TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I was concerned by a video of an EPA political appointee talking about tossing gold bars off the Titanic to distribute billions of dollars before inauguration day. The appointee mentioned getting money out fast before the new administration came in, referencing "gold bars" going to nonprofits, states, and tribes. I don't know what grants they were referencing, but they mentioned tossing gold bars off the Titanic to get jobs from recipient NGOs. They claimed to have given out tens of billions of dollars last year, including $50 million, or maybe $50 billion, for a Climate Bank, suggesting they could then go work for one of these organizations. I don't know what any of that's about, but it's concerning. I want to be a good steward of tax dollars.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling them to stand up to the Americans from a position of strength. In response to criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting the questioner doesn't understand the tax code. The speaker also states that the biggest component of that was the cost of building.

New Englanders need more access to natural gas, and the Constitution pipeline project aimed to deliver it from Pennsylvania. New York stopped the pipeline despite its potential to create jobs, lower energy costs, and provide economic benefits. The pipeline's progress was halted by then-New York governor Andrew Cuomo, who used state-level powers to block it. The speaker suggests that one state shouldn't have the power to affect an issue impacting all of New England, comparing the situation to a highway being blocked. The speaker claims the current president has signed executive orders declaring a national energy emergency.

Do you support the prime minister's veto of the Northern Gateway pipeline? I understand the veto and believe it was the right decision for both environmental and commercial reasons. However, your company has invested $1 billion in pipelines in Brazil and the UAE over the last five years. Do you support those investments? There is a global energy system, and it's important to consider Canada's role in the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. So, you oppose pipelines in Canada but support them abroad? That’s not a double standard. You profit from foreign pipelines while shutting down projects here, which puts people out of work.

We're here to ensure Americans don't wake up needing to boil their water because the EPA's workforce was removed. We provide oversight, especially after reports of EPA employees facing job insecurity. These individuals are already undermining the system. Elon Musk is breaking the law; a federal court ruled against firing people with deferred payments lacking federal authority. We're protecting federal workers, clean air, water, and the environment. This isn't the time to pause climate action. We lost four years and must recover lost ground, so these critical programs must stay intact. Elon Musk threatens essential agencies. Unless the public demands environmental protection, we're here to warn that these changes are coming.

I voted for Donald Trump, and now our farm is at risk. We're in danger of losing it because the NRCS isn't upholding their contract with us regarding the EQIP program. This program, which cost-shares improvements like fencing and wells, was funded by the Inflation Reduction Act. However, executive orders have frozen the funding, preventing payments for completed work and future projects. This isn't just affecting me; other farmers are in the same situation. Before making business decisions, I verified the funding was secured per contract, not contingent. Now, they're breaking the contract due to the funding freeze.

You mentioned wanting to eliminate 600 NIH workers on day one and 2,200 from HHS. Which departments will you cut from? There are 200 political appointees that change with each administration. If you remove those, will you replace them with your appointees? President Biden changed 3,000 employees at HHS. As a potential top health official, will you commit to not firing federal employees working on food safety or cyber protection? There are 91,000 employees. So, will you ensure those working on food safety and cyber security keep their jobs? I commit not to fire anyone doing their job. Will this commitment be based on your opinion or political agenda? It will be based on my opinion. So, it seems those with differing views on vaccines may be at risk of losing their jobs.

Joe Biden's energy policies are causing high inflation and hitting American families hard. He reversed actions that achieved energy independence and canceled the Keystone XL Pipeline. By reentering the Paris climate accord and blocking new oil, gas, and coal production, he is raising energy costs and hurting industries like food, shipping, and manufacturing. China benefits from these high energy prices, driving our heavy industry overseas. To become an advanced manufacturing nation, we need low-cost energy. Biden's energy agenda aligns with China's, as they sign global climate deals and break them. When I'm back in the White House, I'll bring back a pro-American energy policy, eliminating unnecessary regulations and approving energy projects quickly. This will create jobs, restore hope, and make America great again.

