite his efforts, his voice was not widely heard before his passing at age 74.

PCR is not misused, but its interpretation can be. PCR can find almost anything in anybody by amplifying a single molecule. Testing for HIV and claiming it has special meaning is the problem, because someone with HIV likely has other viruses. PCR is quantitative and makes minuscule amounts measurable, but this can lead to misinterpretations. HIV measurements are not exact. HIV tests are based on invisible things and inferred results. PCR makes a lot of something out of something, but it doesn't indicate sickness or harm. Even if you believe in HIV, PCR can't differentiate between virus particles or active live virus.