reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The team is investigating a suspicious device found on a bike. The sniper saw the suspect with the device and sent pictures. They are detaining individuals for questioning. Shots were fired, and one shooter is deceased with three injured. Two helicopters have taken off, but the number of victims is unknown. The team is trying to gather information to report back. The suspect may have been filming the area before the incident. The water tower is a key location. The status of the suspect in the van is uncertain.

Speaker 0 gave the FBI a thumb drive containing 29 minutes of high-definition video showing two men attacking a building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. Speaker 0 states that despite going through over 725 indictments, none of their video or even a single still picture of either man has appeared on the Internet. The FBI is allegedly refusing to take Speaker 0's calls, return emails, or accept an offer to meet. Speaker 0 believes the FBI is hiding these men. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to inquire about the identities of these men. Speaker 0 confirms that Ben Grundler has all this information and that they have been in contact for over a year.

Two individuals discuss a suspicious device found near a bike. A sniper sent pictures of the device and identified the owner of the bike. Gas to the building was shut off, and individuals filming were detained for questioning. One shooter is deceased, with three victims in total. Two helicopters departed, and a drone may be used for surveillance. The fate of the detained individuals is uncertain.

The speakers discuss a suspicious device found on a bike, with a sniper sending pictures of the situation. They mention detaining individuals and investigating further. There is talk of filming and shots fired, leading to detainment for questioning. Details about victims and helicopters leaving are mentioned. The conversation also touches on using a drone for surveillance. The fate of a person involved is uncertain.

According to the FBI, Tyler was positioned here and took the shot. The video they provided to us, and it's edited. It starts as Tyler's running off the roof, but this is that rooftop vent; had they given us the full video, we should have been able to see Tyler in this area with his back or with his backpack and his gear and assembling, disassembling the gun, whatever the FBI is saying. But instead, we get the video of him running off the roof. We don't get the full video. The camera was positioned somewhere right here. This is the field of view of the camera. So we've got an edited version, and I think we need to push to get the whole version.

A recent House report on the January 6th pipe bomber claims the FBI has engaged in a cover-up, halting its investigation in 2021 and refusing to cooperate with Congress. A whistleblower indicated that law enforcement was instructed to stand down just two days after the bombs were discovered at the RNC and DNC. Despite initial investigative efforts, the FBI has not identified the bomber nearly four years later. Conflicting information has emerged regarding whether the FBI received corrupted cell data from major carriers, with a former FBI official suggesting it might contain the bomber's identity. However, the carriers denied providing any corrupted data. The report highlights ongoing concerns about the FBI's handling of the investigation, which remains unresolved.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters who were present. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the individuals responsible for planting pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then analyzes a recently released video showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered, raising questions about the authorities' lack of concern and the involvement of the Secret Service. They also mention the failure of the media to cover this story and the suspicious actions of Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. The transcript ends with an update revealing that the person who alerted the police about the bomb was a plainclothes officer with the Capitol Police.

FBI agents are seeking tips to identify the suspect who planted bombs near the Democratic National Party headquarters. Videos show the suspect sitting on a park bench before one of the bombs was placed. The frame rate of CCTV cameras is typically around 15 frames per second (FPS). However, the security video released by the FBI of the January 6th pipe bomb suspect shows only 1 FPS, which is highly unlikely for unaltered footage. The DNC has a history of security concerns, including the Watergate scandal, and the use of 1 FPS footage is statistically improbable.