The Loan Program Office supplied a little over $40 billion in its fifteen years. Almost $100 billion was then supplied in the 76 days between the election loss and President Trump's inauguration. The speaker questions why, if these were beneficial ideas, they weren't implemented in the two and a half years after the Inflation Reduction Act. According to the speaker, the previous administration changed terms and loan covenants, attempting to complicate unwinding their actions. The speaker asserts this is not a responsible way to handle taxpayer money or advance the energy system. They state that they inherited a mess, but it is fixable with an aggressive team. They claim American energy prices are down and investments to bring jobs back are up, but acknowledge the need for cleanup.

The speaker denies coordinating with President Trump or his campaign while authoring the EPA chapter on Project 2025, stating it's misleading to suggest otherwise. They assert the Heritage Foundation's work on conservative policies predates Trump, with the "Mandate for Leadership" series existing since 1981. The speaker claims Vice President Kamala Harris avoided answering if Americans are better off economically than four years ago, arguing most Americans are struggling due to the Biden-Harris administration's energy policies. They cite rising costs of gas, electricity, and groceries as evidence of financial hardship caused by policies like restricting resource development and demonizing coal, oil, and natural gas. The speaker references an Institute of Energy Research report that claims over 250 actions by the Biden-Harris administration have hindered American energy production, including halting the Keystone XL Pipeline, limiting oil and gas permits, and impeding critical mineral access, increasing dependence on China. They state these actions have increased gas and electricity prices.

I questioned the President about pausing LNG exports to Europe, emphasizing the demand from our allies and how it impacts the war in Ukraine by making them rely on Putin's gas. He was stunned and claimed he didn't do it. I pointed out the recent executive order and offered to have his secretary print it out for us to review together. He then said he only signed something to conduct a study on the effects of LNG. But I told him, no, he paused it, and it's causing massive damage to our economy and national security. It struck me that he genuinely didn't know what he had signed. It made me wonder, who is really running the country if he's signing things without knowing what they are?

I work on environmental climate policy, focusing on implementation at the EPA. My work involves allocating the approved billions of dollars, ensuring the funds are used properly and create good jobs. Currently, the focus is on distributing the money as quickly as possible before the new administration takes over and potentially interferes. We're trying to get the money out to nonprofits, states, tribes, and cities before the inauguration on January 20th. After that date, the new administration could halt all grants and reevaluate the programs. The goal is to get the money to organizations that can continue the work, even if the government changes its policies.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work because of a Biden EO, can expect to get their promised green jobs. I welcome you to present data showing these people won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka wished the President had paired the Keystone EO with a plan for creating new jobs. The Laborers International Union of North America says the Keystone decision will cost thousands of existing and projected jobs. The President plans to share details of a plan to create millions of good union jobs and tackle the climate crisis in the weeks ahead. Many believe investment in infrastructure will boost the US economy, create good-paying union jobs, and advance our climate and clean energy goals.

I asked the president why he paused LNG exports to Europe, which are crucial for our allies and impact national security. He seemed unaware of his own executive order and insisted he only authorized a study on LNG. This raised concerns about who is truly in charge. The situation reflects a deeper issue, suggesting Biden is not fully in control and is being manipulated by others. There are calls for criminal investigations into the actions taken during his administration, particularly regarding energy policies that harm the economy. The need to expose these issues is urgent, as they threaten national interests and reflect a broader pattern of disregard for accountability.

Harris will ban all fracking. Will you commit to a federal ban on fracking on your first day in office? I am in favor of banning fracking. That will put tens of thousands of Pennsylvanians out of work and increase utility bills. I am in favor of banning fracking. Trump will protect clean energy fracking and the jobs it creates. I'm Donald J. Trump, and I approve this message.

