reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Geoengineers discuss implementing weather control through aerosols to manipulate wind speeds and cloud formation. HAARP and chemtrails are used as weather weapons to influence precipitation and storm patterns. The introduction of aerosols in the atmosphere leads to droughts and floods, impacting agriculture and water rights. The California drought results in water restrictions, land acquisition, and prioritization of corporate agriculture over small farmers, leading to public suffering. Water scarcity becomes a critical issue with implications for the future.

Ronald Lauder, the Estee Lauder heir who convinced Trump to pursue Greenland in 2017, is increasingly moving from talk to action. Through a Delaware-registered company called Greenland Development Partners, Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in Greenlandic companies. The broader claim is that this is economic infiltration disguised as investment, with Lauder’s business partners in Greenland described as some of the country’s most influential people with close ties to Greenland’s foreign minister, Vivian Motzfeldt. Greenland Development Partners is portrayed as an opaque Delaware investment consortium. Delaware is described as “the Shell company's capital of America, where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny.” Danish newspaper Politikens Investigation is cited as labeling Laura (Lauder) as a key participant in the consortium, which has bought stakes in two Greenlandic firms, including Greenland Water Bank. Greenland Water Bank is owned by Svein Hardenbair and Sverdrupijn. Hardenbair is a former civil servant adviser to Greenland’s prime minister until recently and was also the director of Greenland’s national energy company. Jan Beboj Johansson is highlighted as particularly interesting. He is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and chairs the governing Ziomoot party in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital. Ziomoot is one of the four parties in Greenland’s current coalition government. The crucial point is that Johansson’s wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland, who handles foreign relations, including relations with the United States. The alleged linkage is that Ronald Lauder, described as Trump’s friend and advisor on Greenland, is now in business with Johansson’s wife’s husband, i.e., the Greenland Foreign Minister’s husband. The narrative asserts this is not merely investment but influence at the highest level. Greenland Water Bank may appear small and harmless. Its 2024 accounts show minimum staffing costs of about $5,500 and a modest financial loss. The company bottles water from the Lingmar Spring in Krakataswak on Disko Island, selling locally under the brand Emilik. Up to 2024, ownership was shared between Hardenbair and Beboj Johansson, before part of their shares were sold to Lauder’s investor group. Hardenbair explains to Pulchikung (Poltikken/Politiken) that the investment is not primarily about the money, but about gaining better access to the luxury market where their water should be a natural part. They believed the water was among the best in the world. The stated expectation is that Lauder’s involvement would grant access to the American luxury market for Greenland Water Bank’s premium water. The question raised is what Lauder receives in return: a pressure point and a foothold into Greenland’s top elite, enabling direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. The narrative suggests funds could flow to Sven and Jorn (Johansson) through Greenland Water Bank as salaries, bonuses, or in Forms such as business trips, luxury offices, boats, or cars, all paid by investments from Lauder. The scale of Lauder’s wealth is mentioned as $5,000,000,000 USD, with Lauder reportedly able to mobilize $10,000,000 for ventures. The central controversy remains the connection to Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt, who previously served on Greenland Water Bank’s board. Her husband’s involvement via Johansson’s alliance with Lauder is presented as a potential conflict of interest, given Lauder’s influence on Greenland’s political and economic landscape.

A billionaire couple, the Resniks, own a significant portion of California's water system, obtained through secretive meetings. They control water supply during droughts, profiting from selling water back to the state. The Resniks influence politicians, like Senator Dianne Feinstein, through donations and lobbying efforts. Their actions harm California's water resources, environment, and economy. This highlights the need for legislative changes to prevent individuals from exploiting essential public resources like water.

Linda and Stuart Resnick control over 60% of California's water rights, amassing wealth through their agricultural business, the Wonderful Company, known for pomegranate juice and pistachios. They consume over 150 billion gallons of water annually. Water was once a public right but changed after a secret meeting in 1994, prioritizing agricultural needs over citizens. As the largest farmers in California, the Resnicks receive the most water. They also sell water back to the county, but this "paper water" often doesn't reflect actual availability. This ongoing issue has persisted for years with little change, prompting calls to boycott the Wonderful Company for its impact on California and beyond.

