TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the next administration will definitely face challenges related to infectious diseases. This includes managing existing chronic infectious diseases, which already pose a significant burden. However, more importantly, be prepared for a surprise outbreak. It's not a matter of if, but when, so pandemic preparedness is crucial.

We moeten weg van technocratisch beleid en de Rijksoverheid en politiek echt hervormen. Dit is een enorme uitdaging die Hercilliaans groot is. I agree completely. Translation: We need to move away from technocratic policy and truly reform the central government and politics. This is a Herculean task that I wholeheartedly agree with.

I'm deeply honored by the nomination for NIH director. The NIH is the crown jewel of American biomedical sciences, but post-pandemic, American confidence in science has declined. If confirmed, my goals are to refocus NIH research on solving America's chronic disease crisis, ensure NIH-supported science is replicable and reliable, and establish a culture of respect for free speech and scientific dissent. The NIH must recommit to funding the most innovative biomedical research possible and embrace transparency while vigorously regulating risky research that could cause a pandemic. I will work with congress to guarantee that. I respect the work and mission of the NIH. I will carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to make America healthy again.

Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the upcoming administration will face challenges in the field of infectious diseases. These challenges include both chronic diseases that are already prevalent and new outbreaks. It is certain that there will be a surprise outbreak in the future.

I have served in 5 administrations and want to emphasize that the next administration will face challenges in infectious diseases. There will be both chronic diseases and surprise outbreaks. History shows that these challenges are inevitable, so it is crucial to be prepared. Many have underestimated infectious diseases, but they remain a significant threat.

"There's the transformative, if I might use that word, experience that we've all had now in year five of COVID." The speaker says, "The thought that we won't have another pandemic, I think is naive at best and just not completely unrealistic at worst." They add, "I'm convinced that there will be another pandemic and that's the reason why we have to be perpetually prepared to prevent the terrible impact of a pandemic."

From the start, the lines were drawn regarding the virus's origins. I believed it came from a lab, while others disagreed. My position as head of the CDC was undermined, and I was told it was a White House decision. I find that hard to believe; it seems like a cover-up. Why would we share advanced biotechnology with China? I doubt the measures in place will be foolproof; issues will arise. There have been multiple lies throughout this situation.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

I have served in 5 administrations and want to share my perspective on pandemic preparedness. Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the coming administration will face challenges in dealing with infectious diseases. This includes both chronic diseases and unexpected outbreaks. The history of the last 32 years as the director of NIAID shows that there is no doubt the next administration will have to confront these challenges.

We aim to reverse the chronic disease epidemic and restore the nation's health. The very people dictating our food production and healthcare are those who instigated the crisis in the first place. Many defending this system and pharmaceutical profits are heavily funded. I was asked to clean up corruption and conflict. If confirmed, I recognize the CDC's critical role for Georgia, our country, and global health. Concerns have been raised regarding my previous promotion of "junk science" and potential conflicts of interest due to book deals and vaccine-related lawsuits. People need assurance that I can be independent and science-based. I will support vaccine development and distribution if the evidence supports it. I am aware of vaccine safety data resources, but question the accessibility and integrity of the data.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

In Belgium, we didn't handle the pandemic scenarios well because they were prepared for a much worse flu. Instead, we improvised and adjusted our response based on the severity of the crisis. Politicians prefer predictability, so this approach was challenging for them. We emphasized that the flu we were facing was comparable in severity to seasonal influenza, but we still took precautions for a potentially worse situation. I personally attended the funerals of the first eight people who died, showing that we cared about protecting the population. It's important not to give interviews at funerals, but demonstrating that you care allows for more flexibility in your actions.