On January 5, 2021, between 7:30 and 8:30 PM, an unidentified individual placed pipe bombs near the offices of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Republican National Committee (RNC) in Washington, DC. The FBI and partners are renewing their call for tips to identify the suspect, with a reward of up to $500,000 for information leading to arrest and conviction. People with information are urged to call 1-800-CALL-FBI or submit tips online at tips.fbi.gov. Tips can remain anonymous. The FBI’s estimate places the suspect’s height at approximately five feet seven inches. The individual wore a face mask, a gray hooded sweatshirt, and black gloves, and used a backpack to transport each of the devices. Distinctive Nike Air Max Speed Turf shoes, black and gray with a yellow Nike logo, were worn; fewer than 25,000 of these shoes were sold between August 2018 and January 2021. The first sighting occurs at approximately 7:34 PM at the intersection of First Street and North Carolina Avenue Southeast. The person walks southwest on North Carolina Avenue, turns north on New Jersey Avenue, west on D Street, and then south on South Capitol Street. Footage on South Capitol Street shows the person placing a backpack, believed to contain one of the bombs, as they scan the area on tiptoes after putting on glasses, then retrieving the backpack and heading back along South Capitol Street. After reaching the corner of D Street, the suspect turns south all the way down South Capitol Street to a bench outside the Democratic National Committee headquarters. The suspect sits on the bench for a few minutes and does not place the bomb at this time. The individual then walks east on Ivy Street, turns north on New Jersey Avenue, pauses near D Street, and retraces steps back to the DNC bench, where the first bomb is placed. The first bomb is placed at approximately 7:54 PM. The suspect then walks north on South Capitol Street, east on D Street, south on New Jersey Avenue, northeast on North Carolina Avenue, and the coverage ends at about 8:00 PM. Eight minutes later, around 8:08 PM, the suspect is seen again heading north on Second Street. The person walks west on C Street, enters an alley leading to Rumsey Court, and walks west on Rumsey Court. The footage shows the suspect passing between the RNC and the Capitol Hill Club, holding the backpack to the side, continuing north on First Street, east on C Street, back into the alley toward Rumsey Court, and then onto Rumsey Court again. The second pipe bomb is placed at approximately 8:16 PM. The suspect turns back onto Rumsey Court, walking east until last seen on camera at approximately 8:18 PM, with the backpack still on their shoulders. The bomb is believed to have been placed shortly before this video, based on how the backpack is carried. Officials state there is still someone with information that may be significant and urge them to come forward to share information with the FBI. The FBI can be contacted at 1-800-CALL-FBI or tips online at tips.fbi.gov. Tips can remain anonymous. A $500,000 reward is available for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person responsible for this dangerous attempt to harm innocent people.

The transcript provides a detailed timeline and description of a suspect involved in placing two pipe bombs near the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and related sites on the night in question. Key facts, observations, and sequence are as follows: - Physical description and gear: The suspect is described as approximately five foot seven inches tall. They wore a face mask, a grey hooded sweatshirt, and black gloves. A backpack was used to transport each of the bombs. Distinctive Nike Air Max Speed Turf shoes were worn, which are black and grey with a yellow Nike logo; fewer than 25,000 of these shoes were sold between August 2018 and January 2021. - Initial sighting and movements: The first sighting occurs at approximately 7:34 p.m. at the intersection of First Street and North Carolina Avenue Southeast. The suspect walks southwest on North Carolina Avenue, turns north on New Jersey Avenue, west on D Street, and then south on South Capitol Street. - First bomb placement: Footage on South Capitol Street shows the suspect setting down their backpack, which is believed to contain one of the bombs at this time. The suspect appears to put on a pair of glasses, scans the area while standing on tiptoes, then picks up the backpack, turns around, and heads back the way they came on South Capitol Street. After reaching the corner of D Street, the suspect turns around again and walks south all the way down South Capitol Street to a bench outside the Democratic National Committee headquarters building, where the suspect sits on the bench for a few minutes and does not place the bomb at that moment. - Movement toward second potential placement: The suspect then walks east on Ivy Street, turns north on New Jersey Avenue, and pauses near the corner of D Street before retracing steps back to the DNC bench, where the first bomb is placed. The sequence shows the suspect sitting on the DNC bench before placing the bomb at approximately 7:54 p.m. - After the first placement: The suspect moves north on South Capitol Street, east on D Street, south on New Jersey Avenue, and northeast on North Carolina Avenue, with video coverage ending around 8:00 p.m. - Reappearance and route leading to second bomb: Approximately eight minutes later, at about 8:08 p.m., the suspect is seen again heading north on Second Street. The suspect walks west on C Street, enters an alley leading to Rumsey Court, and then walks west on Rumsey Court. Footage shows the suspect passing between the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Capitol Hill Club while holding the backpack out to the side. - Second bomb placement: The suspect continues between the RNC and the Capitol Hill Club, then north on First Street, east on C Street, back into the alley toward Rumsey Court, and back onto Rumsey Court. The second pipe bomb is placed at approximately 8:16 p.m. The suspect then turns back onto Rumsey Court, walking east until last seen on camera at approximately 8:18 p.m., with the backpack on their shoulders. The bomb is believed to have been placed shortly before this video, based on how the suspect is carrying the backpack. - Public appeal: The statement ends with an appeal, indicating there is still someone with information who may not realize its significance and requesting that person to come forward.

