TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This video discusses the PCR test used for COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. It explains that the test amplifies a small amount of DNA to detect the virus, but if amplified too much, it can result in false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not meant for diagnosing viruses. The video suggests that the high cycle thresholds used in testing lead to inflated case numbers and a false sense of a pandemic. It also mentions the potential dangers of the test, such as the use of sterilizing solutions and the possibility of containing the vaccine. The video encourages critical thinking and research to understand the true nature of the situation.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explains that the test can detect almost anything in anyone if done properly. However, it was not designed to test for viruses. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to a high number of false positives, resulting in misleading results. Mullis also questioned the HIV-AIDS connection, stating that there was no evidence to support it. He believed that powerful individuals, including Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo, were involved in a cover-up. Mullis was outspoken about his concerns, but his warnings were largely ignored. He passed away in August 2019.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains that the test was not designed to detect viruses. The PCR test can find almost anything in anyone if done properly, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's meaningful. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. Mullis discovered that there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS when he was hired to measure HIV levels using PCR. He realized that no one had evidence to support the claim. Mullis also exposed how the CDC and high-level officials profited from the HIV/AIDS connection. Despite his willingness to challenge them, few people were interested in exposing the truth. Mullis passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19.

This video discusses the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. The test amplifies a small amount of DNA to detect the virus, but when run for too many cycles, it can produce false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not meant for diagnostic purposes. The CDC itself acknowledges the limitations of the PCR test and will be changing its method in 2022. The video also explores claims about the test containing sterilizing solutions, storing DNA, and even acting as a vaccine. It urges viewers to question the information presented and seek out alternative sources.

The PCR test, commonly used for COVID-19, involves a nasal swab. According to Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who created the test, it can detect almost anything if amplified enough. However, Mullis himself stated that the PCR test should not be used to diagnose diseases, as it only detects fragments of illness. Many laboratories worldwide run the test at high amplification levels, leading to a high rate of false positives. Even Anthony Fauci acknowledged that results beyond 33 cycles are likely not infectious material. The New York Times reported that 90% of PCR tests were not indicative of active illness. Lowering the amplification cycles resulted in significant reductions in case numbers. In the past, PCR tests have caused false positives, such as in a whooping cough pseudoepidemic. Some criticize Fauci for misleading the public.

The widely used PCR tests for COVID-19 are too sensitive, meaning they can detect not only live virus but also dead virus and other materials. The problem is that the results sent to doctors and patients don't specify whether the virus is live or dead. Recent data from Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada showed that 90% of positive cases carried very little virus. If this trend applies nationwide, only a small fraction of positive cases would actually need to isolate and undergo contact tracing. To prevent unnecessary disruptions, it's important to test in a smarter way, focusing on the contagiousness of individuals. This approach would help schools reopen faster and make more sense overall.

Speaker 0: They use them for to amplify fear, to boost compliance, and, of course, push those vaccines. Well, joining me now is primary care physician and author of unavoidably unsafe childhood Reconsidered. Doctor Jeff Barky is with us. Doc, it's great to have you back on. Speaker 1: Hey, Grant. Thanks for having me. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: Alright. I know this comes as no surprise, this number, that only fourteen percent of the PCR positive turned out to be COVID in Germany. I would imagine it translates to The United States. But your reaction and now seeing this done by real scientists, real doctors in a real journal of medicine. Speaker 1: Well, there's no surprise by this study. We knew it all along. The PCR test was never designed to detect infection. What it detects is miniscule particles of the RNA virus, and then they would crank up the cycle threshold. They would amplify the test to create positivity. And so the problem is that you could test the side of a table and get a positive result, let alone that we were actually going to treat based on a test result. I was always taught in medical school, we don't treat test results, we treat patients. And that's what I tried to do. And then the government went out of its way to suppress effective repurposed medication, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This was a money game. This was a scam. This was all based on fear. No surprise out of Germany. Speaker 0: You know, I I believe it. And let's not forget because we always talk about the money and the vaccines and big pharma and their ties to government, and I know that was a lot. But let's not forget too. This was weaponized to keep people home so they wouldn't vote for president Trump during during that twenty twenty election. It was all part of the big steal. Speaker 1: These positives, they wanted lots of positives. They didn't want negatives. They wanted positives. Didn't they, doc? Speaker 0: They absolutely did for a variety of reasons. The more you can keep people in fear, the more likely it is they're gonna follow your directive. We've never seen anything like this before. The government imposing its will upon free citizens. They closed churches. They closed mom and pop stores. They forced healthy people to stay indoors, and they closed down hospitals and told sick people to stay away. I've never seen anything like that happen before. The sad part here, Grant, is I'm not clear that the American people learned their lesson. And when the government comes around and does this again, I just hope enough of us will stand up this time and say, hell no. Well

A Chinese study published in Nature conducted 10 million PCR tests in Wuhan and found that out of the 300 asymptomatic cases, none produced a live virus in the lab setting. This suggests that high cycling of PCR was generating false positives. PCR detects nucleic acid, not disease, and is typically followed up with confirmatory tests. The study did not confirm the presence of infectious viral particles through culture-based methods. False positives occur when healthy individuals with residual viral DNA are magnified due to high cycling. PCR can detect viral RNA long after the disappearance of the infectious virus.