De spreker reageert op commotie over zijn eerdere woordgebruik als lid van de oppositie. Hij benadrukt dat er een nieuwe situatie is ontstaan, waarin hij als lid van een fractie de rechtsstaatsverklaring heeft ondertekend en zich daaraan zal houden. Hij erkent dat de demografie van Nederland verandert, met name in de grote steden, en dat het legitiem is om zich daar zorgen over te maken. Echter, hij neemt afstand van de termen 'omvolking' en 'omvolkingstheorie', omdat deze een bewust planmatig beleid suggereren en een negatieve connotatie met het nazisme hebben. Hij gelooft niet in een dergelijk plan en verafschuwt alles wat met Nazi's te maken heeft. Hij sluit zich aan bij het standpunt van de AIVD en NCTV en zal de termen niet meer gebruiken, maar in plaats daarvan spreken over de zorgelijke demografische ontwikkelingen in Nederland. **English translation:** The speaker responds to the commotion about his previous use of words as a member of the opposition. He emphasizes that a new situation has arisen, in which he, as a member of a parliamentary group, has signed the rule of law declaration and will adhere to it. He acknowledges that the demographics of the Netherlands are changing, particularly in the major cities, and that it is legitimate to worry about this. However, he distances himself from the terms 'population replacement' and 'population replacement theory', because they suggest a deliberate planned policy and have a negative connotation with Nazism. He does not believe in such a plan and detests everything related to Nazis. He aligns himself with the position of the AIVD and NCTV and will no longer use the terms, but instead speak of the worrying demographic developments in the Netherlands.

Before we start, I want to say something that cannot be said enough. Even now, people are unnecessarily dying because the Dutch authorities do not allow a reliable and effective medicine. This is a serious and major scandal. I have mentioned it several times before, but it cannot be emphasized enough. This is terrible and it reflects the situation we are in.

I am Marcel de Graaf, Member of the European Parliament for Forum for Democracy. I recently sent a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the approval of medications in the European market, specifically questioning the COVID-19 vaccines. We have received a response that clarifies many issues. This response is highly critical of the vaccination policy in the Netherlands. I will provide more details in a press conference tomorrow at 3 PM via a livestream from Strasbourg. The EMA's response confirms that Forum for Democracy's criticism of the vaccination policy is justified.

I appreciate you sharing those figures. There's a lack of awareness about the pressures on our health service, especially in hospitals and ambulance services, but it affects the entire system. While we're better at managing COVID with fewer deaths and ICU admissions, it still strains the health service. It exacerbates existing demand from people awaiting treatment that was delayed during COVID. Our health service faces a situation as severe as any winter, despite approaching spring. It's crucial to recognize this reality. We don't have a "living with COVID" plan, but rather a "living without restrictions" ideology, which is different. We must implement necessary measures to ease the burden on our health service while the virus remains a factor.

Speaker 0: Wat is er nu? Cresanter dan kerstfeest en dat zal niet gaan. Nieuwjaarsfeest, zal niet gaan. Dat is toch geweldig? Je kijkt er naar uit om samen te zijn. Dat zal niet gaan. De kleinkinderen, grootouders, familie. En dat is dood, dood jammer. Speaker 1: Op een bepaald moment moet je eigenlijk zeggen: de blok erop. Speaker 2: Verder zou ik er ook nog willen wijzen dat het geen zin heeft voor mensen om een masker te dragen wanneer ze in de straat wandelen. Je kan het virus niet krijgen door gewoon straat te wandelen en lucht in te ademen. Dat is onmogelijk. Speaker 1: Als 70 procent van de bevolking gevaccineerd is, is de hele groep beschermd. Speaker 2: De eerste resultaten zijn nu duidelijk in Israël aangetoond. 12 dagen na uw vaccinatie ben je niet meer besmet. Speaker 0: De grote meerderheid van de patiënten die wij nu opnemen zijn gevaccineerde mensen. Speaker 3: De patiënten die wij in GZH nu op intensieve hebben liggen, ik heb het gisteren nog nagekeken, die zijn eigenlijk allemaal gevaccineerd. Hoe gaan we dat controleren? Wat gaan we doen met mensen die regelrecht weigeren om dat te doen? Gaan we ze in de gevangenis gooien? Gaan we hen onbetaalbare boetes geven? Dus het is een verhaal om daar eens intellectueel over na denken. Speaker 1: Ik ga ervan uit dat de politiek, geeft, als je een belofte maakt, dan moet je die belofte ook houden.

