reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Get your kids out of government schools if possible. The education system has been intentionally federalized and influenced by atheists, Marxists, and humanists, who reject Christianity and promote secularism as an alternative religion. This shift began long before the 1960s, rooted in the progressive era, with a deliberate effort to remove God from schools, disrupting traditional family relationships. In the past, schools included the Bible and prayer, but modern interpretations of the First Amendment have led to their removal. The pledge of allegiance, originally lacking "under God," was altered during the Cold War. The education system promotes democracy, which the founders opposed, and the left manipulates language to create alternate realities, using schools as a means to increase control and power.

Speaker 0 believes the school system intentionally avoids teaching about money to produce compliant employees. School discourages mistakes, promotes individual work, and seeks single correct answers, which Speaker 0 says is the opposite of real-world success. This paralyzes graduates, killing their spirit of learning. Speaker 1 relays that children are told not to report bullying to their parents, because parents might bring weapons to school and someone could die. Speaker 1 also states that people shouldn't be judged for wanting to have sex with a five-year-old.

John D. Rockefeller, from the oil industry, funded the General Education Board in 1903, stating he wanted a nation of workers, not thinkers. The board aimed to create schools focused on obedience, memorization, and preparing students for 9-to-5 jobs. Rockefeller also funded Big Pharma and medical schools to shift people from natural healing to pharmaceutical-based care. This created a system where schools create workers who become sick and require pharmaceutical drugs, generating endless profit for Rockefeller. The education system is a monopoly breeding workers for the elites' financial gain.

People can learn things they enjoy, like improving a golf swing, because they pay attention. Different personalities are suited for different fields like math, philosophy, or engineering. It's about finding what aligns with your thinking style, but traditional education, designed by the Rockefeller family, aims to create factory workers and soldiers. Starting education at age five allows for early indoctrination, separating children from their parents and having them taught by people they may not respect. The speaker recalls feeling this disconnect as a child, questioning why people they didn't respect controlled their education.

The speaker discusses the deliberate destruction of the education system and the shift towards a consumer-focused society. They explain that the education system has become a tool of the neoliberal system, prioritizing consumerism over cultivating knowledgeable individuals. The speaker criticizes the current system for favoring the elite and perpetuating caste reproduction. They argue that in the past, education aimed to push students to their highest potential, but now the ruling class sees their children as the rightful heirs to power. The speaker mentions Gabriel Attal as an example of someone benefiting from this system, emphasizing that intelligence is not the sole determinant of success.

Tyrants of the past had limited reach, but 21st-century technology allows total control of wealth, energy, and food. The World Economic Forum's idea of "you'll own nothing and be happy" echoes collectivization under Stalin and Mao, which abolished private property and independence from the state. Education has been captured and infected with critical race theory, gender studies, and diversity, equality, and inclusion. While the curriculum describes what is taught, how it's taught is more important. Progressive culture has turned schools into places of indoctrination, pushing cultural forgetting and dementia. Education has been centralized, and today's pupils, brainwashed and ready to serve, will be tomorrow's governments. The speaker remembers the past identity, history, traditions, and Christianity.

Schools are criticized for training people to be ignorant and lacking in critical thinking skills. They are seen as tools for the military industrial complex, producing obedient workers. However, parents can counteract this by providing alternative education at home. Encouraging creativity, reading diverse materials, and watching educational television can help children develop their thinking abilities. Parents should support their children's intellectual growth and not just focus on their success or being well-behaved.

Education is flawed and unlikely to improve because the true power lies with wealthy business interests, not politicians. These owners control land, corporations, and media, shaping the information we receive. Their goal is to maintain a population that is obedient and minimally educated, ensuring people are just smart enough to perform basic tasks but not to question the system. They prefer workers who accept poor job conditions, lower pay, and diminishing benefits, including threats to Social Security. The system is designed to benefit the few at the expense of the many, leaving citizens without the critical thinking skills necessary to challenge their circumstances.

Speaker 0 argues that the crooked foundation of the public school system makes university indoctrination possible, asserting that everything in school is filtered through a Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors. The speaker claims schools introduce gender ideology, with opponents framed as intolerant; introduce critical race theory, with opponents framed as racist; introduce feminism, with opponents labeled misogynist or part of the patriarchy; and introduce socialism, with opponents described as privileged. The speaker contends that this influence is often subtle rather than overt, embedded in curriculum. An example given is how slavery is taught in elementary school. The speaker acknowledges general agreement that slavery was bad but argues that curricula omit broader historical context. Specifically, they state that The United States banned slavery in seven states while the rest of the world had bans in seven countries; in seventeen seventy six, 92–95% of the world was actively practicing slavery and it was the norm on every continent. The speaker also notes that Thomas Jefferson tried to get slavery abolished in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, that England abolished slavery in 1833, the United States in 1865, and that the rest of the world followed that example in Africa and Asia. The claim is that within proper historical context, the American story is one of liberation. The speaker asserts that the Marxist lens requires the oppressed versus the oppressors, and that if these arguments were made in school, a student would be failed, shamed in front of the class, and possibly sent to the principal’s office. The claim is that the system is designed to keep America divided so it could be easily conquered. Addressing critics, the speaker mentions the Frankfurt School, stating it expanded the ideas of Marxism, developed the oppressed-versus-oppressor framework, and aimed to use race, gender, and sexuality to usher in cultural Marxism. The speaker contends this infiltration began in academia in the nineteen-sixties, and attributes today’s situation to those developments. Note: Promotional content at the end has been omitted.

