TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I'm at the location where the shooter was positioned. As a 70-year-old man, I can confirm that this area is not difficult to access. It's hard to believe anyone would say that Secret Service agents couldn't have been here. The shooter had a clear line of sight to the president, making the shot feasible.

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president and take shots without help from insiders. He offers to protect the president for free.

According to Matthew Murphy, a retired Green Beret and level one sniper, the shooting of President Trump was a planned and coordinated attack with inside help. Murphy asserts that Secret Service teams conduct extensive site security assessments weeks in advance of presidential appearances, securing potential threats and vulnerabilities. He claims it's impossible for a 20-year-old in an American flag t-shirt to bypass security, access a rooftop near the president, unpack a rifle, and take aimed shots without internal assistance. Murphy believes someone within the local police department or Secret Service is compromised and a threat to the president. He suggests focusing on who enabled the attack, not just the shooter, and offers his services to President Trump for protection.

The speaker questions the director about security lapses at an event where the president was present. They criticize the director for not securing a dangerous rooftop, highlighting their own shooting skills to emphasize the potential danger. The speaker expresses frustration with the director's leadership and calls for their immediate dismissal.

I was at President Trump's rally in Ohio and noticed a security failure. There were snipers positioned strategically, but someone in the security detail seems compromised. We need answers. President Trump, we support you.

Good morning. I've been asked about the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, and I want to share my perspective. With 17 years in the military, including 14 in a special operations unit, I have experience in close protection for VIPs, including the Prime Minister in dangerous areas. The recent incident raises serious concerns. The shooter’s ability to access a rooftop so close to the president during daylight seems implausible without assistance from an agency or organization. The aerial photo made it clear that security measures were insufficient. It appears that this was not just a random act; it had to be planned, whether through negligence or strategic intent.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

I believe the security failure at President Trump's rally in Ohio was intentional, with snipers strategically placed around the perimeter. There seems to be a compromise within his security detail, and I demand answers. We support you, President Trump.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and explosives expert, discusses the potential methods the suspect in the attempted assassination of President Trump could have used to create explosive devices. He explains the complexities of manufacturing electric blasting caps and the challenges the suspect would have faced in doing so. The speaker also speculates on the suspect's lack of social media presence and suggests that a foreign actor may have recruited him for the attack. Overall, the speaker finds the situation suspicious. Translation: The speaker, a retired Green Beret and explosives expert, discusses the suspect's potential methods for creating explosive devices in the attempted assassination of President Trump. He explains the complexities of manufacturing electric blasting caps and the challenges the suspect would have faced. The speaker also speculates on the suspect's lack of social media presence and suggests a foreign actor may have recruited him for the attack, finding the situation suspicious.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could have accessed the area and fired shots without inside help. The speaker offers to protect the president for free if needed.

The speakers discuss an alleged shooting incident involving Donald Trump, with claims that a gunman was on a nearby roof during a speech. One witness says he saw a man crawling on the roof with a rifle and alerted police and Secret Service before shots rang out, claiming the Secret Service then "blew his head off." Doubts are raised about whether Trump was actually shot in the ear as reported. One speaker suggests the event was staged, pointing to the position of Trump's body and the lack of blood on his hand after he touched his ear. They claim the blood on Trump's face looked like fake blood and that the Secret Service blocked views to apply it. Another speaker claims the shots came from a Secret Service agent, not the alleged shooter on the roof. They analyze video footage, claiming to identify the sound of gunshots originating from the agent's position. They argue that the lack of blood on Trump's collar proves he wasn't shot.

A US Army veteran calls out to President Trump, expressing concern over a security breach where a person climbed a building unnoticed. He offers to protect the President for free, criticizing the Secret Service's failure. The veteran asks for a chance to safeguard Trump and expresses admiration for him. He urges others to share the video to get attention from Trump's team.

The speaker discusses speculation about the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at Butler Farm Show. They point out a water tower with a clear angle towards Trump, suggesting it as a potential sniper spot. The speaker highlights Gematria connections between "water tower" and "Donald J Trump." They express doubt about the official narrative and urge viewers to consider alternative theories. The speaker hints at upcoming revelations and asks for opinions on the matter.

The speaker presents audio evidence of two shooters targeting Trump and the crowd, contradicting the lone gunman theory. They analyze the sound of shots from different weapons and locations, concluding that the shots were aimed at Trump. The speaker fears for their safety but believes the operation was botched. The analysis suggests multiple shooters were involved, challenging the official narrative.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not a lone shooter, citing messages they've received. The speaker questions why many Americans find the situation "doesn't add up," listing details such as the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone use, and being spotted with a rangefinder. The speaker, identifying as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. They ask if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt, imprison, and depict the target as "a modern day Hitler." The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, and if they received reports of anything "fishy" there, such as silverware or trash. They ask if the home was extremely clean, "almost like a medical lab," stating that's what they are hearing.

The speaker questions why a potential threat was allowed on stage without informing the security team, especially when snipers were present. They demand answers from those responsible for the safety of the president and past presidents.

The speaker expresses disbelief at the security failure allowing someone to scale a roof near the president. They argue that the Secret Service should have thorough security measures in place to prevent such incidents. The speaker questions the intelligence failure and demands accountability from the Secret Service agents involved. They emphasize the importance of prior security checks to ensure the president's safety. The speaker's personal experience with security incidents adds to their skepticism about the reported events.

The speaker questions why snipers initially assigned to a second-story window with a clear view of the roof where the shooter stood and tried to kill President Trump were withdrawn before the shooting. The speaker emphasizes that these are basic questions the Secret Service should easily answer, especially given the seventeen days since the attack. The speaker expresses frustration that the response from the Secret Service has repeatedly been "we're looking into it," which they deem insufficient.

I spent 17 years in the military, 14 in a special operations unit. I believe the recent assassination attempt on former President Trump involved help from an agency or government. The shooter couldn't have reached the rooftop alone to take a shot at the president. It seems too obvious that assistance was involved.

The speaker questions the Secret Service's effectiveness, citing a shooting of Trump and a recent shooting attempt. They claim the Secret Service's current methods are not working and that whistleblowers have revealed the agency isn't following its own protocols. The speaker believes the core issue is a failure of leadership, not the agents themselves. They advocate for firing people, implementing new protocols, and ensuring the protection of Trump and attendees at his rallies. The speaker expresses a lack of confidence in the Secret Service's current protective measures.

The speaker discusses the shooter's close proximity to a fairground and the president's location. They question why law enforcement did not see the shooter on the low roof before the incident occurred, given the close quarters and visibility. The speaker expresses confusion over the lack of intervention before the shooting began.

The speaker criticized the Secret Service for claiming a sloped roof was unsafe when it wasn't. They demonstrated shooting accuracy on a similar roof to highlight the danger. The speaker blamed the Secret Service for failing to secure the rooftop during a past event, putting the President at risk. They called for the director's immediate dismissal due to incompetence.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president with a rifle without inside help. Urging focus on those who allowed the incident, he offers to protect the president for free if needed.

The speaker discusses the lack of security measures during a potential assassination attempt on President Trump. They criticize the decision not to have a patrol car or personnel on the ground for deterrence. They question the explanation of a sloped roof hindering security efforts. The speaker calls for a thorough investigation to uncover the truth and ensure accountability. They express concern over the potential conspiracy theories that could arise from the incident. The speaker emphasizes the need for proper protection of politicians and highlights the importance of accountability in maintaining security standards.