The video discusses the Chinese government's involvement in the takeover of Smithfield Foods and Saudi Arabia's acquisition of farmland in the US to secure food and water resources. Residents in Arizona are facing water scarcity due to excessive pumping by foreign companies, leading to wells running dry. Legal loopholes allow these actions, causing frustration and concern among locals. The lack of regulation exacerbates the situation, prompting calls for conservation measures and accountability from authorities. Translation: The video talks about how the Chinese government and Saudi Arabia are involved in acquiring food and water resources, leading to water scarcity and frustration among residents in Arizona due to excessive pumping by foreign companies. Legal loopholes allow these actions, causing concern among locals.

Do not support pistachios due to the climate crisis caused by billionaire owners draining rivers, causing fish extinction, and corrupting climate science. They donate to art museums for image, but their farming practices harm the environment. Avoid giving them money.

Bill Gates has reportedly partnered with Nestle and BlackRock to buy farmland with aquifers, with the alleged intention of selling the water. The Nestle CEO has stated that water is not a basic human right. Additionally, a product called Appeal has been approved for use on organic produce. Appeal is claimed to be non-water soluble, meaning it cannot be washed off. The speaker suggests that because the human body is 70% water, consuming Appeal could be harmful. The speaker promotes a Kangen water machine, claiming its 11.5 pH water can remove the Appeal residue from produce.

The conversation centers on the claim that Iran has faced long-running weather manipulation and climate intervention, pushing the idea that weather warfare is being waged against Iran for decades and that this has contributed to severe droughts, disrupted rainfall, and harsh living conditions amid sanctions. Dane Wiggington, founder of geoengineeringwatch.org, leads the discussion with Clayton and Natalie, presenting a narrative that goes beyond mainstream geopolitics to point to covert weather manipulation as a central factor. Key points and assertions include: - Weather warfare against Iran has “gone back forty years plus,” with Iranian meteorologists and former president Ahmadinejad publicly asserting that NATO was cutting off precipitation, thereby destabilizing weather patterns and food production. The guests describe this as ongoing warfare that destabilizes populations. - The practice is described as not just about Iran; the tactic, historically used by the US in conflicts such as Vietnam (Project Popeye), has led to international attempts to regulate weather modification (INMOD treaties) in 1976, though the speakers argue that nations still engage in such activities over their own citizens. - The mechanism of climate engineering is presented as two main methods: diminishing and dispersing precipitation, and completely cutting it off. The discussion highlights ionosphere heater technologies (notably HARP) as tools to heat portions of the atmosphere, creating high-pressure heat domes that steer moisture patterns and produce chemically nucleated rainfall or drought. This is linked to current US West Coast heat waves and is described as a deliberate manipulation of moisture cycles. - The oil-cloud phenomenon in Iran is described as a result of such warfare, with reports of oil covering streets, doors, cars, and lungs from inhalation of aerosolized oil. The guest connects this to broader environmental impacts, including toxic precipitation and altered air quality, and claims similar operations have caused dramatic weather and pollution events elsewhere. - The discussion cites historical and contemporary examples to illustrate broader patterns: Kuwait’s oil wells torched by US forces allegedly to justify infrastructure moves; allegations that US military operations use climate intervention as a weapon; and a claim that blizzards and chemical cooling downs (including alleged chemical ice nucleation) have been weaponized in various regions, including the Gulf Coast and the US Northeast. - The conversation ties climate engineering to geopolitical strategies, arguing that portraying Iran as a nuclear threat serves to justify aggressive actions and to obscure the manipulation of weather and climate systems. Netanyahu’s warnings and statements about water and control of resources are presented as part of this broader manipulation. - The speakers argue that the US and allied governments are maintaining control through deception, suggesting that media coverage is insufficient or complicit. They claim that mainstream outlets like Forbes “cover” for the narrative of cloud theft and downplay the severity of drought and weather manipulation in Iran, while asserting that Western North American snowpack is at record lows, much of it chemically nucleated, reducing runoff. - They emphasize the scale of water stress domestically, warning that tens of millions in the US Southwest could face severe water shortages, with reservoirs like Lake Powell and Lake Mead described as near dead pools with substantial sedimentation reducing usable capacity. - The dialogue connects climate engineering to broader biosphere collapse and asserts that the greatest single source of pollution is the US military. They argue that climate engineering is the crown jewel weapon used to inflict misery while remaining hidden, urging listeners to awaken, form supportive networks, and push for action at the legislative level. - They reference the documentary The Dimming as a resource for evidence of climate engineering and invite audiences to explore geoengineeringwatch.org for ongoing information. Throughout, Dane Wiggington reiterates that climate engineering and weather manipulation are central, ongoing operations that intersect with geopolitics, media coverage, and public health. The conversation maintains a consistent stance that these interventions are real, pervasive, and inadequately addressed by mainstream discourse, urging viewers to seek out more information and grassroots advocacy.

