reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Initially, the Mexican president, CEC, opposed opening the gate for humanitarian material. However, I personally persuaded him to change his mind. Additionally, I also spoke with Bibi to convince him to open the gate on the Israeli side.

American Jews support Israel, and Jewish prime ministers have historically enlisted their support to pressure American presidents, which is understandable. American Jews prioritize Israel's survival due to the Holocaust and believe America's security is directly related to Israel's. They believe that supporting Israel does not mean putting America second. However, an American president must prioritize what is best for America, whether dealing with Israelis, Irish, or other groups. Usually, what benefits America also benefits Israel, and vice versa. But sometimes, a president must avoid giving Israel a blank check. One example is the decision to seek good relations with Egypt and other neighbors of Israel. Some Israeli friends preferred a special relationship with Israel only. However, it is better for the U.S. to be a friend to Israel's neighbors, rather than allowing a vacuum to be filled by a country such as the Soviet Union.

The documentary traces Benjamin Netanyahu’s career through a web of security crises, personal power, and ongoing legal jeopardy, arguing that his decisions have been driven by a perceived need to survive corruption investigations while mobilizing fear and factional support to stay in power. It begins with a stark claim: nothing concentrates Netanyahu’s mind like the sound of the prison gate, and that his actions over the last five years were focused on that possibility, with the corruption trial becoming a dominant factor in decision making. The engine, according to interviewees, is the corruption cases, and Netanyahu’s attitude toward the law, with “Anyone that dare to touch mister Netanyahu is doomed.” After October 7, the war became another instrument to stay in power. Several speakers observe that Netanyahu survived in a state of war, in instability, and during divisions among Israelis, noting that a “forever war” benefits him by making people feel constantly endangered and in need of his leadership. A political analyst adds that the trial “took all of us hostage,” while others describe how Netanyahu’s inner circle—referred to as a “sugar daddy” network—provided resources not supported by the state, ensuring political operations despite legal trouble. The relationship between Netanyahu and powerful business figures emerges as central. Arnold Milchan, an Israeli-born Hollywood producer who amassed wealth and influence, is described as a crucial conduit to the prime minister, with Netanyahu and his wife Sarah allegedly receiving gifts valued at a quarter of a million dollars. Milchan’s favors to Netanyahu and the suspicion that Milchan was bribing the prime minister are part of the ongoing breach of trust indictment, which centers on Netanyahu’s access to Milchan and possible protection or preferential treatment in return. The documentary also covers Shaul Alovich (Shai Alovich) and Yair and Sara Netanyahu’s media and political influence, including a controversial arrangement in which Netanyahu secured control of the Walla news site in return for signatures enabling Alovich to access cash. The witnesses describe the Netanyahu circle pressuring finance and tax laws to benefit Milchan and other allies, sometimes invoking American pressure and visa issues in the background. Key personal dynamics are highlighted. Sarah Netanyahu is portrayed as a powerful decision-maker who selects advisers, schedules, and policy, with accounts of her alleged mistreatment of workers and involvement in a sex scandal known as the “hot tape” scandal. The documentary suggests that Netanyahu’s fear and need to appear in control intensified after 2015, a turning point when his political team believed he could prevail regardless of public accountability, leading to a deterioration in judgment and trust. The narrative then shifts to Netanyahu’s long-established stance on terrorism and security, portraying him as an expert on terrorism and defender of Israel, whose televised performances built his popularity. This posture is juxtaposed with his handling of Hamas: the state’s support for Hamas, the flow of money to Hamas via Qatar at Netanyahu’s instruction, and the belief that Israel could control the level of hatred by direct support or management of Palestinian authorities are all presented as part of a strategy that backfired, culminating in October 7. The documentary asserts that his Gaza policy—keeping Hamas in Gaza to weaken the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank—failed catastrophically, and that support for hardline right-wing figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich within his coalition has pushed Israel toward a more expansive, militarized approach, including settlement expansion and punitive actions in the West Bank. Public reaction is depicted as deeply divided. Weeks of demonstrations against judicial reform showed a country split, with protesters fearing that reform would castrate the judiciary and undermine democracy, while Netanyahu and his supporters argued reforms were essential, insisting that the investigations themselves forced drastic measures. The civilian toll of the war—over 15,000 deaths in Gaza at the time of filming, and ongoing hostages—adds urgency to calls for action, with hostage families pressing the government for results and accusing Netanyahu of prioritizing political survival over ending hostilities and securing captives’ release. In conclusion, the documentary presents Netanyahu as a leader who has navigated crises by leveraging fear, strengthening coalition ties with far-right figures, and pursuing judicial changes that he argues are necessary for national security, while his opponents insist the reforms are designed to shield him from legal jeopardy. The film ends by reiterating that the war and the political crisis are intertwined, with the region’s chaos shaping Netanyahu’s tactical choices and the public’s willingness to endure them.