- Kibbe on Liberty hosts Congressman Thomas Massey for part one of a mega episode focusing on the FBI-identified pipe bomber in the January 6 events and the anomalies in the official narrative; Massey argues he does not believe one loner acted alone. - Massey discusses prior coverage and context, noting a Steve Baker interview that documented inconsistencies in the official narrative. He points to fallout from that interview: a Capitol Hill Police official, who was third in command, resigned the day after the interview; another whistleblower contacted Massey about that officer, suggesting misconduct unrelated to the pipe bomb but part of a larger pattern of investigations. - Massey argues that the FBI’s announcement of a suspect came about a week after that interview and after reporting by The Blaze, and suggests the timing is suspicious. He says this coincidence is surprising and potentially a red flag, given that the investigation had been deemed inconclusive or dormant for years. - Massey emphasizes his own context: his staffer on the Hill watched hours of video to identify who found the second pipe bomb; he asserts that the individuals who found the second bomb should be considered suspects, and that the FBI admitted this to him. He recounts efforts with Kevin McCarthy to release video showing how the second pipe bomb was found, noting that those who found it were very lucky to locate it quickly. - He describes other connections and leads: his staffer now works for Kash Patel; Massey has spoken with a counter-surveillance officer who found the pipe bomb and with the officer’s handler, a Capitol Hill Police member who had previously worked for the ATF and later for Metro Police and Capitol Hill Police. He also mentions conversing with the assistant FBI director in charge of the Washington field office, in a transcribed interview with Jim Jordan about why cell phone data wasn’t used to geolocate the suspect (the provider allegedly corrupted data, which the judiciary committee and Barry Loudermilk’s committee disputed). - Massey references a 100-page report from Barry Loudermilk’s committee on the pipe bomb investigation, noting leads the FBI did not follow. He mentions a lead about an individual in Falls Church, Virginia (a former military man now in government service) whose metro card was used on January 5 and January 6; this person’s childhood friend allegedly used the metro card to approach the RNC/Capitol Hill Club area and take photographs near the pipe bomb sites. Massey asserts this person of interest, plus a neighbor who shared a wall with him, could be connected to others the FBI has not fully explored. - He contends that the arrest appears to derail other investigations and interviews that were being planned. He asserts that a “pro-Trump” motive has not been established for the suspect, contrasting the media’s framing with details such as the suspect’s My Little Pony interest and parental political donations. - Massey criticizes the prosecutor in the case, Jocelyn Ballantine, and recounts concerns about her track record (including involvement in the Flynn case, the Proud Boys case, and alleged attempts to obtain confessions implicating Trump). He questions why she remains at the DOJ. - They discuss broader concerns about FBI politicization and surveillance: Massey references reporters and contact with Kash Patel’s team to argue for cleaning house at the FBI, but notes Ballantine remains in place. He describes eight senators discovering they had been spied on, leading to a legislative push: in the last continuing resolution, lawmakers added a half-million-dollar payout and standing to sue the government for surveillance abuses, a provision he characterizes as carving exemptions out of the law; he says this was supported by most lawmakers, who voted for the CR due to Trump concerns. - They debate possible explanations for the pipe bomber case: the possibility that the FBI identified the suspect and cleared him, prompting no arrest due to exonerating information; or the possibility of a false narrative crafted by others to preserve the January 6 prosecution framework; or the involvement of a patsy or rogue actor. - Massey reiterates his three things he said on Twitter: the bomber was a lone wolf (which he disputes); the FBI was unwittingly incompetent for four years (which he says he questions and calls a cover-up); and it was not a Trump supporter. He stresses the need for more transcribed interviews and explanations from the FBI and ongoing oversight to uncover the full truth. - The discussion shifts toward Epstein files coverage and the broader goal of maintaining public pressure for transparency. They indicate a plan to release a separate bonus episode focusing on Epstein files.