What if I told you that every single day kids go to school, they become less intelligent? The speaker argues that there is so much more than just one type of intelligence. While school can increase academic intelligence by teaching subjects like physics, algebra, and calculus, it is diminishing the children's creative intelligence. The claim is that schooling teaches them to think in a particular way, to follow a defined path in life rather than exploring a broader range of possibilities. The argument continues that school promotes a conventional sequence: go to high school, get a diploma, go to a good college, and then find a stable, respectable job. It is suggested that this path is presented as the ticket to success. The speaker questions this premise by posing a rhetorical counterexample: if that predefined path were truly the key to success, how is it that the speaker stands there today? How did the speaker, described as a straight C student, start a technology company at the age of 16? The implication is that there are dimensions of intelligence and potential that academic performance alone does not capture, and that real innovation and achievement can arise from abilities beyond traditional academic measures. From this perspective, the central message is that conventional expectations about education and success may overlook or undervalue nonacademically measured talents and ingenuity. The speaker emphasizes that there must be facets of intelligence—creative, practical, entrepreneurial capabilities—that do not align neatly with standard academic metrics. The claim is that meaningful impact and world-changing outcomes often come from deviating from the standard script prescribed by societal norms about education and career paths. In closing, the speaker delivers a single, pointed takeaway: no one has ever changed the world by doing what the world has told them to do. This concluding assertion reinforces the idea that transformative progress typically arises when individuals pursue paths that challenge conventional wisdom and resist the pressure to conform to a uniform route. The message ends with a simple expression of gratitude: Thank you.

The speaker expresses frustration with the focus on self-help and emotional well-being in the educational system. They argue that the main goal should be to prepare children for productive careers and to be successful academically. The speaker believes that children should not be leading the conversation and that adults should make decisions based on statistics and funding. They also mention concerns about mental health issues and argue that children should be allowed to enjoy their innocence and not be burdened with adult problems. The speaker emphasizes the importance of protecting children who have religious beliefs.

The education system in Western Civilization was designed to create workers for industry, focusing on conditioning children to be better employees. This approach led to a monotonous public that lacked critical thinking skills and instead regurgitated information. Education should aim to enlighten people and promote freedom, but when thinking is suppressed, tyranny and oppression prevail. The systematic approach to education limits our ability to think creatively and solve new problems. Western culture was built on challenging old norms, as seen in the American Revolution. However, today's education system discourages questioning and conformity is encouraged. To change this, we need to differentiate between training and education, engage in longer conversations, and prioritize critical thinking.

The speaker criticizes the education system, claiming that more money and resources won't improve it. They argue that the real owners of the country, wealthy business interests, control everything including politicians, media, and important decisions. These owners want obedient workers, not critical thinkers, and they aim to take away retirement and Social Security money. The speaker believes that Americans are willfully ignorant of the truth and that the American dream is a falsehood.

Children's education depends on their parents being wise and healthy. The current education system focuses on indoctrination rather than critical thinking. Historically, the system was designed to control slaves by keeping children busy and obedient. Today's education system still reflects this model, discouraging creativity and independent thinking.

Education struggles because the true owners of this country—wealthy business interests—control everything. Politicians are merely a facade, giving the illusion of choice while the real power lies with those who own the land, corporations, and media. Their goal is to maintain a population of obedient workers, not critical thinkers. They want people just smart enough to perform tasks but not question the system, which has been deteriorating for decades. As they seek to reclaim retirement funds and Social Security, the average citizen remains unaware of the manipulation. This is the reality of the American dream: it requires being asleep to believe it.

The American public education system is based on the Prussian model developed in the late 1800s. The Prussians created this universal education system because they feared losing military superiority and wanted to produce mindless, obedient soldiers. This model was then adopted in the U.S. in the late 1800s by corporate figures, before Mussolini, who sought to produce obedient workers. The desks are in rows, there are factory bells, and there is top-down leadership because of this. The schools were built aiming to eradicate the will of the students to ensure obedience.

The speaker argues that indoctrination in schools and universities is far beyond what parents realize. He shares an example: a man in the Bay Area with daughters in a high school asks them who the first presidents of the United States were. They can name Washington, but when asked what they know about him, the response is that he was a slave owner. The conversation underscores that, beyond mentioning slavery as a horrific institution, there is little knowledge about George Washington. The speaker concludes that, while slavery is horrific, we should still know more about George Washington than that.