Hamas, the second richest terror organization globally with a $1 billion annual turnover, prioritizes profit over the well-being of Gaza's residents. Instead of investing in clean water sources, they focus on smuggling goods through tunnels for personal gain. Consequently, contaminated water contributes to 12% of childhood deaths in Gaza. Surprisingly, the majority of Hamas leaders don't even reside in the area. This highlights the unfortunate reality that the money meant for the citizens ends up lining the pockets of these leaders. It is crucial to free Palestine from this situation.

The owners of the Wonderful Company, Stuart and Linda Resnick, aim to dominate the US lemon market with their seedless lemons. They hold exclusive licenses for two seedless lemon varieties, hoping to control 25% of the market. This move would prevent lemon tree regrowth from seeds. The Resnicks, who also own Halos, Fiji Water, Wonderful Pistachios, and Pom, have faced criticism for their water usage. They acquired water rights in California through secretive deals and have close ties to politicians like Dianne Feinstein. This situation highlights the importance of supporting small, local farms over large corporations. Translation: The owners of the Wonderful Company, Stuart and Linda Resnick, want to control a quarter of the US fresh lemon market with their seedless lemons. They obtained exclusive licenses for two seedless lemon varieties, which would prevent lemon tree regrowth from seeds. The Resnicks, who also own Halos, Fiji Water, Wonderful Pistachios, and Pom, have been criticized for their water usage. They acquired water rights in California through secret agreements and have close relationships with politicians like Dianne Feinstein. This demonstrates why it's important to support small, local farms over big corporations.

The Idaho Department of Water Resources issued a curtailment of 500,000 acres, affecting 781 square miles of farmland during a year with abundant water. Reservoirs are full, risking overflow. A farmer faces a $3,000,000 loss, potentially ending a 135-year family legacy. The governor has the power to end the curtailment but has not acted. Leadership plans to let the water dry up the farmland.

There are members of Congress who have become strangely wealthy, accumulating, for example, $20 million while earning $200,000 a year. It is unclear how this is possible. The goal is to figure out how this happens and stop it.

Many lawmakers have significantly increased their wealth through stock market investments, like Senator Mark Wayne Mullen. He bought shares in a water meter company shortly before the city of Tulsa announced a $94 million project using the same product. This pattern is happening nationwide due to a federal mandate for cities to upgrade water meters. These investments often outperform the S&P 500. For more information, visit quiverquant.com. Translation: Lawmakers are making money by investing in companies like water meter manufacturers, benefiting from city projects and federal mandates. Visit quiverquant.com for more details.

A company backed by a billionaire hedge fund is attempting to drill 30 industrial wells into the Carrizo Wilcox Aquifer in rural East Texas, potentially extracting 15 billion gallons of water per year. This water would be piped out of the area and sold, while local communities that rely on the aquifer would face depleted water levels and dry wells. The well drilling company hired for the project is owned by Donald A. Foster, who until recently, served on the groundwater district board responsible for reviewing the permits. Public records allegedly do not show Foster recusing himself from discussions or votes regarding the project, except for one vote in April 2025. He was present during discussions of this project and even participated in closed sessions where this project was discussed. Foster resigned from the board the day before a public hearing on the issue.