I will discuss pandemic preparedness today. Based on my experience, I can say that the next administration will face challenges with chronic infectious diseases and unexpected outbreaks. In my 32 years as NIAID director, history shows that these challenges are inevitable for the new administration.

I work in a hospital in Broward County, Florida. The nurse manager informed us that our anesthesia recovery unit will be used for COVID patients and that surgical patients' families cannot visit. I questioned how they knew there would be a crisis next week, and the manager responded that we should already know what's happening. Others seemed unfazed by this, but I find it strange and believe it's time to bring down this corrupt system. I'm really unhappy with my job because of this corruption.

De spreker wil reageren op commotie over zijn woordgebruik in het verleden als lid van de oppositie. Hij zit nu in een fractie die de rechtsstaatsverklaring mede heeft ondertekend en zal zich daaraan houden. De spreker stelt dat de demografie van Nederland verandert, met name in de grote steden, en dat hij zich daar zorgen over maakt. Hij realiseert zich dat de termen 'omvolking' en 'omvolkingstheorie' onjuist en ongewenst zijn, en een verschrikkelijke connotatie naar het verleden en het nazisme met zich meebrengen. Hij neemt hier volledig afstand van en zal die termen niet meer gebruiken. Hij gelooft niet in een plan of complot en verafschuwt alles wat met nazi's en hun ideologie te maken heeft. Hij sluit zich aan bij de AIVD en de NCTV die zich tegen omvolking en omvolkingstheorie hebben gekeerd, en zal in het vervolg spreken over de zeer zorgelijke demografische ontwikkelingen in Nederland. --- The speaker wants to respond to the commotion about his past use of words as a member of the opposition. He is now in a faction that co-signed the rule of law declaration and will abide by it. The speaker states that the demographics of the Netherlands are changing, especially in the major cities, and that he is concerned about this. He realizes that the terms 'population replacement' and 'population replacement theory' are incorrect and undesirable, and carry a terrible connotation to the past and Nazism. He distances himself completely from this and will no longer use those terms. He does not believe in a plan or conspiracy and abhors everything related to Nazis and their ideology. He joins the AIVD and the NCTV, who have turned against population replacement and population replacement theory, and will henceforth speak of the very worrying demographic developments in the Netherlands.

De minister erkent dat haar huidige opdracht niet overeenkomt met eerdere uitspraken, wat pijnlijk is, maar ze zal de opdrachten uitvoeren. Kort na aantreden is ze geïnformeerd over weerbaarheid en de overlap met haar post op de Opandemse paraatheid. Onder leiding van de NCTV wordt geïnventariseerd wat er moet gebeuren, voortbouwend op de ervaringen tijdens de coronacrisis. Voor de volgende begroting zullen er dekking en oplossingen komen, rekening houdend met mogelijke escalaties en NAVO-verplichtingen. Een ander persoon concludeert dat de minister de pandemische paraatheid niet op orde heeft en signalen negeert, wat zorgelijk is. De minister antwoordt dat de landelijke functie infectieziektebestrijding doorgaat, maar de capaciteitsverhoging van de GGD en de verbetering van de modellering van het RIVM on hold staan. Ze benadrukt dat dit niet de hele zorg doet instorten bij een pandemie. Besluiten voor 2026 en verder, zoals ICT, LCPS, Nationale Zorgreserve, persoonlijke beschermingsmiddelen, rioolseveus en insectziektebestrijding, staan nog in de planning. **Translation:** The minister acknowledges that her current assignment does not align with previous statements, which is painful, but she will carry out the assignments. Shortly after taking office, she was informed about resilience and the overlap with her position on Opandemse preparedness. Under the leadership of the NCTV, an inventory is being made of what needs to be done, building on the experiences during the corona crisis. Coverage and solutions will be provided for the next budget, taking into account possible escalations and NATO obligations. Another person concludes that the minister does not have pandemic preparedness in order and is ignoring signals, which is worrying. The minister replies that the national infectious disease control function continues, but the capacity increase of the GGD and the improvement of the modeling of the RIVM are on hold. She emphasizes that this does not cause the entire healthcare system to collapse in the event of a pandemic. Decisions for 2026 and beyond, such as ICT, LCPS, National Healthcare Reserve, personal protective equipment, sewage systems and insect control, are still in the planning.