The PCR test, used to determine COVID-19 cases, amplifies RNA fragments to detect the virus. However, the high amplification can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to avoid false positives. When labs reduced the cycles, case numbers significantly decreased. False positives can occur almost half the time, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. In the past, PCR tests have caused false epidemics. The test requires skilled technicians and careful handling, but it is currently being conducted on a large scale with hastily trained personnel. Therefore, it is important to question the accuracy of reported case numbers.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explained that the test can find almost anything in anyone if done well. However, using it to claim meaning or diagnose a virus is a misuse. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. 30 years ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci pushed for higher doses of the drug AZT for AIDS patients, despite lacking evidence. Mullis discovered there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS. He questioned the CDC's profit motives and the involvement of high-level officials. Mullis wanted to expose Fauci and Gallo but faced little attention. He passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19, leaving many questioning the timing.

This video discusses the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. The test amplifies a small amount of DNA to detect the virus, but if it is amplified too much, it can result in false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not meant for diagnostic purposes. The video also questions the use of the PCR test for diagnosing COVID-19 when the CDC itself states that it should not be used for this purpose. Additionally, there are claims that the PCR test contains sterilizing solutions and may even contain the vaccine. The video encourages critical thinking and further research.

In this video, the speaker discusses how certain strains of influenza are not included in PCR tests, such as the BSL 4 strain, h7n9, and h5n1. They question the effectiveness of testing millions of people without being able to detect these specific strains. The speaker also mentions Kristin Drosten and refers to this situation as an "evil genius" move.

This video discusses the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 and raises concerns about its accuracy and potential misuse. It explains that the test amplifies DNA to detect the virus, but when amplified too much, it can result in false positives. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, stated that it was not designed for diagnostic purposes. The video also questions the use of the PCR test for diagnosing COVID-19 when the CDC itself states that it should not be used for this purpose. It suggests that the high cycle thresholds used in testing contribute to false positives and that the test may contain harmful substances. The video encourages critical thinking and research to uncover the truth.

The speaker asks if a PCR test can be used to determine if a patient is no longer infectious. The other speaker explains that if the cycle threshold is 35 or higher, the chances of the virus being able to replicate are very low. They mention that it is frustrating for both patients and physicians when the cycle threshold is high, but it is unlikely to culture the virus. They conclude that if the cycle threshold is 37, 38, or even 36, it is just dead nucleotides.

Speaker 0 discusses a so-called “PCR test rabbit hole” and asserts that the Rockefeller family has owned the medical system since 1910. The speaker claims that every time someone walks in the door, they are “paying John D. Rockefeller,” and that the PCR test is a tool used to manipulate or control outcomes. They assert that the PCR test can be used to fake pandemics, citing swabs and nasal swabbing as part of that manipulation. The speaker further claims the PCR test can be used to convict people for crimes they didn’t commit in forensic contexts. They also say it can be used to sue small farmers by claiming GMOs fell onto their land, implying PCR tests are used in agricultural disputes. Additionally, the speaker asserts PCR tests are used in gene testing to determine someone’s origin or lineage and to label illnesses that may not exist, including pushing cancer testing to promote chemotherapy. Paternity testing is mentioned, with the claim that the PCR test can determine “you are not the father” by manipulating outcomes. The speaker also asserts that mRNA vaccines are real and links this to PCR tests, suggesting that PCR tests are involved in pushing vaccines. A broader claim is made that vaccines containing heavy metals are being administered through this system, implying poisoning via vaccines. The speaker connects the use of PCR testing to animal culling, stating that a PCR test is used to declare bird flu and thereby justify killing all chickens. They argue that the PCR test is a tool for control and manipulation of people. The discussion notes that the PCR test has even received a Nobel Prize, and reiterates the claim that the Rockefellers own the medical system as well as education, agriculture, electric vehicle technology, gas technology, dentists, veterinarians, and doctors since 1910, framing this as a long-standing monopoly of deception. As supporting material, the speaker cites Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins as a powerful book about lies, deceit, and the monopoly of the medical system, describing it as an umbrella under which all aspects of the medical system are organized around John D. Rockefeller. Overall, the narrative portrays the PCR test as a central instrument of control across diverse domains—healthcare, forensics, agriculture, genetics, vaccines, and education—tied to a long-standing Rockefeller-led monopoly beginning in 1910.

The speakers discuss the misuse of PCR in estimating viral RNA. They explain that PCR can detect almost anything in the body, making it easy to find even rare viruses like HIV. However, they argue that testing for HIV specifically is unnecessary because individuals with HIV are likely to have other viruses as well. They emphasize that PCR is a quantitative tool that provides measurable information, but it does not determine sickness or the potential harm of a virus. The speakers also mention that PCR cannot differentiate between virus particles and active live viruses. Overall, they highlight the limitations and misinterpretations of PCR testing.