A billionaire couple, the Resniks, control a large share of California's water system, acquired through secretive meetings. They own The Wonderful Company, worth billions, and influence water policies through political donations. Their control over water resources allows them to profit at the expense of taxpayers, selling water back to the state during droughts. The Resniks manipulate legislation, exploit workers, and harm the environment with their water monopoly. Legislation is needed to prevent individuals like the Resniks from exploiting essential public resources.

A billionaire couple in California, the Resnicks, uses more water than all residents of Los Angeles combined. They own the Palm Wonderful Company, which includes brands like Fiji Water, Palm Pomegranates, and Wonderful Pistachios. In 1994, California's public water access was privatized, and the Resnicks acquired 60% of the state's fresh water resources, making them the largest owners of fresh water in California.

"Are rich people okay?" "LA's newest mansions are made of raw concrete and glass." "They're full of sharp edges." "Today's mansions betray a darker influence, the nihilism of billionaires like Peter Thiel." "The solution? Build a compound with every possible amenity." "Two kitchens, one for entertaining and one for cooking." "A giant turntable to turn your car around." "Showers so complex they need instructions." "And yet, no matter how fancy the bathroom fixture, they still dispense LA tap water, and they're often next to lowly plastic trash cans." "As the ultra wealthy seek out larger homes with more amenities, less energy efficiency, fewer toilet paper holders, in short, more expensive lives, they externalize the costs onto society through tax avoidance, their massive carbon footprint, and of course by backing politicians who cut social services to fund tax breaks for the rich." "And it doesn't trickle down." "Zero."

A billionaire couple, the Resniks, control a large portion of California's water system, acquired through secretive meetings. They own The Wonderful Company, worth billions, and influence water policies to profit from selling water back to the state. Their political connections, including with Senator Dianne Feinstein, help them secure control over water systems and funding. The Resniks' actions harm California's water resources, environment, and economy. They exploit workers, manipulate studies, and prioritize profits over public welfare. Legislative changes are needed to prevent individuals like the Resniks from exploiting essential public resources.

LA is facing devastating fires, and there's speculation that this is linked to a cover-up involving a couple who owns a significant portion of the water supply. This couple, known for their ownership of pistachios and Fiji water, controls 60% of the water, raising concerns about public resources being privatized. While people are suffering from the fires and water shortages, the regulators who allowed this should be held accountable. There’s a call for prayers for those affected, but a suspicion lingers about the wealthy who may have evacuated in advance of the fires. The situation raises questions about the motives behind the fires and the protection of evidence related to serious allegations.

According to the speaker, powerful, wealthy entities influence politicians to create laws that benefit them. Robert Kennedy Junior stated these entities work in coordination to increase authoritarian control, transform people into consumers, shift wealth to the ultra-rich, and exploit the planet. They are allegedly at war with democracy and operate without checks, balances, or legal constraints. The speaker claims there is a secret government operation with more resources than the constitutional government. This operation is described as a criminal enterprise, unsanctioned by the president or Congress, that uses tax dollars to exploit the planet and impoverish populations. The speaker asserts this is the problem that needs to be addressed.

BlackRock owns the four meat packers in the country, who are keeping meat prices high and cow prices low, hurting both farmers and consumers due to their monopoly. BlackRock also owns all the pharmaceutical companies. The speaker suggests initiating antitrust suits against the meat packers and regulating pharmaceutical companies to prevent cartel-like behavior.

Small farmers in Oregon are facing challenges due to new regulations. One rule requires permits for any water use, except rainwater. Another rule limits water use for commercial purposes, affecting market gardeners. A farmer named Christina Del Campo was forced to stop irrigating her half-acre farm, Oak Song Farm, due to lack of a water right permit. The Oregon Water Resources department cited the need to manage water resources effectively. These regulations have sparked controversy and legal battles among farmers in the state. Translation: Farmers in Oregon are struggling with new regulations on water use, impacting small-scale farmers and market gardeners like Christina Del Campo. The rules have led to disputes over water rights and resource management.