The speaker discusses the FBI's "failed investigation" of the January 6th pipe bomb, alleging the FBI has no leads or suspects, has lost information and evidence, and that the Secret Service deleted all texts from January 6th. The speaker claims Steve D'Antuono said cell phone data that could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. The speaker states that the FBI does not have video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The speaker asks if confidential human sources were involved in the pipe bomb incident. The other speaker responded they would have to refresh themselves on the information gathered to date. The speaker suggests getting the information public before the election.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

The FBI released videos of the Capitol riot suspect in the hope of generating tips. One video shows the suspect near the Democratic National Party Headquarters where one of the bombs was later found. The frame rate of the security video is questioned, as it is unusual for it to be just one frame per second. A study found that no cameras in America operate at such a low frame rate. The DNC has a history of attacks, and the area is known for its security concerns. It is highly unlikely that the FBI's released video is the original, unedited footage.

Previously unreleased footage shows the suspect sitting on the DNC bench before placing the first bomb. The suspect positioned the bomb at around 7:54 PM.

The DNC pipe bomb was planted on January 6th at 7:52 PM, according to the FBI. They released two clips from different security cameras. The first camera shows the suspect arriving at 7:42 PM, sitting on bench 1, then leaving. Ten minutes later, he returns and sits on bench 2. At 7:52 PM, the second camera captures him planting the bomb next to the bush, but the view is obstructed. The first camera has a clearer shot of both benches, yet the FBI has not released the full footage from it. This raises questions about transparency, especially since there is a $100,000 reward for information leading to the suspect's capture.

The speakers discuss the need for defense counsel to have access to the video evidence in the case. They suggest a stepwise process to ensure all information reaches defense lawyers. One speaker mentions concerns about public release due to nefarious organizations and threats to witnesses. Another speaker believes that the evidence should be made available to the public to identify those involved. They mention the presence of a pipe bomber and the refusal of the DOJ to disclose undercover agents. The speakers emphasize the importance of transparency to uncover the truth.

The FBI released new video of the suspect who planted pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters the night before the Capitol riot. The FBI confirmed the pipe bombs were viable devices that could have detonated, resulting in serious injury or death. The video shows the suspect walking along a residential street at 7:40 PM, with investigators noting their unusual gait. By 7:52 PM, the suspect was at the DNC headquarters, appearing to fumble with a backpack before a bomb was discovered in a nearby bush. At 8:14 PM, the suspect walked down an alley next to the RNC headquarters, placing a bomb there before exiting the area. The FBI suggested the public look for changes in behavior since January 5th, such as bragging about Capitol Hill activity or exhibiting unusual emotional responses to news about the event. The bombs contained black powder, and the FBI is interested in the source of the kitchen timers used. Images of the suspect's Nikes were also released to help generate leads.

An individual sent pictures of a suspicious device on a bike. A sniper inside a building took the pictures and saw the person walking away from the bike. The sniper called it out and sent the pictures. Someone is detained who may be the owner of the bike. Gas is off to the building. Authorities were notified. Individuals were filming them, a person on the roof, and then them again. When shots were fired, they tried to run away. There is one shooter deceased and three victims in the crowd. Two helicopters have taken off.

The transcript centers on a report from NBC News about the man charged with planting two pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of the January 6th attack. The speaker cites NBC’s article, which states that the suspect told the FBI he believed conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, according to two people familiar with the matter. The speaker notes that NBC provides no direct quote or further context beyond that single claim. The speaker asserts that their own sources indicate the word used by the suspect, Brian Cole Jr., in his FBI interview was that he believed the 2020 election was stolen. However, the speaker claims there is a widespread belief within the FBI that this comment was a legal maneuver rather than a genuine belief. According to the speaker, the FBI allegedly thinks the statement was coached by Cole’s lawyer to secure a pardon from President Trump, specifically a retroactive pardon because Trump had issued a pardon for individuals convicted of January 6–related crimes. The speaker emphasizes that there is no additional evidence in Cole Jr.’s background, as far as their sources can determine, indicating he is a Trump supporter. They remark that NBC is one of the few outlets making this claim, noting that the article contains several paragraphs but only repeats the initial sentence without further detail. The speaker suggests that even within liberal media, there is a belief that the comment was a legal maneuver rather than a reflection of genuine political conviction, and argues that NBC’s reporting is selectively presented to push a particular narrative. Throughout, the speaker contrasts this with a broader media portrayal, arguing that while Brian Cole Jr. did make the comment about the 2020 election being stolen, the context is missing, and the media narrative is being shaped by selective reporting. The speaker frames the situation as an instance of media cherry-picking intended to influence perceptions about the suspect’s political affiliations and the nature of his statements to the FBI, rather than providing a complete account.