The speaker asks if a PCR test can be used to determine if a patient is no longer infectious. They mention that if the cycle threshold is 35 or higher, the chances of the virus being contagious are very low. They also mention that even if a patient has a cycle threshold of 37 or higher, it is unlikely that the virus can be cultured. Therefore, they conclude that a cycle threshold of 37 or higher indicates that the virus is no longer viable.

PCR is a process that can amplify molecules in the body, making it possible to find almost anything in anyone. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the presence of a molecule indicates illness or harm. The measurement for HIV, for example, is not exact and is based on invisible factors. PCR itself is just a method to create more of something. It doesn't determine sickness or potential harm.

In the early pandemic, 2020–2021, eighty six percent of PCR-confirmed COVID cases were not real infections. The speaker asserts that all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, and all of those policies that destroyed livelihoods and the economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. A study is described that compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks, noting that the antibody test indicates whether you got antibodies to COVID. The speaker states that only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It is claimed that it may even be up to ninety percent weren't real infections. The speaker concludes that this fraud is confirmed and calls for accountability for all the people who lost their jobs and were forced to take injections based on this fear campaign, which was based on this false test.

The speaker discusses the PCR test used by the medical system to diagnose illness, asserting that technicians “crank up that machine” to confirm illness and then “crank it down” to show the opposite, implying the test is manipulated. They claim the PCR test is used to sell treatments and to poison people for illnesses they do not have, referencing Lyme disease as an example. The discussion broadens to the pandemic, noting that the Tanzanian president observed a link between a pawpaw fruit and COVID and that this connection was explored further. The speaker then reports that they looked up what the inventor of the PCR technology has said, stating that the inventor insisted time and time again that PCR tests “do not prove causation and cannot diagnose illnesses.” They acknowledge potential pushback but maintain that “the system lies to you to poison you and make money off you,” suggesting that PCR tests are used for multiple deceptive purposes. According to the speaker, these tests are also used to fake pandemics, convict people who aren’t guilty, and put people in jail. They claim PCR testing is used to say things about individuals or to enable GMO practices so small farmers can be sued. The speaker further asserts that gene testing, paternity testing, and culling animals are controlled by these mechanisms to influence the food supply. The overarching claim is that whenever someone suggests you might have an illness, you should question the professional and their motives, and consider why they might be “dancing.” To support these ideas, the speaker directs listeners to read Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullens, implying that the book explains the lies being described in the discussion. A number of provocative connections are presented as part of the argument: the manipulation of PCR tests, the exploitation of diagnostic claims for financial gain, the alleged use of tests to influence legal and agricultural outcomes, and the suggestion that public messaging around illness is part of a broader scheme. The reference to the Tanzanian president’s observation about pawpaw fruit and COVID is used to illustrate how seemingly unrelated elements were brought into consideration in evaluating the pandemic. In closing, the speaker reiterates that the inventor of PCR has stated that PCR cannot prove causation or diagnose illness, and they urge listeners to scrutinize the claims of professionals who discuss illnesses, the pandemic, and related technologies, while endorsing the book Murder by Injection as a deeper explanation of the purported lies.

The PCR test, used to detect the presence of the SARS CoV-2 virus, has come under scrutiny for its reliability and potential for false positives. The test amplifies RNA fragments to identify the virus, but it can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Testing at high cycle thresholds can result in false positives, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to reduce false positives. Lowering the cycle thresholds has led to significant reductions in reported cases. The misuse and misinterpretation of the PCR test has contributed to inflated case numbers and unnecessary panic.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains how the test can find almost anything if amplified enough. The PCR test for COVID-19 has been misused to create false positives. Mullis discovered there was no proof linking HIV to AIDS, exposing a sham in the medical industry. He criticized CDC's profit motives and called out Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. Mullis wanted to expose the truth on TV but faced little support. Despite his efforts, his voice was not widely heard before his passing at age 74.

This is a transcript discussing the lack of isolation of SARS-CoV-2, the inefficacy of PCR tests, and the questionable actions surrounding COVID-19. The speaker questions the existence of the virus, criticizes the use of PCR tests, and highlights the lack of autopsies. They also mention the government's spending on tests that do not accurately detect the virus. The speaker references documents sent to authorities and statements made by officials regarding the PCR test's accuracy.

If a PCR test has a cycle threshold (CT) of 35 or higher, the chances of it being replication competent are very low. So, if someone's PCR test has a CT of 37 or higher, it's unlikely that the virus can be cultured from it. In fact, even a CT of 36 may indicate that it's just dead nucleotides.

The speaker emphasizes the PCR test as the foundation of the current situation, stating that without it, there would be no cases or public health emergency. They question the necessity of measures taken, pointing out the absence of excess mortality before the vaccination campaign. The speaker suggests focusing efforts on addressing the PCR test as the key issue.