I was asked to help sell Wonderful Pistachios, but they're so great they sell themselves. Sales haven't gone up in the last 30 seconds, so let's work on branding.

A billionaire couple, the Resniks, own a significant portion of California's water system, obtained through secretive meetings. They control water supply during droughts, profiting from selling water back to the state. The Resniks influence politicians, like Senator Dianne Feinstein, through donations and lobbying efforts. Their actions harm California's water resources, environment, and economy. This highlights the need for legislative changes to prevent individuals from exploiting essential public resources like water.

Linda and Stuart Resnick control over 60% of California's water rights, amassing wealth through their agricultural business, the Wonderful Company, known for pomegranate juice and pistachios. They consume over 150 billion gallons of water annually. Water was once a public right but changed after a secret meeting in 1994, prioritizing agricultural needs over citizens. As the largest farmers in California, the Resnicks receive the most water. They also sell water back to the county, but this "paper water" often doesn't reflect actual availability. This ongoing issue has persisted for years with little change, prompting calls to boycott the Wonderful Company for its impact on California and beyond.

A billionaire couple in California, the Resniks, control a significant portion of the state's water system, originally funded by taxpayers. They own The Wonderful Company, worth billions, and have acquired vast farmland for products like pistachios and pomegranate juice. Through secretive meetings, they gained control of the Kern Water Bank, profiting off droughts by selling water back to the state. The Resniks influence politicians like Senator Feinstein through donations, securing more water access and funding. Their actions harm California's water supply, environment, and economy, highlighting the need for legislative change to prevent such exploitation. Translation: A billionaire couple in California, the Resniks, control a significant portion of the state's water system, originally funded by taxpayers. They own The Wonderful Company, worth billions, and have acquired vast farmland for products like pistachios and pomegranate juice. Through secretive meetings, they gained control of the Kern Water Bank, profiting off droughts by selling water back to the state. The Resniks influence politicians like Senator Feinstein through donations, securing more water access and funding. Their actions harm California's water supply, environment, and economy, highlighting the need for legislative change to prevent such exploitation.

Let me explain something about what is called the Jewish lobby in this country. Their belief is that being for Israel first, that that does not mean you're putting America second. An American president, however, has to approach it in a different way in my opinion. He's got always to think first of what is best for America. An American president must make a decision that does not in effect give the Israelis a blank check. And one example of that is a decision that I made. I decided early on in our administration that we were going to seek good relations with Egypt and other others of Israel's neighbors. Many of my Israeli friends didn't like that because they wanted a special relationship with Israel and Israel only.

After the sanctions started, we learned a lot. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. They will never kill us, so they are making us stronger.

Syria had a surplus of wheat before the war, but we wanted to create famine by taking it away. We also seized oil and gas fields to disrupt transportation and freeze the population during winter. Despite our efforts, the resilient Syrian people resisted against overwhelming military force for over a decade. To regain control, the US imposed harsh CAESAR sanctions on Syria.

Do not support pistachios due to the climate crisis caused by billionaire owners draining rivers, causing fish extinction, and corrupting climate science. They donate to art museums for image, but their farming practices harm the environment. Avoid giving them money.

The Jewish lobby in the United States has significant influence, sometimes even counterproductive to Israel's interests. They exert pressure on various individuals and institutions, which may ultimately harm Israel. The president pays attention to this lobby due to its strength and control over numerous sectors, including media and finance.

Let me explain something about what is called the Jewish lobby in this country. Their belief is that being for Israel first, that that does not mean you're putting America second. An American president, however, has to approach it in a different way, in my opinion. He's got always to think first of what is best for America. An American president must make a decision, that does not in effect give the Israelis a blank check. And one example of that is a decision that I made. I decided early on in our administration that we were going to seek good relations with Egypt and other others of Israel's neighbors. Many of my Israeli friends didn't like that because they wanted a special relationship with Israel and Israel only.

The owners of the Wonderful Company, Stuart and Linda Resnick, aim to dominate the US lemon market with their seedless lemons. They hold exclusive licenses for two seedless lemon varieties, hoping to control 25% of the market. This move would prevent lemon tree regrowth from seeds. The Resnicks, who also own Halos, Fiji Water, Wonderful Pistachios, and Pom, have faced criticism for their water usage. They acquired water rights in California through secretive deals and have close ties to politicians like Dianne Feinstein. This situation highlights the importance of supporting small, local farms over large corporations. Translation: The owners of the Wonderful Company, Stuart and Linda Resnick, want to control a quarter of the US fresh lemon market with their seedless lemons. They obtained exclusive licenses for two seedless lemon varieties, which would prevent lemon tree regrowth from seeds. The Resnicks, who also own Halos, Fiji Water, Wonderful Pistachios, and Pom, have been criticized for their water usage. They acquired water rights in California through secret agreements and have close relationships with politicians like Dianne Feinstein. This demonstrates why it's important to support small, local farms over big corporations.