The middle class has been getting "screwed" for 40 years due to deindustrialization and loss of union jobs since the late 1970s. While construction workers are building plants, such as the battery plant outside of Youngstown with 700 people working there, the plants aren't open yet. One speaker believes credit must be taken for these jobs, mentioning Trump and Obama. The idea is that Biden has given working-class people in Ohio good jobs, but they don't realize it. Another speaker states that Biden has done more than cut taxes for the wealthiest people.

There are no building plans in New York City for the next 2 to 3 years, which means no employment for electrical workers. Construction is the largest industry in the country, and without new projects, there will be a significant lack of jobs. The chairman has asked for action to restore incentives, as the current situation resembles the lack of motivation in the Soviet Union. Urgent measures are needed to prevent the country from facing serious consequences.

Ranking member Raskin is creating a "boogeyman" that isn't there. The speaker authored the EPA chapter on project 2020 5, but did not work with President Trump or his campaign. The speaker is not vying for a position in the next administration and now lives in Mississippi. The leading candidate is running away from policy actions that make Americans' lives difficult. Vice President Kamala Harris did not answer when asked if Americans are better off than they were 4 years ago. Most Americans are struggling with expensive gas, electricity, and groceries due to the Biden-Harris Administration's day 1 energy policies. Since January 2021, President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Congressional Democrats have taken over 250 actions that make it harder to produce energy in America. Actions include stopping the Keystone XL Pipeline, issuing a moratorium on new oil and gas permits on federal lands, greenlighting Putin's Nord Stream 2 pipeline, rejoining the Paris climate agreement, blocking the Twin Metals mine, and slowing permits for LNG facilities.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work due to the Biden EO, will get their promised green jobs. When can they count on this? Well, present your data showing that they won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka noted the need to pair the Keystone EO with job creation. The Laborers International Union of North America said the Keystone decision will cost union jobs. The President plans a climate plan with transformative investments and infrastructure, creating millions of good union jobs while tackling the climate crisis. He plans to put forward a jobs plan. People need money now. When do they get their green jobs? The President believes that investment in infrastructure creates good-paying union jobs, advances our climate and clean energy goals, and he plans to share more details in the weeks ahead.

I support banning fracking and am committed to passing a Green New Deal to end it permanently. If necessary, I am willing to eliminate the filibuster to ensure its passage. The Green New Deal is one of the most progressive proposals available, and I believe in its core principles. For voters in the fossil fuel industry, the solution lies in providing workers with opportunities to transition into future jobs. We can afford this transition; it's not about the cost.

Auto workers are being taken advantage of by Joe Biden and their leadership for pushing electric vehicles. Electric cars are not popular. A new economic plan will create jobs and benefit the nation. Inflation is due to energy prices rising significantly.

We used to be the biggest producer of Pluto, but now we have nothing. People are frustrated and want Trump back. They question when America was ever great, as they struggle with gas, electricity, jobs, and food. Many are waiting for stimulus checks and extra food stamps. They want to know why anyone supports Joe Biden. People feel silenced and helpless, while the Democrats promise a Green New Deal for 2030 but lack plans for electricity. The speaker passionately expresses their desire for Trump's return.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling economic independence and strength against the Americans. Regarding criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting critics don't understand the tax code. The speaker also acknowledges that the biggest component of cost was building.

My name is Anna from Colorado. I see the wildfires affecting us. I want to know how you plan to support working-class people. You seem sincere, but I need clarity on your stance. Can you commit to not accepting corporate money? I’m just trying to understand your position. I’m a working-class person myself. What’s your job? Are you representing working-class interests or corporate ones? I’m not trying to shut you down; I just want a straightforward answer. Are you with the working class or the corporations? Yes or no? Why do you refuse to answer?

Kamala Harris supports the far-left Green New Deal, which entails new taxes, higher utility bills, and a ban on gas cars. She is committed to passing a Green New Deal and ending fracking. Kamala's fracking ban would eliminate jobs and increase gas prices. Only President Trump can restore Trump's strong economy. Donald J. Trump approves this message.