FBI agents are seeking tips regarding the unidentified person who planted bombs near the Democratic National Party Headquarters. One video shows the suspect sitting on a park bench near the location. The frame rate of most CCTV cameras is around 15 frames per second (FPS). However, the security video released by the FBI of the pipe bomb suspect operates at just one FPS. A study found that no cameras in America today operate at such a low frame rate. Considering the history of attacks on the DNC building and the security measures in place, it is highly unlikely that the FBI's video is the original, unedited footage.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the person or people who planted pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then introduces new surveillance footage released by Capitol Police, showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered. They describe the video, pointing out the lack of concern from law enforcement and the Secret Service, as well as the proximity of the bomb to VP-elect Kamala Harris. The speaker raises questions about the identity of the person who alerted authorities to the bomb and the subsequent cover-up.

Vice President Kamala Harris was allegedly targeted by a pipe bomb at the Democratic National Committee headquarters on January 6, 2021. The FBI is urging people to report any suspicious activity, offering a $500,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the suspect. However, the person in charge of the FBI investigation now claims that Harris was never in danger and the bomb couldn't have detonated while she was there. The incident is not mentioned in a special January 6th report. Questions arise about why Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell denied National Guard assistance prior to the Capitol riot. A newly released video shows Capitol Police and Secret Service officers seemingly relaxed near the bomb. The FBI released video footage of the suspect, but the cell phone data was corrupted, leaving unanswered questions.

A white pickup truck with a 40-year-old white man inside was seen zipping by a house seconds after an explosive device next to a gas can was detonated. The can didn't explode, leaving singe marks on the building that houses Mr. G's Hair Design Studios and the local chapter of the NAACP. Federal agents are investigating if this was a targeted attack, which the group's president believes is a sign of their progress in fighting for civil rights. The neighborhood is in shock, and some are concerned for their safety. However, a skeptic claims that the bombing is a hoax, pointing to a Google Maps photo from September 2014 that shows the same black mark on the building. The FBI has released a sketch of a white male suspect and is offering a $10,000 reward for information leading to an arrest.

John Nance and Hogan DeGidley discuss a recent FBI case and press conference. Patel’s FBI has been extremely transparent, and that transparency will continue to reassure the American people that information regarding this subject will flow as appropriate without jeopardizing the prosecution of the case. A key takeaway is the suggestion that forensic evidence could be the linchpin to identifying the suspect, despite millions of data lines to review; pieces such as DNA or a fingerprint related to the pipe bombs themselves may have been the actual “smoking gun.” There is emphasis on teamwork and the idea that information had been left to collect dust rather than being newly uncovered. AG Merrick Garland’s remarks are cited, highlighting that the evidence leading to the arrest had been sitting at the FBI for years. The FBI, along with US Attorney Piro and prosecutors, worked tirelessly for months sifting through evidence that had been at the FBI with the Biden administration for four years. The point is made that there was no new tip or new witness, just diligent police work and prosecutorial effort. Hogan DeGidley asks why the case wasn’t cracked during President Biden’s four years in office. The response suggests that it either couldn’t be done or wouldn’t be done, and that the American people suffered as a result. It is stated that this did not come from new evidence but from information already in the bureau and departments being sifted through. The discussion frames the case as a win for the administration, the FBI, and the DOJ, and a step toward transparency, accountability, and justice. They note that the attackers placed pipe bombs at both the RNC and DNC locations; the motives remain unknown, and questions about a possible Antifa link or other theories are mentioned as preliminary. Cash Patel is quoted as saying the FBI has committed to being the most transparent law enforcement operation in U.S. history while ensuring accountability in the courts with U.S. Attorneys and prosecutors. The aim is to divulge information when prudent and constitutionally permissible, safeguarding the case, to secure the nation’s capital and allow Americans to live in safe, secure neighborhoods. This is attributed to leadership from the FBI Washington Field Office. John Nance comments that Patel is doing a very good job and that the director’s social-media transparency is notable. He expresses encouragement about the FBI’s reform efforts and notes that the White House press narrative around January 6 is seen as misaligned with the pipe-bomb case. The arrest took place in Woodbridge, Virginia, a wealthy DMV suburb, prompting remarks about why the dots weren’t connected sooner.