Speaker 0 believes the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful, even for Israel's interests, because they pressure too many people. This pressure, exerted through various means, ultimately doesn't help Israel. The president of the United States pays attention to this lobby because they are strong and control many things. When asked to elaborate on what they control, Speaker 0 lists newspapers, media, banks, and finances. Speaker 1 expresses surprise and asks if Speaker 0 really believes the Jewish community in the United States is that powerful.

Syria had a significant wheat surplus before the war, and there were plans to seize this wheat to create famine. Additionally, oil and gas fields in northern Syria were targeted to disrupt transportation and harm the civilian population during harsh winters. The goal was to starve and freeze the Syrian people, but their resilience against overwhelming military force frustrated these efforts. To regain control, the US Congress imposed the CAESAR sanctions, which were among the most severe sanctions ever placed on a nation.

We're going to cut off the funding streams to Iran. This action aims to resolve the hostage situation involving Israelis, Americans, and others held by Hamas and Hezbollah, who are essentially mercenaries of Iran. It's time for America to recognize the importance of Israel, secure the release of the Israeli hostages, and reaffirm our commitment to standing by Israel, our most important ally.

In the US, 34 states have anti-BDS laws prohibiting the state from working with those who boycott Israel. BDS stands for boycott, divestment, and sanctions, supporting Palestinian freedom. The anti-boycott law of 2018 makes it illegal for US citizens to participate in boycotts against Israel supported by a foreign country, subject to civil and criminal charges, including fines over $300,000 and up to 20 years in jail. A new bill, the CHI Act, would make anti-BDS laws federal, requiring companies doing business with the US government to swear not to boycott Israel. An amendment to the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018 would make it illegal for US citizens to participate in boycotts against Israel supported by the UN, the EU, or international governmental organizations. Politicians are passing laws preventing schools that divest from Israel from getting federal money, which attacks free speech on college campuses. Nikki Haley initiated the wave of anti-BDS laws in America. These laws are pushed by Zionists and promoted by the Pro-Israel lobby.

A billionaire couple, the Resniks, control a large share of California's water system, acquired through secretive meetings. They own The Wonderful Company, worth billions, and influence water policies through political donations. Their control over water resources allows them to profit at the expense of taxpayers, selling water back to the state during droughts. The Resniks manipulate legislation, exploit workers, and harm the environment with their water monopoly. Legislation is needed to prevent individuals like the Resniks from exploiting essential public resources.

A billionaire couple in California, the Resnicks, uses more water than all residents of Los Angeles combined. They own the Palm Wonderful Company, which includes brands like Fiji Water, Palm Pomegranates, and Wonderful Pistachios. In 1994, California's public water access was privatized, and the Resnicks acquired 60% of the state's fresh water resources, making them the largest owners of fresh water in California.

Syria had a significant wheat surplus before the war, and there were plans to seize this wheat to create famine among the population. Additionally, oil and gas fields in northern Syria were targeted to disrupt transportation and freeze civilians during winter. Despite these efforts, the resilience of the Syrian people was unexpected, as they continued to resist against overwhelming military forces. Frustrated by their endurance, the U.S. Congress implemented the CAESAR sanctions, described as the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on any nation, in an attempt to regain control over the situation in Syria.

A billionaire couple, the Resniks, control a large portion of California's water system, acquired through secretive meetings. They own The Wonderful Company, worth billions, and influence water policies to profit from selling water back to the state. Their political connections, including with Senator Dianne Feinstein, help them secure control over water systems and funding. The Resniks' actions harm California's water resources, environment, and economy. They exploit workers, manipulate studies, and prioritize profits over public welfare. Legislative changes are needed to prevent individuals like the Resniks from exploiting essential public resources.

American Jews support Israel, and every Israeli prime minister has sought their help to influence American presidents, which I understand. However, a president must prioritize America's best interests, whether dealing with Israelis, Irish, or any other group. While what's good for America is often good for Israel, a president can't give Israel a blank check. For instance, my administration sought good relations with Egypt and other neighbors of Israel, even though some Israeli friends preferred a special relationship with Israel alone. I believed that it was in Israel's best interests for the United States to be friends with Israel's neighbors and potential enemies, to avoid a vacuum that the Soviet Union would fill. I still believe that should be American policy today.

Texas should ban Kellogg and other companies that sell inferior and unsafe food products in public institutions like schools and the military. Earlier this year, I filed a shareholder activist letter against Kellogg for providing a less safe version of their cereals in the U.S. compared to other countries. We have gathered over 450,000 signatures for the largest food petition in U.S. history, urging Kellogg to offer safer products. Kellogg refused to meet with us, claiming American children prefer the more colorful, toxic versions. California has already passed a bill banning certain artificial food dyes in public schools, and Texas should follow suit. I believe Texas can lead the way in removing harmful ingredients from our food and reversing this trend of poor nutrition.