Schooling is criticized as a government-controlled system that stifles creativity in children, turning them into obedient individuals. The strict rules and regulations mirror a prison-like environment, conditioning kids to submit to authority. Mandatory schooling is seen as a form of slavery, producing citizens who comply with orders without question. The system aims to create a standardized population that benefits corporations and maintains power structures. The state enforces strict punishments for non-compliance, treating students like factory workers meeting quotas. Until mandatory schooling is abolished, children will continue to be raised as slaves, primed to accept subjugation in adulthood. Translation: The speaker criticizes schooling as a government-controlled system that stifles creativity in children, turning them into obedient individuals. The strict rules and regulations mirror a prison-like environment, conditioning kids to submit to authority. Mandatory schooling is seen as a form of slavery, producing citizens who comply with orders without question. The system aims to create a standardized population that benefits corporations and maintains power structures. The state enforces strict punishments for non-compliance, treating students like factory workers meeting quotas. Until mandatory schooling is abolished, children will continue to be raised as slaves, primed to accept subjugation in adulthood.

The speaker argues against attending college, claiming the school system is a scam designed to create controllable employees. They allege John D. Rockefeller established the general education board to mold people into workers, not thinkers. Schools purportedly fail to teach essential money skills, instead prioritizing obedience and rote memorization. The speaker believes the system discourages independent thought and rewards conformity through tests and attendance. They assert that school curricula are outdated and easily accessible online. Choosing financial freedom over a traditional career, the speaker learned about investing and business, generating more income from their phone than a college degree could provide. They claim the system traps individuals in debt and unfulfilling jobs, and that rich people perpetuate wealth by withholding knowledge from the poor and middle class. The speaker concludes that self-education is the only escape from this system, and that college is only worthwhile if a specific passion requires a degree.

The speaker discusses the centralization of education globally, highlighting the push for uniform standards and indoctrination of children into a one-world system. They emphasize the significance of this issue, pointing out the contrast between traditional American values and the UN's approach to human rights. The speaker believes that this education agenda will have long-lasting effects, surpassing other current geopolitical tensions.

The speaker outlines a chilling blueprint for global social control by exploiting humanity’s own psychology. It begins with detaching people from their inner love and identity, forcing them into a system that teaches it is wrong to be themselves if they differ from what is deemed normal. It proposes confusing individuals about their biological makeup so permanent body alteration becomes the presumed path to happiness, and mandating daily attendance at an institution that concentrates exclusively on provided information. Education would start at age five, continue into adulthood, and be punctuated by constant testing to make that information their truth. A strategy is described to suppress independent thought: offering explanations for everything so there is little room for personal interpretation, scolding and humiliating dissenters, and continually reminding people of past cruelties while broadcasting present cruelties to cultivate fear. The narrative suggests convincing people that humanity is inherently incognizant and wild, eroding their sense of purpose or belief in a creator. It claims to promote the illusion that humans are as intelligent as ever, preventing scrutiny of the system’s integrity. The plan includes elevating artificial ideals of beauty and stealthily shaping desires through idols to prevent contentment with one’s appearance, prompting constant self-comparison. It envisions the creation of addictive digital platforms that rank individuals by follower counts, so self-worth hinges on numeric validation. Society would be organized so that money determines status and opportunity, with a built-in mechanism to favor those with wealth over those without. Economic and daily life controls are described: money would be the main focus, but accumulation would be so difficult that people remain in perpetual struggle, locking them into the system. Taxation would be pervasive, justified as for their own benefit, and time would be drained through continuous labor. People would have only two days of respite to feel rewarded, yet even these breaks would not alleviate systemic control. Poisonous consumption would be promoted in social settings so that, even on their two days off, people remain disconnected from themselves and others. The speaker also describes medical control: food would be pumped with excess sugars and addictive chemicals, making health problems cheap and ubiquitous, while medications would mask symptoms and create dependence. Healthcare would be expensive, anchoring a cycle of consumption, medication, and work. Finally, chaos would be manufactured and blamed on a group of their own, generating widespread judgmental stereotypes and turning people against one another in numerous ways.

I did some investigation into the derivation of the American public education system and found out that it was based on the Prussian model. And the Prussians produced a universal education system in the late eighteen hundreds because they were afraid they were losing military superiority, and they wanted to produce a cadre of mindless obedient soldiers. That was expressly the purpose. And then that model was adopted by prototypical fascists in The US, again in the late eighteen hundreds. This is before Mussolini and all of that time. Corporate types mostly who wanted to produce cadres of obedient workers.

The reason education sucks is the same reason it will never be fixed: the owners of this country don’t want that. The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians; politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls. They’ve got the judges in their back pocket, and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They’ve got you by the bulls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But they don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They want obedient workers because they own this fucking place. It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.

Education is flawed because the wealthy control everything, including politicians and the media. They want obedient workers, not critical thinkers. The system is rigged against hardworking people, who keep electing those who don't care about them. The rich want more for themselves and less for everyone else. The game is rigged, but many don't realize or care.

The speaker claims that the system is rigged and that we are the ones who truly protect ourselves, not the company, scientists, or government. They argue that the media constantly tells us what to believe and buy, making us believe we have freedom of choice when we don't. The speaker asserts that big wealthy businesses control everything, including land, corporations, politics, and media. They state that the elite across the world are becoming more powerful, while the majority of people in every country don't want that. The speaker believes that those in power want obedient workers, not critical thinkers. They mention that this goes against the idea of Americans valuing independence.