Nederlandse samenvatting: Afgelopen maand schreef ik met Joachim Koez en zes EU-parlementscollega’s een brief aan de EMA over de Covid-vaccins en vroeg om opheldering en mogelijk intrekking van de markttoelating. De EMA antwoordde met schokkende feiten: "de corona vaccins alleen en uitsluitend op de markt heeft toegelaten voor individuele immunisatie En absoluut niet voor beheersing van besmetting en absoluut niet voor het voorkomen of verminderen van besmettingen." "EMA's beoordelingsrapporten over de toelating van vaccins benadrukken het gebrek aan gegevens over besmettelijkheid." "De vaccins waren niet bedoeld voor het voorkomen van besmettingen en er zijn al helemaal geen gegevens die onderbouwen dat de vaccins helpen tegen besmettingen." "Sterker nog, de EMA verklaart herhaalde blootstelling aan het virus verhoogt de kans op infecties, zelfs in gevaccineerden." "Vaccinaties zijn uitsluitend voor de bescherming van het gevaccineerde individu." "alle veiligheidsinformatie zorgvuldig worden overwogen alvorens een vaccinatie toe te dienen of aan te bevelen." Verder: "de eerste 14 dagen na vaccinatie juist niet werden gemeld omdat het vaccin 10 tot 14 dagen nodig zou hebben om effectief te worden. Alle klachten in die periode werden juist aan het coronavirus toegeschreven." De regering wist dat de vaccins niet zouden beschermen tegen de verspreiding van het virus maar deelde deze informatie niet met de burgers. "De vaccinatiecampagnes dienen zo snel mogelijk stopgezet te worden. Het is gewoonweg niet veilig en ze voldoen niet aan de eisen die de EMA stelt." De regering en alle politieke partijen die dit steunden behoren op hun leugens en bedrog afgerekend te worden. English translation: Last month I, together with Joachim Koez and six colleagues from the European Parliament, wrote a letter to the EMA about the Covid vaccines and asked for clarification and possibly withdrawal of market authorization. The EMA replied with shocking facts: "the corona vaccines were only and exclusively authorised on the market for individual immunization And absolutely not for controlling infection or for preventing or reducing infections." "EMA's assessment reports on the authorisation of vaccines emphasise the lack of data on transmissibility." "The vaccines were not intended for the prevention of infections and there are absolutely no data to support that the vaccines help against infections." "Moreover, the EMA states that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infections, even in vaccinated individuals." "Vaccinations are solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual." "all safety information should be carefully considered before administering or recommending a vaccination." Furthermore: "the first 14 days after vaccination were not reported because the vaccine would take 10 to 14 days to become effective. All complaints in that period were indeed attributed to the coronavirus." The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus but did not share this information with the citizens. "The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible. It is simply not safe and they do not meet the requirements set by the EMA." And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

Speaker 0 questions the rationale behind implementing stringent interventions for people who will soon die anyway. Speaker 1 responds, stating that the choice was difficult and required a delicate balancing act throughout the pandemic. They explain that driving down the virus necessitates taking actions that can have damaging consequences in other areas. Speaker 1 acknowledges that their previous statement may not have been intended for public broadcast but was an attempt to summarize the problem. They express the need for a swift assessment of the benefits, impacts, and costs of the interventions.

This is my home. The whole historical promise was fulfilled. I had closed down in Kerkhuis, I had closed down in Brunskes. Every time a promise was made. But in Heerlen, a full-fledged hospital remains. The focus is on education. The problem is the staff. We can do something about that. Arbeitsco has proven to be attractive to all those people who have had care in recent years to come back to the floor. Better childcare arrangements, so that people may be able to work longer hours in healthcare. These are the kind of things that we can bring from national policy.